第 300 期·中文精讀

喬·羅根:喜劇、爭議、外星人、UFO、普京、中情局與自由

Joe Rogan: Comedy, Controversy, Aliens, UFOs, Putin, CIA, and Freedom

播客主持人談喜劇創作、輿論爭議、UFO 傳聞、權力機構與言論自由,兼及個人成長經歷。

官方音訊00:00 / --:--
中文精讀由 AI 基於原始訪談改寫,非官方翻譯,可能存在偏差或錯誤;表述以原音訊與官方文稿為準。說明

2022 年 1 月,CNN 連續幾天在節目裡迴圈播放同一段畫面:喬·羅根(Joe Rogan)在某一期播客裡說出了那個詞。同一周,音樂人尼爾·揚(Neil Young)把自己的全部作品從 Spotify 撤下,理由是這家平臺獨家簽了他。英國、美國、加拿大的媒體用同一個詞描述這件事:cancel。

羅根當時的應對方式是這樣的:每天吃不到一克的裸蓋菇素,然後進健身房,把自己練到幾乎站不起來。不作公開宣告,不開新聞釋出會,不請危機公關。他太太想給他念一篇罵他的文章,他說不用念,那只是一個人的觀點,寫下來不會讓它變得更重要。

結果那一個月,他的播客漲了 200 萬訂閱。這個節目的收聽量在整場風波結束時達到了歷史最高點。

布考斯基給藝術下了個奇怪的定義

對話從一個詩人開始。查爾斯·布考斯基(Charles Bukowski)在一首叫《Style》的詩裡寫:風格是一切的答案,是接近一件沉悶或危險的事的新方式。把沉悶的事做得有風格,勝過往沒有風格地做一件危險的事;把危險的事做得有風格,那才叫藝術。

羅根說,他理解的藝術就是這個。他給朋友卡梅隆·海恩斯(Cameron Hanes)的新書寫過序言,書裡講的一個人怎麼同時做全職工作、當父親、當丈夫、做地球上最好的弓箭獵人、舉鐵,還在備賽 240 英里的超長跑,凌晨四點起床跑完一個馬拉松再去上班。

「一個人怎麼能做到這些?所以某種意義上,紀律也是藝術。」(喬·羅根)

他說看到真正自律的人,比如大衛·戈金斯(David Goggins),那種把苦役最大化的活法本身就是美的。善良也是。有些人天生厚道,世界往他們身上扔什麼,他們都還是那個樣子,這在旁邊看著的人眼裡就是藝術。

布考斯基還有一句話:重要的是你如何走過火焰。羅根的解釋很樸素:你可以一邊走一邊抱怨,也可以走得體面、有尊嚴、有紀律,讓旁邊的人看見之後覺得,我自己那點事好像也沒那麼難。這種示範效應對別人是有用的。

「我記得我太太想讀一篇文章給我聽」

Lex 把話頭轉向 2022 年 1 月。他關心的是一個活人怎麼從那場風波里走出來。

羅根說他當時什麼都看,也什麼都不看。確切地說,他知道那些東西在那兒,但他一個字都不讀。他跟太太說,別把那些負面文章念給我聽。他的理由跟逃避無關,是個權重問題:一個人私下裡對你有意見,或者跟朋友吃飯時罵你兩句,本來是沒有重量的。你把它寫成文章發出去,它不會因此獲得更多真理性,只是獲得了更多傳播量。

「你不應該吸收全世界的意見。你只應該吸收你身邊那一小圈人的意見,從他們那兒知道自己讓別人有什麼感受,然後想,也許我太粗魯了,也許我不夠體貼,也許這方面我可以做得更好。我們的人格是這樣塑造出來的,社交能力也是這樣長出來的。」(喬·羅根)

他還講了一個更細的機制。為什麼批評會讓人疼?因為被擊中的那一部分,往往真的有點道理。但麻煩在於,你讀到的那個版本是濃縮過的,一句話、一個片段、一個標題,被壓縮成彷彿能定義你全部的東西。而人本來就會犯錯,會在公開場合、實時地邊說邊想,這本身是件複雜的事。真正在公開場合實時思考的人不多,所以必然會有說錯的時候,也必然會有大量圍觀者從一句話裡得出「這人不瞭解烏克蘭,他憑什麼說」這樣的結論。

還有另一類人,他們只是把任何有爭議的話題當作流量入口。羅根說這類人的數量可以非常大。

他看到的另一樣東西是媒體機器的內部佈線。CNN 一天到晚翻來覆去播同一段素材,他第一次近距離看清楚這套東西怎麼運作。他用的詞是「機器底下的線路」。

Lex 問了一個更沉重的問題:這種事能不能摧毀一個人?他自己也經歷過小規模的攻擊,聊俄羅斯和烏克蘭,聊不同的視角,然後就有一批人非常討厭他,說的話能扎到很深的地方,而且他想不明白為什麼。

羅根的回答是:100% 可以。但他也指出,攻擊之所以能生效,很大一部分原因是你不在場。別人在說你,你不在那兒,你沒有反駁的機會;如果你反駁,那就是公開反駁,等於把全世界都請進來一起評理。而人在網上跟陌生人打交道時,天然偏向負面,哪怕只有 10% 的人是惡意的,當你面對幾千幾萬條訊息時,那也是幾百幾千條。

他給這段經歷算了一筆賬:如果過去確實搞砸過、說錯過話,那這場風波反而給了一個機會,把事情攤開講,該道歉就道歉,也讓人看到你在壓力下真實的想法。他說沒有比一個人被逼到極限時更誠實的時刻。

所以他的結論是:說這件事「有好處」聽起來很怪,但確實有好處。

金剛對哥斯拉,和父親說的那句「別哭」

話題轉向童年。羅根五歲時父母離婚。他說在那之前,父親在他眼裡是英雄、是保護者、是世界上最酷的人,每個小孩都這樣看自己的爸爸。

他講了 1972 年前後的一件事。他和表兄為了「金剛和哥斯拉誰更強」打了起來,真打,他打了表兄的臉。他站金剛那邊。他媽那邊的人衝著他說「你這個小怪物」,他當時以為自己闖大禍了。結果父親把他單獨叫過去問發生了什麼,他講了,父親問:「你哭了嗎?」他說沒有。父親說:「很好。永遠別哭。」

羅根說他記得那一刻的想法:好,那我以後就到處打人好了,因為我爸顯然覺得只要我不哭,打人就沒事。他特意說明,那是 1972 年,那是另一個世界。

Lex 提到榮格(Carl Jung)的陰影理論:你壓在無意識裡的東西,會投射到別人身上,你對別人的哪些毛病最來氣,往往就是你自己的。羅根說他檢查過了,不覺得還剩下什麼沒看過的。被問到怎麼確認,他說就像有人告訴你東西落在他家,你不知道在哪兒,那就去找,認真找一遍。他找過了。

他更願意談的,是這段經歷的另一面。母親後來嫁了一個很好的繼父,是個嬉皮士,和他父親完全不一樣。家裡搬了很多次。壞處是他沒有長期的朋友,好處是他被迫形成自己的觀點,而不是直接繼承街區、繼承小圈子的看法。他說這讓他變成了一個非常獨立的人。

獨立到什麼程度?他說自己太野了,不適合正常工作,不適合學校,坐不住,不想聽人指揮。如果換一對父母,尤其是在今天,他幾乎肯定會被開藥。

「這條時間線,對我來說已經是最好的版本了。」(喬·羅根)

那他給困境裡的年輕人什麼建議?找到一個自己真的喜歡的東西。他自己最早是畫畫,畫漫畫,想當漫畫插畫師,後來是武術。武術是把他從自己的焦慮、創傷、不安全感裡拖出來的那輛車。

他講得最實在的一段,是關於年輕人為什麼覺得自己是廢物。他說每個年輕人都這麼想。他不知道自己是廢物,直到他開始贏,直到他開始練武。練武教會他的是,他可以在一件事上變得更好,他不是廢物,他只是待在一個爛環境裡。然後突然之間有人開始佩服他,他從一個極度不自信、基本算失敗的人,變成了在一個別人害怕的、有危險的專案上很成功的人。這給了他巨大的自信,也讓他直接看到了苦練和結果之間的對應關係。

還有一層:你不能聽別人的。他父母也不想讓他練武,不想讓他打,不想讓他講單口。你得知道自己是誰,然後在別人的質疑和不看好面前穿過去。

「如果你還活著,你就能變好」

Lex 把問題往前推:那五十多歲的人呢?假設你九十歲,坐在德州,回頭看今天的自己,會給什麼建議?

羅根先是用戈金斯做了個例子。他 100% 確定戈金斯七十歲還會對著鏡頭吼。他說如果兩個人都活著,七十歲那年戈金斯會打電話給他,說「撐住,混蛋」。

然後是那句總結:如果活著,你就能變好,無論如何。

他舉了一個極端例子:就算你九十歲,只剩一個月,你還可以為自己認為做錯的事道歉,還可以修補和身邊人的關係,讓他們在你走之後對你的感覺不一樣。

中間他插了幾個觀察。他喜歡看到七十多歲的人重新開始約會。他看過一個影片,一個女人六十多歲開始練力量舉。柔術館裡也有七十歲的白帶。他說人只要不給自己出難題,就不會開心,無論那個難題是一個藝術專案,還是學一門全新的手藝。

「做困難的事,對心智的滋養就像食物對身體一樣。你需要有一些讓你困惑的東西,你必須在這件事的難度裡找到自己作為人的潛力,然後一點點啃過去。」(喬·羅根)

他說自己是個很快樂的人,而這種快樂從來沒有離開過「我正在做一件難事」這個狀態。Lex 順著布考斯基那句接了句玩笑:重要的是你如何走過火焰,那你就是不停地給自己點火。羅根糾正了一下:失控的火不算,他要的是你主動選的、在體力和腦力上都被挑戰的任務。

赤腳跑七英里上班的機器人學家

話題落到身體的訓練為什麼也是心理的訓練。羅根的觀點很直接:覺得體力挑戰只是體力活的人,從來沒真正被體力挑戰過。那裡面全是情緒智力,你要面對自己想放棄的慾望,要制服心裡那個軟弱的部分。這股從身體裡長出來的力量,可以用在智力工作上。

他順帶批了一種傲慢:只做智力訓練、不做任何身體訓練的人,覺得身體的東西是低階的、是蠻力、是不必要的。他說這不對,很多學者給自己胖、懶、瘦弱找理由,而這件事的重點落在別處,身體上的挑戰本身對人有用。

Lex 講了 MIT 的機器人學家拉斯·特德雷克(Russ Tedrake)。他研究足式機器人,每天赤腳跑到學校再跑回來,單程七到十英里,各種路面都跑,水泥地也跑。到學校就換上正常的鞋和衣服,融進人群。他以前體重嚴重超標,導師自殺這件事讓他直面了自己的死亡,從此開始認真對待身體。他不說教,很少勸別人,只是自己這麼幹。

羅根聽完的反應是:他的腳什麼樣?Lex 說很厚的繭,但沒毀掉。羅根說他喜歡這個,因為這個人研究的就是行走,看人體怎麼動,他在所有運動裡都看到美。

羅根自己也講了他的版本:他喜歡在戶外拉雪橇,德州的夏天,一百華氏度,就在這種溫度里拉。這是他今天剛做過的事。他把桑拿和冷水浴叫作折磨療程,在那些時間裡忍過去,別的事就都變容易了。

「先成為別人願意與之在一起的那種人」

Lex 把自己的困境擺上檯面:他沒找到伴侶,問羅根的建議。

羅根先說了一句像是繞開的話,然後給了很直接的答案:先成為別人願意與之在一起的那種人。很多人想要一個好伴侶,但憑什麼?你是不是愛爭論,是不是嫉妒,是不是撒謊,是不是刻薄,是不是沒有幽默感,是不是不善良。別人不願意靠近你的那個點是什麼,把它修好。

他接著講了一個挑選的邏輯:很多人為了性感就妥協了,為了好看就妥協了,選錯了人。好看的、善良的人存在,但不要選好看的、刻薄的。中間他還插了一句玩笑,說那樣你會得到艾梅柏·希爾德(Amber Heard)。

他講自己婚姻裡最看重的東西:他太太很聰明,很努力,是個專注、有紀律的人,同時非常善良,總是在笑。那種狀態會讓旁邊的人也活得舒服。他說你可以找到這樣的人,他們是真實存在的,找到之後你的生活會變好。

還有一層是「部落」。他說自己最幸運的地方是身邊的人好,卡梅隆·海恩斯、戈金斯,還有很多慷慨、好奇、誠實的朋友,他們讓你想做得更好。把積極、健康、友善、慷慨的人圍在身邊,是最值錢的事之一。

Kill Tony 為什麼是喜劇最重要的節目

Lex 提到 Kill Tony,說這個節目是錄播的,你一旦搞砸,就永遠留在那裡,全世界都能看到。羅根說正因如此它才重要。

他的論證是這樣的:剛上臺的開放麥新人能從這兒學到一件事,最重要的是好笑。這是這門手藝的全部。而很多不安全感會讓人做一個替代性的選擇:宣稱表達的資訊更重要,宣稱喜劇必須有社會意識,必須傳播正向的東西。

「說這種話的人,全都是不好笑的。他們喜劇上就是不行。因為殺不了場,所以只好假裝自己本該有社會意識。我把話說清楚一點:地球上沒有一個人因為一個笑話改變了自己的人生。觀眾來這兒不是為了這個,他們是為了笑話。」(喬·羅根)

他把 Kill Tony 的機制拆得很細:只有一分鐘,是直播,你不想被 Tony 和全場人當場嘲笑,所以每個上臺的人都在盡全力好笑。沒人管你是同性戀、異性戀、亞裔、黑人、跨性別還是非二元,沒人管你八十歲還是二十歲,沒人管你是男是女還是說不清楚。只有一個問題:你好不好笑。好笑你就進圈,所有人都喜歡你。

他舉了沙恩·吉利斯(Shane Gillis)當例子,說這是現在最好的年輕喜劇演員之一,在爾灣一起演出時他看完整場,笑得流淚。他說這個人絕無可能某天突然轉去搞什麼社會議題的自我標榜,不可能。

Lex 問,那即使最好笑的段子裡也會漏出一些智慧吧。羅根承認有,蒂姆·狄龍(Tim Dillon)就是例子,能把重要的觀點織進笑話裡。但那不是首要目的。

開放麥是心理酷刑,而且教不會

Lex 說他最近常去開放麥,只是坐著聽,覺得非常受鼓舞:有人在臺上不顧一切地試,一晚又一晚,吃著屎往下走。他最喜歡看的是那種臺下只有五個人、笑話全部不落地的時候。

羅根說他還記得那些日子。他提到戴恩·庫克(Dane Cook)是他第一次聽到有人公開說這件事:如果要從頭再來一遍,他不確定自己扛不扛得住從開放麥到成功的那個過程。試過然後失敗的人和試過然後成功的人,比例懸殊到離譜。他說他不確定還有哪種藝術形式成功率這麼低。

為什麼?因為這是心理酷刑。而且這東西教不了。你學吉他,有人能教你按和絃,練會了你就彈得出《All Along the Watchtower》。沒人能教人怎麼做喜劇。

Lex 追問:那能不能從不幽默變成幽默?羅根說可以,但要吃很多屎,要反覆檢視自己為什麼不幽默,要長時間跟不舒服的念頭待在一起。可能需要多些人生經歷,可能需要心碎,可能需要戀愛,也可能需要重新想一想自己跟現實介面的方式。他 21 歲開始講單口的時候是個傻子,沒資訊量,只會模仿人,只會講性。他那時候沒有哲學,沒有獨特的視角,什麼都沒經歷過。而每一次炸場都逼你內省,逼你問自己到底信什麼。信念是靠做長出來的。

普京的臉、拜登的手,和民主的重新整理機制

Lex 說他幾天後要去烏克蘭和俄羅斯,問如果見到普京該問什麼。羅根的第一個問題是:「癌症怎麼樣了,老兄?」

他解釋說這個敘事很嚇人:掌握世界最大核武庫的獨裁者同時還患癌,而且剛剛入侵了一個主權國家。這個人什麼都輸得起,而所有人真正恐懼的就是這一點。

但他自己不太信。他的判斷落在臉上:普京看起來浮腫,身體沒大多少,臉卻腫了。他有個朋友得過結節病,吃潑尼松,一種激素,用藥期間臉會腫起來,積水、發炎。他說普京看起來就是那個樣子。

他順帶把話題扯到拜登。他說主流媒體對拜登是另一種待遇,明顯到什麼程度大家心裡都有數,而 Fox 那邊又變成純粹的嘲諷。Lex 說他想要一個不帶嘲諷的、認真的討論:你自己知不知道,你在做什麼安排,你身邊的人是誰,如果你開始看不清世界了怎麼辦。

羅根說你會坦白,所以你永遠當不了政客。

回到普京,Lex 想問的是民主和俄羅斯現行制度的對比。羅根先替普京把反駁說了:他在俄羅斯國內支援率很高,大多數人是真心支援他。反對這一說法的人會說,那是因為任何像樣的對手都被趕出國、被下毒、被謀殺。

接下來的那段是這期節目裡比較少見的、結構完整的政治論述。羅根說美國這套東西有一個很奇怪的地方:每四年,世界上最難的一份工作,有可能交給一個完全沒有經驗的新人。八年之後你有了智慧,其實接著幹會更好,但權力又會開始腐蝕人。

他說他相信普京是真心認為自己對俄羅斯最好。他拿斯大林做類比:斯大林到死都認為自己在為蘇聯好。希特勒是另一回事,戰爭期間他明顯失去了清醒。而普京的信念是,他是那個能把國家帶到最好狀態的人。問題在於,定期換人從長期看可能才是對的;每一個領導人都相信自己最懂,而這恰恰是這套系統需要不斷重新整理的原因。

他也不認為美國的制度就乾淨。他說華盛頓特區外面那一帶是全美最富裕的地區之一,住的是遊說者。錢深度參與了誰被選上、選上之後做什麼決定。羅根把這個國家叫作一場自治實驗,如果重來一次,最重要的事是用法律把錢擋在政治之外,把用利潤換取政策影響定成重罪。

Lex 問起特朗普。羅根說他不是特朗普的支持者,一次都沒有,對方多次提出要上他的節目,他每次都拒了,理由是他不想幫這個人。

Lex 說那晚上還長。羅根說,也許吧,我可能會請他上。Lex 說你會,因為你連普京都請,你太好勝了。

後面羅根補了更完整的理由:如果要請特朗普,那得是一對一、長時間、認真準備的對話。而他自認在政治上的知識儲備不足以把那些指控全部弄清:通俄門裡到底哪些是真的,有機構在大選前跟俄方有往來是清楚的,克林頓陣營牽涉其中是清楚的,特朗普陣營跟俄方某些人有過溝通也是清楚的,亨特·拜登在烏克蘭的生意非常可疑。這些東西誰都不容易拆清楚,何況還要公開播出。他說他願意為鮑勃·拉扎(Bob Lazar)花那種時間,因為那是他真好奇的東西,但特朗普不是。

中間還留了個手錶梗。Lex 說他戴的這塊表是羅根送的,問如果普京要看怎麼辦,超級碗戒指的事大家都記得。羅根說那你先講這塊表的來歷,他要是戴上說聲謝謝,那就說「老兄,摘下來」。他說普京真搶了,我再給你買一塊一模一樣的。

「他們不知道我會柔術」

Lex 描述

Lex 描述了他這趟行程:去烏克蘭,去俄羅斯,沒有明確目標,用他的話說,就是有東西在拉他。他記得很多年前那片土地的樣子,記得家裡幾代人在那片土地上生活過,記得那些人的靈魂、那種文化的質感。他想看看今天變成了什麼樣,這場戰爭造出了什麼,憤怒也好,愛也好,他想聽人講,大部分不錄音。他也想見幾個相關政治人物,說他該有的聯絡都有,所有人都答應了,最後成不成不知道。

他說得更坦白的一層是:他從來沒去過戰區,從來沒見過被武器犁過的土地,他想感受一下。他記得一切繁盛時的樣子,有腐敗,有艱難,但人在,文化在,人是快樂的。現在到處都是恨。

「有時候就是有個東西把你往一個地方拉,你必須去。這可能說不通,但你就是得去。」(萊克斯·弗裡德曼)

羅根說他擔心。Lex 說記者已經被殺了,但「他們不知道我會柔術」。羅根說他想他會沒事,人生裡有些事就是心往那邊拉。

後面 Lex 又講了一層動機:一個人要當好的美國人,得搞清楚自己從哪來。而戰爭是最能把一切廢話剝掉的東西,它讓人看清一個民族到底是誰。

他還說了句:「我不找風險。你怕熊、怕鯊魚,那為什麼還下海?」意思是怕的東西和必須做的事是兩回事。

播客裡坐著的中情局探員

Lex 說他最近讀了很多關於克格勃、聯邦安全域性的東西,一部分是為了這趟旅行。他讀了傑克·巴爾斯基(Jack Barsky)的書,還跟他聊過。他意識到那些機構的監控和操縱規模有多大,也聽到大量關於官僚化和無能的部分。但核心是,為了獲取情報、為了控制人,有些線它們不介意跨過去。

然後他提出了自己的疑問:我沒被任何情報機構正式接觸過,但我開始懷疑,我認識的某個人,是不是在做這件事。你問過自己這個問題嗎?

羅根說,當然。100%。他相信上過他節目的嘉賓裡就有。

那在意嗎?他說看情況。如果裡面涉及欺騙,是想用這個節目去操縱敘事、騙人,那他會在意。但那正是他們會做的事,他們會植入敘事。他說如果自己是世界上收聽量最大的播客,各大情報機構大概都開過會討論:主要平臺有哪些,資訊怎麼放進去。

他提到邁克·貝克(Mike Baker),一個他請過很多次的前中情局探員。他說「前」這個字要加引號,他不信這個「前」。但他也說貝克是個好人,從貝克那裡學到了很多關於機器怎麼運轉的東西。貝克不會什麼都說,但說的夠多了。

Lex 追問:那朋友呢?你怎麼判斷誰能信?

羅根說,大部分朋友都是老朋友。時間是唯一的過濾器,一起經歷過事情才行。然後他講喜劇圈子的邏輯:真正的職業喜劇演員不多,全世界也許不到一千個。能在俱樂部和劇場週末壓軸的人,再往上能賣劇院、賣體育館的人,一層層篩下來非常少。在這個層級上,人和人之間有某種誠實,有某種彼此的理解。

「成為一個好喜劇演員的過程會把人磨謙卑,像柔術一樣。你吃過的屎太多了,所以哪怕你是個瘋子、很混亂、滿嘴跑火車,底下還是有個好人。你表面上可以胡說八道,但在重要的事上,你是可信的。」(喬·羅根)

他也講了反面:有一種人被叫做「島」。他們很成功,但沒接在整個社群上,通常只帶一個跟了很多年的開場演員上路,在喜劇圈裡沒有朋友。他們不快樂,因為他們沒法交流。名聲本身會把人隔離,你得主動下功夫,別讓它把你隔開。他承認自己不喜歡別人對他有企圖,那種關係太不平衡。

他也提到自己最愛錄的節目之一叫《Protect Our Parks》,和阿里·沙菲爾(Ari Shaffir)、沙恩·吉利斯、馬克·諾曼(Mark Normand)一起,幾個人喝到爛醉胡說八道。有時候事後要剪掉一段,因為沙恩走得太遠,但那就是純粹的好玩。他說馬克·諾曼像米奇·赫德伯格那種級別,腦子太利,而且是那種真愛喜劇的人,一提起喜劇就興奮。

「我太想相信 UFO 是真的了,這就是我的問題」

Lex 引出鮑勃·拉扎。羅根的描述是:他專門去見了這個人,想聞一聞有沒有狗屎味。結果沒聞到。他把拉扎三十多年來的訪談全部看完了。三十多年裡拉扎沒做過多少次訪談,但每次講的內容都驚人地一致。

這件事的詭異之處在於:他講的是一套極其離譜的東西,在秘密軍事基地裡逆向工程外星飛船,基地挖在山體側面,為了躲衛星。但這個人是真的在洛斯阿拉莫斯實驗室(Los Alamos)工作過,真的是推進系統專家,真的是科學家。羅根說他不知道拉扎是否真的參與過逆向工程,但拉扎描述那些飛行器的運動方式,跟飛行員在影片裡拍到的現象完全對得上。

羅根說這整件事最讓他著迷的地方是:這樣一個人,不管他是不是在胡說,都逼著別人開始認真對待這個話題。哪怕只是為了反駁他,人們也會掉進兔子洞,然後開始嘀咕,也許呢。

接下來他講了一段自我拆臺的話,這段是全篇最誠實的地方。

「UFO 這件事,我的問題是:我太想它是真的了。我就是這麼個容易上當的人。我特別想它是真的,而我很清楚這一點,所以我才要停下來問自己:我為什麼這麼想讓真相被揭開?答案是,因為好玩,就這麼簡單。」(喬·羅根)

Lex 說他從跟國防部有聯絡的人那裡聽到過,這些人會區分誰在胡說、誰不在。公共領域裡有一批人,他們明確說是胡扯。真正不胡扯的人往往很安靜,這也是為什麼拉扎的故事顯得特別,因為他很長時間裡也在努力保持安靜。按拉扎自己的說法,他最初跟喬治·納普(George Knapp)做那些影片時藏了身份,後來覺得不夠,為了保護自己的命,必須把身份徹底公開。

羅根說,正因為這個故事太帶勁了,他才更警惕。一個人講的故事越是剛好對上你的胃口,你越該後退一步。

五角大樓為什麼忽然開始談這些東西

Lex 提到加來道雄(Michio Kaku)。羅根說他很棒,能把極複雜的概念煮成一個普通人能嚥下去的東西,而且他不怕說瘋狂的話,但始終踩在物理上真實可能的地面上。現在加來道雄在 UFO 這件事上站到了「舉證責任轉移」那一邊:既然這些東西違背了我們現在知道的物理和推進能力,那舉證責任就落到了要給出常規解釋的人身上。

羅根舉了隱身戰機的例子。隱身技術被保密了非常久,直到你準備用它、需要用它的那一刻,它才變成公開的,而且也不是正式公開,只是被別人在外面探測到了。所以整個流程是:秘密測試,偶爾露一點,一直等到下一場大戰爭、下一個必須把它拿出來的理由。

Lex 順著講了一個更寬的假設:有沒有可能推進系統早就發展到了遠超燃燒火箭燃料往外噴火的程度,比如某種能操縱引力、能扭曲時空、能讓兩點之間的旅行快到荒謬的東西。羅根說,這不僅可能,而且這類東西被保密是大機率事件。你只要看看洛克希德·馬丁這類承包商或者國防部本身怎麼運作,全是黑箱。裡面可能是推進技術,可能不是,也可能是人工智慧監控,可能是各種隱身無人機,可能是網路戰武器,這些東西當然都會被藏起來。

然後他丟擲了自己真正的懷疑:五角大樓在談,NASA 在談,政府在談,那這反而可疑。他的判斷是,這大機率是一場煙幕,那些東西是某種他們自己開發出來的、希望外界認為不存在的極其先進的無人機。

邏輯很簡單:如果不是這樣,公開談這些有什麼好處?為什麼要告訴我們這些「不是地球製造的飛行器」?除非有某種迫在眉睫的入侵風險,需要先給公眾打個預防針,讓人到時候不至於徹底失控。

他補了一句對自己的補充說明:不過我也不覺得他們會這麼幹。他認為政府對公民有很多輕蔑,對公眾的智力有輕蔑,對你我是否「需要知道」有輕蔑,而且他們覺得自己在管著我們,不覺得這是「我們在一起」。但即便如此,他仍然不認為他們會主動出來做這種鋪墊,所以煙幕的可能性更高。

費米悖論,和肖恩·卡羅爾的那句「不一定」

話題回到最基本的那個問題:他們都在哪兒?

羅根提到尼爾·德格拉斯·泰森(Neil deGrasse Tyson)跟他講過的一個版本:宇宙無限大,那麼不只是有外星生命,還有你。同樣的細胞、分子相互作用,以完全相同的順序,在宇宙裡發生過無限次。

Lex 在這裡做了一次很剋制的糾偏:首先這不一定成立,是可能成立。肖恩·卡羅爾(Sean Carroll)那種,在某些量子力學解釋下,這是非常可能的。但真正實際的問題是另一層:在我們這個區域性的口袋,這個星系或者鄰近的星系裡,有沒有外星人?長什麼樣?

他給出了一個很有畫面感的框架。你可以設想「泛種論」(panspermia):一個更大的、爸爸級的文明開著船經過,在差不多的時間在銀河各處播下幾顆種子,就像《普羅米修斯》那樣。那麼我們可能接觸到的,就是跟我們智力水平差不多、可能只差幾百萬年的鄰居們。這種情況下,我們還有機會真正聯絡上。也可以是完全開放的場面:存在規模巨大的外星文明,擴張極快。

這裡有個細節值得停一下:你抬頭看到的星光,是那些星球很久以前發出的光。所以在我們看到外星文明之前,它們可能已經到門口了。因為一個文明一旦掌握了接近光速的擴張能力,從零到滿天都是,中間可能只隔一段很短的時間。所以你今天看天空還是空的,可能某一天醒來,到處都是。

羅根接著講他真正著迷的那一層:替代性的運輸方式。駕馭蟲洞,做三級文明才做得到的事。他還提了一句自己國家的態度:政府一邊說沒這回事,一邊每年往這些專案裡砸不知道多少預算,而國會議員自己都常常不知道錢去了哪兒。

萊尼·布魯斯、理查德·普賴爾,和一個 15 歲的觀眾

從宇宙回到喜劇,中間轉了十幾分鐘關於「偉大」的討論。

Lex 問誰是有史以來最偉大的喜劇演員。羅根說沒有這個人。被追問是不是諾姆·麥克唐納(Norm Macdonald),他說諾姆肯定是偉人之一。

然後他聊到諾姆死後才上線的那部作品。Lex 說一個人死了以後還發專場的作品,這件事本身就是天才之舉。羅根說他沒看,但聽說叫《Nothing Special》,這名字聽起來就像諾姆會說的話。那部片子裡他就坐在螢幕前,像一場 Zoom 通話,一處笑點都沒有鋪墊。羅根說也許諾姆本人不希望被剪成那樣,因為他覺得剪得漂漂亮亮反而不像他。但也正因為沒有觀眾,那種幹、那種暗,反而成立:它像是在嘲笑我們被迫一起困在那個洞裡,他還在假裝面前有觀眾,還在自嘲這種被迫的形式。它把觀眾笑聲和觀眾的能量這件事,反過來證明了一遍。

羅根講了兩個關於諾姆的故事。他們並不常一起工作,也不常待在一起,但他真的很喜歡這個人。有兩次,純屬隨機,他坐飛機就坐到了諾姆旁邊。有一次聊得很好,羅根說他戒菸了,以前抽得厲害,對身體太糟了。飛機落地,諾姆衝向機場裡的商店買了包煙,往門口走的路上就點上了。羅根說你不是戒了嗎?他說,是啊,但剛剛聊了那麼多抽菸的事,我又想抽了。

羅根說,他是那種活在一個不合邏輯、荒誕、好笑的世界裡的人,一點都不假,那就是他本人,他的才華就是他的本質。他還說諾姆極愛賭博,那種衝動和那種不合邏輯是同一套東西。

然後他回溯了源頭。整個東西的祖師爺是萊尼·布魯斯(Lenny Bruce)。他家牆上掛著布魯斯的演唱會海報和照片。惠特妮·卡明斯(Whitney Cummings)送過他一張照片,是布魯斯因為講了淫穢笑話被捕時的樣子。羅根說他是喜劇早期最重要的人物,因為現代單口這門藝術基本是他生出來的。在他之前,是一群主持節目的人在講段子,兩個人走進一家酒吧那種。而布魯斯會講社會議題,講生活,講語言,講法律。

這裡羅根講了一個很關鍵的觀看方法:今天你去看布魯斯的錄影,它不成立,因為社會變了。藝術,尤其流行文化,是一扇窗戶,也是一臺時間機器。你得把自己放回 1963 年,得問自己:在 1963 年聽到他說這些話是什麼感覺?那年頭的美國看起來跟今天差不多,人人開車、穿西裝,一切顯得正常。但那是一個完全不同的世界。他當年說的那些禁忌,今天已經是常識,所以不再有衝擊力,也就不再好笑了。

他把這個思路推廣到更遠。《查泰萊夫人的情人》當年因為性描寫驚世駭俗,《古拉格群島》講的是人類歷史最黑暗的部分,而它們發表的時候,這些內容是被禁的、會被燒的、會讓人坐牢的。也正是那樣的時候,這種冒險才有意義。

布魯斯被逮捕過很多次,最後死在洗手間的地板上,打海洛因,正在對付一堆官司。羅根說,他人生最後階段有一些影像,他上臺以後拿著法律檔案,念自己案子的材料。喜劇徹底垮了。一個人被體制追著打了那麼多年,最後連逗人笑的能力都被耗掉了。

布魯斯之後,是理查德·普賴爾(Richard Pryor)。羅根 15 歲那年,父母帶他去看了《Live at the Sunset Strip》,普賴爾的演唱會電影。他非常清楚地記得自己在觀眾席上的感覺:笑,然後環顧四周,看到滿場的人笑得從椅子上翻下去、前仰後合。他自己也笑得厲害,然後心裡冒出一個念頭:天哪,這個人什麼都沒做,只是在說話。

他想到自己看過的那些好笑的喜劇電影,然後確定:我從沒看過比這更好笑的東西,而他就只是在說話。那顆種子就這麼種下了。他開始在電視上看單口,後來去開放麥,最後自己上臺。

五分鐘有多難

Lex 說他也想上臺,五分鐘,開放麥,不做 Kill Tony。他說他怕的東西他都想去做。

羅根先列了條件:有多難取決於你琢磨這事多久了,取決於你怎麼看事情,也取決於你的風格。

他把最難的一種挑出來說:史蒂芬·賴特(Stephen Wright)那種,完全不相干的聯想,一個話題不引向下一個,沒有流動,就是「我注意到這個,我注意到那個」。這種極難記,把一小時的這種東西拼起來極難。但它也有一個好處:笑點坐在段子本身裡,好不好笑主要是材料的責任,而不是你的節奏和跟觀眾的共舞。

反過來說,如果你沒有賴特或者赫德伯格那種原始的笑點,那一切就都在表演上了。這種表演,要麼殺場,要麼全軍覆沒。

Lex 問,殺場還是炸場,是隨機的嗎?

羅根說,從某種意義上來說是。因為你在人生中的每一天都是不同的人,相似,但你今天更累,或者休息得更好,或者精力耗盡,或者精神煥發,或者你今天維生素和食物都到位。

把這一期濃縮成能用的東西

這期節目表面上散得很開,從布考斯基講到普京,從外星人講到開放麥。但羅根講的東西反覆落在同一處:你怎麼處理別人對你的看法,你怎麼判斷該信誰,你怎麼在難事裡把自己長出來。

下面的幾條,是這一期裡可以真的拿去用的部分。

  • 別讀關於你的公共評論,只接收你身邊人的反饋。羅根的做法很具體:他知道那些東西在那兒,但一個字都不讀,也不讓太太念給他聽。理由落在權重上:一個陌生人對你的判斷被寫下來,並沒有讓它變得更有分量,只讓它傳播得更廣。真正該吸收的是你身邊那一小圈人的感受,因為那裡面有你可以修正的具體資訊。
  • 想判斷一件事是不是真的,先問自己有多想它是真的。他講 UFO 時把這一條示範得非常清楚:他承認自己太想它是真的,並把這個慾望本身標記成風險訊號。對任何讓你興奮的結論,先測一下自己的動機,再去看證據。一個故事越是剛好對上你的胃口,越需要退後一步。
  • 給自己造一個受控的難事,最好帶身體。他要的是你主動選的、在體力和腦力上都被挑戰的任務,比如桑拿、冷水、在熱天里拉雪橇、跑長距離。這些東西之所以有用,是因為你在裡面學會了聽自己說「想放棄」然後不放棄。這股能力可以用在任何別的地方。
  • 把「先成為別人願意與之相處的人」當成關係上的第一步。不要先列對方該有的條件,先列出別人不願意靠近你的那幾個點,然後修。愛爭論、嫉妒、撒謊、刻薄、沒有幽默感,這些都是可改的,而且改了以後問題的性質會變。
  • 用時間來篩人,不用印象。他被問到怎麼判斷誰能信,答案就是:大部分朋友都是老朋友,一起經歷過事情才算數。這個標準慢,但比任何直覺都可靠,尤其在你有名氣、有人想從你身上拿東西的時候。
  • 如果你正被公開攻擊,先判斷這是不是你能長的東西。他的框架是:如果你過去真搞砸過,那這反而是唯一能把話攤開說的視窗,因為人在極限壓力下的表現,是別人判斷你真實想法最可靠的樣本。但前提是你別去讀那些東西,否則你吸收的全是濃度被壓縮過的版本。
  • 如果你五十歲、六十歲、七十歲,仍然可以重新開始。他的判斷標準簡單到近乎粗暴:只要活著,就能變好。六十歲開始練力量舉、七十歲繫上柔術白帶、九十歲只剩一個月也能去道歉和修補關係。人不出難題給自己,就不會開心。
  • 如果要從零學一門手藝,記住它教不會,只能熬出來。吉他有人能教你按和絃,喜劇沒人能教。你只能反覆炸場,然後被迫內省,問自己到底信什麼。這個過程中長出來的東西,比技巧更值錢。

節目最後,Lex 留了宮本武藏的一句話:一旦你寬闊地知道了道,你會在一切事物中看見它。

羅根那天講的,大概就是這個意思。練武、講單口、拉雪橇、對付一場全國性的輿論風暴、判斷五角大樓的話能不能信,在他那兒是一件事。你得親手做過難的事,才知道自己是誰,也才知道別人說的話裡,哪一部分值得聽。

文稿來自公開 Kaggle 資料集(rajneesh231/lex-fridman-podcast-transcript),為早期自動轉錄存檔,可能存在識別錯誤。
The following is a conversation with Joe Rogan, his second time on this podcast. He has inspired me for many years with his conversations to be a better and kinder person and has now been doing so as a friend. There's no one I would rather talk to on this 300th episode of this podcast on the 4th of July, both the anniversary of this country's declaration of independence and the anniversary of my immigrating here to the United States. A silly kid who couldn't speak English and could never imagine that he will be so damn lucky as to live the life I've lived and to feel the love I felt from the amazing people along the way. From the bottom of my heart, thank you. I love you all. This is the Lex Friedman podcast. To support it, please check out our sponsors in the description. And now, dear friends, here's Joe Rogan. Charles Bukowski said something in a poem called Style about art. He defined art saying style is the answer to everything, a fresh way to approach a dull or dangerous thing. To do a dull thing with style is preferable to doing a dangerous thing without it. To do a dangerous thing with style is what I call art. What do you think he meant by that? Do you agree with this? A dangerous thing with style is art. He said bullfighting can be art, boxing can be art, loving can be art. Have you ever made love and it was art? No, okay, I'm not asking. Every time, bro. Opening a can of sardines can be art. I think there's something to that. Yeah, I think, I call the way people live life art. Like I wrote a foreword to my friend, Cameron Haynes's book, which is right now the number one selling audio book in the world. And one of the things that I said was that he practices an art that very few people appreciate and it's the art of the maximized life. And that the discipline that he displays in his life and through his practices and all the things that he does, it's so difficult to live the way he lives that for someone like me who understands it and knows what he's doing and appreciates it and appreciates how insanely difficult it is to have a full time job and run ultra marathons, get up at four o clock in the morning, run a full marathon before work. Like that's the kind of shit that he does when he's training for these 240 mile runs, at the same time being like a father, a husband, having this full time job, also being the best bow hunter on earth, lifting weights. It's like, how does a person do this? So in a way, discipline is art too. Yes, discipline is art. Yeah, I think it is, because it's beautiful for me to see. When I see someone who's really truly disciplined, who like a David Goggins, someone who just like truly maximizes the grind, I feel like there's an art to that. And there's an art to kindness. Like there's people that are really kind and really sweet and when I'm around them, it's beautiful. It's like there's an art to them. No matter what. Yeah. They still, they got, the world can throw a bunch of shit at you, but through all of that. Yeah, some people are just great at it. And it's a thing that you learn how to do. And it's pleasing for other people to see. And that I think is where the art is. Well, I think Bukowski also said, and I'm just a Bukowski quote generator today. I love him. I love him very much too. He's a dark and troubled and fascinating and a weird person, like Hunter S. Thompson. He said, what matters most is how you walk through the fire, I think. So there's a bit of the Ken Haines in that too, David Goggins in that too. What do you think he meant by that? Well, how you walk through the fire. I mean, you can walk through the fire complaining along the way, or you can walk through the fire and create an example for everyone else so that the trials and tribulations of their own lives seem trivial because they're comparing themselves to the way you handle things, or the way you handle things with grace and dignity and discipline can show other people that they can handle their own life this way. And there's beauty in that, there really is. And there's so much inspiration to be gathered from other people if you're a charitable person, if you're charitable and compassionate and you can look at people, even people that I don't like, I try to look at the best aspects of how they live their life and recognize those aspects, admire them, give them credit for it. There's something that we can all get out of watching the way other people live their lives. So I got a chance to see you walk through the fire a little bit privately and publicly this year in January. I gotta ask you about that. So there's like generic conversations about sort of cancel culture and all those kinds of things. But as a human being, this to me is fascinating. Sort of there's the N word highlight video, there's the criticism of the different guests, whatever the side is on the COVID pandemic. And you, I mean, there's a mass amount of attack on you. Outside of being a public persona, outside of being a comedian, podcaster, you're also a human being. So how did you survive that? How did you sort of walk through that fire? Because you seem to do it with grace. I used mushrooms. That was one way I did it. Really. What's your, as Andrew Huberman would say, what was your protocol? I took, it was probably less than a gram every day. Every day? Yeah. And I did a lot of like really hard working out. But also, I mean, there's a great benefit to going through anything difficult. And if you're aware, like in advance and during, like anything that's gonna happen that's very difficult and troubling, the great benefit is it gives you an opportunity to grow, gives you an opportunity to express yourself under pressure, to show your character, to show who you truly are. And it gives you an opportunity to see how you handle a very difficult situation. It also was fascinating as a person that's involved in media, right? Because what we're doing right now is media, even though it seems, like podcasts seem like we're just having a conversation, right? And they are, and in that sense, it's kind of the purest form of media because what you're doing is you're doing it without any fanfare, you're doing it without any, there's no executives looming over your head or network or big meetings about ratings or any of that stuff, but it is media. But what I got to see is the wiring under the machine of how the rest of media would try to take me out. And like when CNN would just be playing things over and over and back and forth, it was wild to watch. What was also wild to watch was people's responses because I gained two million subscribers during that time. Like the podcast never got bigger. It just kept growing, it had never been bigger than it had been at the end of all of it. It just made it bigger. And ultimately, if you've fucked up in the past or made mistakes or done something wrong, that gives you an opportunity to discuss those things and to say, to apologize if you feel the need to apologize and also to just address it. And so people under that kind of pressure, it's an opportunity for them to understand how you think about things honestly, how you actually honestly think about things. And there's no more honesty that you get out of a person than when that person is under extreme duress. So I think in that sense, I mean, it's horrible to say that it's a benefit, that it's a good thing that it happened, but it was a benefit. Can you see how it can break a person? Yes. I've gotten the chance to experience small attacks here and there, ones that get to the core of things. Like even just talking about Russia and Ukraine, to Stephen Calkin or Oliver Stone, looking at different perspectives, you gain, for me, feeling like a sizable number of people who really don't like you and say things about you that may be cut deep for a reason I don't understand why. It's just my own psychology. Well, it's also because you can't defend yourself because they're saying it and you're not there and you don't have any opportunity for a rebuttal. And if you do have a rebuttal, you're doing it publicly and you're opening it up to the whole world to chime in. And there's a general tendency that people have towards negativity when they're interacting with strangers online, especially about controversial subjects. And even if it's only 10% of the people, it's one out of 10. That's a lot. That's a lot of negativity when you're dealing with thousands and thousands of tweets. Yeah, and I think, maybe I'm just a very self critical person, but I hear their words and I probably, somewhere deep inside, see the truth in the criticism, in some aspect of the criticism, and that's why it hurts. But it's in one aspect of you. Right. But when you're reading it, it's so, it's boiled down to this one thing, as if that one thing defines you totally. Like if you've made a mistake, if you've said something that you shouldn't have said, or if you said something and maybe you should have considered it more carefully, given the gravity of the situation, that's just a part of being a person. And it's also part of being a person where you're communicating with things publicly in real time, thinking out loud, which is what we do. It's complex and most people don't do it. And you're gonna have these, you're gonna have genuine hot takes where people just see what you said and go, why did he say that? Fuck him. He doesn't know anything about, he doesn't live in Ukraine. It's like, there's people that are gonna have takes on that in that way. And then there's also gonna be these disingenuous people who just use any kind of controversial topic or subject as an opportunity for them to get clicks or views. But the number of those people can be quite large. Quite large. And so, going back to, do you think it can destroy a person? Because I kind of worry about this. And you're, in many ways, but in this way, an inspiration that it didn't seem to have destroyed you. But is that? I kept doing shows, I kept doing standup. I ignored everything. I didn't read any of it. So it is possible to just? 100%, yes. Yeah. I ignored it all. But you have like. I knew it was there. Like your family didn't bring it up. My family was very aware of it. My wife was aware of it. What was the conversation like? If your wife is aware of it, is there like a rule? Pretend it's not happening. No. Just like. Well, I tell her, don't ever read. Past the green beans. Yeah. I don't ever let her like read negative articles to me. You know, I don't want them. I don't, he care. I go, that's a person's opinion. You take a person's opinion, you write it down. Doesn't give it any more relevance. Like that person, you know, could have had that opinion in silence. They could have had it with some friends at dinner. They don't like me, whatever. I don't want to read it. I don't want to absorb it. I don't even know them, especially if I'm not there. And especially if it's some biased and it's it's not an objective opinion of me. It's this, you know, they have a narrative and they want to stick to that narrative and they want to write an article and they piece it all together, make you a piece of shit. And that's their prerogative. They're completely out to do that. But I know I shouldn't absorb that. I shouldn't take that in. You're not supposed to be taking in the opinion of the world. You're supposed to be taking in the opinion of small groups of people that you encounter so that you get an understanding of how you make them feel. And then maybe you say to yourself, maybe I come across too rude or maybe I come across too insensitive or maybe maybe I could do better in this way or that way. That's how we sort of shape our personalities and it's how we we develop our social skills. But when the people don't know you and they have this like distorted narrative of you and, you know, there's fucking millions of people. There's so many people. You can't be saying, you know, actually, I mean, millions of people that are like communicating about something like during the height of the, you know, the attempt to cancel me or whatever that is. I don't know how many people were involved in that. People take this kind of stuff seriously. But the problem is the false narratives take hold and then you have meetings, you have groups, you have it builds on top of each other and there's this outrage and then it reaches you at some point and it can just have these destructive effects. It can, but it also sometimes doesn't. And in my case, it didn't. It didn't work. What lessons did you draw from that? Mushrooms, exercise. Mushrooms and exercise, exercise is critical. So I don't think the mushrooms by themselves would have worked. But that's the thing that I use for everything is the brutal exercise. Like my exercise routines are horrible. And because of that, everything else is easier. I create my own bullshit and my own bullshit is so much harder. And it's not just that. It's also sauna and cold plunge and these torture sessions. They in enduring those when you endure those, it makes enduring other things much easier. And it's also an understanding of what's happening. Like you have to know, like media, you have to understand, like what the hot take, you know, YouTube, social media, podcast, ecosphere is doing. Like if they're talking about, you know, Lex Friedman said this and we have to comment on that and, you know, Lex gets canceled in all capital letters on a YouTube clip. And if you you watch that, you're fucking crazy. What are you doing, absorbing all this negativity? It's not good for you. You are you, you know, you and you know, generally, if you've made a mistake, you know, generally, if people are upset with you. You posted this awesome video on your Instagram of a woman who was being interviewed in 19, late 1920s, maybe. Yes. Yeah. And she's close to 100 years old. So she's lived through the Civil War, through World War One. She was at the time living through the early days of the Great Depression. So I was just looking back, you know, what have we as a human civilization in recent times survived, especially in the United States? You're talking about the two world wars in the 20th century, the Great Depression, the Spanish food, the pandemic at the beginning of the 20th century. Yeah. What do we do in the United States? 9 11. If you think of what are the traumatic events that shook our world, it's 9 11. It made us rethink our place in the world. The pandemic pandemic is a huge one is one of the bigger ones, because it also accelerated and exacerbated our anxiety, which people have a certain level of anxiety already, especially sedentary people. They have a very high level of anxiety already because I don't think they're they're giving their body what it what it needs. I don't think they're you know, your body has certain requirements in terms of movement. And when you deny your body those requirements, I think there's like a general level of anxiety that exists in almost everyone. And then you have people obviously that have mental health issues and that also exacerbates the anxiety. The lockdown exacerbated the anxiety, losing loved ones to the pandemic, exacerbated anxiety. And then there was the the division that the different schools of thought, the people that were never going to get vaccinated no matter what. I ain't trusting it. People thought there was microchips in there. People that thought that, you know, Fauci's the demon and there's there was a lot. And there's also like political leanings. The right wing people tended to not want to be vaccinated, whereas the left wing people, for whatever reason, all of a sudden are trusting pharmaceutical companies like explicitly. It was weird. It was a weird time. And I think over time, as it's going to as it gets analyzed and we break it down, it's going to be one of the weirder moments for shaping human culture. And unfortunately for throwing gasoline on this already burning fire of, you know, of conflict between the various factions of of thought in this country. Just it's already a weird time, you know, post Trump, like the Trump era is also going to be one of the weirder times. When when people look back historically about the division in this country, he's such a polarizing figure that so many people felt like. They could abandon their own ethics and morals and principles just to attack him and anybody who supports him because he is an existential threat to democracy itself. But don't you think it's not a cause, but maybe like a symptom, like it's going to get you said it got real weird. Maybe it's going to get weirder. Yeah, I think it's going to get weirder. He's going to run again. You think he wins? Well, he's running against a dead man. You know, I mean, Biden shakes hands with people that aren't even there when he gets off stage. I think he's seeing ghosts. Yeah. You see him on Jimmy Kimmel the other day? No. Well, he was just rambling. I mean, he's if he was anyone else, if he was a Republican, if that was Donald Trump doing that, every fucking talk show would be screaming for him to be off the air. And by the way, I'm not a Trump supporter in any way, shape or form. I've had the opportunity to have him on my show more than once. I've said no every time. I don't want to help him. I'm not interested in helping. The night is still young. We'll see if I have him on the night is still young. I think I'll have him on. I think you'll have him on. Really? Why do you think that? Because you'll have Putin on. And you're competitive as fuck. No, I think ultimately, I mean, you had you've had a lot of people that I think you might you may otherwise be skeptical. Would I have a good conversation, which I think is your metric. You don't care about politics. You just got your heart broken. You haven't slept in days. You're a different person all the time. And you go on to that stage. You're in the neighborhood of who Lex Friedman is. You're in the Lex Friedman neighborhood. Which Lex Friedman am I going to get? Yeah. You know? Energy levels. Yeah. It depends. It all depends. But, oh, the other thing with Kill Tony is it's videotaped. Yes, so you eating shit is on there forever. Forever. The world can see it. But it's one of the most important shows in comedy. It's the most important show in comedy. Because, first of all, it establishes stand up in a sense that, like, for the open micers, for the people that are starting it out, it establishes that the most important thing is to be funny. Like, this is what the art form is all about. And there's a lot of insecurity attached to that and a lot of fears. And so to alleviate some of those insecurities and fears, people will decide that the message is more important. And they'll pretend that you have to be socially aware, that you have to promote things that are positive in your comedy, which is bullshit. The people that say that, they're all bad. They're all bad at comedy. And that's where the insecurity is. It's like they can't just kill. So they have to pretend that they're supposed to be socially aware. And that being socially aware is an important part into society. Like, let me explain something really clearly. It's not a fucking person on earth who's ever changed their life because of a joke. That's not what they're there for. They're there for jokes. The people that say that, they say that socially important comedy is the only comedy that's necessary, the only comedy that you have to do. That is just because they suck. That is it. It's like the cop out is that they can't do the real comedy. They can't crush. It's not like someone goes from being, you know, take like Shane Gillis, one of the best comics up and coming right now. He's fucking fantastic. I can't recommend enough seeing that guy live. I work with him in Irvine, and I hadn't seen like his whole set. I was crying. I mean, he's so good. I heard he's a racist. I haven't listened to any of his material, no. He's so good. And his comedy is just all just trying to be as funny as possible. There's not a chance in hell that guy's just going to go woke and he's just going to start promoting some sort of, you know, socially conscious agenda that's, you know, facetious and just a bunch of nonsense that he's trying to elevate his own personal brand and virtue signal. That's not going to happen. The thing about Kill Tony is in that because you only have one minute and because it's live and because you don't want Tony shitting on you, everybody else shitting on you, everybody's just gearing up to try to be as funny as possible. And no one cares if you are gay or straight or Asian or black or trans or nonbinary. Nobody gives a fuck. Are you funny? If you're funny, you're in and everybody loves you. You could be 80. You could be 20. Nobody gives a shit. You could be a woman or a man or ambiguous. Nobody fucking cares. Are you funny? And that's the most important thing for a community of comedy to really promote comedy. Just funny. Just be funny. And so in that sense, Kill Tony is a real cornerstone of comedy. It's a reminder of what comedy is supposed to be. That said, even the funniest stuff has underneath it some wisdom that comes out of it, but that's not the primary goal of it. Yeah. I mean, it might be inspiring and fun. Tim Dillon's a great example of that. Yeah. He's got some amazing insights in his comedy, but still it's fucking comedy. It's all about the funny. Yeah, it's all of the funny. He's the best at doing that, especially in a podcast form about weaving really important points in with hilarious, obviously, just jokes. Let me ask you, speaking of Tim Dillon, a chaotic fucked up individual. Can we go to your childhood real quick? A brief stroll. So your mom and dad split up when you were five. From a younging perspective, if you look at your subconscious, what impact do you think that had on you informing who you are as a man, as a human being? Well, at the time I thought that my father was like a hero. He was my dad. I think every kid thinks like that about his dad. His dad is like, your dad's your protector. Your dad is like the coolest guy in the world. That's what you like. Yeah. Everybody wants to be like their dad, especially if your dad is like an imposing figure. I remember one time me and my cousin got in a fight over nothing. It was like over who's tougher, King Kong or Godzilla. Yeah. Over nothing. That's an important, but yeah. Actual fight, actual physical fight. I punched him in the face. This is when you were like five? Yeah. Which side were you on? King Kong. Okay. I was wrong. Godzilla's like way bigger. Godzilla's 500 feet tall and he shoots fire out of his mouth. Yeah. Are you sure? I mean, there's, there's an argument to be made. It's not all about size, right? No, there's no argument to be made. 500 feet tall versus 50 feet tall. One's a gigantic dinosaur. One is a stupid monkey who gets shot down by a plane. You don't think you can't kill Godzilla? Godzilla, like no back. No, you can't kill Godzilla with a plane. Like that shit wouldn't work in Godzilla killed King Kong. King Kong and the new movies kept growing. It's getting bigger and bigger. It got to the point where he's as big as Godzilla. It just feels like King Kong is stronger. Stop. Backtake, backtake, immediate backtake. You don't think there's a backtake. There's a different. If he's the same size. Human weapons and two animals going at it of a different size. You don't think there's in the jungle, a smaller animal could take on a bigger animal. Like a monkey versus a, let's see, a lion. Monkey versus a bear. What? Who wins? A monkey versus a bear. Not a monkey. Not a monkey. What's the strongest ape? No, but gorillas eat. Okay. Gorilla can't do back takes. I'm thinking of like a smaller. You know what I'm saying? Because in Jiu Jitsu you see this all the time. You remember that scene in Talladega Nights? Do you know Talladega Nights? Where the little boy's talking to his grandpa? I'll be all over you like a spider monkey. Exactly. Spider monkey. I was thinking. All right. There's some animals. Like here's a better example. A wolverine. Wolverines chase wolves and bears off of their kills. And they're not very big at all. They're just so ferocious. And they're so durable. Like it's very hard to kill a wolverine. Yeah. And there's videos of like cats. Like not actual cats. Like domestic cats or domestic dogs starting shit with much larger animals. Yeah. And if they're ferocious enough. Well, pit bulls are a great example of that. Pit bulls are small. Like real game bred pit bulls are like 35, 45 pounds. And they'll kill much larger dogs. Anyway, you were on King Kong's side. Yeah. So shit out of your cousin. I remember he said to me like I thought it was in like real trouble. Because I remember my cousin's mom was yelling at me. And it was like, you monster. All this crazy shit. So my dad got me alone. And he said, tell me what happened. And I told him, you know, we got in a fight. We were arguing. We were King Kong, Godzilla. And I punched him in the face. And he goes, did you cry? I go, no. He goes, good. Don't ever cry. And I remember that. Like, whoa, okay. And I remember thinking, all right. I'm just going to start punching people because like obviously my dad thinks it's a good idea if I go running around punching people as long as I don't cry. Like, I remember certain things about, you know, and also like this is, again, like we're talking about watching Lenny Bruce and getting a timeline of what the world was like back then. This is a different world, you know, in 1970. This would have been 1972. It's a different world back then, man. Like a really different world. It's some of that, so Carl Jung talked about the shadow. It's the unconscious where you have dark stuff and oftentimes you use it to project. There's stuff that you're very self critical about yourself. But because it's in your unconscious, you use it to project onto others. You see it as flaws in others. And that's a good way to, like whatever, he gives a quote, like everything that irritates us about others can lead us to an understanding of ourselves. So that's a nice way to investigate yourself. Like something that pisses you off, you start asking questions of your own mind, and that's how you bring it to the surface. But anyway, from that, those are formative years. From that time, is there still stuff in your unconscious you think you haven't examined? Some dark shit? I don't think so. I don't, I'm not aware if it is. Cause I've looked, you know, like if someone, you know, someone says, you know, I left something over your house. Like, where'd you leave it? I don't know. Like, all right, I'll go look. Yeah. I'll get a real thorough look. But I'm pretty sure. Pretty sure it's not there. Yeah. Yeah. I don't know. I think I've looked. I mean, it certainly had an effect. I think the positive effect also was compounded by the fact that when my mother married my stepdad, who's a great guy, who was a hippie, very different, we moved around a lot. And so the bad thing about that was I didn't really develop longterm friends. The good thing about that was that I was forced to develop my own opinions about things instead of adopting an opinion of the neighborhood and the group about anything. I was forced to form my own thoughts and opinions about almost everything. And so it made me much more of an independent thinker. So that on top of the fact that losing my quote unquote hero very early on and then having to form my own opinions about things, it left me with a very independent streak in terms of... And if I hadn't done the things that I got interested in, martial arts and then comedy, if I hadn't gotten interested in those things, I would have been fucked because I was just too independent for normal jobs. I was too independent for school. I just didn't want to listen to people. I was too feral. I just didn't want to sit still. If I was with the wrong parents, especially today, I most certainly would have been medicated. Yeah, there's so many possible trajectories you can imagine where you would have not been the person you are today. Oh, yeah. That's probably one of the best possible. This particular storyline you're living through is one of the better ones. This timeline is as good as it gets for someone like me. Is there advice you can give to people, to young kids that are living through a shitty situation of any sort, a tough life? Find a thing you like. Try to find a thing that you really enjoy. Try to find a thing that you're passionate about. Like an activity. Yes. For me, early on, it was drawing. It was illustrations. It was comic books. I wanted to be a comic book illustrator. Then it went from comic book drawing and illustrations to martial arts. It was just another thing that I was very, very passionate about. That was my vehicle out of my dilemma. That was my vehicle out of my own anxiety and trauma and my own issues and insecurities. Find something. Find a thing that you genuinely enjoy because getting good at things you genuinely enjoy is extremely beneficial for young people because it lets you know that everybody thinks they're a loser. Every young person thinks they're a loser, at least a young person in the situation I was at. I didn't know I wasn't a loser until I started winning, until I started doing martial arts. Martial arts taught me that I could get better at stuff, that I wasn't really a loser. I just was someone who was in a fucked up situation, but you could channel all that energy that you have as a young person into something and get better at it. Then all of a sudden, people admired me. I was like, this is crazy. I went from being someone who was incredibly insecure and basically a failure to someone who was really successful at this one thing that was very dangerous that other people were scared of. That gave me immense confidence and also a real understanding of the direct correlation between hard work and success. And a kind of understanding that you're not a loser, that there is some diamond in the rough. There's also an understanding that you can't listen to people, because even my parents didn't want me to do martial arts. They didn't want me to fight. They didn't want me to do stand up. You have to understand who you are, and then in the face of other people's either criticism or lack of faith in your ability to succeed, you push through and there's great benefit in that. And you realize that you can kind of apply that to other things in life. You can apply that to critics, you can apply that to social media commentators, you can apply that to a lot of things. Okay. What about young people in their 50s? Can you give advice to like, imagine you're sitting back, probably still here in Texas in your 90s looking back, what advice would that guy give to you today? Or like people that have done some shit in their 50s, you've gone through hell of a life, there's potentially some incentive to settle down, you got a great family to relax. But maybe there's some incentive to still do epic shit, still be David Goggins running in the middle of the desert screaming shit into a camera. If you're David Goggins, you have to be David Goggins. I don't think there's a path for that guy that exists at this stage of his life other than that. Do you think he'll be 70 and still screaming? Yes. Okay. 100%. 100%. If David and I are alive, we're both 70, he's going to call me up and say, stay hard motherfucker. Guaranteed. Guaranteed. So lean into whatever the fuck you are at this point. Well, if you're enjoying it, but if you're not enjoying it, rethink your life. Try to figure out why you're not enjoying it. You still think it's possible to shift things in your 50s? Yeah. If you're alive, you can get better. No matter what. Yeah. No matter what. If you're alive, you can shift things. I mean, if you're 90 years old and you have a month to live, you can apologize for the things you think you did wrong and maybe reconcile and shape relationships that you have with the people that are around you better, so that they feel differently about you after you're gone. Yeah. I always love people in their 70s who are like getting back into dating or something like that. Yeah. I was watching a video about a woman who's in her 60s who just started powerlifting. Nice. Yeah. And same with Jiu Jitsu. You see people get into Jiu Jitsu, like a white belt that's like 70. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. There's a lot of... If you're alive, you can get better at stuff. I don't think people are happy if they don't have puzzles and complex tasks and things that are interesting to them, whether it's an art project or whether it's learning something completely new like standup comedy. Doing things that are difficult, it's as much of a nourishment of the mind as food is a nourishment of the body. I think you need things that are puzzling to you where you have to find your own human potential in the difficulty of the task and work your way through things. At least for me, I mean, I can only speak for me because I'm the only life that I've ever lived that I'm aware of. And in my life, that has been a 100% constant. I am a very happy person and I have never had a moment where I'm not doing difficult shit. Yeah. Ever. What matters most is how well you walk through the fires. You just keep starting fires for yourself to walk through. Well, they don't necessarily have to be fires, right? Because fires are like kind of out of control. Lukewarm tasks. Tasks. The surfaces. Tasks. Give yourself something, an arduous, difficult task where you're challenged, challenged mentally and challenged physically. One of the great things about being challenged physically is it's also mental. The people that don't understand that have never really been challenged physically. People that think that physical challenges are just like, just physical. It's just brute grunt work. It's not. It's emotional intelligence. It's understanding your desire to quit and, you know, conquering your inner bitch. All that stuff is, it's mental. It's playing out inside your head and there's a mental strength that you acquire from that, that you can apply to intellectual pursuits. And the people that don't think that are the people that haven't attempted them. And there's an arrogance to people that only pursue intellectual exercises, only pursue intellectual things and don't pursue anything physical. That the physical stuff is base, it's grunt work, it's primal, it's not necessary. I don't think that's accurate. I don't think that they're, I mean, obviously these people like Stephen Hawking's who have no opportunity to do anything physical, right? His physical dilemma is keeping us or was keeping his heart beating. But for most people, I think you can really benefit from physical struggle and you benefit from it in a mental way. And I think that is overlooked. It's unfortunately overlooked by academics and intellectuals who they make excuses for why they're fat and lazy or scrawny. They don't need to be, it's not even about the fat or all of that. It's like literally there's something about the physical challenge that's really good for you, especially if you're academic, especially if you do intellectual type stuff. There's this great roboticist at MIT, Russ Tedrick, he runs barefoot to and from MIT every day. I love it, like seven, seven to 10 miles each way. Barefoot. Barefoot. Well, he studies legged locomotion, legged robots, so for him, it's also interesting how the human body moves. He sees the beauty in all movement. What do his feet look like? You know, calloused. Destroyed, right? No, just calloused. They're nice. They form a nice, it's not like I gave him a foot massage, but I mean, they look, and I don't have a foot fetish, so I don't, I'm not able to correctly evaluate another man's feet. I apologize for this, but they don't look fucked up. Does he run on concrete? Yeah, he runs all surfaces. And he does everything completely barefoot? The running part at work. So one of the things he has to do is fit into society, which means he has to change clothes and appear normal. Right. So does he wear like zero shoes? Yeah, those barefoot type shoes? No, because that's like very hippie, wokey type of thing. No, like he doesn't, he's barefoot when he's running and then he wears like normal looking stuff like dress shoes. How did he work his way up to running barefoot? So he was significantly overweight and his advisor, this other famous person at MIT who was a roboticist, took his own life and that made him, that made Russ face his own mortality, I think. I mean, you start to ask big questions about your wellbeing, like, holy shit, this ride can end at any moment. And so he started taking his sort of physical wellbeing seriously, but as a result of that, not that he, did he become like shredded, but he's also discovered the intellectual value, the humbling value of physical exercise. He's not preachy about it at all. I actually rarely hear him advise it to anyone. He just does it as a, almost like meditation or something like that. It's definitely a form of meditation and you can attest to that, right? You do quite a bit of running. There's a thing about a, you kind of, almost like a mantra gets formed and you get into it. It was great here in the Austin heat, a hundred degree weather. That tests you. You know what I love to do outside? Pull sleds. That's my thing. I love to pull sleds outside. In the heat. Yeah. I did it today. Yeah. Yeah, I love it. So you're also, your wife is incredible. You're in a relationship. You're married. You have a great family. What advice would you give to me and to others like me who are dumb fucks and have not found a relationship? Well, you're a great guy. So this definitely doesn't necessarily apply to you, but be someone who someone would want to be in a relationship with. There's a lot of people out there that want a great partner. They want someone in a relationship, but why would someone want to be in a relationship with you? You know, maybe you bicker a lot. Maybe you're jealous. Maybe you, uh, maybe you lie. Maybe you, you know, maybe you're cruel, maybe you're, you don't have a sense of humor. Maybe you're, you know, you're not kind. Like what is, what is it about you that people would not enjoy being around or the people avoid? Fix that. Fix that. Well, this applies to me as well. Like you, you said something with Cam Haynes. One of the things you admire is the, the discipline it takes to sort of juggle so many things and just successfully. I'm not sure I'm very good at that. So juggling all this hard work and then also a relationship. Also relationship, also family, all of these kinds of priorities. I mean, that requires having your shit together. It does. It's a different thing, but it's also, you got to find the right person. There's a lot of people who sell for, they settle for sexy. They settle for hot, settle for the wrong person. Like you can get hot and nice. They're out there. Yeah. But don't get hot and mean, hot and mean is not fun. Then you get Amber Heard. Yeah. You know? And then you get hot and dry. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. You can be deceived by perfect symmetry. So you don't think it's a good idea to record your partner? I think you should record all conversations. The CIA is doing it no matter what. I assume that every conversation I have is recorded because I'm pretty sure it is. Even when we had dinner with Alex Jones, he was recording. Yeah. I still remember that. I didn't know that was recording. He might, you know what? It'd be funny if he is the CIA. He could be. Could be. That'd be the ultimate joke. So my advice about relationships is be somebody. And then also like find someone who you can grow with, right? You don't want to be with someone who doesn't share your values. You don't want to be with someone who makes excuses. You don't want to be with someone who's lazy or who's spiteful. You want to be with someone who's like genuinely kind. That's one of the things that I really love about my wife and she's very smart and she works hard. She's a dedicated, disciplined person, but she's also really nice. That's one of the things I like the most about her. She's so nice. She's always smiling. And that energy is great. Yeah. I mean, you've seen us together. Yeah. You've hung around with us. She's fun. Yeah. She's a lot of fun. Yeah. She makes you just feel great to be alive. It's good to have people like that around you. She's happy. She's a happy person. She's happy to be around. That's the kind of people that you could have in your life as friends and as coworkers and as lovers and wives and husbands. You can find those people. They're real. And when you find those people, your life is better. To have a good tribe is very important, to have a good tribe of people. And I think if there's anything that I'm very, very fortunate about, it's the people that I'm around. I have very good friends and one of which is you. It's so valuable to have quality people around you because it makes you want to do better because you admire the hard work that these people put in, like Cam Haines or Goggins or many of my friends and people that are generous and people that are curious and people that are honest. They inspire you to do the same and it's extremely valuable. It's one of the most valuable things is to surround yourself with positive, healthy, friendly, generous people. That's why I cut out Tim Dillon from my life. I broke up with him. I thought you guys were getting married. No, it's over. It's none of those things. The Texas nonstop, the nonstop conspiracy theories, the nonstop mocking of my Eastern European origins, it's just not healthy for me. Plus he's physically abusive and a towering figure, both emotional and physically. No, no, I love him. Okay. If he worked out, he would be a house. A brick house. He's got such a large frame, you know? So if I interview Putin, what should I ask him? How's the cancer? How's it doing, buddy? That's question number one in Russian. Do you think he has cancer? I don't think so. The narrative is terrifying, right? Dictator of the largest nuclear arsenal in the world who also has cancer and he just invaded a sovereign country. That's a terrifying narrative because that's what we're all afraid of. Someone who has nothing to lose who just decides to let loose a nuke. Well, I do think maybe it's projecting, but if I had cancer or if you think about leaders that have cancer, you're facing your own mortality, I would think he would be more focused on his legacy and dropping a nuclear bomb is not good for legacy. I do believe he wants to be remembered as a great leader, as a lot of leaders do, as a lot of even dictators do. And I think he wants to figure out a way to pull out a win so he can say that whatever this thing was, whatever this invasion was, was good for Russia, was good for the nation. He ultimately made it a greater nation than it was before. And perhaps you could justify an escalation of war to be that. And it's just the cancer thing concerns me so much because it's been so often part of this propaganda that's been told about Putin that he's sick. I don't know why. People kind of wonder that a lot about, especially dictators, but you had that even with Hillary Clinton and obviously with Biden, that narrative is stickier. So for some people it's stickier than that. Well, that narrative is transparent and obvious. But the degree of it is a question with Biden as it is with everyone. How healthy is this leader? That's a question people often ask. Sure, always. They were doing that about Trump too. The thing about Putin though is like his appearance is altered, where he looks very bloated. His body doesn't look much bigger, but his face looks like puffy and swollen. I had a friend who had sarcoidosis and they prescribed prednisone, which is a type of a steroid. And one of the things that would happen when he was on it is his face would get really big. He was like, he would blow up like a swell up and maintain a lot of water and inflammation. And that's what it looks like when I'm looking at Putin. So actually like if you're sitting with him, one question is about health. Has Biden been asked that kind of question? Like without mockery, without any of that? You would have to go on Fox News. Like the mainstream media treats him with kid gloves in a way that I've never seen. It's so obvious there's something horribly wrong with his cognitive function. Well, I had to push back. I don't know if it's horribly wrong. You don't think it's horribly wrong? I think it's no, I think there's uncertainty to which degree is wrong. I would love to there to be a serious like conversation about with him. In fact, I actually have to now look, cause of course Fox News will mock his like declining mental health and then I would love like sort of an objective discussion. Are you aware of this? Are you like, what are you putting in place? Are you yourself? Cause if I was a person with a declining mental abilities, like you have to start thinking about that kind of stuff. Like who is around you, who are the advisors? What if you start, stop being able to see the world clearly? I would be transparent about that kind of stuff. Well, you would be, but you're also would never be a politician because you're too fucking honest. Well, yeah, but actually from a conversation perspective, it would be nice if that kind of discussion was sad. It would be. But all jokes aside with Putin, I would ask questions about democracy versus what they have. So that without any disparaging descriptions of what is going on over in Russia, it's clearly not a democracy. It's they, I mean the way he has it set up, the elections are a joke. He's So he would push back. That's not clearly not a democracy. He is still very popular. So majority of people are huge supporters of Putin inside Russia. The he would, the people that push back against that would say that that's because any serious opposition is pushed out of the country. Yeah. So it gets competition and murdered. Yeah. So, but yes, that's a really, really good question. The value of dictatorships. One of the things about the United States that's fascinating to me is that every four years, unless it's a, it's four to eight years, right? One does two terms, but every four years there's an opportunity for someone to be new and completely inexperienced at the most difficult job in the world, which is ridiculous. So the interesting thing is it actually makes sense after eight years, you've gained the wisdom. Yeah. You would actually be a pretty good leader to keep going. Yeah. But there is some problem where you, the power gets started getting to your head. Yeah. So from Putin's perspective, I think he genuinely wants the best for Russia. I don't think he's lost his mind in terms of like, it's all about greed and so on. Same as Stalin. I think Stalin until the end of his days wanted the best for the Soviet Union. So it's not like you become, Hitler I think lost his mind during the war. Like where it was like he wasn't seen clearly at all. What Putin believes is that he is actually the best person to bring out the best for his country. Now, the problem is maybe refreshing the leader is in fact in the long term, the best thing versus every leader believes they know what's best for the country, the point is to keep refreshing it. Well. And that's the case for democracy. That's the case for the system we have that creates a natural, maybe emergent balance of power. I think it makes it evident that there is no clear cut real right way to do it. And that if you had the perfect person in having them for 12, 20 years would be amazing. If you had a perfect benevolent leader who clearly only cared about the people was doing their best and striving hard and got great satisfaction knowing that he is a dedicated civil servant that only wants to lead the country in a way that's going to benefit the most people in the most profound way. But we have a dirty political system. It's completely corrupted by money, completely corrupted by influence. The fact that the lobbyists, I mean, there's an area outside of Washington DC, it's one of the richest areas in the country and it's where the lobbyists live. There's so much money involved in being a lobbyist, there's so much money involved in special interest groups and how much of an impact they have on who gets elected and what decisions get made once that person gets elected. We know this, right? We know it's not for the people by the people, it's just not what it is. I mean, this country is an experiment in self government and if we could do it all over again, I would say the most important thing is to have laws in place to keep money out of politics and to make it a heinous crime for someone to influence laws and policy based entirely on the amount of profit it could generate for a party or for a company that is investing in a candidate. That's fucking incredibly dangerous and it's corrupt and that corruption has been accepted. We've just accepted that this corruption exists, you know? Last question. If Putin asks to see this watch, what do I tell him? Would you give it? Should I let him see it? Because we know what happens with the Super Bowl ring. I think a Super Bowl ring is unique. He could buy a watch like that pretty easy, you know? But this particular, isn't that a power move? Yeah. So this is the watch you gave me as a story. Yes. I would probably share it with him, the story. And then maybe you go, can I see this watch? Yeah. And then he puts it on and says thank you. Do you say no? Do you say no? You go like this. Yeah, there it is, bro. Bro. You know, take it off. I've got so many words I'm going to have to find translations, buddy, bro. I guess bro is brother. I mean, if he takes your watch, I'll buy you another one if Putin steals it. Keep him going. I'll just give you the same exact watch. Well, first of all, thank you for this. My pleasure, bro. I really wanted to talk to you because in a couple of days I'm leaving to Ukraine and Russia and I hope I'll be back in one piece and drink whiskey with you once again. Yeah, I hope so too. I'm nervous about you going over there. You know, I know journalists have been killed now. But they don't know Jiu Jitsu. No, I think you'll be okay and I think there's certain things you do in life that just kind of your heart pulls towards that so much. What's your objective over there? I'm not somebody who thinks about objectives clearly. It's just something about me says I need to go there. But to put in loose words is to try to understand what that world is now. So I remember what it was years ago when I was there. I know my family, I know the generations of family that was there on that land in Ukraine and in Russia, and the soul of the people, the love that's there, the beauty of the culture. And I want to see what it is today and what this war has created. Both the anger and the love and the people and just hear them out and just talk to them. No recordings, none of that. Maybe a little here and there, but mostly just for me. And to see, I don't know, sometimes it's just something pulls you to a place. And I also, because I'm able to speak Russian and some Ukrainian, I do want to try to have these, a couple of the political leaders involved, talk to them. And I have all the right connections, everybody has said yes. Of course you don't know the likelihood it finally happens, but I want to at least have that possibility there. Sometimes you have to go to a place to really understand it. You can't just read about it. You can't just talk to the people that are living there. You have to be there. And I've never been in a war zone. I've never been in a land that's been damaged and wiped by the weapons of war. And I just want to feel that because so much of that land is, I remember when everything was flourishing. Yes, corruption, all those kinds of things, but people were there and the culture was flourishing and people were happy. There was lots of struggle, but they were happy. And now people are extremely angry. There's hate in the air on all sides. I want to see that. I want to understand. Sometimes it just pulls you and you have to go. So it doesn't make any sense perhaps, but you just got to do it. What's the timeline of when I'm going? How long? No, one way. I don't have a plan. Really? Wow. Yeah. So I'm hoping back in a month, but also just to clarify, I'm not somebody who seeks risk. And like, you're somebody who seems to be terrified of bears and sharks, so you don't like, so why go swim out? Why go surfing? Why go swim out in the ocean? Yeah. So I'm somebody that's the same probably with sharks too. I'm not taking unnecessary risk, but certain things that just mean a lot to you, you take the risk. And so a little bit of risk willing to take to discover something about myself, honestly, it's probably what it all boils down to, trying to understand myself. Because so much of me is from that place. Well, this is the beautiful thing about America is it's like stitches together all these different cultures. Everybody came from somewhere else. Yeah. And you try to understand, in order for me to be a good American, I need to understand who I was, where I came from. And that's nothing reveals the spirit of a people better than war. It's like there's something about this conflict that's really cuts all the bullshit. This is who we are. This is who we are as a people. So I want to see it. I want to understand. And like I said, when I come back, drink some whiskey with you. All right. Well, I hope that happens. I really do. And I hope you're safe over there. And I hope you come back with whatever insight you're trying to achieve. Thank you for doing this conversation. My pleasure, brother. Thank you for everything you've done for me, for the support, for the love, and everybody around you. Thank you for everything you're doing for everybody around you, for giving back, but for just giving and being kind to everybody. I love you, brother. I love you too. Thank you. Thanks for listening to this conversation with Joe Rogan. To support this podcast, please check out our sponsors in the description. And now let me leave you with one of Joe's and one of my favorite quotes from Miyamoto Musashi. Once you know the way broadly, you will see it in everything. Thank you for listening and hope to see you next time. So can I have a good conversation? And I think you had like people like Kanye on, for example, and you had a great conversation with him. I think you I think he is an artist, but Kanye doing well or not doing well doesn't change the course of our country. Yeah, but, you know, do you really bear the responsibility of the course of our country based on a conversation? I think you can revitalize and rehabilitate someone's image in a way that is pretty shocking. Look at the way people look at Alex Jones now, because Alex Jones has been on my podcast a few times. Yeah. How do they which direction? The people that have watched those podcasts think he's hilarious. And they think that he definitely fucked up with that whole Sandy Hook thing. But he's right more than he's wrong. And he's not an evil guy. He's just a guy who's had some psychotic breaks in his life. He's had some genuine mental health issues that he's addressed. He's had some serious bouts of alcoholism, some serious bouts of substance abuse, and they've contributed to some very poor thinking. But if you know the guy, if you get to know him like I have, I've known him for more than 20 years. And if you know him on podcasts, you realize like he is genuinely trying to unearth some things that are genuinely disturbing for most people. Like this is a guy that was telling me about Epstein's Island fucking decade ago. At least he was telling me about I was like, what you're telling me? There's a place where they bring elites to compromise them with underage girls and they film them. Really? Like what? Cut the fuck out here. Like, no, President Clinton's been there. Everyone's been there. Like, but it sounds like nonsense. And not only is it true, but people keep getting fucking murdered for it. Did you see that latest Clinton adviser that got murdered about it? Yep. Yeah. Hung with an extension cord, shot himself in the chest 30 miles from his house, and they're calling it a suicide. And now even Elon Musk is asking, where's the clientele list? Yeah, we should we should probably see who's been to that island. Yeah, we should probably see who's been to that island. And there's probably more of those kind of things out there that haven't been exposed. Yeah, but sort of to push back in you, you had those conversations with Alex Jones. Wouldn't you be able to have the same kind of conversation with Donald Trump? That's the problem. Reveal. No, it's not the problem. You revealed that Alex Jones is a human being. Yeah, he's fucked up. He has demons in his head. He's obviously chaotic all over the place, but there's some wisdom to the perspective he takes on the world. Even though he is often full of shit, he is able to predict certain things that very few people are willing to bring up. So isn't Trump the same way? Fucked up person, egomaniac, whatever personality things you can talk about. Isn't it worthwhile to lay it out? Like, who's going to, if you listen to interviews of Trump, who has the balls to call him out on this bullshit? Chris Wallace did. No, calling out somebody on their bullshit is easy when you're just being adversarial. But as a person who is genuinely and pathetically trying to understand, I think you're really good at that. Like, you pull them in. I don't know if he would genuinely be there. You know what I'm saying? Like, I think he would be putting on a performance. You don't think he can break through that in like 30 minutes? I'd need more time than that. And he doesn't do any drugs. That's the thing about Alex. You can get Alex high, get him drunk, and he'll start talking about interdimensional child molesters. Yeah. You know, and then you get the real Alex. Or maybe you have somebody else on as well to introduce chaos, like Alex. No, no, no, no. You have to be one of them. I would have to be just me and him. I would have to, that would be a focused thing. I would have to, like, really take time with Trump. But also, I'm not well versed enough politically to know all of the corruption that's been alleged and to understand what the whole Russiagate stuff, what's real. Like, how much of it, it's clear that there is more than one organization that's involved in communicating with Russia before the 2016 election. So it's pretty clear that the Clinton administration was involved. It's pretty clear that the Trump administration had some communication with some people in Russia. It's pretty clear that Hunter Biden had some very suspicious dealings in Ukraine. And there's a lot going on there, man. And it's hard for anybody to parse. It's really hard for anybody, and especially to have an objective assessment of exactly what's going on. And then to be able to do that and broadcast it publicly. That's quite a project. And I think if you really want to do that correctly, it's something that I would have to research for a long time. And to really, really, and I don't have that kind of time. Not for, maybe for certain people that you're really curious about. Like, you have that kind of time for Bob Lazar. Yes, yes. But maybe not for Donald Trump. No, that's different. Because Bob Lazar, what he's talking about, I wanted to know, with the Bob Lazar thing, I wanted to know, first of all, I want to be around him and see if I could smell bullshit. Did you? No. OK. No, I didn't, man. That was what's weird about it. Not only did I not smell bullshit, I went over all of his interviews. He hasn't done a lot, but he's done enough. And he's done them over the course of 30 plus years. And it's alarming how consistent his story is, which is really weird when you think about, you're talking about back engineering alien crafts and working on a top secret government test site that's carved into the side of a mountain to camouflage it from satellites. It's such a wacky story. But the guy really did work at Los Alamos Labs. He really is a propulsions expert. He really is a scientist. Did he really work on back engineering UFOs? I don't know. But the way he described their motion is exactly like what's been observed by some of these pilots that have these videos that they've captured. And I just love that, like, NASA, I've been hearing from a bunch of folks who are there legitimately funding research. And there's people really taking this seriously of UFO sightings, investigating them. Yeah. Like, adding more and more sensors to collect data from just observing at higher and higher definitions. It's cool to finally see that. And he was one of the early people, whether he's full of shit or not, that kind of forced people to start taking these topics seriously. Or at least forced people to have conversations about them and maybe attempt to debunk them because it seems so preposterous, but then get sucked down the rabbit hole and start going, hmm, maybe. We'll fucking. The thing is, like the Fermi paradox, like, where are they, right? And when you take into account just the sheer raw numbers, the vast majority of people objectively assume that there is life out there, the vast majority. Well, if you really take into account what we understand about the universe itself, what we understand about the concept of infinity, and the way Neil deGrasse Tyson has explained it to me, is that not only are there life forms out there, but there's you. You are out there. Infinity is so large that Lex Friedman exists, and doesn't just exist, but exists an infinite number of times, like the amount of interactions at cells and molecules. The same exact interactions that have happened here on Earth have happened in the exact same order an infinite number of times in the cosmos. Well, first of all, it's not certain that that's true. It's possible. It's possible. Like Sean Carroll, you know, especially with quantum mechanics, based on a certain interpretation of quantum mechanics, that's very possible. But the question is, can you access those universes? Right. How far away are they? The more sort of specific, practical question is, this local pocket of the universe, our galaxy, or our neighboring galaxies, are there aliens there? What do they look like? Are they, so you can have this panspermia idea, where a much larger, like daddy civilization, like rolled by and just planted a few aliens at a similar time. Like Prometheus. Yes, a different, you know, throughout the galaxy. And those are the ones we might be interacting with. They're all kind of dumb as we are relatively, you know, maybe a few million years apart. And then those are the ones we're interacting with. And then we have a chance to actually connect with them and communicate with them. Or it could be like much more wide open. And you have these gigantic alien civilizations that are expanding very, very quickly. And the interesting thing is when you look up at the sky and you see the stars, that's light from those stars. We might not be seeing the alien civilizations until they're already here, meaning like you start expanding, once you get really good at expanding, you're going to be expanding very close to the speed of light. So right now we don't see much in the sky, but there could be one day we wake up and it's just like everywhere and they're here. Right. Because the amount of time the light takes to reach us. Yeah, and then the thing that I've been really fascinated by is these, you know, these alternative forms of transportation that they're discussing, like the ability to harness wormholes and the ability to do things that a type three civilization is capable of. I had Michio Kaku on my podcast recently. Fantastic. Love that guy. He's so good at taking extremely complex concepts and boiling them down for digestion. And, you know, and saying them in a way that other people can appreciate and not being hesitant about saying wild, crazy shit that's out there, but grounded in what's actually possible. Yeah, he's all in on this UFO phenomenon. Now he's like, now the burden of proof is to people for people to come up with some sort of a conventional explanation for these things. He goes, because these things are defying all the concepts of physics that we currently know in terms of what our capabilities are and propulsion systems and so many other things that, you know, what we know about what current science is capable of reproducing. As far as what we know, the problem is like these military projects that are top secret, like how much money do they have? They have a lot of money. Like, but is it possible? And maybe you could speak to this. Is it possible that there could be some propulsion systems that have been developed and implemented that are far beyond just the simple burning of rocket fuel, pushing the fire out the back, which forces the rocket at extreme speeds forward. That's something that does harness gravity, something that can distort space and time and can make travel from one point to another like preposterously fast. Well, not only is it possible, I think it's likely that that kind of stuff would be kept a secret. Yeah. It's just everything you see about these, about the way either if it's contractors like Lockheed Martin or if it's DOD, the actual departments of defense, they operate in complete secrecy. Just even looking at the history of the stealth fighter, just even stealth technology was kept a secret for a very, very long time and not until you're ready to use it and need to use it, does it become public and not officially public. It just is being detected out in the wild. So there's going to be a process where you're secretly testing it and that might creep up, which is maybe what we're seeing. And then it's waiting for the next big war, the next big reason to use the thing. Yeah. And so, yeah, there's definitely technologies in that. There might not be propulsion technologies. There could be AI surveillance technologies. There could be different kinds of stealth drones. It could be also in cyberspace like cyber war weapons, all that kind of stuff. They're obviously going to be kept secret. Yeah, I'm very skeptical lately. And the reason why I'm skeptical is the government keeps talking about it. The Pentagon keeps talking about it. NASA keeps talking about it. In which direction are you skeptical? I'm skeptical that they're aliens. I think most likely it's a smoke screen. And most likely these are some sort of like incredibly advanced drones that they've developed that they want to pretend don't exist. That seems the more likely scenario. Because otherwise, my take is like, what's the benefit of them discussing these things? What's the benefit of them discussing these things openly? These are, the way they described it, off world crafts, not made from this earth. Why? Why would they tell us that? Unless there's an imminent danger of us being invaded and they want to prepare people so they don't freak out as much. You know, like maybe freak them out a little bit. Say that publicly. The New York Times article, the Pentagon discussing it, all these different things. Test the waters. Yeah, well, let people know that this is a thing or my take is like that. I don't think they do that. I don't think they tell us. I think the government has a lot of contempt for the citizens. I really do. I think they have contempt for our intelligence. They have contempt for our need to know things. And I also think they think that they are running us. It's not we're all in this together. And the government works for the people. And the government is of the people. I don't think they think that way. Yeah, the basic idea is you can't trust the populace, the government itself, because we're a bunch of idiots. I think that's accurate. Well, they're not wrong, but they're also idiots, power hungry idiots. Yeah, I don't think everyone's an idiot, but I think there are enough idiots that it becomes a real problem if you're completely honest about everything you do. And you don't want to let everybody weigh in about things that are incredibly complex and that most people are ignorant of. And on top of that, there's this machine of intelligence that I've recently been reading a lot about the KGB, about the FSB. So several things sparked my curiosity. So one, I'm traveling to Ukraine and to Moscow. And because of that, I started to sort of ask practical questions of myself, just travel and all those kinds of things. So I started reading a lot about the KGB. Jack Barsky has a book on this. I talked to him. And you start to realize, you probably looked into some of this, but you start to realize the scale of surveillance, manipulation. Now, a lot of them also talk about the incompetence of those organizations, the usual bureaucracy creeps in. But the point is, it seems like there's no line they're not willing to cross for the purpose of gathering intelligence, for the purpose of controlling people in order to gather intelligence. Now, this is MI6, FSB. There's not much information about the FSB or the GRU, but the KGB. So we're always like 20 years behind or more on the actual information. And so I started to wonder. So I have not officially been contacted by any intelligence agency, but I started to wonder, well, is there somebody I know that's doing that, undercover CIA or undercover FSB, undercover anything? You probably do. Have you asked yourself this question? Yeah, for sure. Yeah, people that have been on my podcast. Yeah, for sure. Do you think there was actually a guess that may have been? 100%. Oh, man. I would imagine. Would you know? I have suspicions. Do you care? Is this? I mean, it depends on what they're attempting to do, right? Like if I felt like there was some deception involved and they were trying to use the podcast to manipulate a narrative in a deceptive way to trick people into things, yeah, I would care. But this is exactly what, those are the kind of things they do. They do plant narratives. Yeah. I mean, I would imagine if you have the number one podcast in the world that people would want to infiltrate that. Yeah, there's probably meetings in all major intelligence agencies about, okay, what are the large platforms? How do we spread the message? Yeah. Well, I mean, that's the thing that really emerged when we're talking about during my cancellation, that there's a clear, there's no objective analysis of this in mainstream media. There's clear narratives that they're trying to push forward to, whether it's to promote certain ideas or to diminish the power and reach of people who are mavericks or people who aren't connected to a system that you can't compromise. That's where it gets dangerous, right? Where it gets dangerous is when someone has the largest reach, but is also completely detached and clearly is independent in the sense of independent thinking, has on whoever he wants. But your mind can still be manipulated. I guess I can. I mean, I guess everybody can be manipulated a certain way. I manipulate my own mind, I'm sure too. But I also spend a lot of time thinking about what I think. You know, I don't just accept things like the UFO thing, like I was all in for a while and now I'm like, man, something smells fishy. And then I'm thinking like, here's my problem with the UFO thing. I want it to be real so bad. That's my problem with it. I'm such a sucker. I want it to be real so bad, you know, and that's a problem for me because I'm aware of it. And so then I stop and think about like, what is my desire for UFO truth to be exposed? Well, it's because it's fun, you know, that's what it is. So I have a desire for it to be real. I mean, I've talked to a bunch of folks about this. So those with connection with DoD, and they do draw lines between people that are full of shit and people who are not. There's a lot of people in the public sphere that they say are full of shit. Yeah, for sure. And then you have to kind of tell the difference. Yeah, CNN, watch them talk. Well, I mean, on the UFO topic, there's certain individuals that are like, okay, they're just like using this. In fact, like people who are not full of shit are often very quiet, which is why, you know, even Bob Lazar is an interesting story because he was trying to be quiet for the longest time. Well, he was worried about his own life, according to Bob, and that's why he went public with it. And initially, the first videos he did with George Knapp, they hit his identity. Yeah, yeah. And then he felt like that wasn't enough. And he really needed to expose his own identity just to protect his life, which is a great story. You know, so you got to go, well, that seems so juicy. I want to buy into it. And that's where I get nervous. You don't know. You don't know who to trust in this world. Exactly. How do you figure that out? How do you figure out who to trust in your life? You're Joe Rogan. A lot of people want to be close to you. CIA agents, FSB agents, people that want to. I'm friends with a former CIA agent, Mike Baker, who's been on my podcast a bunch of times. Allegedly former. Former. Think about that. He's air quotes, former. Yeah. Yeah, I don't believe he's former. I'm sure he has some connection to him. I also believe he's a good guy, but I gain a lot of very intelligent and well informed insights from him as to how things work. And, you know, I think, yeah, I'm sure he doesn't tell me everything about everything, but he's told me enough where I think I can understand things better from talking to him about how the way, you know, the elves work under the machine. What about friends? How do you know if you can trust? Well, most of my friends are old friends. Time. So time is the thing. Yeah. Like just going through shit together. Yeah. And also people that, you know, first of all, comics. You can trust comics? Yeah. Comics are pretty trustworthy. The good ones, the really good ones. There's not that many of us. If there's a thousand professional comics on earth, I'd be stunned. I'd be stunned. I don't even think there's a thousand like real professionals who you get booked all the time, headline weekends at clubs and theaters and arenas. And then there's levels to that, right? There's like the guys who are middle acts who kind of like barely scraped by and then like how many headliners are there? How many like really funny headliners that I would say, you know, if you Lex, you tell me you're going to be in Cincinnati. Hey, this person's playing at this club. Should I go see them? I'd be like, you know, like how many people would I give the recommendation to? And then how many people sell out theaters? How many people sell out arenas? How many people? There's not that fucking many. So those people like at the levels of comedy where you do, you know, you've been doing stand up for 20 years. There's a certain amount of honesty and a certain amount of understanding of each other that we all have. Oh, so that process of becoming a great comic is like humbling in a way. Like Jiu Jitsu is humbling. Very similar. Like you've eaten so much shit that that somehow, even if you're insane, even if you're chaotic, even in the way, even if you're full of shit, you lie a lot, all those kinds of things, underneath it, there's a good human. You could be surface bullshitter, but on important things, you're trustworthy. Hopefully. I mean, if you're not, then people shy away from you. And there are people like that, too, that are really successful, but that are what I call islands. I've talked to other comics about that, like you don't want to be an island because there's these people that aren't attached to the rest of the community and they're doing well on their own. And usually they have like one opening act they bring with them on the road they've worked with forever and they don't have comedy friends. And those people are miserable because they can't relate. Sometimes fame in itself is isolating. So you have to actually do a lot of work and make sure you don't, it doesn't isolate you. Because if you become successful, people start wanting stuff from you. And then sometimes you want to push them away because of that, as opposed to connect with them. Yeah, I don't enjoy it when people want things from me. It's not fun. You just ignore it. Yeah, it's fucking too heavy. They want too much. And it's too much of a disproportionate relationship. It's too unbalanced. Because there are people where you could tell that they're working toward something. They're working towards an angle and they want to be close to you because you will benefit them. And then there's other people that are just, there's not that many of us. And so we all want to hang out together. Like when I, one of the podcasts I love the most is this podcast I do called Protect Our Parks. It's a thing I do with Ari Shaffir, Shane Gillis and Mark Nolen. It's great. It's so fun because we just get obliterated and we talk so much shit. Like there's conversations after that podcast where I go, hey man, we got to cut that part out because like Shane will go too far or go too crazy. But we're just making each other laugh and it's just fun. And it's like that kind of camaraderie between real comics is very precious to me. My favorite part of that is like the non sequitur stuff from Mark Norman. And you guys get so trashed that you don't even understand what the hell he's talking about. But it's funny to the listener because he's still on point. That guy is sharp. He's so good. Mitch Hedberg quality. Yes. Well, he's such a dedicated comic. He loves comedy so much. That's one of the things I love about him. He's like comedy. He gets excited. He loves it. As does Shane and as does Ari. They really love it. So there's that. Like I have friends in that way and I have martial arts friends who are some of the also the thing about being humbled, how things like Jiu Jitsu will humble you. Martial arts friends, they know who's been through it. They know who really has gone through the gauntlet and emerged on the other end a better person. Well, you said there's very few of us. Let's have the goat discussion. You're not going to pick anybody, but who are the greats of comedy? Who's the greatest comic of all time? I don't think there is a greatest comic of all time. Is it Norm Macdonald? Norm Macdonald was one of the greats for sure. Well, by the way, actually on that topic, what do you think about is I think as a person who is fascinated by the fear of death and death, I think it was a truly genius thing to release a special after you're dead. I don't know how that works. I haven't seen the special of you. Yeah, it's called I think nothing special. Which sounds like something Norm would say. And it's basically him in front of... I mean, I imagine he wouldn't have wanted it edited that way because it's made to look nicer than I think he probably would have preferred it. But it's him in front of the screen like in a Zoom call doing jokes without cold. Really? Yeah. And somehow given his like dry, dark humor, it works. Because it's almost making fun of itself. Almost making fun of that hole that we were stuck alone inside. And because he's still acting as if he's in front of the audience and is almost making fun of the fact that this is what we're forced to do. I mean, it's quite genius. It's really well... And the jokes are really good. But it also makes you realize how important laughter is from the audience, the energy from the audience. But there's also an intimacy because it's just you and him because you're listening into it, there's no audience. So that's, I don't know, I think it's quite genius. And he is, of course, there's certain comics that are like, not only are they funny, but they're truly unique. And they're not in terms of friendship and all that kind of stuff, but in terms of comedy, they're an island. It's like they, you know, Mitch Hedberg probably is that. Of course, a lot of people then start to imitate them and so on. Stephen Wright. Stephen Wright. I mean, there's like people who are like, you know, Dave Chappelle, who's like probably one of the greats, but he's just like raw funny. I don't know if he's an island. He's just raw. Yeah, I know what you're saying. An outlier, a unique individual. Yeah, he's just great. Norm was definitely unique in his greatness. There's only one Norm, you know, who's got a very specific style. Is there a reason you guys weren't, it doesn't seem like he was, you guys were close. I mean, I loved him. He was great. I always enjoyed talking to him. We just didn't work together that often. We weren't around each other that often. That's all it was, but it wasn't like, it was, I loved him though. He was a great guy. I had a funny story about it, Norm. Twice, just randomly, I was on airplanes next to him. Seated right next to him. Just totally random. Yeah, and one time we're on this airplane and we're having this talk and I was like, yeah, I quit smoking. I was smoking a lot and I just had terrible, terrible smoke. It's terrible for you. And we have this great conversation. We get off the plane and he sprints towards a store and buys cigarettes like in the airport and is lighting it on the way out the door. And I go, I thought you quit smoking. It was, yeah, I did. But all that talking about smoking made me want to smoke again. So before he's getting through the door of the airport, he's lighting it up. I can't wait. He can't wait to get that cigarette in him. It was, he was just so crazy and impulsive and loved to gamble. He loved gambling. And in that way, he embodied the joke. You can't even tell that certain people just live in a non sequitur, ridiculous, absurd, funny way. Yeah, that was him. Nonstop. There was nothing artificial about Norm. That was who he was. His brilliance was his essence. That was who he was. But in terms of the greats, the godfather of it all is Lenny Bruce. I mean, I have a bunch of Lenny Bruce concert posters at my house and photos that I have framed and Whitney Cummings actually gave me this brilliant photo of him when he got arrested for one of the times when he got arrested for saying obscene jokes. He was the most important figure in the early days of comedy because he essentially gave birth to the modern art form of standup comedy. Before that, it was a bunch of guys that were like hosting shows and they would tell jokes. They were just like, you know, two guys walking to a bar, that kind of stuff. And he would talk about social issues. You know, he would talk about life. He would talk about language. He would talk about laws. And it was just he was the very first guy who did modern standup. And what's fascinating is if you go and you try to watch it, if you try to watch Lenny Bruce today, it doesn't work because society has evolved. Like in many ways, art is a window, especially like pop culture or modern, you know, at the time, culture, art, art that discusses culture is a window into that time period. It's a little bit of a time machine. So you get to like, you have to put yourself like, what was it like to be in 1963? Like, what was he in 1963? What was this like to hear him say this? And the civilization that existed in 1963, although it looked pretty similar, they're all driving cars and they're all wearing suits and they're all it seems normal. That's a it's a different world. And the things that he was saying that are so taboo are so normal today that they're not shocking. And it's not not that good. It's not that funny. Yeah, you have to do the same kind of stuff for like there's a D.H. Lawrence has a book called Lady Chatterley's Lover. And I know it sounds ridiculous, but it was one of the early books, I believe, at the over a century ago that was very controversial for its sexual content. It's sort of one of the great books because it dared to actually talk about a woman cheating on her husband and like and do so in the highest form. And the same thing with Gulag Archipelago talking about talking about some of the darkest aspects of human history right when all of that stuff is forbidden, when it's banned. Because now it's like not, you know, yes, we all know this history. But when in the middle of it, when you're risking your own life, when you're risking your book being banned or burned or you being in prison, that's when it matters, like taking that risk. Yeah. And no one took that risk more than Lenny Bruce. Lenny Bruce was arrested many, many times. And ultimately, it wound up costing him his life. I mean, he died on the bathroom floor shooting heroin and trying to cope with all the lawsuits that he was going through. This guy was constantly being arrested and constantly going through lawsuits. And then his comedy deteriorated horribly. There's some footage of him towards the end of his career where he's essentially would go on stage with legal papers and read from the legal papers about his case. From then, it's Richard Pryor. From him, then the next great is Richard Pryor. And he had the most profound impact on me when I was a kid. When I was 15 years old, my parents took me to see Live at the Sunset Strip, which is Richard Pryor's concert film. And I remember very distinctly being in that audience and laughing and looking around at all the people in the audience who were like falling out of their chairs, just dying, laughing, just swaying back and forth. And I was laughing hard, too. And I was like, my God, this guy is doing this just by talking. And I thought of all the great movies that I'd seen that I love that were hilarious comedy movies. And I was like, nothing that I've ever seen is as funny as this. And all he's doing is talking. And that planted a seed in my head for my love of stand up comedy and my curiosity about the art form. And that's what got me interested in watching it on television and then ultimately going to open mic nights and then eventually doing it. I've actually been going to open mics a lot recently, just listening. For psychological examinations of people. No, it's actually really inspiring to me to see people that somewhere in the world some are funny, some are not so funny, unapologetically trying, putting it all out there night after night, like eating shit. My favorite is when you're talking about five people in the audience and the jokes are just not landing. And they still, I don't know, it feels like even just empathetically, there's few things as difficult as that. It's hard. I still remember those days, many comics will say this, and I think Dane Cook was the first person I heard say it publicly, that if he ever had to go back and do it again, like from scratch, doesn't think he could do it. Doesn't think he could endure the struggle of open mic to ultimately to success. And the numbers of people that try it and fail versus try and succeed are off the charts. I don't know if there's any other art form that has such a low rate of success. Because it's psychological, it's torture. It is torture, and it's also not something you can learn. Like, here's the thing, like, if you play guitar, you can learn to play guitar. Someone can teach you the chords, and if you do it, you could do all along the watchtower, you could play it. You can't teach someone how to do comedy. You think it's you're funny or not? You think it's you're funny or not, or can you still figure it out? Like, can you still learn? You can figure it out, yeah. Can you start being unfunny and become funny? Yes, it's possible. It's not easy, though. You're gonna have to eat a lot of shit. You're gonna have to eat a lot of shit, and you're gonna have to examine why you're not funny, and you're gonna have to spend a lot of time with uncomfortable thoughts and try to figure out what it is. Like, what's missing? Like, you know, could you edit your stuff and make it better? Maybe you need to do drugs. Maybe you need to get involved in psychedelic drugs and rethink the way you interface with reality itself. Maybe you need your heart broken. Maybe you need to be in love. Maybe there's a lot of maybes there. Like, maybe you just need more life experience. But, you know, when I started comedy, I was 21, and I was a moron. I had no information, you know? I could do impressions of people, and I could talk about sex. Those are the things that I was interested in back then. I mean, if I was talking philosophically, I didn't have a philosophy. I didn't have a unique perspective on life. I hadn't experienced much. So, every time you bomb, it forces you to introspect, to ask questions of yourself, and then that's how you actually develop a philosophy of what you actually believe. You learn through doing, and I think you could say that about podcasting, too. You know, I'm certainly way better at having conversations than I ever was when I first started doing comedy. Or, excuse me, when I first started doing podcasts. You learn through it. You should stick with it, kid. Because one day, you'll be able to interview Donald Trump. You'd be mad enough to handle that conversation. How hard is it to do? Because I've been really curious. It's been on my bucket list because I'm terrified. I want to do everything I'm terrified of. Do you want to do stand up? No. But I do want to do, like, one five minute, like, open mic. Why don't you do Kill Tony? How hard is it to do five minutes, would you say? It's hard. Well, it depends on, you know, how long you've been thinking about doing comedy. It depends on how you look at things. And also depends on your style of comedy. Like, the most difficult style of comedy is, like, I think, like, Stephen Wright style is probably the most difficult style of comedy. Complete non sequiturs. One subject doesn't lead into the next. There's no flow to it. It's just, oh, I noticed this. I noticed that. And then there's this. And then there's that. And that's hard to memorize. And it's really hard to piece together an hour of non sequiturs. But it's easier because you can rely on the joke. It sits more with the joke. Like, whether you're funny or not is on the actual material versus, like, the timing and the energy of the dance with the audience, right? Because, like, if you don't have the raw jokes like Stephen Wright does or Mitch Hedberg, then you have to, it's all about the delivery. Yeah. And, yeah, they either kill or they bomb. Is it random? Like, whether they kill or bomb? Yeah. Well, I mean, you're essentially a different person every day of your life. You know, you're similar. But you're more tired. You're more rested. You're exhausted. You're refreshed. You have vitamins and food nourishment in your system.

本集資源與出處