第 360 期·中文精讀

蒂姆·厄本:部落主義、馬克思主義、自由主義、社會正義與政治

Tim Urban: Tribalism, Marxism, Liberalism, Social Justice, and Politics

科普寫作者談部落主義、馬克思主義、自由主義與社會正義,剖析當下政治對立的心理根源。

官方音訊00:00 / --:--
中文精讀由 AI 基於原始訪談改寫,非官方翻譯,可能存在偏差或錯誤;表述以原音訊與官方文稿為準。說明

把人類歷史攤成一本一千頁的書,每一頁寫二百五十年,會看到什麼?

蒂姆·厄本(Tim Urban)在新書《What's Our Problem: A Self-Help Book for Societies》裡畫了這張圖。結果是前九百五十頁幾乎一片空白。狩獵採集者在大草原上晃悠,偶爾學會用火,偶爾造出弓箭,然後又是幾百頁的安靜。

有記錄的歷史從第 976 頁才開始。羅馬、文藝復興、工業革命、兩次世界大戰、登月、網際網路,全部擠在最後二十五頁裡。我們身處的 21 世紀,差不多就是這本書末尾最後幾行字。

蒂姆在 Lex Fridman 播客第 360 期講起這個比喻,語氣裡帶著一種孩子氣的較真:

我們總覺得公元后這兩千年很漫長,羅馬帝國是兩千年前的事,好像已經很久很久了。可人類歷史已經走了兩千多個世紀,這個尺度很難塞進腦子裡。(蒂姆·厄本)

時間跨度本身還好,真正讓他放不下的是那本書裡活過的那些人。

他們和我們一樣會愛上誰,會嫉妒,會和朋友鬧翻,會在夜裡害怕。他們有意識,有感官,有想象,會編故事,會對著星空發呆。他們唯一缺的東西,是我們腳下這座知識高塔。

熱水澡是歷史上極少數人才享受過的東西

我們習慣了自己出生在一座知識高塔的頂端。地球是顆球,繞著太陽轉;人是從動物演化來的;人終有一死。這些事對我們像空氣一樣自然,對幾百年前的人卻是足以顛覆一生的發現。

蒂姆說,古人根本不知道自己在經歷什麼。黑死病在十四世紀橫掃歐洲,人們認定那是上帝的懲罰。他們想不到,罪魁禍首藏在跳蚤身上,是一種叫細菌的微小生物。病因、傳播路徑、應對辦法,全是一片空白。既然完全不知道發生了什麼,把災難歸因於神發怒就成了最合理的解釋。換到今天任何一個人,站在同樣的資訊條件下,也會得出同樣的結論。

他描述這件事時用的角度很奇特:

最瘋狂的地方在於,這些人跟我們是一模一樣的靈長類動物。某種程度上我知道當他們會是什麼感覺,因為我也是人。可他們那種生活,幾乎不是這個物種經歷過的那種生活。(蒂姆·厄本)

他舉的例子是熱水澡。

這東西大概一百年前才普及。喬治·華盛頓一輩子沒洗過一次熱水澡,他洗冷水,或者讓人把水燒熱倒進木盆。絕大多數人終其一生沒體驗過那種感受:一個受控的小隔間,下著熱雨,水從頭頂澆下來,你走出去,地板是乾的,水不流到房間其他地方。洗澡這件事被關進了一個盒子裡,不弄溼別的東西。

還有下水道。城市之所以聞起來不像糞坑,是因為有一套系統把汙穢悄無聲息地運走,從我們所有感官裡徹底消失。這件事在古代幾乎不存在。加上老鼠,加上蟑螂,加上瘟疫,加上生病了沒有藥只能疼著熬著,加上不知道病是什麼。

下面這段是蒂姆的原話,把三層東西疊在了一起:

他們還會得更多病,得了病又沒有治療手段,所以往往就死了,或者承受巨大的痛苦。而且他們根本不知道那是什麼病,不知道微生物這回事。(蒂姆·厄本)

採訪裡 Lex 說了一句很實在的話:這一切聽起來很浪漫,可如果真把人扔回幾千年前,大概幾個月就適應了,然後又開始覺得不滿。人的尺度會自動校準,這是天性。

蒂姆接過話頭,講了他在感恩這件事上的一個模型。這個模型比它看起來要重要得多,因為後面幾乎所有關於政治的討論,都從它長出來。

每個人腦子裡都有一個從 1 到 10 的刻度盤

Lex 問,感恩能不能主動控制。

蒂姆的回答是能,他把它拆成兩層。第一層是個人。

他給了一個刻度的比喻。每個人腦子裡都有一個從 1 到 10 的刻度盤。

到 10 是什麼感覺?你低頭看著腳下那座由東西堆起來的山,滿心都是"我太幸運了"。那是一種接近狂喜的體驗,能讓人真的快樂起來。它讓你去品嚐你已經擁有的東西,那是一件很划算的事。

到 6 或 7,你偶爾會這麼想。更多時候眼睛往上抬,盯著你沒有的東西、別人有而你沒有的東西、你以為自己會得到卻落空的東西。蒂姆說,往這個方向看,長出來的可以是嫉妒,可以是渴望;如果你看向的是過去,那就變成怨恨。

到 1,你成了一個徹底的受害者。兄弟姐妹對不起你,父母對不起你,社會對不起你,伴侶對不起你。你沉溺在"我本該有的"和"發生在我身上的壞事"裡。那是一個很不健康的精神位置。

任何人都可以走到那個地方去。你可以列出一份望不到頭的清單,說明自己受了多少委屈;也可以列出一份同樣長的清單,說明自己該感激多少東西。(蒂姆·厄本)

他還補了一句很關鍵的觀察。翻哪一份清單,取決於習慣,也取決於你怎麼被養大。

這裡有個更容易理解的例子。嬰兒紙尿褲的廣告永遠在拍柔軟的棉布、微笑的媽媽、安靜的午後。為什麼有效?因為它賣的東西跟紙尿褲關係不大,它賣的是"你的生活會好起來"這個承諾。人腦對"我擁有的"和"我缺的"這兩條線路的敏感度並不對稱,缺的那條天生更響。刻度盤之所以需要主動去撥,就是因為重力預設把它往下拉。

這個模型有意思的地方在於,它能被放大。一個家庭、一個部落、一個國家,也會集體撥動這個旋鈕。

德國在兩次大戰之間,集體把旋鈕擰到了 1

蒂姆認為,納粹德國裡發生的很多事,可以用一種社會性的嫉妒和怨恨來解釋。敘事在人群裡傳播,滲進每個人的腦袋,把整個國家的刻度盤從"感激一切"推到"怨恨一切"。屈辱感需要出口,出口被指給了某一群人。這個機制不需要每個德國人都變壞,它只需要足夠多的人相信自己是受害者。

所以他不滿足於只描述個人心態,他要問的是:一個社會怎麼才能不掉進那個"1"裡?

他講到影響一個人的東西有兩層。一層是自己腦子裡的狀態,另一層是周圍的文化。周圍的文化像一圈圈同心圓,最裡圈是你身邊的人。如果這群人習慣談感激,你就被這種語氣包住,跟外面的大氣候隔開一層。麻煩在於很多時候每一圈都在說同一件事,身邊的人這麼想,社群這麼想,整個國家也這麼想。

一個社會里最響的那種情緒,會慢慢變成那個社會的預設設定。

愛國是感恩,排外是怨恨

順著旋鈕往下講,蒂姆做了一個區分,值得慢一點讀。

他認為美國語境裡的愛國主義,如果把排外那個分支剝掉,本身是好事。原因在於愛國主義的底子是一份感激之情。

一個美國人說"我們住在全世界最好的國家",其他國家的聽眾往往不愛聽。蒂姆覺得,這句話翻譯過來,其實是"我很感激這個國家給我的一切,以及它為這個世界做過的事"。

他舉了個反例。如果換成菲律賓人說"菲律賓是全世界最好的國家",美國人不會覺得這是沙文主義,反而會覺得很好、很酷。同一句話,換個人說就順耳了。聽完的人感受到的東西不一樣:前者像在說"我比你強",後者像在說"我愛我自己的地方"。

愛國主義是一種團結的感覺,也帶著一種隱含的感激。可這個東西很快會滑向排外的民族主義,所以你得確保它別從懸崖上掉下去。(蒂姆·厄本)

他在書裡用"高度執行的進步主義"和"高度執行的保守主義"對應愛國主義的兩種寫法。一種愛的是這個國家代表的那套傳統,一種愛的是推動這個國家往前走的那些人。這兩條路從智識上都站得住,都是同一份愛的不同表達。

分界線在愛的方向。同一份愛,一旦滑到"我們最好,所以你們不好",就變成了排外;一旦滑到"我們受夠了委屈,都是他們害的",就變成了怨恨。前者看向外面,後者看向過去。兩個都是刻度盤被擰錯了位置。

這也是他那本書整個框架的起點。他要診斷的是整個社會腦子裡那個刻度盤被誰撥到了哪個位置,具體的政治立場反倒不在射程裡。這個取向讓書在當下的輿論環境裡顯得很不合群,因為它不提供站隊的位置。

如果成吉思汗沒出生,蒙古人還是會往外衝

Lex 把話題轉向書裡的另一張圖。歷史被切成一個個二百五十年的方格,每格放一個代表人物。

從甘地、莎士比亞、聖女貞德、成吉思汗、查理曼、穆罕默德、君士坦丁、耶穌、克利奧帕特拉、亞里士多德,一直到佛陀。最後十一頁,大約兩千七百五十年。Lex 挑了個刺:放甘地不放希特勒,讀者大概要吵起來。

蒂姆說,最讓他震動的是這些人都是活生生的"人"。

佛陀是個男人,他有過胳膊、腿和手指甲,他咬過指甲,他有喜歡的食物,可能有時候消化不好,他被劃傷會疼。(蒂姆·厄本)

耶穌也曾經是胎兒,是學走路的傻嬰兒,會因為什麼不順心發起脾氣。蒂姆開玩笑說,佛陀大概從沒發過脾氣,畢竟神話裡的他不一樣。

成吉思汗更狠。他本來是蒙古草原上一個極窮的放牧少年,被掠為奴隸,十幾歲時和母親、兄弟靠抓老鼠過活。放在當時的視角看,他不過是十三世紀蒙古成千上萬個少年裡的一個。他本可以像另外幾萬人那樣一生默默無聞,被歷史的塵土徹底埋掉。

結果他打穿了歐亞大陸。蒂姆半開玩笑地跟 Lex 說,你和我今天能有這樣的關係,說不定得謝他。

問題於是來了:歷史的方向,到底是被少數幾個人推著走的,還是他們只是恰好在正確的時間、正確的位置,站上了那股更早就在湧動的浪潮?

蒂姆的答案是兩邊都成立,但他緊接著說了一句更有分量的話:

有些時候,你完全可以把這個人從地球上摘掉,事情還是會照樣發生。(蒂姆·厄本)

他把成吉思汗當成這類例子。當時中國文明的特定形態,加上特定的氣候,對蒙古形成了一種壓力。他們的騎射優勢、他們的馬匹、他們的組織方式,全都擺在那裡。就算沒有鐵木真這個人,蒙古人遲早也會往外衝,區別只在於能走多遠、規模有多大。

這類人像是被浪頭捲上去的,看起來是他帶著浪走,其實是浪把他託到了那個高度。

希特勒又屬於另一種情況。蒂姆的判斷更偏向"如果沒有他,事情很可能不會發生"。前提條件當然得齊:德國得有一戰之後那股深到骨子裡的屈辱,得有大蕭條,得有一整套讓民怨有地方去的社會環境。可這些條件湊齊了,也未必會湊出一個人來把每個條件都用上。

他那句評價挺狠。一個脾氣暴躁、被藝術學校拒之門外的落魄畫家,在畫室裡掀桌子、打老婆、當個徹頭徹尾的失敗者,本來大機率就是個無名之輩。放到另一條時間線上,他可能把那股演講天賦用在別的地方,也可能爛在某個小酒館裡。天賦在那裡擺著,用在哪,是另一回事。

所以問題不該被簡化成兩種答案。歷史在有些節點上確實由個人決定,在另一些節點上確實由浪潮決定。它更像兩股力量恰好對上了一個介面。有時候是介面等來了人,有時候是人趕上了介面。哪個成分更多,只能一個案例一個案例地算。

他順手把威廉一世也拉進來。有些人靠著手裡一支更好的軍隊、恰好在某個時刻趕上對面出現弱點,就這麼跨過去,然後把基因播撒得到處都是。幾百年後你看到某個地區的面孔有某種共同特徵,那可能真就是這一小撮人的分佈留下的印子。

幾家平臺在同一天拉下同一根閘

Lex 把這個問題拉回現在。如果歷史上個人的作用這麼難判斷,那今天呢?社交媒體那幾個關鍵人物,算不算在擰動歷史的方向盤?

他數了幾個人:馬克·扎克伯格,MySpace 的湯姆,拉里·佩奇,傑克·多爾西,還有現在的埃隆·馬斯克。

MySpace 的湯姆成了一個梗。網友說他才是社交媒體史上最成功的案例:沒有演算法干預,大家都很開心,很正面,然後他把公司賣了,拿了幾百萬美元走人,現在照片還在微笑。蒂姆順口補了一句,湯姆可能正過著一種很舒服的生活,不用面對扎克伯格現在那堆噩夢。

但真正的問題在於:這些人究竟在塑造時代,還是被時代裹著走?

蒂姆給了一個區分,這大概是這期訪談裡最有用的一個定義:

所謂領導力,是把事情推向文化力量本來不會去的方向。很多時候一個人看起來像領袖,只是因為他正好踩上了那波文化浪潮,然後衝到了浪尖上。(蒂姆·厄本)

按這個標準,扎克伯格算不算領袖?他確實做過很多真正的領導動作,把一個宿舍裡的小網站推成全球基礎設施級別的存在。

同時蒂姆點出了一個耐人尋味的細節。幾家平臺在同一天把特朗普的賬號封了。

同一天。相隔一週都算多,何況是同一個季度。這說明背後有一股更大的力量在同時推動他們,讓他們做出一致反應。那股力量不屬於任何一個人,也不屬於任何一家公司。如果那股力量真的存在,這些人的個人意志就沒那麼重要了。

所以他給了 Elon 一個正面的例子。SpaceX 和特斯拉,在他看來屬於真正改變了浪潮形狀的那種領導。當然有人會說電動車早晚會來,可證據不太支援這個說法,至少不支援它在那個時間點來。如果人類最終真的登上火星,那 Elon 在那件事上的作用就更難被歸到浪潮頭上。

至於扎克伯格,就得看元宇宙了。蒂姆承認自己在這件事上判斷錯過。

那種"我按了個鍵,螢幕上的東西動了"的感覺

他講了一段很具體的經歷。他去參加 Facebook 的一場大會,試了當時所有的 Oculus 新品。那次他本來想寫一篇長文,後來被這本書吞掉了。

他本來會寫錯。因為他當時的判斷是:這東西有點像當年的任天堂。

我第一次按下一個鍵,螢幕上的馬里奧跳了起來,我說,我能讓螢幕裡的東西動。那種感覺,和我第一次看見別人教我用電子郵件時一模一樣。(蒂姆·厄本)

按下回車,對方那邊的東西真的發生了。他說,當你產生這種感受的時候,往往意味著你正在目睹一次正規化轉移。那種體感很難描述,它帶著一種近乎本能的興奮,像有人在你的認知邊界上開了個口子。

十幾年過去,他還在等那個革命。頭顯還是又大又沉,有些體驗讓人反胃,價格也沒低到能隨手買一個。那個"一百美元、簡單、傻瓜式、但真的能給你那種體驗"的頭顯還沒出現。

他說,這東西可能還在等一個對的人。一個像卡馬克那樣的人,把它做得像 iPhone 一樣簡單。然後上面會出現一個殺手級應用,一旦火了,就是通往另一個世界的入口。

這裡有個細節挺有意思。真正讓個人電腦走進普通人生活的,是圖形介面。Windows 95 之前,大家還在敲命令列。突然之間"視窗"這個概念出現了,你把東西拖進去,雙擊一個圖示,它就開啟。現在看這太理所當然了,可當時它是革命性的,因為它讓機器變得直觀。

技術的每一次真正普及,靠的都是門檻被降到普通人願意邁進去的高度。引數變強只是必要條件,從來不是那個開關。VR 卡住的地方就在這裡,它的強度早夠了,缺的是門檻被降下來的那個時刻。

好的在指數級變好,壞的也在指數級變壞

訪談的後半段,蒂姆把話頭拉回他那本書最重的那個論點。

他先講了一個觀察到的趨勢。每一個世紀都在變好。按人均 GDP 算,按預期壽命算,按貧困率算,按疾病控制算,二十世紀是人類歷史上最好的一百年。二十一世紀到目前為止,這個勢頭還在。

然後他講了另一半。技術帶來更好的時代,也帶來更壞的時代。嚇人的地方在這裡:

如果好的和壞的都在指數級增長,那好時代變得多好都無所謂。只要壞的那一邊到了一定的量級,一切就都完了。(蒂姆·厄本)

Lex 追問,這個"壞會贏"的推斷是不是被誤解了。蒂姆說,恰恰不能這麼看。

他把這個結構講得很清楚。指數曲線看起來像一條貼地的平線,慢到你幾乎察覺不到它在動。然後它在一個很短的時間裡陡然豎起來。人類過去幾百年一直待在這條曲線比較平緩的那段,於是養成了一種直覺:進步是漸進的,危機是能被消化的,最壞的情況總能兜住。

一旦好的和壞的同時進入陡峭段,這個直覺就失效了。指數曲線不會因為你有善意就拐彎。

他在這裡用了一個說法,把技術比喻成一種能力放大器。一個能讓人多活三十年的工具,同時也是一個能把破壞力放大三十倍的工具。中間沒有任何機制會自動幫你把方向掰正,方向是人給的。

這就是他那本書叫"給社會的自助書"的原因。他把一個社會當成一個人來看。這個人有沒有自我覺察,有沒有情緒調節能力,能不能在看到自己錯的時候承認。心理治療裡有個基本判斷:一個人能不能變好,很多時候不取決於他的問題有多嚴重,取決於他願不願意說"我可能錯了"。社會也一樣,只是這個過程被拉長到幾代人的長度。

一個失去了"我可能錯了"的社會,站在哪邊都很危險

今天的社交媒體、身份政治、部落對立,在蒂姆看來都在削弱這種自我修正的能力。人被推到某個立場上,然後被同溫層不斷加固,最後失去的是"我可能錯了"這個念頭。

一個失去了"我可能錯了"的社會,不管它站在哪一邊,都很危險。因為站錯的時候它沒有能力回頭,而指數曲線不會給它多少試錯的時間。

他在訪談裡反覆用"高執行"和"低執行"這兩個詞。高度執行的社會,內部也有激烈爭論,但爭論朝著解決問題的方向走。低執行的社會,爭論變成站隊,變成"你是誰"的問題,不再討論"什麼是對的"。前者能自我修正,後者只會越陷越深。

這套框架的聰明之處在於,它不預設哪一邊是對的。它只問一個問題:這個系統還有沒有能力發現自己錯了,然後改過來?

把這個標準套到自己身上,會有點不舒服。因為大部分人評判一場爭論,看的是誰贏了,很少看這場爭論有沒有讓任何一方改變過看法。一場沒人改變看法的爭論,無論誰佔了上風,都是一次空轉。

回到那本一千頁的書。前九百五十頁一片空白,最後二十五頁突然擠滿了東西。這個形狀本身就說明一件事:人類剛剛進入那條曲線的陡峭段,還帶著一條平緩路段的舊直覺。我們以為時間是夠的,以為自己會慢慢適應,以為犯錯的代價可以像過去那樣被攤薄。這些直覺在陡峭段裡全部失效。

蒂姆整期訪談其實一直在做同一件事,把宏大的歷史敘事拆成人可以操作的小單位。從一千頁的人類史,到每個人腦子裡那個從 1 到 10 的刻度盤,到"我可能錯了"這個念頭。這三樣東西之間是有連線的。刻度盤撥到哪,決定了你怎麼看別人;你怎麼看別人,決定了你的社會還能不能自我修正;社會能不能自我修正,決定了那條曲線最後停在哪個高度。

可以帶走的東西

  • 每天有意識地檢查一次自己的刻度盤。今天我是低頭看著自己有的東西,還是抬頭盯著自己沒有的東西?這個動作只要幾秒鐘,它能決定你一整天的底色。
  • 跟人爭論之前先問自己一句:這件事我是想要一個答案,還是想要贏?想要答案的時候你聽得進對方的話,想要贏的時候你只是在找一個更好的反駁。
  • 給"我可能錯了"留一個具體的入口。每當你在某個話題上情緒特別強烈,就把它當成訊號,說明那裡可能有你還沒看到的證據。
  • 把注意力從"誰是壞人"挪到"這個系統哪裡出了問題"。前者讓你站隊,後者讓你動手。
  • 對技術保持雙面預期,既相信好的那一邊會更好,也承認壞的那一邊同樣在加速。雙面預期會讓你對風險更敏感,而不會更麻木。
  • 身邊如果有幾個人能讓你說出"我可能錯了"而不用害怕,好好珍惜他們。那是一個高度執行的小環境,比任何資訊源都珍貴。

蒂姆在訪談裡表達過一個意思:歷史由無數個介面上的具體判斷累積而成,每個介面都很小,但加起來的方向是真實的。

你腦子裡那個刻度盤,就是其中一個介面。

文稿由本站用語音識別模型(基於官方釋出音訊)機器轉寫,可能有識別錯誤,人名與數字請以音訊為準。
Lex Fridman Podcast #360 – Tim Urban: Tribalism, Marxism, Liberalism, Social Justice, and Politics Machine transcription by Qwen3-ASR 0.6B (MLX, local, Apache-2.0). May contain recognition errors. The following is a conversation with Tim Urban, his second time on the podcast. He's the author and illustrator of the amazing blog called "Wait, but why," and is the author of a new book coming out tomorrow called "What's Our Problem: A Self-Help Book for Societies." We talk a lot about this book in this podcast, but you really do need to get it and experience it for yourself. It is a fearless, insightful, hilarious, and I think important book in this divisive time that we live in. The Kindle version, the audiobook, and the web version should be all available on date of publication. I should also mention that my face might be a bit more beat up than usual. I got hit in the chin pretty good since I've been getting back into training jujitsu, a sport I love very much after recovering from an injury. So if you see marks on my face during these interludes of conversations, you know that my life is in a pretty good place. And now a quick few second mention of each sponsor. Check them out in the description. It's the best way to support this podcast. We got House of Macadamias for healthy snacks. Indeed for hiring excellent teams and Athletic Greens for health. Jews, wise and my friends. Also, if you want to work with our amazing team, we're always hiring. Go to lexfreeman dot com slash hiring. And now onto the full ad reads. As always, no ads in the middle. I try to make this interesting, but if you must skip them, please do check out our sponsors. I enjoy their stuff. Maybe you will too. This show is brought to you by a sponsor that brings a smile to my face: House of Macadamias, a company that ships delicious, high quality and healthy macadamia nuts directly to your door. The snacks that these guys make are delicious, and they're in small portion. I can share it with guests, I can share it with friends when they come over, and I feel like a normal adult. I feel like an adult because an adult can moderate their intake of snacks. I need my snacks portion perfectly because otherwise, if you have like a giant jar of like macadamia nuts, they're too delicious, they're too good. So the fact that they're segmented perfectly for you is really nice. Whether it's bars or whole nuts, it's a variety of deliciousness that brings joy to my life and and I really love it. Go to house of macadamias dot com slash lex to get twenty percent off your order for every order, not just the first. You the listener will also get four ounce bag of macadamias when you order three or more boxes of any macadamia product. That's house of macadamias dot com slash lex. This show is also brought to you by Indeed, a hiring website. Like I mentioned, we're hiring, and you should be using the best tools for the job when you do that because friends, there is nothing more important than the people you surround yourself with. And I am going to go bro science for a second and pull out a random statistic. I remember reading an article yesterday about the amount of time that an average American spends in their workplace across different roles and positions and industries and so on. I don't remember what the number is, but it was tremendous. It was huge. So like those hours are really important. It's really important not just for the productivity and the success of a company, but just for your happiness, for your fulfillment. And so to me, that's what hiring is. It's like building up a team of awesome people that make each other better. And you should use the best tools for the job. I certainly use Indeed. It's amazing. Indeed knows when you are growing your own business. Every dollar counts. That's why with Indeed, you only pay for quality applications that match your job requirements. Visit indeed dot com slash lex to style hiring now. That's indeed dot com slash lex. Terms and conditions apply. This show is also brought to you by Athletic Greens and is AG One Drink, which is an all in one daily drink to support better health and peak performance. It replaced a multivitamin for me. It replaced so much for me, and it gave me so much. In fact, right after I am done saying the words I am saying now, I am walking over to the fridge, which is where I made an AG One Drink that's now cold. I am going to open the container and I am going to consume the deliciousness, knowing that my nutritional basis is taken care of. There are certain things in life that if you take care of them, they give you the freedom to take on anything in any way you want. Just knowing that when I take care of the quote unquote adult stuff, I am free to be a child basically, which is to explore the world, to follow my curiosity, to take big risks, to be fearless but also to be joyful. All of that. And to me, it's kind of the nutrition side of that is Athletic Greens help me with that. I also take electrolytes that really helps and fish oil as well. But that's pretty much about it. Oh yeah, drink a lot of water, of course. Anyway, they'll give you one month supply of fish oil when you sign up at athleticgreens dot com slash lex. This is the lex Friedman podcast to support it. Please check out our sponsors in the description. And now, dear friends, here is Tim Urban. You wrote an incredible book called "What's Our Problem: A Self-Help Book for Societies." In the beginning, you present this view of human history as a thousand page book, where each page is two hundred and fifty years, and it's a brilliant visualization because almost nothing happens for most of it. So what blows your mind most about that visualization when you just sit back and think about it? It's a boring book. So nine hundred and fifty pages, ninety five percent of the book, hunter gatherers kind of doing their thing. I am sure there is you know there is some there is obviously some major cognitive and advancements along the way and language. And I am sure you know the bow and arrow comes around at some point. You know so tiny things, but it's like okay now a four hundred pages till the next thing. But then you get to page nine fifty and things start moving. Recorded history starts at nine seventy six. Right, right. So basically the bottom row is when anything interesting happens. There is a bunch of agriculture for a while before we know anything about it, and then recorded history starts. Yeah, twenty five pages of actual like recorded history. So when we think of prehistoric, we're talking about pages one through nine seventy five of the book, and then history is page you know nine seventy six to one thousand. If you were reading the book, it would be like epilogue AD. You know the last little ten pages of the book, and we think of AD is super long, right two thousand years. The Roman Empire two thousand years ago, like that's so long. Human history has been going on for over two thousand centuries. Like that is, it's just it's hard to wrap your head around. And this is, I mean, even that's just the end of a very long road. Like you know, one hundred thousand years before that, it's not like you know, it's not like that was that different. So it's just there is been people like us that have emotions like us that have physical sensations like us. For for so so long, and who who are they all, and what was their life like? And it's you know, I think we have no idea what it was like to be them. The the thing that's craziest about the people of the far past is not just that they had different lives, they had different fears, they had different dangers and different responsibilities, and they lived in tribes and everything, but they didn't know anything. Like we just take it for granted that we're born on top of this tower of knowledge, and from the very beginning we we know that the earth is a ball floating in space, and we know that we're going to die one day, and we know that you know we evolved from animals and all the those were all like incredible you know epiphanies quite recently and the people a long time ago they just had no idea what was going on and like I am kind of jealous because I feel like it I mean it might have been scary to not know what's going on but it also I feel like would be you'd have a sense of awe and wonder all the time and and you don't know what's going to happen next and once you learn you are kind of like oh that's like it's a little grim but they probably had the same capacity for consciousness to experience the world to wander about the world maybe to construct narratives about the world and myths and so on. They just had less grounded systematic facts to play with. They still probably felt the narratives the myths they constructed as intensely as we do. Oh yeah, they also fell in love. They also had friends and they had falling outs with friends. Didn't shower much though. No, they did not smell nice. Maybe they did. Maybe beauty's in the eye of the beholder. Yeah, maybe it's all like relative. How many people in history have experienced a hot shower? Like almost none. That's like when were hot showers invented one hundred years ago. Like less, so like George Washington never had a hot shower. It's like it's just kind of weird. Like he he took cold showers all the time or like. And again, we just take this for granted, but that's like an unbelievable life experience to have a rain a controlled little booth where rains hot water on your head and then you get out and it's not everywhere it's like contained. That was like you know they a lot of people probably lived and died with never experiencing hot water. Maybe they they had a way to heat water over a fire, but like then it's I don't know it's just like there is so many things about our lives now that are complete just total anomaly. It makes you wonder like what is the thing they would notice the most. I mean the sewer system like it doesn't smell in cities. Incredible. What does a sewer system do? I mean, it gets rid of waste efficiently, such that we don't have to confront it both with our with any of our senses, and that's probably wasn't there. I mean, what else? Plus all the medical stuff associated with. Yeah, I mean, how about the disease? Yeah, how about the the cockroaches and the rats and the and the disease and the the the plagues and you know and and then when they got so they they caught more diseases but then when they caught the disease they also didn't have treatment for it so they often would die or they would just be in a huge amount of pain. They also didn't know what the disease was. They don't know about microbes. That was this new thing the idea that these tiny little animals that are causing these diseases. So what did they think you know in the the bubonic plague you know in the the Black Death the thirteen hundreds people thought that it was an act of God because you know God's angry at us because why would you know why would you not think that if if you didn't know what it was. And so the crazy thing is that these were the same primates. So I do know something about them. I know in in some sense what it's like to be them because I am a human as well and to know that this particular primate that I know what it's like to be experienced such different things. It's and and like this isn't our life is not the life that this primate has experienced almost ever so it's just it's just a bit strange. I don't know. I have a sense that we would get acclimated very quickly. Like if if we threw ourselves back a few thousand years ago, it would be very uncomfortable at first, but the whole hot shower thing you'll get used to it. Oh yeah, after a year you would not even like miss it because there is a few trying to remember which book that talks about hiking that Appalachian trail. But you kind of miss those hot showers. But I have a sense like after a few months after a few years. Well, your scale recalibrates. Yeah, I was saying the other day to a friend that whatever you are used to, you start to think that oh, that the people that have more than me are more fortunate. Like it just sounds incredible. I would I would be so happy, but you know that's not true because experience. What would happen is you would you would you would get these new things or you would you would get these new opportunities and then you would get used to it and then you would the hedonic treadmill you'd come back to where you are and likewise though because you think oh my god what if I had to you know have this kind of job that I never would want or I had this kind of marriage that I never would want. You know what if you did you would adjust and you get used to it and you might not be that much less happy than you are now. So on the other side of the you being okay going back you know you we would survive if we had to go back. You know we'd have to learn some skills and but but we would buck up and you know people have gone to war before that were in the you know shopkeepers a year before that they were in the trenches the next year. But on the other hand, if you brought them here, you know I always think it would be so fun to just bring forget the hunter gatherers bring a seventeen hundreds person here and tour them around, take them on an airplane, show them your phone and all the things it can do, show them the internet, show them the grocery store. Imagine taking them to a Whole Foods. Likewise, I think they would be completely awe struck and on their knees crying tears of joy, and then they'd get used to it and they'd be complaining about like they don't you don't have the this oranges in stock because like you know and that's the grocery store is a tough one to get used to like when I when I first came to this country, the the abundance of bananas was the thing that struck me the most or like fruits in general but food in general but bananas somehow struck me the most that you could just eat them as much as you want that took a long time for me probably took several years to really like get acclimated to that is that why didn't you have bananas the number of bananas fresh bananas I don't that that wasn't available bread yes bananas no yeah it's like we don't even know what to like we don't even know the proper levels of gratitude you know walking around the grocery store I don't know to be like the bread's nice but the bananas are like we're so lucky I don't know I am like oh I could have been the other way I have no idea. Well, it's interesting then where we point our gratitude in the West in the United States. Probably, do we point it away from material possessions towards, or do we just aspire that to do that towards other human beings that we love? Because in the East in the Soviet Union, growing up poor, it's having food is the gratitude, having transportation is gratitude, having warmth and shelter is gratitude. And now, but see within that the deep gratitude is for other human beings. It's the the penguins huddling together for warmth in the cold. I think it's a person by person basis. I mean, I am sure yes, of course in the West we will on average feel gratitude towards different things or maybe a different level of gratitude. Maybe we feel less gratitude than some than countries that. You know, obviously I think the easiest the person that's most likely to feel gratitude is going to be someone who's on whose whose life happens to be one where they just move up up up throughout their life. A lot of people in the greatest generation, you know, people who were born in the twenties or whatever, and a lot of the boomers too. The story is the greatest generation group dirt poor and they often ended up middle class. And the boomers, some of them started off middle class and many of them ended up quite wealthy. And I feel like that life trajectory is naturally going to foster gratitude, right? Because you are not going to take for granted these things because you didn't have them. You know, I didn't go out of the country really in my childhood very much. You know, like you know, we we traveled, but it was to Virginia to see my grandparents or Wisconsin to see other relatives or you know maybe Florida for going on to the beach, and then I started going out of the country like crazy in my twenties because I I really you know became my favorite thing, and I feel like because I if I had grown up always doing that it would have been another thing. I am like yeah, that's just something I do, but I still every time I go to a new country, I am like oh my god, this is so cool. And in another country, this thing I've only seen on the map, I am like I am there now, and so I feel like it it it a lot of times it's a product of what you didn't have and then you suddenly had, but I still think it's case by case in that there is a there is like a meter in in everyone's head you know that I think on on on at a ten you are you are experiencing just immense gratitude right which is a euphoric feeling it's a great feeling and it's it makes you happy it's to savor what you have to look down at the mountain of stuff you have that you are standing on right to look to look down at and say oh my god I am so lucky and I am so grateful for this and this and this and you know obviously that's a happy exercise now when you move the meter meter down to six or seven maybe you think that sometimes but you are you are not always thinking that because you are sometimes looking up at this cloud of things that you don't have and the things that they have but you don't or things you wished you had or you thought you were going to have or whatever and that's the opposite direction to look right and and that's the either that's it's envy that's yearning or often it's it's it's if you think about your past it's it's grievance right and so then you go on to a one and you have someone who feels like a complete victim they are just a victim of the society of their their their siblings and their parents and their their loved one and they are they're wallowing in everything that's happened wrong to me everything I should have that I don't everything that has gone wrong for me and so that's a very unhealthy mentally unhealthy place to be. Anyone can go there, you know. There is an endless list of stuff you can it can be aggrieved about and an endless list of stuff you can have gratitude for. And so it's it's in some ways it's a choice and it's a habit and maybe it's part of how we are raised or our natural demeanor but it's such a good you are really good at this by the way. Your Twitter is like go on well like like you are you you you are constantly just saying man I am lucky or like I am I am so grateful for this and that's it's it's a good thing to do because you are reminding yourself but you are also reminding other people to think that way it's like we are lucky you know and and so anyway I think that scale can go from one to ten and I think it's hard to be a ten I think you'd be very happy if you could be but I think trying to be above a five and looking down at the things you have more often than you are looking up at the things you don't or being you know resentful about the things that people have wronged you and well the interesting thing I think it's an open question but I suspect that you can control that knob for for the individual like you yourself can choose like the Stoic philosophy you can choose where you are as a matter of habit like you said but you can also probably control that on a scale of a family of a tribe of a nation of a society. I mean, a lot you can describe a lot of the things that happens in Nazi Germany and different other parts of history through a sort of societal envy and resentment that builds up. Maybe certain narratives pick up and then they infiltrate your mind and then now your knob goes to from the gratitude for everything it goes to resentment and envy and all Germany between the two World Wars you know like like you said the Soviet kind of mentality. So yeah, and then when you are soaking in a culture, so there is kind of two factors, right? It's it's it's what's going on in your own head and then what's surrounding you and what's surrounding you kind of has concentric circles. There is your immediate group of people because that group of people if they're a certain way, if they feel a lot of gratitude and they talk about it a lot, that kind of isolates you from the broader culture because you know the people are going to have the most impact on you are the ones closest. But often they're all the all the concentric circles are saying the same thing that people around you are feeling the same way that the broader community which is feeling the same way as the broader country, um, and you know I think this is why I think American patriotism, you know nationalism, you know can be tribal can be very not not a good thing, patriotism, um, I think is is a great thing because really what is patriotism I mean it's if you love your country you should love your fellow countrymen you know to patriot you know that's a rig in quotes it's like patriotism is like I think a feeling of like um unity, um and but it also comes along with an implicit kind of concept of gratitude because it's like we are so lucky to live in you know people you know think it's chauvinist to say we live in the best country in the world right and you know yes when Americans say that no one likes it right but actually it's not a bad thing to think it's a nice thing to think it thinks it's a way of saying I'm so grateful for all the great things this country gives to me and this country has done and and I think you know if you heard the Philip you know a Filipino person say you know what the Philippines is the best country in the world no one in America would say that's chauvinist they'd say awesome right because when coming from someone you know who's not American it sounds totally fine but I think I think you know a national pride is actually good now again that can quickly translate into xenophobia nationalism and so you know you have to make sure it doesn't go off that cliff but yeah there's good ways to formulate that like you talk about we'll talk about like high run progressivism high run conservatism those are two different ways of of embodying patriotism so you could talk about maybe loving the tradition that this country stands for or you could talk about loving the people the that ultimately push progress and those are from an intellectual perspective a good way to represent patriotism we got to zoom out because this this graphic is epic a lot of images in your book are just epic on their own it's brilliantly done but this one has famous people for each of the cards like the best of yeah for you and by the way good for them to be the person yeah that that it's not that I could have chosen lots of people for each card but I think most people would agree you know that's a pretty fair choice for each each page and to good for them to be you know you you crush it if you can be the person for your whole 250 year page so well I noticed you put Gandhi didn't put Hitler I mean there's a lot of people going to argue with you about that particular last page true yes you're right I could have I could have put an I actually I was thinking about Darwin there too Darwin Einstein yeah exactly you really could have put anyone you think about putting yourself for a second yeah I should have I should have that would have been awesome I'm sure that would have endeared the readers to me from right from the beginning of the first page of the book a little bit of a messianic complex going on but yeah so the list of people just you know so these are 250 year chunks the last one being from 1770 to 2020 and so it goes Gandhi Shakespeare Joan of Arc Genghis Khan Charlemagne Mohammed Constantine Jesus Cleopatra Aristotle Buddha it's so interesting to think about this very recent human history that's 11 pages so it would be 2750 almost 3000 years just that there are these figures that stand out and that define the course of human history and it's like the crazy the craziest thing to me is that like Buddha was a dude he was a guy with like arms and legs and fingernails that he may be bit and like he liked certain foods and maybe he got like you know he had like digestive issues sometimes and like he got cuts and they stung and like he was a guy um and he had hopes and dreams and he probably had a big ego for a while before he I guess Buddha totally overcame that one but like and it's like who knows you know you know what the myth the mythical figure Buddha who knows how similar he was but the fact same with Jesus like this was a guy like to me it's he's a primate yeah what a impact he was a cell first and then a baby yeah he was a fetus at some point a dumb baby trying to learn how to walk yeah like having tantrum yeah um because he's frustrated because he's in the terrible twos Jesus was in the terrible twos Buddha never had a tantrum let's be honest the myth the mother was like this baby's great like wow figure something out it just but I mean this I mean listen hearing learning about Genghis Khan it's incredible to me because it's just like this was some Mongolian you know herder guy who was taken as a slave and he was like dirt poor you know catching rats is a you know young teen with you know to feed him and his mom and his I think his brother um and it's just like the the the odds when he was born he was just one of you know probably tens of thousands of random teen boys living in Mongolia in the 1200s the odds of that person any one of them being a household name today that we're talking about it's just crazy like what had to happen and it's for that guy to for that poor dirt poor herder to take over the world I don't know so history just like continually blows my mind like you know and he's the reason you and I related probably yeah no I mean it's it's it's also that's the other thing is that some of these dudes by becoming king by being having a better army at the right time you know William the Conqueror whatever has is in the right place at the right time with the right army you know and there's a weakness at the right moment and he comes over and he exploits it and ends up probably having you know I don't know thousand children and those children are high up people who might be have a ton of the species is different now because of him like if if that forget England's different or you know European borders look different like like we are like we look different because of a small handful of of people you know certain when sometimes I think I'm like oh you know this part of the world I can recognize someone's Greek you know someone's Persian someone's wherever because you know they kind of have certain facial features and I'm like it may have happened I mean obviously it's that that's a population but it may be that like someone 600 years ago that looked like that really spread their seed and that's why the ethnicity looks kind of like that now sorry anyway yeah yeah do you think individuals like that can turn the direction of history or is that an illusion that narrative we tell ourselves well it's both I mean so I said that William the Conqueror right or Hitler right it's not that Hitler was born and destined to be great at all right I think in a lot of cases he's frustrated artist with a temper who's turning over the table in his studio and hitting his wife and being kind of a dick and a total nobody right um I think almost all the times you could have put Hitler baby on Earth he's a he's a rando right you know and and maybe he's a you know maybe sometimes he becomes a you know some kind of you know he uses this speaking ability because that ability was going to be there either way but maybe he uses it for something else but um but that said I also I think but it's not that World War II was going to happen either way right so it's it's both it's that like these circumstances were one way and this person came along at the right time and those two made a match made in in this case hell but it makes you wonder yes it's a match in hell but are there other people that could have taken his place or do these people that stand out they're the rare spark of that genius whether it takes us towards evil towards good whether those figures singularly define the trajectory of humanity you know what defines the trajectory of humanity in the 21st century for example might be the influence of AI might be the influence of nuclear war negative or positive not in the case of nuclear war but the bioengineering nanotech virology what else is there maybe the structure of governments and so on maybe the structure of universities I don't know there could be singular figures that stand up and lead the way for human there will be but I wonder if the society is the thing that manifests that that person or that person really does have a huge impact I think it's probably a spectrum where there are some cases when a circumstance was such that something like what happened was going to happen if you pluck that person from the Earth I don't know whether the Mongols is a good example or not but maybe it could be that if you pluck Genghis Khan as a baby there was because of the specific way Chinese civilization was at that time and the specific you know climate you know that was that was causing a certain kind of pressure on the Mongols and the way they they still had their their great archers and they had their horses and they had a lot of the same advantages so maybe it was like it was waiting to happen right it was going to happen either way and may not have happened to sit to the extent or whatever so maybe or you could go the full other direction say actually this was probably not going to happen and you know I think World War II is an example where I kind of think World War II really was kind of the the the work of of course it relied on all these other circumstances you had to have the resentment in Germany you have had the Great Depression but like I think if you take Hitler out I'm pretty sure World War One World War II doesn't happen well then it seems like easier to answer these questions when you look at history even recent history but let's look at now let's look at I'm sure we'll talk about social media so who are the key players in social media Mark Zuckerberg what's the name of the MySpace guy Tom Tom it's just Tom yeah there's a meme going around where like MySpace is like the perfect social media because no algorithmic involvement everybody's happy and positive also Tom did it right at the time you were like oh man Tom only made like a few million dollars oh socks to not be zuck Tom might be living a nice life right now where he doesn't have this nightmare that these other people have yeah and he's always smiling in his profile picture he looks and so there's like Larry Page so with Google that's kind of intermingled into that whole thing into the development of the internet Jack Dorsey now Elon um who else I mean there's people playing with the evolution of social media and to me that seems to be connected to the development of AI and it seems like those singular figures will define the direction of AI development and social media development with social media seeming to have such a huge impact on our collective intelligence it does feel in one way like individuals have an especially big impact right now in that a small number of people are pulling some big levers um and you know there can be a little meeting of three people at Facebook and they come out and they come in they come out of that meeting and make a decision that totally changes the world right on the other hand you see a lot of a lot of conformity you see a lot of you know they all pulled the plug on Trump the same day right so that suggests that there's some bigger force that is also kind of driving them in which case it's less about the individuals I think you know this is you know what is leadership right I mean to me leadership is the ability to move things in a direction that the cultural forces are not already taking things right a lot of times people seem like a leader because they're just kind of hopping on the cultural wave and they happen to be the person who gets to the top of it now it seems like they're but actually the the wave was already going like real leadership is when um is is when someone actually changes the the wave changes the shape of the wave like I think Elon with you know SpaceX and and with Tesla like genuinely like shaped a wave you know maybe you could say that EVs were actually like they were going to happen anyway but it it's there's no it's not much evidence about at least happening when it did you know if we end up on Mars you know you can you can say that Elon was a genuine like leader there and so there are examples now like Zuckerberg definitely has done a lot of leadership along the way he's also um potentially kind of like caught in a a storm that is happening and you know he's one of the figures in it so I don't know and it's possible that he is a big shaper if the metaverse becomes a reality if in 30 years we're all living in a virtual world to many people that seems ridiculous now that that was a poor investment he talked about getting you know 10 you know I think it was something like a billion people with a VR headset in their pocket in by you know I think it was 10 years from now back in 2015 so we're we're behind that but when I he was talking about that and honestly I this is something I've been wrong about because I went to like one of the Facebook conferences and tried out all the new Oculus stuff and I was like you know pretty early talking to some of the you know major players there because I was going to write a big post about it that then got swallowed by this book but um but I would have been wrong in the post because in what I would have said was that this thing is you know when I tried it I was like this is you know some of them were sucks some of them make you nauseous and they're just not that your headsets were big and you know but I was like the times when this is good it is I have this feeling I haven't had it reminds me of the feeling I had when I first was five and I went to a friend's house and he had Nintendo and I and he gave me the controller and I was looking at the screen and I pressed a button and Mario jumped and I said I said I can make the something on the screen move and the same feeling I had the first time someone showed me how to send an email is like really early and he's like you can send this and I was like it goes I can press enter on my computer and something happens on your computer those were obviously you know when you have that feeling it often means you're you're witnessing a paradigm shift and I thought this is one of those things and I still kind of think it is but it's kind of weird that it hasn't you know like where's the VR revolution like yeah I'm surprised because I'm I'm with you my first and still instinct is this feels like it changes everything VR feels like it changes everything but it's not changing anything like a dumb part of my brain is genuinely convinced that this is real then the smart part knows it's not but that's why the dumb part was like we're not walking off that cliff the smart part's like you're on your rug it's fine the dumb part of my brain is like I'm I'm not walking off the cliff so I was like it's crazy I feel like it's waiting for like that revolutionary person who comes in and says I'm going to create a headset like honestly Steve Jobs iPhone of honestly a little bit of a Carmack type guy which is why it was really interesting for him to be involved with with Facebook it's basically how do we create a simple dumb thing that's 100 bucks but actually create that experience and then there's going to be some viral killer app on it and that's going to be the gateway into a thing that's going to change everything I mean I don't know what exactly was the thing that changed everything with a personal computer does that understood why that maybe graphics like what well was the use case I mean exactly wasn't wasn't the the 84 Macintosh like a moment when it was like this is actually something that normal people can and want to use because it was less than 5000 dollars I think was and I just think it had some like Steve Jobs user friendliness already to it that other ones it hadn't had I think Windows 95 was a really big deal the I remember like because I I'm old enough to remember the MS DOS when I was like kind of remember the command and then suddenly this concept of like a window you drag something into you double click an icon which now seems like so obvious to us was like revolutionary because it made it it made it intuitive so you know I don't yeah Windows 95 was good it was crazy yeah I forget what the big leaps was because I was Windows 2000 which sucked and then Windows XP was good I moved to Mac around 2004 so I stopped I sold just sold to the devil yeah I see well us the people still use Windows and Android the device and the operating system of the people not you elitist folk with your books and your what else and success okay you write more technology means better good times but it also means better bad times and the scary thing is if the good and bad keep exponentially growing it doesn't matter how great the good times become if the bad gets to a certain level of bad it's all over for us can you elaborate on this why why is there why does the bad have a that property that if it's all exponentially getting more powerful then the bad is going to win in the end was is my misinterpreting that in no so the first thing is I noticed a trend which was like the centuries the good is getting better every century like the 20th century was the best century yet in terms of prosperity in terms of GDP per capita in terms of life expectancy in terms of poverty and disease

本集資源與出處