第 172 期·中文精讀

瑞安·席勒:Librex 與大學校園裡的觀點自由交流

Ryan Schiller: Librex and the Free Exchange of Ideas on College Campuses

Librex 創始人講述匿名校園論壇的緣起與運營,討論學生自我審查、言論自由與平臺治理的難題。

官方音訊00:00 / --:--
中文精讀由 AI 基於原始訪談改寫,非官方翻譯,可能存在偏差或錯誤;表述以原音訊與官方文稿為準。說明

瑞安·席勒(Ryan Schiller)在耶魯讀大一的時候,選了一門全球事務的課。授課的萊特教授是中東衝突領域的專家。這正是他選這門課的理由。

課程快結束了,他跑到教授的辦公時間去問:我們什麼時候能聽到您講中東衝突?辦公室裡只有他們兩個人。

我過去每年都講這個專題,還會專門開一個小範圍的討論課,像圓桌一樣把學生聚起來,講我的研究、我的觀點,然後大家真刀真槍地辯論。兩年前,有一個學生把我舉報給了學校。我意識到我的工作可能保不住了,我也意識到最穩妥的做法就是別碰這個話題。所以現在,我乾脆連提都不提。你想說什麼都可以,但我不參與。(萊特教授,席勒轉述)

席勒的感受是:來耶魯這件事的價值,本來就在於能聽到教科書之外的專家看法,能當面質疑、當面被反駁、看對方怎麼回應。這些正在被抽走。

這件事的機制值得細看。一個學生的一次舉報,就足以讓一位教授把整個研究領域從課堂上撤掉。萊克斯在這裡補了一句:這不需要是一群人舉報,一兩個人就夠了。一種想法被判定為讓人痛苦、讓人不被尊重、製造了不安全的氛圍,它產生的力量就大過想法本身。這很奇怪,也很難在行政層面修好,除非把所有人開除。

他還做了一個區分:人們批評學術界的時候,罵的其實是行政,很少有人真的在罵教職。教授往往是最大膽的思考者,是真正掌握最深真相的那批人,也是真正有能力教育你的那批人。行政的問題在於牽扯的利益方太多,也缺少兩樣東西。一樣是勇氣,走進火裡。另一樣是風度,走過火的時候還能保持從容,不至於粗魯、不敏感,或者笨拙地開口。這兩樣都需要訓練,而他們沒有受過這個訓練。

61% 這個數字不是保守派的,也不是自由派的

席勒動手之前做過調查。耶魯最近一次的機構評估報告裡,學生、教職員工、校友三方共同指向行政的第一件事,是"在校園裡培育更多的對話,尤其是更困難的對話"。蓋洛普的一項調查顯示,全美 61% 的大學生因為校園氛圍而害怕說出自己真正相信的東西。

他的判斷是,這個數字既不屬於保守派,也不屬於自由派,它屬於所有人。你甚至不需要有觀點,你只需要感到那層恐懼。

萊克斯接著往下推了一步:恐懼最傷人的地方在於它同時殺死幽默和思考。如果你不敢用隱喻說話,不敢在表達上不精確,你就很難真正想出新的東西。因為在我們還沒找到精確的數學語言之前,比喻和含混的表達就是我們思考的工具,是通向新知識的第一步。當這第一步被禁止,一個人能想到什麼程度,是有上限的。

真相像一種聚類演算法

兩人在這場對話的開頭還繞到了一個更遠的地方:深偽(deepfake)技術普及之後,"什麼是真的"這件事會變。

席勒的看法是,這會產生一個反方向的後果:每一個人都會擁有"合理的推諉空間",所以人們會變得更懷疑,會去找多個信源,會真的動用常識和推理,去判斷什麼可信、什麼不可信。過去我們有《紐約時報》這樣的機構,它們靠聲譽成為真相的源頭。當任何單一信源都不再可信的時候,人就開始自己想了。

萊克斯說這讓他回到自己來的地方。在蘇聯,你不能真的相信任何單一的信源,你必須自己判斷,必須跟朋友聊。他說,幾十億人的想法像一團點雲在遊動,所謂真相幾乎就是一個聚類演算法的輸出:一群人相信同一件事,那件事就成了真的。會有多個真相,也會有真相之間的戰爭。也許"真相"這個詞本身在社會中的分量會下降。

危險的版本是這樣的:說某件事是真的,它的反面是宗教人士口中的"科學主義"。一旦科學宣佈某件事為真,你就不能再質疑它。可科學本身是一臺不斷運動的機器,它的全部意義就是不斷質疑。也許真相該被重新定義成一個過程,一個沒有終點的過程。

錢是另一種這樣的東西。它的力量只來自我們相信它。比特幣也是。全球各地的文明圍繞共同的價值、共同的道德、共同的地方聚在一起,各自長出了自己的真相。《人類簡史》把這條線拉得更長:讓人類特殊的,是能夠發展出觀念的簇,把它們以故事的形式儲存在腦子裡,傳給彼此,越滾越大。

一個不會寫程式碼的人,決定自己造一個

席勒寫過很多文章,跟朋友聊過很多次,最後得出的結論是:這件事得靠一場文化上的變化,一場自下而上的草根運動。他查過資料,能量是有的。缺少的是一個工具。

他決定自己做。他沒有寫過程式碼。

他的路徑樸素到近乎笨拙:先買一臺 Mac,去 YouTube 搜"斯坦福 Swift 教程",點開播放量一百萬的那個影片。那其實是一所大學的入門課,班上的學生基本都是軟體工程師或電腦科學背景。他說他當時並沒有完全意識到自己比同班的人落後多少,只是覺得別人好像都上手很快。他花了大量時間在 Stack Overflow 上。

他給自己定的目標很清楚:驗證一個想法,僅此而已。他要的只是下一步。只要一直能走到下一步,至少不會死掉,至少能學到新東西,至少能認識新的人,並且讓外界看到他是認真的。

最後他做出來的東西是真正意義上的最小可行產品:螢幕上顯示文字,釋出文字,評論文字,發帖,回覆,任何有耶魯郵箱的人都能註冊。他把一個完全沒有資料庫知識的人能搭出的資料庫結構搭了出來。朋友看過之後問他:你為什麼用堆(heap)來存這個?他說:我都不知道堆是什麼。

萊克斯從這裡抽出了一條更普遍的教訓。工程師容易掉進"什麼才是正確的做法"這個兔子洞,反覆最佳化、反覆推遲,最後你五年後還在寫登入頁。席勒的做法正好相反:先讓它跑起來,然後迭代。世界上最偉大的軟體產品大多是這個順序長出來的。

他還有一個更具體的驗證方法。一件事是跟別人講一個想法,另一件事是把東西放到對方手上,看他眼睛裡的光。他跑到耶魯的校園裡,逮著人就讓人試。有人不感興趣,很正常。有人眼睛一轉,就懂了。

他不需要 50% 的人喜歡,他需要 5% 到 10% 的人愛上它,然後這些人會去告訴另外的 5% 到 10%。

如今他的程式碼已經被全部替換掉了。現在的朋友直接跟他說:寫程式碼的部分你別管了,你去做別的事。他說自己從來不是工程師,也從來沒打算當工程師,但這件事裡有很多事不是工程。

兩千張海報,和一張陌生人的地板

2020 年 3 月,他想驗證一件更硬的事:能不能從一個校園擴充套件到兩個校園。

他在 Dartmouth 一個人都不認識,只發了幾封冷郵件,內容大致是:期末週期間,我能在你的宿舍地板上睡兩天嗎?很多人後來跟他說這太瘋狂了,沒人會理你。但有一個人答應了。他坐火車過去,除了對方的姓名之外,對這個人的一切一無所知。

Dartmouth 在新罕布什爾州,偏僻程度超出他的預期。他在火車上收到對方的提醒:從車站到學校不好走。他當時想,應該沒事吧。結果那裡沒有 Uber。

最後他找到那輛據說唯一能把人送到 Dartmouth 的車,花了幾個小時才到。第二天早上他問哪裡可以列印,對方說,Dartmouth 的影印室免費列印。他印了兩千張帶二維碼的海報。影印室的工作人員看著他說:孩子,我不知道你在幹什麼,但你得趕緊離開這兒。

然後他把海報塞進每一扇宿舍門的門縫底下,蹲下去再站起來,腿都在燒。他在校園裡跟每個人打招呼,在食堂一張桌子一張桌子地自我介紹,說一遍這個 App 是幹什麼的。

二十四個小時後,他坐在大巴上,一遍遍重新整理後臺的註冊面板。

那二十四小時裡他把一句話說了太多遍,後來就成了他固定的說法:這是 Dartmouth 的匿名討論區。他發現根本不需要跟人解釋為什麼值得一試,人們自己知道。他們已經在等這個東西了。結果是,一夜之間全校 90% 的人註冊了。

之後發生的事比數字有意思。有人在上面找到合夥人,一起辦起了社團;有人找到了伴侶,耶魯的校園媒體後來專門寫過兩個女生因為在 Librex 上認識而開始一段關係的故事。期末周有人寫詩互相加油。席勒的總結是:當人們被允許脆弱、被允許社交的時候,他們就會連線起來。人本來就有連線的慾望。當這種慾望碰上表達的自由,一個人是以真實的自己在連線,用的不是某個表演出來的形象。這兩件事的差別很大。

匿名是工具,不是目的

席勒對匿名的定位很明確:在 Librex 裡,匿名是一種工具,不是目的。它是在當前校園氛圍下通向真實對話的一條路徑。

Librex 的匿名是有邊界的。每個人都是經過驗證的在校學生,用的是學校郵箱;同一所學校只能有一個賬號;除了學校名字,你看不到任何使用者名稱。所以它和 Reddit 式的匿名完全是兩回事。你知道對方和你上同一所學校,你們共享同一套語彙、同一批正在發生的事。人對社群因此有了更強的所有權感。

由此長出一個功能,是席勒最引以為豪的部分:匿名直信。任何一條帖子下面,你都能給發帖人(OP)發一條私信,對方只會看到你的學校。如果他接受,你們就進入一對一,可以交換手機號、Snapchat 或者郵箱,然後約見面。有一位哈佛法學院的教授跟他說,這是他最喜歡的功能。有人發帖說自己在收集硬幣,然後收到了另一個收集硬幣的人的私信。

不做使用者名稱的考慮有兩條。一條是安全,這些社群太小,所有人都認識某個認識你的人,2021 年的技術條件下,幾條帖子就足以把你認出來。另一條是儘量不要讓人被"框住",讓討論停留在想法上,不落在人身上。

萊克斯講了他自己的使用體驗。他下載了,但用得不多,因為他不是任何一所學校的學生,進去之後像個局外人。他覺得這個產品給人的感覺是,每所學校真的像一個村子,同時常春藤聯盟層面又有一個更大的公共空間,兩者的耦合很有力量。

席勒說這正是他要的。人交流的方式高度依賴語境,語言本身有非常細微的差別,你需要共同的經歷才能真的對話。所以把社交產品繫結在社群上,對他來說是根本性的選擇,也是 Librex 和之前那些產品最大的差別。

一條帖子:本該是他的家的地方,讓他更孤獨

席勒記得最清楚的一條帖子,來自耶魯的一位墨西哥國際學生。

帖子寫得很尖銳,卻在社群裡拿到幾百個贊。他講自己在 La Casa(耶魯的墨西哥與拉丁裔文化中心)的經歷:因為他是羅馬天主教徒,因為他是國際生,他覺得自己在那裡不受歡迎,融不進那裡既定的議程。結果,那個本該是他的家的地方,反而讓他在校園裡感到最被排斥、最孤單。

席勒說,看到一個人本該被某個文化支援,卻站出來說"這對我沒有任何幫助,這不是讓我覺得像家的地方",那一刻的力量很大。這種話在實名環境裡幾乎說不出口,因為它同時冒犯了機構、身份和好意。

為什麼他不肯賣使用者資料

萊克斯提到他讀到過一個說法:席勒在 YC(Y Combinator)最後一輪被拒的原因之一,是他堅持不賣使用者資料。席勒沒有直接確認這件事,他給的理由很簡單:

人們在上面講的是最私密的東西。政治觀點、心理健康、感情關係。把這些人最私密的信念和秘密變成一種我買進賣出的貨幣,我不認為這是道德的,我不覺得我能睡得著。(瑞安·席勒)

萊克斯說他相信中間地帶是存在的:透明、給使用者選擇權、讓他們決定哪些部分可以分享給廣告商。關鍵是讓刪除變得極其簡單。他自己被鎖在 Instagram 外面一個月,一個 bug,有人拿他的賬號猛刷 API,系統就認定他是機器人。他花了很多力氣去證明"我是我"。他的結論是:在 Facebook 上讓賬號和資料徹底消失,理論上應該可以,實際上極其困難。而如果你想做一個好產品,就該讓這件事變得毫不費力。

Librex 的做法是加了一個按鈕,叫"忘了我"(forget me)。按兩下,你的郵箱就從資料庫裡刪掉了。

萊克斯的反應是:這其實很動人。他說如果他能隨時消失,並且信任創始人和創始原則,他願意給出更多。人們要的就是這個,信任和隨時可以離開的容易程度。

一條公路不該挑乘客

話題轉到 Parler 被 AWS 下架。席勒說,讓他不安的地方在於,一條公路開始做意識形態上的區分。Parler 本身被移除這個決定,倒還在其次。人們依賴它,人們在它上面搭東西,人們預設它是立場中立的。亞馬遜有權這麼做,它是一傢俬人公司,他支援私人公司的權利。但他不確定一家公司在什麼節點上應該保持中立,讓開發者在它之上構建。

萊克斯用了一個更具體的類比:如果一條私人擁有的高速公路宣佈只允許電動車通行,很多人會鼓掌,因為電動車環保。可接下來你要考慮滑坡,也要考慮它對很多人的生活、對創新和競爭的衝擊。

席勒說,我們的存在有一個層級結構,某些層級不該被動手腳。儲存和計算就屬於這個層級。

萊克斯說他沒有看到有人真正為此抗爭,也不確定政府是不是合適的機制,因為政府的修補方式往往很髒。他更希望從資本主義的意義上有競爭者出現,逼 AWS 做得更好。

席勒補了最有分量的一句:這次對 Parler 的決定本身是對是錯並不是重點,重點是滑坡,以及它讓那些正在做好產品的善良的人變得更恐懼。而恐懼,正是你無法創造出最好的東西的原因。這跟匿名的邏輯是同一個邏輯。

"安全空間"這個詞已經變味了

萊克斯舉了羅納德·沙利文(Ronald Sullivan)的例子。這位哈佛法學院教授加入過哈維·韋恩斯坦的法律辯護團隊,也代理過阿隆·赫爾南德斯的雙重謀殺案。他接這些案子,是因為他相信這是檢驗一個人是否真的相信法治的方式。哈佛因此爆發了抗議,學生要求撤掉他的職務。抗議的是少數學生,但反噬很大。抗議者的邏輯是安全空間:讓一個實質上在為韋恩斯坦辯護的人待在身邊,是不安全的。

席勒的回答是這樣的:安全空間在私生活裡、在家庭裡、在宗教組織裡完全沒問題。問題出在機構開始鼓勵或者背書安全空間的時候。人們到底在躲避什麼傷害?似乎有一種預設設定是,需要被緩解的傷害,是"面對你不同意、甚至覺得反感的觀點"所帶來的傷害。一旦把這個和"安全"混為一談,博雅教育就死掉了。當然這件事很複雜,我們仍然需要安全的知識環境,但今天"安全空間"這個詞的用法,在知識語境裡沒有位置。

萊克斯順著這條線往下說:這裡存在一種權力的不對稱,讓"安全空間"和"仇恨言論"的定義不斷往前滑,最後意味著任何你想讓它意味的東西,用來讓好人、讓深思的專家閉嘴。這種滑坡不只是實用層面的噤聲,它還有語言學層面的目的:把詞語等同於不安全、等同於傷害、等同於暴力。一旦開始把言語當作暴力,開始用刑法處理言語,就進入了非常威權的領域。

席勒說自己是大屠殺倖存者和排猶暴動倖存者的孩子。萊克斯說他來自蘇聯。兩人都同意,大多數人的血液裡都流淌著來自歷史的愛與恨。

MIT、愛潑斯坦,和一個沒有被討論完的名字

節目錄制的這幾天,Librex 剛向 MIT 和斯坦福開放。萊克斯希望有人在 MIT 的版塊裡開一個關於傑弗裡·愛潑斯坦(Jeffrey Epstein)的討論。各種教職員工和愛潑斯坦的關聯、那些被說過的話,產生了巨大的衝擊,但對話沒有真正發生。行政層在忙著打掃,給出一堆場面話,假裝什麼也沒壞、沒什麼可看的,好像那只是一個壞人做了些壞事、幾個教授因為不知情而稍微失當,大家還是往別處看吧。

他還加了一句帶刺的觀察:哈佛在這件事上處理得"更好",好到人們幾乎假裝哈佛跟愛潑斯坦毫無關係。

然後他講了他真正在意的那部分。馬文·明斯基(Marvin Minsky),人工智慧領域的奠基人物之一,也是萊克斯想來 MIT 的原因之一。當年某個郵件列表上出現過一段關於明斯基和愛潑斯坦互動的討論,討論很快被掐斷了。理查德·斯托曼(Richard Stallman)因為要求把事情說清楚,被推出了 MIT。萊克斯說,讓他最不安的是它沒有繼續,也沒有展開。原本有那麼多的複雜性和求知慾,中途被打斷了。明斯基的名字被拖進泥裡,卻從未被真正澄清。他不知道該怎麼想這件事,而唯一的出路是繼續談。

席勒接過話頭:人有對"了結"(closure)的自然需求。每次校園裡發生悲劇,Librex 的使用者量都會出現一個巨大的峰值。前幾天耶魯有人自殺,人們湧進來說"願他安息",同時討論是什麼樣的環境會把人推向那樣的結果。人們需要一個能說話的地方,尤其是在沒有人願意當那根出頭的草的時候。

萊克斯說,這種讓人自我審查、讓人沉默的恐懼,是他最在意的東西之一。

18 歲那年,醫生說他有大約三成的機率會死

席勒講了自己的那段經歷,他說他從沒在公開場合詳細講過。

三四年前,他正準備去耶魯,每天打六個小時壁球,甚至想過也許能進耶魯校隊。有一天醒來他感覺非常不舒服。他本來要去訓練,想了想決定不去,改去考駕照,因為他要在離家上大學之前把駕照拿到,否則可能永遠拿不到了。

拿到駕照回到家,天旋地轉,頭痛到極點。他問做醫生的媽媽要不要去醫院,媽媽說等等看,會好的。然後他看了看自己的手臂,上面全是紅色的斑塊。到了醫院,診斷是猩紅熱,醫生說什麼也做不了,回家吧。凌晨三點他被放出來。

第二天早上,他覺得胸口像插了一根長矛。他說自己作為運動員對疼痛不陌生,但從來沒感受過這種東西。父母立刻把他送回六個小時前剛去過的那家醫院,醫院一開始不想收他,說你還年輕,等著排隊。他說,不,你們不明白,我胸口疼。檢查的時候他們在他的背上紮了一根很粗的針,他在笑,他說他用這種方式緩解壓力,或者說得輕一點,是把它當成笑話講。

結果是病毒攻擊了他的心臟,心肌炎加心包炎,醫生說他在某個時刻有 25% 到 35% 的死亡機率。

他在醫院躺了三個星期。有一個時刻他記得非常清楚:他疼到哭,情緒的成因幾乎沒有,純粹是因為疼。他能感覺到自己的心臟在胸腔裡,往後靠的時候,心臟會撞到肋骨,痛得無法入睡,所以整夜只能往前傾著坐。那段時間他拒絕任何非自然的東西進入身體,儘量不用藥,最後還是讓醫生加了一點。

接下來的一年,他沒法走路去上課。耶魯給他安排了一間單人醫療宿舍,去上課要坐接駁車,他還要請幾位教授把課挪個地方,好讓他能到。他不能提書包,不能爬樓梯。每天在宿舍裡對著牆壁十幾個小時。他看著自己的身體退化,肌肉掉下去,因為那些藥是分解代謝的。

一個 18 歲的人,在那種狀態下,等於看著某種死亡在眼前發生。他很疲憊,因為心臟不在巔峰狀態。他喜歡的東西被一樣樣拿走。他開始冥想,每天五分鐘起,最多的時候四十分鐘,堅持了大約兩年。

然後在那些對著牆壁的時間裡,他問自己:我到底想做什麼?我在乎什麼?

他得到的答案是:盡頭是存在的。有一些他相信的東西,可能不那麼受歡迎,但他真的認為它們能讓世界變得更好。如果身體條件允許,他想做一件讓自己覺得完整的事。

萊克斯的回應是,這段經歷如果最終導向成功,會有非常深遠的影響,因為掙扎既讓人謙卑,也給人力量。他還半開玩笑地說,你還是應該去打壁球。

不要聽太多人的話

被問到一個 21 歲的人能給出什麼建議時,席勒的回答有一段很有嚼頭。

他說,如果你是 21、22 歲,想做一個類似的東西,第一件事是:你大概比幾乎所有人都懂。如果你內心有一種感覺,這件事我必須做,而且我能想象自己做十年,那你就要認真對待它,因為如果你成功了,你真的要做十年,要熬過所有的高點和低點,要撐過很棒的訪談和不太棒的文章。你必須相信你在做的事。

第二件事:儘量少聽別人的話。人們在各自的領域是專家,但講到什麼會流行、什麼在社交語境裡說得通,你就是那個權威,因為你就是那個正在經歷這些的年輕人。

萊克斯把這一條講得更狠。他說那是一片遍佈糟糕建議的雷區,這是年輕人最難的部分。他經常幫耶魯的學生,任何一個創始人要求跟他聊,他從不拒絕。他最擔心的恰恰是:在耶魯,人們被明確地、也隱晦地教導要聽房間裡最年長的人說話,聽薪水最高的人說話。創新就是這麼死掉的。

而且心理上很難。一個身價十億美元的投資人會告訴你他的看法,你很難在心裡認定他可能是錯的。席勒說,更難的是那種"我當然會聽,但我知道他為什麼錯,然後我按自己的來"的姿態,聽起來很抽象,實際上你有時候根本說不出他為什麼錯。

萊克斯總結成一句:要有那種信念感,你錯了,我說不出為什麼,但我還是覺得我是對的。這很罕見,也很反直覺,別人可能說這是傲慢,但它是必要的。因為很多事情在你看到它們實際發生之前,根本沒法用語言表達,很多都是美好的意外。

席勒說這對他尤其艱難,因為他共情心很強,別人說什麼,他本能地想去理解,尤其是親近的人。他做的幾乎所有事,尤其是最近幾年,很多親近的人都說不要做,包括他的父母。他必須對自己承認:你不知道。他非常愛他的父母,但他們就是不懂。

萊克斯的說法是,越聽起來合理的建議越危險,就像一首你在電臺聽過的歌,你開著車就在哼。理智是一種糟糕的藥,要非常小心。每一個重大創新、每一門重大生意,在誕生的時候看起來都是不可能的。也不只是不可能的事,你看愛情,給它提建議太容易了,指出所有可能出錯的地方,離婚率、痛苦、浪費掉的錢。可當你真的墜入愛河,這些建議一點用都沒有。

他還指出,這兩件事是同一個機制。小時候父母通常是對的,專家通常是對的,他們讓你進了耶魯。但到某個點它就不成立了。他看到耶魯的朋友因為繼續聽父母的話,走上一條他們心裡知道不對的路。

整個教育體系的意義,是把你帶到人生的某個點,每個人的點不一樣。你的任務是,在那個點上發動一場個人的革命,創造自己的路。沒有人會告訴你這一點,因為他們想讓你繼續沿著他們指的路徑走。他們不會說"你全部的功課就是最終造反"。造反本來就不該被告知,但任務本來就在那兒。

一句"我覺得你能做到"

席勒講了一件從沒公開說過的事。他大二上了一門研究生級別的數學課,在課上認識了一個學生,那個人有相當多的論文引用,也有創業經驗,後來成了一家獨角獸公司的 CTO。他跟這個人說,他很想做這件事,但完全沒有技術背景。這個人是個計算機天才,在丹·斯皮爾曼(Dan Spielman)手下工作過。

他們當時在一起做組合數學(combinatorics)的東西,和 discrepancy 有關。那個人轉過頭來說了一句話:我覺得你能做到。

席勒說,他當時震驚了。他非常尊重這個人,而且這個人瞭解他,因為他們一起上過兩門課,花了很多時間待在一起。他的想法是:如果他說我能做到,他是真正的天才,那我憑什麼說我不行?

萊克斯把這個故事當成一條關於導師的教訓:當一個孩子跑來跟你說一個瘋狂的想法,你有義務偶爾拍拍他的肩膀說"我相信你,你可以做到"。如果他仰望你,你的話就有分量。而如果你說"別傻了,先完成學業吧",你可能就掐掉了一件本來會發生的事。他說這是席勒的《心靈捕手》時刻,那部電影裡的那句臺詞是"去看看那個女孩"。羅賓·威廉姆斯(Robin Williams)是個特別的人。

2000 分的象棋,14 歲的比特幣撲克

席勒從小學棋,一直下到 13 歲,拿到了 2000 分的 USCF 等級。13 歲那年的一場本地比賽裡,他遇到一個四十多歲的男人,兩人下了一盤很強的棋。他至今記得那盤棋,覺得自己本該走另一步。賽後他們覆盤,一個 13 歲的孩子和一個 40 歲的男人趴在同一張棋盤上研究走法。即使以他當時的年紀,他也看得出來這個人絕對是個天才。

回家之後他上網查了一下,發現這個人叫 Bill Chen,是世界撲克系列賽(WSOP)冠軍。14 歲那年,他在另一場象棋比賽裡跟著 Bill Chen 走進電梯,假裝自己也要上樓,只為了跟他說幾句話。他建議 Bill Chen 在書裡做幾處修改,Bill Chen 說,其實我也正在想同一件事。他說這句話對 14 歲的他是巨大的肯定。

Bill Chen 後來寫了一本《撲克的數學》(The Mathematics of Poker),他讀完那本書,先是迷上博弈論,然後迷上撲克。至於一個 14 歲、有一對關心他的父母的孩子怎麼開始打撲克,他的解法是比特幣。那年頭有一批促銷性的比特幣錦標賽,投進去幾美元,幾千人報名,贏家拿一美元。他從那裡開始往上爬。

讓他印象最深的是那個社群。有人願意做他的"投資人",在從沒見過他的情況下,替他出一場比特幣錦標賽的全部報名費,贏了分成。他說這種程度的相互信任,讓人對人類還是抱有希望。

萊克斯順便問了他物件棋史上最偉大棋手的看法。席勒說,如果只比純粹的技術,把歷史上所有人放到同一場比賽裡,卡爾森(Magnus Carlsen)會贏,這沒什麼爭議。如果比政治影響力,那是鮑比·菲舍爾(Bobby Fischer)。席勒說,菲舍爾是唯一一個你在街上隨便拉個人還會認識的名字,因為他代表的東西超出了棋盤。他是美國人,在冷戰年代單挑強大的蘇聯,那件事對當時的地緣政治格局意義重大。可惜他後來的下場很糟。

如果要在同時代人裡找一個純粹的碾壓型天才,席勒會提保羅·摩菲(Paul Morphy),一個活在另一個時代的怪物,水平遠遠甩開同輩。至於他個人最喜歡的棋手,是米哈伊爾·塔爾(Mikhail Tal),極度兇悍、極度戰術化。席勒說自己實際上更擅長慢步調、有條不紊的下法,但他就是被塔爾身上那股創造力吸引。這也是他後來物件棋淡下去的原因之一:象棋對創造力的獎勵,遠遠不如創業這類事。

撲克這邊,被問到他欣賞誰,席勒提了 Bill Chen。理由是 Bill Chen 把撲克學習裡那些數學層面的細節徹底民主化了,而且他自己也是一個你能想象坐在你餐桌邊上的、風趣又愛社交的人。他還提到 Daniel Negreanu,同樣是能把關於撲克的想法講得既清楚又有娛樂性的人,讀牌能力是他見過最強的之一。他也提了一句 Daniel Negreanu 最近和 Doug Polk 單挑輸了一百萬美元,看這些人幹活本身就很好看。

《藝術之戰》,和一場沒有終點的自我審查

萊克斯問有什麼書或遊戲對他產生過影響。席勒說的是史蒂文·普萊斯菲爾德(Steven Pressfield)的《藝術之戰》(The War of Art)。這本書講創作抵抗,講創作掙扎,講做一個有創造力的人到底意味著什麼。讀起來是痛苦的,他不建議所有人都去讀它的每一部分,但在他人生的那個階段,它起了作用。

它做到的一件事,是讓他意識到自己是一個有創造力的人,一個必須創造的人。他說自己沒法離開這件事。他也意識到,即使在那些更僵硬的體制裡,他格格不入也是沒關係的。聽到別的創作者的掙扎,對他當時的自尊和成長很重要。書本身也許不完美,但對他的生活產生的影響是真實的。

萊克斯補了一句:普萊斯菲爾德還有一本《Turning Pro》,他整體上主張的就是認真對待這件事。如果你有一個創造性的頭腦,你想在這個世界上做出一些特別的東西,那就去做,別再對著空白頁面發呆。

席勒說,很多人會用各種方式,明的或者暗的,勸他別把這件事看得那麼重。他反而覺得這個訊號很好:那些從來不說這種話的,是他真正親近的朋友,因為他們懂那是他的路。他們可能懷疑,可能不理解,有一個朋友後來跟他說,我一直不明白你為什麼這麼確定這件事能成,我看到它真的起來了才懂,在那之前我就是不懂,但我還是支援你。

他說,走完這個過程之後,他在社交上反而更連線了。他把自己的社交生活某種程度上收攏了,但變得脆弱、真實得多。這本身就是創作過程的一部分。

遊戲方面他推薦《新手指南》(The Beginner's Guide),和《史丹利的寓言》(The Stanley Parable)出自同一個人,Davey Wreden。他說這個遊戲更適合當作藝術品來對待,而且他不宣稱自己理解創作者,那對一個創作者來說是大罪。但它的確觸及了他們這場對話裡的很多東西:創造的心智。它可以被解讀成女性主義的,可以被解讀成一個關於朋友的故事,也可以被解讀成批評者和創作者之間的故事。席勒自己的解讀是:這個遊戲講的是你腦子裡那個純粹為了創造而創造的部分,那個沒有明確目的、近乎飄渺的部分,和另一個部分之間的張力。另一個部分你可以叫它編輯,叫它實用主義者,叫它自我(ego)在我們生活裡那股必要的力氣。我們沒法完全無我,但要創造又必須無我。內在的審查扮演什麼角色?我們怎麼讓自己的創造心智去創造,同時又能變得有用?

一個電子遊戲能承載這種張力,他說這很有意思。

意義的答案,是這個問題可以被一起追問

萊克斯說他每隔一段時間就會問那個荒謬的問題:意義是什麼,死亡是什麼。他提醒席勒,你現在在旅程的開頭,但旅程隨時可能結束,人這一輩子就是這麼運作的,可能今天,可能明天。他問席勒是否思考自己的死亡,是否冥想它。

席勒說,關於生命的意義,首先他想說的是,我們能一起長時間地在這個問題上掙扎,這件事本身就已經是答案的一部分。有時候他覺得答案是沒有意義,有時候他覺得,光是"生命的意義"這個說法本身,光是去想它,就已經夠了。

他說自己還很年輕,希望今天說的任何話在將來都會變得很不一樣。二十年後再看現在,他關於生命意義的想法大概會很不一樣。他請未來的人對他寬容一點。他還加了一句,觀點這個東西就是要不斷變的。

但有一件事給他的生命帶來了意義,就是像這樣的對話。和真正在這件事上認真的人一起想這些問題,和人建立連線。萊克斯說,這場對話本身就是他在數字空間裡想創造的那種東西的回聲。長播客吸引他的地方也在這裡:聲音的交換裡有一種深刻的、真實的人性。席勒說他覺得文字連線可以更強,比如信件。他到現在還會往俄羅斯寫信。當你把大量的自己放進你寫的話裡,你傳達的不只是字面的意思,還有你是誰,那能造出真實的連線。

萊克斯最後說,他相信這是一片善意會贏的戰場,愛會贏。他很高興席勒在做這樣的技術。他說,謝謝你浪費掉所有的時間跑來這裡。

如果想複製這條路,可以做的幾件事

萊克斯在節目結尾引用了喬治·華盛頓 1783 年 3 月 15 日的一段話:如果言論自由被剝奪,我們就會變得又啞又沉默,像羊一樣被牽去屠宰場。

把這場對話裡可操作的部分拆出來,大致是這些:

  • 先做一個能跑的東西,別先做一個正確的東西。席勒給自己定的目標從來都只是"我的朋友們會不會用",可擴充套件的程式碼是後來的事。想去學正確的架構、正確的語言,很容易在寫登入頁的階段耗掉幾年。把第一步做完,再迭代。
  • 把想法放到別人手裡,看他們的眼睛。講一個想法和讓人用上它是兩件事。你不需要 50% 的人喜歡,你需要 5% 到 10% 的人愛上它,然後由他們去告訴下一個 5% 到 10%。
  • 驗證一個社群的時候,去做那些最笨、最不體面的事。坐幾小時火車去一個陌生人的地板上打地鋪,印兩千張海報,蹲著塞進每一扇門縫,在食堂一張桌子一張桌子地自我介紹。種子使用者是手動一個個拉來的,之後才是口碑。
  • 從第一天就把原則定下來,別等規模大了再補。Librex 的三條是:社群繫結而非地理繫結,匿名只是工具而非目的,不賣使用者資料。每一條都在後來替他們擋掉了具體的決策困難。
  • 把使用者隱私做成一個按鈕,別做成一份政策。"忘了我",兩下,完事。讓人可以隨時離開,反而會讓人更願意留下。
  • 規則要少、要具體、要留一點模糊空間。他們最終收斂出來的核心就是"別說針對核心身份群體的全稱判斷",要具體。規則一旦變多,社群就會把它當遊戲來破解,而那本身也是一種創造力的體現。
  • 少聽別人的話,尤其是在判斷什麼會流行的時候。你比房間裡那些已經成功的人更懂你的同代人正在經歷什麼。越聽起來合理的建議越要小心。你需要的是那種"你說我錯了,我說不出為什麼,但我還是覺得我是對的"的信念感。
  • 如果你打算做十年,先確認你願意做十年。因為如果你成功了,你真的要做十年,要熬過所有的高點和低點。這一點沒法靠別人替你判斷。
  • 如果你身邊有一個年輕人帶著一個瘋狂的想法來找你,偶爾說一句"我覺得你能做到"。如果他仰望你,你的話就有分量。你可能根本不會記得那次對話,但對方會記得一輩子。
文稿由本站用語音識別模型(基於官方釋出音訊)機器轉寫,可能有識別錯誤,人名與數字請以音訊為準。
[00:00:00] The following is a conversation with Ryan Schiller, creator of Breck's, an anonymous discussion feed for college communities, starting at first with Yale, then the Ivy Leagues, and now at Stanford and MIT. Their mission is to give students a place to explore ideas and issues in a positive way, but with much more personal and intellectual freedom than has defined college campuses in recent history. I think this is a very difficult but worthy project. Quick thank you to our sponsors. [00:00:33] All form Magic Spoon, Better Help and brave click their links to support this podcast. As a side note, let me say that Ryan, the young entrepreneur and genuine human being who quickly won me over, he's inspiring in many ways, both in the struggle he had to overcome in his personal life, but also in the fact that he did not know how to code, but saw a problem in this world, in his community that he cared about and for that he will learn to code and build the solution in the best way he knew how. [00:01:07] That's an important reminder for us humans. Let us not only complain about the problems in the world, let us fix them. I also have to say that there's passion in Ryan's eyes for really wanting to make a difference in the world, his story, his effort gives me hope for the future. There is hate in this world, but I believe there's much more love. And I believe it's possible to build online platforms that connect us through our common humanity as we explore difficult, personal, even painful ideas together. [00:01:41] As usual, I'll do a few minutes of ads. Now, I try to make this interesting, but I'll give you timestamps because I value your time and listening experience so you can skip. But please still check out our sponsors. I'm fortunate to be able to be very selective with the sponsors we take on. So hopefully if you buy their stuff, you'll find value in it. Just as I have clicked their links in the description, it really is the best way to support this podcast. [00:02:07] This episode is sponsored by a new sponsor all form. They make stylish, comfortable, customizable sofas for an engineering mind. Their modular design pleases my soul. I say their new sponsor, but I've had their stuff for quite a while. I have, in fact, their black leather love seat. How great is the term love see? I think you can't help but step up the depth of human connection between any two people that sit on a love seat. [00:02:37] I said on the all forum love seat with Mr. Michael Malice and now I'm in love. See, it works. Some of the best experiences in my life had to do with just sitting, with friends talking and the weird friends, the out their friends. I think quote unquote, adult life can kind of carry you down the stream of busyness where you no longer have these online conversations with the weirdos in your life. [00:03:02] I think that's probably why I never want to grow up. Anyway, all form is offering 20 percent off all orders for our listeners. That's you, my dear friend, at all form of social acts, that's all Phone.com Slack's to find your perfect sulpher or love seat. Michael Mals is not included with your purchase. Finally, they're deciding whether to sponsor this podcast long term. So now's the time to buy their stuff if you like it. This episode is sponsored by Magic Spoon, low carb, keto friendly cereal. [00:03:37] It has zero grams of sugar, 13 to 14 grams of protein, only four nine grams of carbs and 140 calories in each serving. They have a couple limited edition flavors this month cookies and cream and maple waffle. [00:03:52] But my favorite flavor is still cocoa. But these sound pretty good. Haven't tried them yet. I will try. You should, too. Yes, I am very much excited to be living in this day and age when we have reusable rockets being launched into space and landing back on Earth. [00:04:09] I think what really excites me is that we can have what used to be a sugar stuffed meal like cereal that's now completely keto friendly. Anyway, Magic Spoon has a 100 happiness guarantee. So if you don't like it, they refunded even Dostoyevsky's such and Carmo would be impressed. Go to magic. The counselors selects and use code leks at checkout to save five bucks off your order. That's magic spoon dot com slash legs and use code. This episode is also sponsored by Better Help Spelled Help Help. [00:04:48] They figure out what you need. [00:04:49] A match with a licensed professional therapist in under 48 hours. I've always been fascinated with talk therapy and I guess the Birdwood phrase that is the power of conversations. In some sense that's what podcasting is. When I was younger, I did see it as the ideal of psychotherapy, that through this interaction between two humans, you can arrive at something deep and profound that's personal about your particular brain and almost from an engineering perspective, rewire things. [00:05:23] I think there's a lot of ways in which our work with human robot interaction in the artificial intelligence space will teach us how to do this kind of range. [00:05:30] Inuring better. But anyway, better help is easy. [00:05:33] Private, affordable, available, worldwide. Check them out of better health outcomes. Works. That's better help dotcoms. Lex. This show was also sponsored by Brave Afast Privacy Preserving browser that feels like Google Chrome, but without the ads or the various kinds of tracking that ads can do. I love using it more than any other browser, including Chrome. I also love Google Chrome, but I love Brave even more. [00:05:59] You should check out my conversation with Brendan Eich, who's the creator of Brave but also the creator of JavaScript and Mozilla Foundation. I mean, this guy has done basically everything, but it's his work on JavaScript, actually, that's really stuck with me. In that conversation. I was reminded that change in the world doesn't have to start with a perfect solution. You can start with something to put it nicely that's imperfect and grow. Iterate over time. You don't have to start with something pretty. [00:06:29] You just have to start anyway. Get the browser at Brave Dotcom Slash works and it might become your favorite browser to as brave dotcom slash flex. This is the Lux Friedman podcast. And now here's my conversation with Ryan Schiller. Let's start with the basics what is Celebrex, what are its founding story and founding principles and looking to the future, what do you hope to achieve? [00:07:16] Celebrex? Sure. Let me break that down. So what is the Seabrooks? Celebrex is an anonymous discussion fit for college campuses. It's a place where people can have important and unfettered discussions and open discourse about topics they care about ideas that matter. They can do all of that completely anonymously with verified members of their college community. And we exist both on each Ivy League campus and we have an interactive community. And actually this week we just opened to MIT and Stanford. [00:07:49] So now really I might. Yeah. So M.I.T. and Stanford communities and I expect you to sign up for your Amethi account as very first day. [00:07:58] What are for people who are not familiar like me, actually, which are the Ivy Leagues. [00:08:03] Sure. [00:08:04] So we started at Yale, which is my I don't know, can you call it alma mater because I haven't technically graduated. Yeah. [00:08:11] What's that called when you're actually still there. My university. Yeah, I guess. I guess I'll call it home. That's my home educational home and my educational home of Yale. [00:08:21] And then we moved to and we could get into the story of this eventually, if you'd like. [00:08:27] And then we went to Dartmouth and then quarantine her. We opened to the rest of the Ivy League and now we have. And the Ivy League, for those who don't know, is Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Dartmouth, Columbia, Cornell, Brown and Penn. I got it all in one breath. [00:08:45] Was the youngest Ivy League Penn? No, Columbia. [00:08:49] I can't say I got a camera well, edited in post. I don't know. [00:08:53] OK, they each have all all eight of them and then you can just like get it in like Penn, Harvard. There's actually a really nice software that people should check out. [00:09:02] Like a service is using machine learning really nicely for podcast editing where you can it learns the voice of the speaker and it can change the words you said. [00:09:15] It's like some deep fake stuff is deep fake. But for positive applications, it's very interesting. It's like the only deep fake positive for have a friend who's obsessed with Devika. What's great about I think Tippex is that it's going to do the opposite of sort of what's happening with our culture where everyone will have plausible deniability. Yeah, exactly. I mean, that's the hope for me, is there's so many fake things out there. [00:09:40] There we're going to actually be much more skeptical. And I think and taking multiple sources and actually like reason, like use common sense and use my deep thinking to understand, like what is true and what is not. Because, you know, we used to have, like traditional sources, like The New York Times and all these kinds of publications that had a reputation there, these institutions. And they are the source of truth. And when you no longer can trust anything is a source of truth, you start to think on your own. [00:10:10] I guess part of the individual that goes it takes its way back to like where I came from, the Soviet Union. We can't really trust any one source of news. You have to think on your own. You have to talk to your friends. [00:10:22] A tremendous amount of intellectual autonomy, don't you think it? Think about the societal consequences. Absolutely. [00:10:28] I mean, we see so much decentralization in all aspects of our digital lives now, but this is like the decentralization of thought you could say. It's sadly, I don't think it said is decentralization of truth or like truth is a clustering thing. We have these like this point cloud of people just swimming around like billions of them, and they all have certain ideas. And what's thought of as truth is almost like a clustering algorithm when you just get a bunch of people that believe the same thing. [00:11:03] That's true. But there's also another truth. And there might be like multiple truths and it would be like a battle of truths. Maybe even the idea of truth will like lessen its power in society, that there is such a thing as a truth. Because the downside of saying something is true is it's always the downside of what people like religious people call scientism, which is like once science has declared something is true, you can't no longer question it. [00:11:36] But the reality is science is a moving mechanism. [00:11:39] You constant question, you constantly questioning and maybe truth should be renamed as as a process, not a not a final destination. The whole point is to keep questioning and keep questioning and keep discovery. [00:11:54] Kind of like we're going backwards in time to like back when back when people were sort of finding their identities and we were less globalized like people would get. [00:12:05] Together and they'd get together around common value system, common morals and a common place, and those would be sort of these clusters of their truth, right. And so we have all these different civilizations and societies across across the world that created their own truth. You know, we talk about the Jews in the Tomine Torero, look at Buddhist texts. [00:12:24] We can look at all sorts of different truths and how many of them get out the same things. But many of them have different ideas or different articulations. [00:12:32] Harare and Sapience rewinds even farther back until like Manti's, that's the thing that made us humans special, is you can develop these clusters of ideas, hold them in their minds through stories, pass them on to each other and they grows and grows. And finally, we have Bitcoin. [00:12:48] So which money is another belief system that that that has power only because we believe in it? And is that truth? I don't know. But it has power and it's carried in the minds of millions and thereby has power. But back to the parks. So what was the founding story was the founding principles of libraries? [00:13:14] Sure. So I was on campus as a freshman and I was talking to my friends. Many of them felt like it was hard to raise your hand in class. That's question. They really felt like even outside the classroom, it was hard to be vulnerable. And the thing you have to understand about is it's not that big a place. Everyone knows someone who knows someone who knows you basically. Yeah. And people come to these schools, first of all, they're home for people and they want to be themselves. [00:13:41] They want to feel like they can be authentic. They want to make real friendships. [00:13:43] And second of all, it's a place where people go for intellectual vitality to explore important ideas and to grow as thinkers and fortunately, to do the culture. My friends express that it was very difficult to do that, and I felt it, too. And then I couldn't talk to my professors. And I remember I talked to one specific global affairs professor and was taking this class and his area of expertize was in the Middle Eastern conflict. And I went to him and I said, Professor, we've we're almost finished this class and we haven't even gotten to sort of the reason I originally want to take the class was to hear about your perspective on the Middle Eastern conflict, because something I learned at Yale and this is maybe a sort of a tangent, but I'll I'll flesh it out. [00:14:27] But I learned at Yale is that you can learn all sorts of things from a textbook. And when you kind of go to Yale to do is to get like the opinions of the experts that go beyond the textbook and to have those more in-depth conversations. And that's sort of the added value of going to a place like Yale and taking a course there, as opposed to just reading a textbook, but also interact with that opinion. [00:14:47] Exactly. Person. Yeah, to interact with that, with that opinion, to hear it, to respond to it, to push back on it and to have that with some great minds. And there really are great minds at Yale. Don't get me wrong, it's a place it's still a place of tremendous brilliance. So I'm talking to Professor Wright and I'm like, we haven't I haven't heard your area of expertize. And I'm like, are we going to get to it? [00:15:09] What's the deal? And this is during office hours, mind you. So we're one on one. It says Ryan. To be honest, I used to teach this area every single year. In fact, I would do a section on it, which is like a small seminar like break away from the class where he would talk to the students in small groups and explain and explain his perspective, his research, and have a real debate about it, like around a Harkness table. [00:15:32] And I used to do this. And then about two years ago, a student reported me to the school and I realized my job was at risk. And I realized the best course of action was basically. Just not to broach the topic. And so now I just don't even mention it. And it's like you can say whatever you want, but I'm not I'm not going to be part of it. And it's a real shame. It's a real loss to all of the students who I think came to the school to learn from these brilliant professors in that context of these world experts. [00:16:09] The problem seems to be that reporting mechanism. Moore, There's a disproportionate power to a complaint of a young student, a complaint that an idea is painful or an idea is disrespectful to you or ideas creating an unsafe space. And the conclusion of that, I mean, I'm not sure what to do with that because it's a single reporting, maybe a couple, but that has more power than the idea itself. And that's strange. I don't know how to fix that in the administration except to fire everybody. [00:16:47] So like this is to push back against this storyline that academia somehow fundamentally broken. [00:16:53] I think we have to separate a lot of things out. Like one is to look at faculty and you have to look at administration and like at MIT, for example, the administration does tries to do well, but they're the ones that often lack courage. They're often the ones who are the source of the problem. When people criticize academia and I'll just speak to my myself, you know, I'm willing to take heat for this is they really are criticizing the administration, not the faculty, because the faculty oftentimes are the most brilliant, the the boldest thinkers that you think whenever you talk about. [00:17:39] We need, like, the truth to be spoken. The faculty are often the ones who are in the possession of the deepest truths in their mind. And in that sense. And they also have the capacity to truly educate in the way that you're you're saying. And so it's not broken. I like fundamentally, but there's stuff that like needs that's not working out well. [00:18:00] And you can't take my words. That's that's what I thought you were going to ask me if I think the Ivy League is broken. That's totally that's exactly it. [00:18:07] So you don't think so? On the question, do you think the Ivy League is broken? Like what? How do you think about it? The academia in general, I suppose. But Ivy League still I think it represents some of the best qualities of academia. [00:18:19] And what more is there to say there? I think the Ivy League is producing tremendous thinkers to this day. I think the culture has a lot that can be improved. But I have a lot of faith in the people who are in these institutions. I think, like you said, the administration and I have to be a little careful because, you know, I've been in some of these committees and I've talked to administration about these sorts of things. I think they have a lot of stakeholders. [00:18:44] And unfortunately, it makes it difficult for them to always serve these brilliant faculty and the students in the way that they would probably like to. Yeah. [00:18:54] OK, so this is me. Speaking of the administration, I know the people and there are oftentimes the faculty holding positions in these committees, right? Yes, but it's in in the role of, quote unquote, service. [00:19:06] They they're trying to do well. They're trying to do good. But I think you could say the mechanism is not working, but I could also say my personal opinion. [00:19:22] Is they lack courage and one courage and two. Grace, when they walk through the fire, so courage is stepping into the fire and grace when you walk through the fire is like maintaining that like light as opposed to being rude and insensitive to the lived, quote unquote, experience of others or like, you know, just not eloquent at all. Like as you step in and take the courageous step of talking and saying the difficult thing, doing it well, like doing it skillfully. [00:20:01] So both of those are important, the courage and the skill to communicate difficult ideas. And they often lack them because they weren't trained for it. I think so. You can blame the mechanisms that don't that allow 19, 20 year old students to have more power than the entire faculty. Or you could just say that the faculty need to step up and grow some guts and skill of graceful communication and really administration. Well, the EPA and the administration. [00:20:29] That's right. That's the administration. [00:20:32] The faculty are sometimes some of the most brave, outspoken people. Yes. Within the bounds of their career. Yeah. [00:20:40] So so that takes a that's like the founding kind of spark of a fire that led you to then and say, OK, so how can I help? [00:20:52] Yeah. And I export a lot. I export a lot of options. I wrote many articles to my friends, talk to them, and I realized it sort of need to be a cultural change, sort of need to be bottom up grassroots something. I knew the energy was there because you just look at the most recent institutional assessment from Yale. [00:21:12] This was basically the number one thing that students, faculty and alumni all pointed to, to the administration was cultivating more conversations on campus and more difficult conversations on campus. So the people on campus know it. And you look at a Gallup poll, 61 percent of students are on Ivy League campuses afraid to speak their minds because of the campus culture. The campus culture is causing sort of freezing effect on discourse. Can you pass on that again? So what percentage of students feel free to speak their mind? [00:21:49] Sixty one percent nationally. [00:21:52] And that you're talking about, you know, places nothing like the Ivy League, where I'd say I'd imagine it would be even worse because of just the way that these communities kind of come about and the sorts of people who are attracted or are invited to these sorts of communities that's nationwide that college students. And it's going up that college students are afraid to say what they believe because of their campus climate. So it's a majority. It's not it's not a conservative thing. [00:22:22] It's not a liberal thing. It's a group thing. We're all feeling it. [00:22:25] The majority of us are feeling and basically just it doesn't even you don't even necessarily need to have anything to say. You just have a fear. That's right. So when you're like teaching. You know, metaphors are really powerful thing to explain, you know, and there's just the caution you feel is just horrible for humor. Now comedians have the freedom to just talk shit, which is why I really appreciate somebody who's been a friend recently, Tim Dolan, who has who gives zero pardon my French fucks about anything, which is very liberating, very important person to just tear down the powerful. [00:23:05] But, you know, inside the academia, as a as an educator, as a teacher, as a professor, you don't have the same freedom. So that fear is felt, I guess, by a majority of students. [00:23:16] It's and you're getting at something there, too, which is that if you're afraid to speak metaphorically, if you're afraid to speak imprecisely, it can be very difficult to actually think at all and to think to the extremities of what you're capable of, because these are these are the mechanisms we use when we don't have quite the precise mathematical language to quite pinpoint what we're talking about. Yet this is the beginning. This is the creative step that leads to new knowledge. [00:23:43] And that really scares me is that if I'm not allowed to sort of excavate these things, these ideas with people in the sort of messy, sloppy way that we do as humans when we're first being creative, are we are we going to be able to continue? Are we going to continue to be able to learn? [00:23:58] That's what really sort of scare me. So you've explored a bunch of different ideas. You wrote a bunch of different stuff. How did books come about? [00:24:07] Basically came to me that had to be kind of a grassroots movement and it had to be something that changed culturally and had to be relatively personal. People meeting people, people finding out that, no, I'm not the only one on campus who feels this way. I feel alone. And there are a lot of other people who feel alone. I believe this thing and it's not as unpopular as I thought, you know, the basically creating heterodoxy of thought. [00:24:35] And it's creating that moment where you realized that your politics are personal and that your politics are shared by a lot of people on campus. And so I just started coding. I didn't have much coding experience, but I went headfirst in and figured how hard could it be? You know, I mean, this is really fascinating. [00:24:56] So I talk to a lot of software engineers and people. Obviously, that's where my passion, my, uh, interests are, my focus has been throughout my life. [00:25:06] The fascinating thing about your story, I think it should be truly inspiring to like people that want to change the world, is that you don't have a background in programing. You don't have even maybe a technical background. [00:25:21] So you saw a problem. [00:25:24] You explore different ideas and then you just decided you're going to learn how to build an app like without a technical background, like you didn't try to. [00:25:37] That's so bold. That is so beautiful. [00:25:39] Then came take me through the journey of of deciding to do that, of like learning to program without a programing background and building the app like detail like what do you actually like. [00:25:52] How do you start. Sure. I mean you want to you want to buy a Mac I learned and you had to find that. I'm just going to go step by step. Right. I'll be as dumb as possible. It was. [00:26:02] It was truly is truly you know. Yeah. Like leading by your feet. [00:26:06] You need a computer for this. Yeah. I had a PC at the time and I was injured at the time and I realized, you know, I realized it should be like and I was out. And so yeah, that was a decision. But, you know, I knew kids these days, they're always on their phone. [00:26:20] And, you know, I wanted you to be able to say a passing thought, you know, in class, make a passing like you're walking around and you have a thought and you can express it or you're in the dining hall and you have your phone out, you can express it. So it was clear to me it should be was, by the way. [00:26:33] Yeah. Andrew, it is great to have you check out. We also are now available on Android. We'll get there for your Android users from MIT, Stanford of the Ivy League. So. Back to how it happened, so I am EMAC, so I went out and got back and realized that an iPhone for testing eventually got an iPhone. So those are the real robot blocks to start with. Um, from there, I mean, there's there's almost too much information out there about programing. [00:27:02] The question is like, where do you start and what's going to be useful to you and. [00:27:07] I my first thought was I should look at small classes, but it became very clear very quickly that that was not the right place to start. That would probably be the right place to start if I wanted to get a job at Amazon. But Michael was slightly different. Yeah. And I definitely had it in mind that what I was trying to make was I'm trying to prove out an idea. [00:27:28] I'm not trying to make a finished product. [00:27:29] I'm just trying to get to the first step because I figured if I keep if I keep getting to the next step, at least I won't die now, you know, like at least things will move forward. I'll learn new things. Maybe I'll meet new people. I'll show a degree of seriousness about what I'm doing and things will come together. And that is, as you'll see, what ends up happening. So I start with Swift, right. And I find this video from the Stanford professor that had like a million views. [00:27:57] That was like how to make basically swift apps like Perfect. [00:28:00] And you just like so you got this Mac and you what, like go to Google Dotcom and you type download Xcode and those code. [00:28:08] Yeah. And then I typed it on YouTube like Stanford, I was Swift's enter first YouTube video has a million views and like that has to be good at Stanford as million views. [00:28:20] And I got lucky. I mean, that turned out to be a very good video and it's basically like introductory course to Swift. Yeah. [00:28:27] I mean, you say introductory. I think most of the people in that class probably had a much better background than I did software developers, probably a computer scientist. [00:28:37] And it was slow for me. [00:28:39] I, I don't think I realized it fully at the time, just how far behind I was from the rest of the class, because I was like, wow, it seems like people are picking this up really quickly. [00:28:48] So took a little longer and, you know, a lot of time on stack overflow. But eventually I made a truly minimal viable product, the most minimal, like we're talking, you know, put text on screen, add text to screen, comment on top of text, you know, make a post, make a response. And anyone with a yell email can do this. And you plug it into a certain iCloud server and you verify people's accounts and you you're off. [00:29:17] You have to figure out how to like the whole idea of like having an account. So there's a permanence like you can create an account with an email, verify it, verify it. OK, so that that's not and that's literally how I thought about. [00:29:31] Right. Like so do I need to do. And I'm like, well first thing I need is a log image and I'm like how to make a login page and swift. I mean, it's that easy. So this has been done before, of course. [00:29:43] And then the first page that pops up is probably pretty damn good. Page when you it wasn't that bad, it wasn't perfect, but like maybe me. [00:29:50] Eighty percent of the way there. And then I came in to some bugs and then you know, our stack overflow a few questions and then I got a little further and then I found some more bugs. And then I'm like, maybe this isn't the right way to do. Maybe I should do it this way. And yeah, I'm sure my code isn't great, but the goal isn't to make quick code. [00:30:05] The great wasn't the goal wasn't to make scalable code. It was to understand. Is this something my friends will use? Like what is the reaction going to be if I put it in their hands and am I capable of making this thing? And it's awesome. [00:30:18] And so is focusing on the experience, like actually just really driving towards that first step, figuring out the first step and really driving towards a question to also figure out like this concept of like stories like database, you know, something funny or sad. [00:30:33] I just made the database structure with no knowledge of databases whatsoever. And I start showing it to my friends who have an experience and see us now like used a heap. That's so interesting. [00:30:43] Like, why did you decide to store it in this way? I'm like, I don't even know what a heap is. [00:30:48] Yeah, I just did it because it works like I'm trying to make calls and stuff and they're like, yeah, they're like the is really like I'm like, what? [00:30:59] There's a deep, profound lesson in there that that I don't know how much you've interacted with computer science people since, but they tend to optimize and have these kind of discussions. And what leads what results is over optimization. It's like worrying. Is this really the right way to do it? [00:31:13] And then you go as opposed to doing the first thing on Stack, or if you go down this like rabbit hole of what's the actual proper way to do it? [00:31:23] And then you're like you wake up five years later working on AM, working at Amazon because you've never finished the login page. [00:31:30] Like it's kind of hilarious, but that that's a really deep lesson, like just get it done. [00:31:35] And why what's a hebra is is the right that should be a T-shirt. Uh, that that's really the right approach to building something that ultimately creates an experience. And then you iterate eventually. That's how the great some of the greatest software products in this world have been built as you create it quickly. [00:31:58] And then just iterate what was, by the way, in your mind, the thing that you were chasing is a prototype like. What what was the first step that if you like, something is working like this, see you interacting with another friend? Yeah, I think the first step was like. It's one thing to tell someone about an idea, but it's another thing to put it in their hands and kind of see like the way they're their eyes kind of look. [00:32:26] And when I go, I'd walk around cross campus, which is part of you that literally just go up to people and run up to them and be like, try this. You've got to try this as a precaution team. [00:32:36] By the way, of course, this will never be the same. It's going to be like you got to try. You got to try this, like, what is it? And be like and I'll explain. It's like an anonymous discussion fit for a Yale campus. Yeah. And you see the gears turning and they just some people would be like, not interested. [00:32:51] Might find not your target demographic. I get it. You'll come eventually. [00:32:54] But some people like you could see it. They got it. They're like yes. [00:33:00] And that's when I was like, OK, ok, there is. [00:33:03] And you don't need I mean you don't need 50 percent of people to like it. Yeah. You need, what, five percent, 10 percent to love it. [00:33:11] And then they'll tell five percent. 10 percent. Word of mouth and you're good. [00:33:17] Of course, the first version was very, very crappy, but seeing people trying despite all the crappiness was it was sort of enough to be the first step. And, you know, since since then, all of my code's been stripped out. I now have friends who basically have told me, don't bother with the coding part. You do. [00:33:34] You do the rest. You just make sure that we can it because they want to code of great. I mean, I'm not an engineer. I never intended to be an engineer. And there's a lot to do that's not engineering. Yes. But the point was just to validate the idea, so to speak. [00:33:48] When was the moment that you felt like we've created something special, maybe a moment where you're proud of that? [00:33:56] This is this is this has the potential to actually be the very implementation of the idea that I initially had. [00:34:07] There's so many there's so many little moments. It's like and I bet they'll still be moments in the future that make that make it hard to like, totally say like. Yeah, we should say this is this is still very early years of Liebreich. So, yeah, it's only it's only been a year since we've had like actual like a lot of people on the RPA about a year. [00:34:27] Oh wow. [00:34:28] OK, I mean there's some crazy moments I could talk about sort of going to Dartmouth because it's one thing to like get some traction at your school. [00:34:35] Yeah. People know you and you know it's your school. You know, it's another thing to go to another school and where no one knows you and sign up 90 percent of the campus overnight. Wow. [00:34:46] So tell me that story. You're invading another territory. It was literally like that. Did you buy like a Dartmouth sweatshirt? Purposefully. I didn't want to fraud a fraud anyone, but I was purposefully nondescript in my clothing. Yeah, no yellow stuff, no doubt. This stuff. Just funding. Um, I'll get I'll go back there. So what happened was. This was like March of last year, um, so almost almost a year ago today, and I really wanted to see if we could go from sort of one campus to two campuses. [00:35:22] So I didn't know anyone at Dartmouth campus, but I kind of. I had some cold emails, some warm ish emails, um, and I went to people and I was like, basically, can I sleep on your floor for two days during finals period? [00:35:37] Yeah, I a lot of people have said this is crazy. Like no one's going to know what's the DeLynn app during finals period, a social after Nanosphere. [00:35:45] But I emailed a few people. I was like, you know, can I sleep on your floor? [00:35:49] And one of them was crazy enough to say, Sure, come to me, come to my dorm. Oh, I have a nice floor. Um, and he ended up today. He's still really close. He's a close friend. But anyway, I take a train knowing nothing about this guy besides his first and last name. And I arrive and Dartmouth is really, really remote, way more remote than you think to the point where I'm like he's like he warned me. [00:36:16] He's a really hospitable guy. He wore me like, it's going to be hard to get to campus from the train station because it's really remote and like, I'm sure it's fine. [00:36:23] I'll just get no, there are no Hubers and Hanovers. What do you think this is New Hampshire. So Connecticut I mean, Yale is pretty remote as well. [00:36:33] No. Yeah, Yeliz. Well, and Yale, New Haven, which is a real city, has whooper. [00:36:39] It has food, has culture, has a nightclub even. Yeah. Like we're talking about a real city. Like it's not New York, it's not Philadelphia where I'm from, but it's a city. [00:36:49] New Hampshire is something very different. Yeah. [00:36:52] Beautiful campus, I'm sure. Beautiful. Oh my gosh. I could I could talk so much about I was blown away by Dartmouth. I started wondering, like, why didn't apply legitimately between the people and the culture? It was it was it was a beautiful vacation. So I arrived there, no Uber. [00:37:10] But eventually I called this guy who's like the only guy who can get you to Dartmouth and takes a couple hours. But we got there. I slipped on this guy's floor. I wake up, I ask him if there's any printing. He's like, oh, Dartmouth happens to have free printing in the copy room. I print out like two thousand posters. [00:37:26] And so the guy in the copy room literally goes to me. It's like, kid, I don't know what you're doing, but you need to get out of here. [00:37:32] Like, I'm going I'm going on the limits. [00:37:36] I know. Yeah, I found the limit. And I think a lot of stories about finding the limits. There's a little piece of advice socially. Yeah. He's like, you got to get out here. And I, I then go to every single dorm door. I put a poster under every single term to advertising the app with a with a QR code. Yeah. [00:37:55] I walk around campus saying hi to everyone and telling them about the app. I go from table to table in the cafeteria, introduce myself, say hi and download the app. It's exhausting. There's so many steps, so manage crouching down to slip the poster into the dorm during my legs were burning. But by the end of it, the twenty four hours later I'm sitting on a I'm sitting in a bus and I'm just pressing the refresh button on the account creation panels. [00:38:22] It's like going up by hundredths. Yeah. I'm like, oh my gosh, this is working in a sense. [00:38:29] I mean certainly you're like initial seed is so powerful. Just a piece. Yeah. But then the word of mouth is what carries it forward. And what was the explanation you gave to the app. It's anonymity, a fundamental part of it, like saying this is a chance for you to speak your mind about your experiences on campus. Yeah, I think people get it. You don't know what I've realized is you don't need to tell people why to try it. [00:38:57] They know, yeah, there's a hunger for this. Exactly. So all I do is I'm very factual. I said and this is where I kind of ended up coining the kind of the line that I now used to say, because I said it so many times in those 24 hours. I just said, it's not a discussion fit for Darmouth. [00:39:16] And they're like, yes, like they've been waiting for it, you know, some people are more skeptical, but a lot of people were like, great, I'm excited to try this. [00:39:27] I'm excited to meet people and connect. And I mean, the way Dharma's taken to it's incredible everything from professors writing poems during finals period to be like, good luck in finals period, you're going to rise like a Phenix or whatever to like. Yeah, it's crazy to. [00:39:44] I heard about two women meeting on Breck's and starting a finance club at Dartmouth to significant others, meaning there's an article recently written up at Yale as well, about two queer women who met on Leverett's and started a relationship which was pretty it was pretty interesting to see people throwing parties. Grekov it yeah. [00:40:06] It was just amazing to see how when you allow people to be vulnerable and social, they connect. People have this natural desire to connect. Yeah. [00:40:14] When when you have whatever natural desire to have a voice and then when that voice is is paired with freedom, that you could truly express yourself. [00:40:26] And there's something liberating about that. And in that sense, you're like you're connecting is your true self, whatever that is. What are the most powerful conversations you've seen on the app? You mentioned like people connecting hard? [00:40:39] Part of that, that is the sorting, you know, figuring out which one am I going to put it that the mental sorting out just something that stand out. Sorry, I don't mean to do like the top ten conversations ever of all time ever on the app. I just mean, like stuff that you remember that stands out to you. [00:40:53] I remember this one really amazing comment from this. He was a Mexican international student who spoke out. And this this post was super edgy, but yet it got hundreds and hundreds of upvotes within the community. [00:41:11] It was a Yale community specific post. And we should point out that there's a school specific community now and there's an all Ivy community. So this was specifically in the Yale community and this was a little while ago, but it stuck with me. This Mexican international student comes to Yale and he starts talking about his experience in the La Casa, which is the Mexican Latin access, as they would say, cultural center at Yale, and how he doesn't feel welcome there because he's Roman Catholic, basically, and international, and how he doesn't feel like he fits with their agenda. [00:41:48] And as a result, this place that's supposed to be home for him, he feels outcasted and feels more alone than he does anywhere else on campus. That's powerful. [00:41:56] That was powerful to me. Yeah. Hearing someone, someone who should be feeling supported by this culture say. Actually, this is not doing anything for me like this is not helping me. Yeah, this is this is not where I feel at home. [00:42:13] So what do you make of anonymity? Because it seems to be a fundamental aspect of the power of the app, right. [00:42:23] But at the same time, anonymity on the Internet, uh, so protects us. Right. It gives us freedom to have a voice, but it can also bring out the dark side of human nature, like trolls or people who want to be malicious, want to hurt others purely for the joy of hurting others, being cruel, for fun and going to the dark places. [00:42:48] So, like, what do you make of anonymity as a fundamental feature of social interaction, like the pros and the cons? [00:42:55] Yeah, just to break that down a bit, I would say a lot of the same things about a place like Twitter where people are very often anonymous. Having said that, of course, there's a different sort of capacity people have when they're anonymous, right? Well, in all different sorts of ways. So what do I make of anonymity? [00:43:13] I think it can be incredibly liberating and allow people to be incredibly vulnerable and to connect in different ways, both on politics. [00:43:20] And there was a lot to talk about this year regarding politics and, you know, personally vulnerable, being vulnerable, talking about relationships and mental health. I think it allows people to have a community that's not performative. And of course, there's this other side where, you know, people can sometimes break rules or say things that they wouldn't otherwise say that people don't always agree with or that people might find repugnant. And to an extent, this can facilitate great conversations. [00:43:49] And on the other hand, we have to have moderation in place and we have to have community guidelines to make sure that the anonymity doesn't overwhelm the purpose, which is that anonymity. First of all, anonymity is a tool in libraries. [00:44:02] It was not the purpose of libraries. It is a way that we get towards these authentic conversations given our campus climate. And second of all, I would say it's a spectrum. It's not just it's not just libraries is anonymous. Right? Because libraries isn't totally anonymous. Everyone's a verified Ivy League student. You know exactly what school everyone goes to. You only have one account per person at Yale. Meaning if meaning that. I mean, what that amounts to is people have more of an ownership in the community and people know that they're connected. [00:44:39] They have a common vernacular. So the anonymity is a skill and it's a tool. [00:44:44] But you can also trust I mean, this is the difference between Reddit anonymity, where you can easily create multiple accounts when you have only one account per person, or at least it's very difficult to create multiple accounts, then you can trust that the anonymous person you're talking to is a human being, not about. [00:45:05] I try to be completely anonymous now in my public interactions. I try to be as real in every way possible, like zero gap between private me and public me. [00:45:17] Why exactly did you it seems like this is an intentional mission. What made you want to sort of bridge that gap between the private sphere and public sphere? Because that's that's unique. I know a lot of intellectuals who would make a different decision. [00:45:31] Yeah, interesting. I had a discussion about when about this actually with a few others that. Have a very clear distinction between public and private, something I'm struggling with, by the way, personally and thinking about. [00:45:50] So one of the very basic surface level is if you carry with yourself lies, small eyes or big lies, it's extra mental effort to remember what you like, to remember what you're supposed to say, not supposed to say. So that's on a very surface level of like it's just easier to live life when you have the smaller the gap between the private you and the public you. And the second is, I think for me from an engineering perspective, like if I'm dishonest with others, I will too quickly become dishonest with myself. [00:46:35] And in so doing, I will not truly be able to think deeply about the world and come up and build revolutionary ideas. There's something about honesty that feels like it's that first principles, thinking that it's almost like overused as a term, but it feels like that requires radical honesty, not radical asshole Englishness, but radical honesty with yourself, with yourself. And I feels like it's difficult to be radically honest with yourself when you're being dishonest with the public. [00:47:05] And also, I have a nice feature, honestly, that in this current social context, so we can talk about race and gender and what are the other topics that are touchy today and nationality, all those things. [00:47:22] I mean, like family structure. [00:47:25] Maybe I'm ineloquent in the way I speak about them, but I honestly, when I look in the mirror like I'm not deeply hateful of a particular race or even just hateful particular race, I'm sure I'm biased and I'll try to like, think about those biases and so on. [00:47:42] And also, I don't have any creepy shit in my closet about women I haven't done. It seems like everybody it seems like a lot of people got like did a lot of creepy stuff in their life. [00:47:55] And I just feel like that's really nice and liberating and especially now, you know, it's funny because I've gotten a bit of a platform and I think it all started when I went to this community, female comedian Whitney Cummings. And, you know, I've gotten a lot of amazing women writing me throughout. But when I went on Whitney. [00:48:18] Is like the number of DMS I get an Instagram for women is just ridiculous, and I think that was a really important moment for me, is like I speak and I feel, you know, I really value love, long term monogamy with like one person. And it's like I could see where a lot of guys would now continue that message in public and in private, just start sleeping around. And so, like, that's an important statement for me mentally. [00:48:49] It's like, nope, the straight and narrow, it just goes straight and not out of fear, but out of principle and just like live life. Honestly, I just I feel like that's truly liberating as a human being. [00:49:04] Forget public all that, because then I feel like I'm on sturdy ground when I say difficult things. And at the same time I'm ranting on this, apologizing. I'm interested. [00:49:17] So you've gone. I, I honestly believe in the Internet. [00:49:25] In people on the Internet, they when they hear me speak, they can see if I'm full of shit or not, like I won't be able to fake it, you know, like they'll see it through. Yeah. [00:49:39] So. I feel like if you're not lying about stuff, you have the freedom to truly be yourself and the and the Internet will figure it out and figure out who you are. [00:49:50] People have a natural tendency to be able to tell Bocian it makes sense from an evolutionary standpoint, exactly like why? [00:49:57] Why wouldn't why? Like, of all the things that we could evolve to be good at. [00:50:03] Being able to detect honesty seems like one that would be particularly valuable, especially in the sorts of societies we developed into, and then also from a selfish perspective, like a success perspective, I think there's a lot of folks that have inspired me like that. Ellen is one of them. That shows that there's a hunger for genuineness, like you can build a business as a CEO and be genuine and real and do stupid shit every once in a while, as long as it's coming from the same place of who you truly are. [00:50:36] Like Ilan's inspirational there. And then there's a lot of other people I admire that are counter inspirations in a sense, like they're very formal. They hold back a lot of themselves. And it's like I know how brilliant those people are. And I think they're not being as effective of leaders, public faces of companies as they could be. I mean, to be honest, like. Not to throw shade, but I will like Mark Zuckerberg as an example of that. [00:51:07] Jack Dorsey is also a bit of an example that I like Jack a lot. I've talked to him a lot. I will talk to him more. I think he's much more amazing person than he conveys through his public presentation. I think a lot of that has to do with PR and marketing people having an effect that this is difficult, I think is really difficult as probably many of the same difficulties you will face as the pressures. Um, but it's it's hard to know what to do. [00:51:36] But I think as much as possible as an individual, you should try to be honest in the face. Of the world and the company that wants you to be more polished and that being more polished turns into politician and politician eventually turns into being dishonest, dishonest with the world and dishonest with yourself. [00:51:57] Something I noticed, which was the people of the people you mentioned, those things have had ramifications in terms of letting things go too far, get out of hand. And you wonder like it's an aspect of lying, right? You say one lie goes to another lie. You push it down. Does it doesn't matter. You can figure it out later. [00:52:16] You figure out later, pretty soon. You've dug a pretty big hole. And I think if we look at Twitter and we look at Facebook, I think it goes without saying what sorts of holes have been dug because of perhaps because of a lack of honesty that goes all the way up to the leaders. [00:52:33] So, yeah, there's two problems within the company. It doesn't make you as effective a leader. [00:52:39] I think that's one and two for social media companies. I think people need to trust, like it doesn't have to be the CEO, but it has to be this is how humans work. We want to look to somebody. [00:52:53] We're like, I trust you. If you're going to use a social media platform, I think you have to trust the set of individuals working at the top of their social and social was something I realized really quickly. [00:53:08] One of the lessons throughout the startup was that people don't totally connect to products as much as they connect to people. Yeah. And I mean, I don't know if, you know, how much you spent on labor. [00:53:22] Only been here the last couple of weeks, like last week, but. I mean, I love the product and one of the one of the aspects of me loving the products that was super active and I've been super active throughout the entire time and the amount of support I've received has made that very easy to do from the community. And the fact that I could I mean, so I came to Boston for this interview, right? Yeah, I came to Boston. [00:53:47] I got off the train. Yeah, it's around five thirty pm. I check lyrics. Someone is writing, hey, I'm in Boston and I want to get dinner. Three minutes later I'm going to dinner with them. That's amazing. And I mean it's incredible. [00:54:02] First of all, as an entrepreneur, the amount of stuff I learn from these people and when they reiterate and I hear that they got the message through the I mean, that's incredibly validating. [00:54:13] But also, I mean, I think it's just important to be able to put a face to a brand and especially a brand that's built on trust, because fundamentally, the users are trusting us with some really important discussions and some really and a movement to some degree. It's a community and a movement. [00:54:32] I think actually why I didn't use the app very much so far is there's something really powerful about the way it's constructed, which I felt like a bit of an outsider because I don't know the communities it felt like it's a is a really strong community around each of these places. Yeah. And so I felt like I was that it made me really wish I was and mighty one. [00:54:57] And so there's both discussions about the deep, like community issues within Columbia or Yale or so on at Dartmouth. And there's also the broader community of the Ivy Leagues that people are discussing. But I could see that actually expanding more and more and more, but which is it's a powerful coupling, just the feeling of like the little village in this little community we're building together, but also the broader issues. Yeah, as you could do both discussions. One thing that was important to me is talk about social media as a concept. [00:55:34] I think the way people socialize is very much context dependent. So what we're talking about people understanding each other through language, through English. Yes. And these languages are constructed there in a very nuanced way, in a very sort of temperamental way. Right. And you kind of need some more context to be able to have productive conversations. So to me, it's really important that these these groups, they share something in common, a really big lived experience, the Ivy League or their school community. [00:56:10] And they have a similar vocabulary. They have a similar background. They know what's happening in their community. And so having social media that is community connected to me was fundamental. Like you talk about anonymity to me, community is the it's the thing that when I think about Libbrecht, I think what makes it different, it's the fact that everyone everyone knows what's going on. Everyone comes from a similar context and people can socialize in a way where they're. They understand each other because they're been through use the word lives experience, they've been through so many of the same lived experiences, a one like clarification. [00:56:45] Is there an easy way if you choose to then connect in a meatspace and physical space? [00:56:53] So the I guess the sort of magic of it and I was talking to a bunch of Harvard law professors who I met off the app while I was in Boston. And every time they told me this is my favorite part of the app, this is what I love about the app with this matching system, which is an anonymous direct message that you can send to any poster. So like I was talking to this guy who he was really into coin collection, and he met other people who are really into coin collection through a post and what he would make a post about coin collection. [00:57:27] And then someone would come to him and they'd be like and they could direct message to him anonymously. And it would just show them that he would just show him their school and then they could just text totally anonymously, direct message if he accepted the anonymous request. Judicial usernames. Right. There are no usernames, only Broox. [00:57:45] It's all just schools names, so he made this post about coin collection. And he got a direct message. Yeah, I guess so, right? I didn't know because I was just looking at the text. Yeah, that's interesting. That's right. And I can tell you, I can go into why that's really interesting. Yeah, I can go. And the truly is anonymous. It's well, I mean, you know, not exactly a very different kind of anonymous. [00:58:14] And the reason the reason that we made that decision is because we want people to connect to ideas, wants people to connect to things in the moment. [00:58:22] We don't want people to go, oh, I know this guy. He said this other thing. And we didn't want people to feel like they were at risk of being boxed. So these are small communities, right? We talked about this. Everyone knows someone who knows you yet. And in twenty twenty one, it would not take much to be able to figure out who someone might be, just a couple of posts. So it's about safety and about the ideas in terms of not adding usernames. [00:58:49] Anyway, we have this anonymous direct message system where you can direct message the original poster of any post the OP if you're ever editor of any posts and you that that makes it really easy to meet up because once you guys are one on one, you can exchange a number, you can exchange Snapchat, you can exchange email, probably not very often, but good. [00:59:11] And then that's how people meet up matching and then a lot of people connect in this way. [00:59:17] Then it's to take a small step into the technical I read somewhere. And if it's true that one of the reasons you were rejected from Y C Y Combinator in the final rounds is because one of the principles is to refuse to sell user data. Can you speak to that? What's why do you think it's important not to sell user data and sort of which draws a clear contrast between other basically any other service on the Internet? [00:59:50] I mean, to be honest, it's quite simple. I mean, we talk about this platform. People are talking about their most intimate secrets, their political opinions. You know what how how are they feeling about what's going on in their city, you know, during the summer? [01:00:06] How how are they feeling about the political cycle and also their mental health, their relationships? [01:00:15] These are some of the most intimate thoughts that people were having point blank. I don't think it was ethical to pawn them off for a profit. I didn't think it was moral. I don't think I could sleep at night if that was what I was doing is turning these people's most intimate beliefs and secrets into a currency that I bought and sold. There's something very off about that. [01:00:41] I tend to believe that there is some room. So like like Facebook, we just take that data and sell it, right, but there is some room in transparency in giving people the choice and which parts they can. I wouldn't even see it a cell, but like share with advertisers. [01:01:00] Are you going to give them a profit? The rates you have to monetize, you have to create the entire system. You have to rethink this whole thing. Right. But if as long as you give people control and are transparent and make it easy, I think it's really difficult to delete a Facebook account or delete all your data or to try it. [01:01:19] It's very difficult. [01:01:21] So, like, just make it easy and trust in that. If you create a great product, people are not going to do it. [01:01:27] And if if they do it, then they're not actually something by deep loving member of the community. Was that. [01:01:34] So we very quickly realized that user privacy was something that was not only a core value, but was something that users really cared about. And we added we added this functionality. It's just a button that says, forget me. [01:01:48] Yeah, you press it. Yeah, like two clicks. It's not that hard. We just remove your email from the database and, um. Yeah, you're good. Beautiful. [01:01:59] I think Facebook should have that. I, I honestly so call me crazy but maybe you can actually speak to this, but I don't think Facebook will now. They would but if they did it earlier they would lose that much money. If they allow, like, transparently tell people you could just delete everything, they also explained that, like. [01:02:22] In ways that's going to potentially like lessen your experience in the short term. Like, we'll explain that, but then there shouldn't be like. Multiple clicks of a button that don't make any sense. I'm trying to hold back from ranting about Instagram because let me just say real quick, because I've been locked out of Instagram for a month and there's a whole group inside Facebook. [01:02:49] They're like supporters of like, let's help Lex. Relax, relax. I wasn't blocked. It was just like a bug in the system. Somebody was hammering the API with my account. So they kept thinking, I'm a bot. You know, it's a bug. It happens a lot of people. But like, first of all, I appreciate the love from all the amazing engineers and Instagram and Facebook, all of those folks. The entire mechanism, though, is somehow broken. [01:03:14] I mean, that I put that on the leadership, but it's also difficult to operate. A large company wants to skills all those kinds of things, but it should not be that difficult to do some basic, basic things that you want to do, which is in the case of Facebook, that's verify your identity to the app. [01:03:37] And also in the case of Facebook, in the case of the works like like disappear. If you if you choose, there's downsides to disappearing, but it should not be a difficult process and I think I think people are waking up to that. [01:03:55] I think there's a lot of room for a nap, a nap like Lee breaks with its that with its foundational ideas to redefine what social media should look like. You know, and like you said, I think beautifully anonymity is not the core value, it's just a tool you use. And who knows, maybe anonymity will not always be the tool used. [01:04:18] Like if you give people the choice, who knows what this evolves from. The login page initially created. The key thing is the founding principles. And again, who knows if you give people a really nice way to monetize their data, maybe they will no longer be a thing that you say do not sell user data. Yeah, all those kinds of things. But the basic principles should be there. And also a good simple interface design is goes it goes a really long way, like simplicity and elegance, which Libbrecht currently is. [01:04:50] Clubhouse is a lot better, by the way. I don't I don't mean to I don't mean to go too deep into the history. But the it was bad. It was I didn't look at the earlier pictures. [01:05:00] Oh thank goodness. [01:05:01] I read somewhere that it was like a white screen, like with black e-mail facing down. But buttons were like these big these big frickin boxes. And like I could go on, but it was my it was my genius design skills, almost a world art class when I was like in first grade. And I think I still have some more skills to my first grade self, but it's gotten a lot better. And thanks to a lot of my friends who have, you know, sort of chipped in here and there. [01:05:32] Oh, I love the idea of a button. [01:05:34] They just like, forget me. I don't know. That's that's really moving. Actually, that that's actually all people want is that they want I think, OK, I'll speak to my experience, like I will give so much more if I could just like disappear if I needed to. And I trusted the the community I trusted, like the founders and the principles. That's really that's really powerful. Men like trust and ease of escape. Yeah. [01:06:07] You've also kind of mentioned moderation, which is really interesting. So with this anonymity and this community, I don't know if you've heard of the Internet, but there's trolls on the Internet. [01:06:19] So I've heard and even if they go to Yale and Dartmouth, there's still people that probably enjoy the sort of being the the guerrilla warfare contra revolutionary and just like creating chaos in a place of love. [01:06:39] So how do you prevent chaos from and hatred breaking out and Libras? [01:06:46] So the way I think about it is we have these principles, the pretty simple and they're pretty easy to enforce. And then beyond the principles, we have a set of moderators matter from every single Ivy League school system of diverse moderators to enforce these principles, but not only enforce the principles, but kind of clue us in to what's happening in their community and how the real life context of their community translates to the context of their community. And beyond that, we have a conversation with them about the standards of the community. [01:07:20] And we're constantly talking about what needs to be further elucidated and what needs to be tweaked. And we're in constant communication with the community. Now, if you want me to get into the principles that underlie Lee Brooks's moderation policy, yeah, please. [01:07:34] Maybe you can explain that there's moderators. What does that mean? How are they chosen and what are the principles under which they operate? [01:07:40] Sure. So how are the moderators chosen? The moderators are all volunteers. They're professors who reach out to me and respond to the opportunity to become moderator. And whether chosen is basically we want to make sure that they're in tune with their community. We will make sure they come from diverse backgrounds and we want to make sure that they're they sort of understand what the game is about. And then we ask them some questions about how they would deal with certain scenarios, ones that we've had in the past and we feel strongly about. [01:08:13] And then also ones that a little bit murky where we want to see that they're sort of thinking about these things in a critical way. Yeah. And from there, we choose the site and they have the power to take down posts. Of course, everything at the end of the day, my review. But they can take them down and we can reinstate them if that's if it's a problem. But they can take time posts and they can advocate for, you know, different moderation standards and different moderation policies. [01:08:42] So for now, you're the Linus Torvalds community. [01:08:44] And so meaning like you're able to make people are actually able to like email you or like text me, text you, contact you and get a response. [01:08:57] Like you respond to basically everybody. [01:08:59] And then you're like, really, you know, you're you're living that live on people's floor life currently. That's not necessarily this is the early days, folks. [01:09:11] I knew he was a billionaire and he was cool. And then he was in a mansion making meat on his barbecue, you know? [01:09:19] OK, but how does it scale up? Like what? I suppose how does it scale is the question, I mean, Linus, I don't know if you're familiar with the open source community, but he still stayed at the top for a while, was really important, like leadership there was really important to drive that large scale, really productive open source community. [01:09:45] What do you see your role as Libros grows? [01:09:48] And in general, what are the mechanisms of scaling here for moderation versus open discourse is fundamental to the purpose of the app. Right. So as the I guess you could say, founder, CEO, what have you. Part of my purpose has to be to enforce the vision. Right. And part of the vision is open discourse. And that does come down in part to reasonable moderation and community guided reasonable moderation. So I imagine that will always be something that I'm intimately involved with to some degree. [01:10:24] Now, the degree to which the way in which that manifests, I imagine, will have to change. Right. And hopefully I'll be able to just like you can hire a CTO. [01:10:37] Hopefully I'll be able to be integrated in hiring people who are who understand the the way that we are sort of operating and the and the reasonable standards of moderation. And there can be a sort of hierarchical structure. [01:10:51] But I think when you've a product whose key purpose is to allow people to have these difficult conversations on campus that need to be had, I can never hear to that. Yeah, I can never fully. I don't think I can fully ever abdicate that responsibility. I think that would be like I mean, they would be like Basso's abdicating e-commerce, right? That is part of the job. Yeah. [01:11:17] Of course, you can run companies in different ways, I think, because he might have abdicated quite a bit of the details. That's hard for me to say because the Amazon does so many things. I think the probably the better examples like Elon with Rock, as he's still at the core of the engineer, he's at the core of the engineering. [01:11:34] There's some fundamental questions of what he probably does, way too much of the engineering, like he's like the lowest level detail. [01:11:41] But you're saying like the core things that are that make the app work is. Is the moderation of difficult conversations. And by the way, I'm 21 years old. Let's remind everyone of that. [01:11:54] If this thing. Does scale and if this thing continues to be a positive force in a lot of people's lives, who knows what will will happen in the next? What I'll learn, I'm still growing definitely as a leader, still growing as a thinker, still as a person. I don't I can't pretend that I know how to run a business that is worth, you know, up 10 billion dollars, whatever. Yeah. I can't pretend I know how to run a business that's, you know, going to have millions, millions of users. [01:12:24] I expect that there are going to be a lot of amazing people who will teach me and that a lot of people who have already kind of stepped into my life and helped me out and taught me things. And I imagine that I'll learn so much more. I just know that moderation is always going to be important to me because I don't think Liebreich Celebrex, unless we have open discourse and moderation, reasonable, open light touch moderation is at the heart of creating that right. [01:12:54] So as a creator of this kind of community in place with anonymity and difficult conversations, what. What do you think about this? Touchy, three words that people have been tossing around and politicizing, I would say, but as that the core of the founding of this country, which is the freedom of speech, how do you think about the freedom of speech of this particular kind of freedom of expression? And do you think it's a fundamental human right? How do you define it to yourself when you when you think about it? [01:13:27] Have I went down especially preparing for this conversation down a rabbit hole of like just how unclear it is philosophically what is meant by this kind of freedom? It's not as easy as people think, but it's interesting, pragmatically speaking, to hear how you think about it in the context of Bluebox. Yeah, it's a tough one, right? There's a lot there, so I come from the background of being a math major. It's important to start with that. [01:13:59] Yeah, and I found myself in the middle of this question of freedom of speech. Well, one of the wonderful things is that the labor community is filled with ideas and governance majors who have taught me a ton about this sort of thing. And I'm still learning. I'm still growing. I'm still probably going to modify my perspective to some degree, hopefully. [01:14:24] Don't worry. [01:14:25] I imagine I'll always support free discourse. Like learning. Yeah. How to speak about stuff is is as critical here because it's like I'm learning that this is a minefield of conversations, because the moment you say like even saying freedom of speech is a complicated concept, people will be like, oh, this part of the communist, you know, like they'll say there's nothing complicated about freedom. Freedom is freedom, bro. It's it is complicated. First of all, if you talk about there's there's different definitions of freedom of speech. [01:15:02] If you want to go constitution, if you want to talk about the United States specifically and what's legal, it's actually not as exciting and not as beautiful as people think of complicated. It's complicated. I think there's ideals behind it that we want to see. What does that actually materialize itself in the digital world where we're trying to communicate in ways that allows for difficult conversations and also at the same time doesn't result in the silencing of voices not through like censorship, but through like just assholes being rude, spam, spam. [01:15:44] They so it could be just bots, racism, racism. Going back to the name of the app libraries. Yes. Libra Free X was support Montu for free exchange and the free exchange of what my purpose was to create as many as much intercommunication of ideas, be them repugnant or otherwise as possible. And of course to do that within legal bounds and to do that without causing anyone to be harassed or doxa to keep things focused on the ideas, not the people. [01:16:20] And then. No B.S. crap, you know, stuff and so to me, the easiest way to moderate around that because as you said, figuring out what is hateful and what is hate speech is really hard was to say no sweeping statements against core identity groups. And that seems to work on the whole pretty well to be pretty light touch and hard to do, though it's it's difficult like to generalize we humans, it's difficult. [01:16:49] But what it comes down to is be specific. Yeah. And when you think about what are sweeping statements are done in groups. Right. Oftentimes these are these are sort of hackneyed subjects. These are things that have been broached and. We've heard them before, they don't really lead anywhere productive, so we so it goes on this principle of be specific in the ideas you're discussing. [01:17:12] So even for, like, positive and humorous stuff, we try to avoid generalizations against core identity or identity goals. So what to groups we're talking, you know, race, religion, OK. Got it, even positive stuff. [01:17:29] Well, against negative against Syria, against against OK, very, very we've learned to be very specific, very few words, but the community gets, you know. [01:17:41] Yeah, they get it. I mean, this the thing they they the trouble with rules is as the community grows, they'll figure out ways to manipulate the rules. Absolutely. [01:17:53] It's human nature. It's creativity. Yeah. Something beautiful about it, of course. [01:17:58] Unlike from an evolutionary perspective. Yes. Yeah. The fact that people are so creative and so looking to and because people are genuinely interested in figuring out these things about social media. And so the 100 percent like see like where's the edge? And I mean, part of that's maintaining some level of vagueness in your research. Yeah. Which has its own set of questions and something we could think about. And I'm not implying have all the answers, but there is something really interesting about people being so engaged that they're looking to figure out where those edges and what does that mean? [01:18:30] What does that mean? You know? [01:18:32] So one of the things I'm kind of thinking about, like from an individual user of liberals or individual user of the Internet, I think about like that one person that is on Reddit saying hateful stuff or positive stuff doesn't matter or funny stuff. One of the things I think about is the trajectory of that individual through life and how social media can help that person become the best version of themselves. I don't mean from like an Orwellian sense, like educate them properly or something. [01:19:05] I just mean like we're all I believe we're all fundamentally good. And I also believe we all have the capacity to do to create some amazing stuff in this world, whether that's ideas or art or engineering, all those kinds of things, just to be amazing people. [01:19:25] And I kind of think about like, you know, a lot of social media mechanisms bring out the worst in us. [01:19:32] And I try to think like in the long term, how can the social media or how can a website to the create can make the best like you take a trajectory that makes you better, better and better and like the best version of yourself. So I think about that because like, you know, Twitter can really take down some dark trajectories. I've seen people just not being the best version of themselves. Forget the counterculture and all that kind of stuff is just like they're not developing intellectually in the way that's going to make the best version of themselves. [01:20:07] I think Reddit, I'm not sure what I think about ready yet, because one positive side is all the shit posting I read. It could be just like a release valve for for some stress in life. And you almost have like a parallel life where you're in meatspace. You might be actually becoming successful and so on and growing and so on. But you just need sometimes to be angry at somebody. But I tend to not think that's possible. I think if you're shit posting, you're probably not spending your time the best way you could. [01:20:41] I don't know. [01:20:42] I am. I'm torn on that. [01:20:44] But do you think about that would lead Breck's of creating a trajectory for the for the Yale for the Dartmouth, the students to where they grow intellectually? [01:20:53] One thing that I think about a lot is how do you incentivize positive content creation? How do you incentivize well put really intellectual content creation? It's something that frankly, you know. I think about every single day, and I think there are ways that. I mean, one thing that's great about humans is that they can be incentivized, right? And I think there are ways that you can incentivize people to make the right kind of content, if that's your goal. [01:21:25] Do you think such mechanisms exist for such incentivization? I do. I don't want to let the cat out of the bag, so to speak. [01:21:32] So already, ideally, concrete ideas in your mind about you, really concrete ideas that I'm very, very optimistic about. Yeah. And, you know, you need to share that. [01:21:41] And the fact that I understand totally, but like the fact that you have them, that's really good, because I feel like sometimes the downfall of the social media is that there's literally not even thinking or a discussion about the incentivisation of positive long term content creation. [01:22:03] And Twitter. I really was excited about this when they said, like when Jack has talked about, like creating healthy conversations, he does seem to care. [01:22:11] I've listened to him. I mean, he's very he's a very particular way of saying things. But you get the impression that he's someone who actually cares about these things within the limits of his power. [01:22:21] Yeah, and that's the question. The limits of the power. [01:22:25] Liebreich is growing not just in the number of communities, but also in the way you're incentivizing positive conversations like coupled with the moderation, so on. So you think there's a lot of innovation to be had in that area? [01:22:41] There's a tremendous amount. I think when you think about the reasons people post, fundamentally, people want to make a positive impact on their community to some degree. Now, there always be bad actors and part of the benefit of sort of our moderation structure is that we can limit some of those bad actors. [01:22:59] You know, no body counts, no brigading. At the same time, the more you incentivize a certain type of behavior, the better it's going to be. And it's we don't see this our role as the platform to force the communion in a direction. And frankly, I don't think it would be good for anyone, the community or the conversations, if we forced a specific type of conversations, a conversation. We just need to make the tools to allow people to be good. [01:23:28] Yeah. And to incentivize good behavior. [01:23:30] I believe that, like, if you you don't you will not need to censor. If you allow people at scale to be good, the good will overpower the assholes. [01:23:40] That's that's my fundamental belief. I'm very optimistic about that. But currently, the Abraxas small in the sense that it's a small set of communities that I believe and you mentioned to me offline, that by design you're scaling slowly, carefully. So how does the work scale, is it possible, you know, Facebook also started with a small set of communities that were schools and then now grew to be basically the if not one of the largest social networks in the world. [01:24:16] Do you see as potentially scaling to be beyond even college campuses, but encompassing the whole world? So it's a long time timeline. I'll say this, this goes back to like. Where to his Facebook go wrong, because clearly they did a lot right, and we can only we can only speculate about what the objectives were of the founders of Facebook. [01:24:45] You know, I'm sure they've said some things, but it's always interesting to know what the what the mythology is versus what the truth is of the matter. So perhaps they and they've been very successful. I mean, they they've taken over the world to some extent. At the same time, the goals of the BRICS are to create these positive communities and these open conversations where people can have real conversation and connection in their communities in a vulnerable and authentic way. [01:25:15] And so to that end, which I imagine might be different then the goals of a Facebook, for example, one thing that we want to do is keep things intimate and community based. So each school is its own community. And perhaps you could have a slightly broader community. Maybe you could have a I know the California system is an obvious one. [01:25:38] PacTel might be an obvious one, and we can think about that. But fundamentally, the unit, the unit of community is your school or your school community. So that that that's one difference that I think will help us. The other thing is that we're scaling intentionally, meaning that when we expand to a school, we have moderators in place. We have moderators who understand that school's environment in a very personal level. And we're growing responsibly. We're growing as we're ready, both technologically but also socially, you know, but as we think we have the tools to preserve the community and to encourage the community to create the sort of content that we want them to create. [01:26:23] And, you know, there's a lot of ways to find communities. So, first of all, this geographic community as well. But the way you're kind of defining community with Yale and Dartmouth is the email. Right? [01:26:36] That's what gives you there's a power to the email in the sense that that's how you can verify, officially verify yourself for being a single individual in the university. In that same way, you can verify your employment at a company, for example, like Google, Microsoft, Facebook, decir, potentially taking on those communities that be facing getting like anonymous community conversations inside Google. [01:27:09] One hundred percent crossed my mind to some extent. This is this is something where. I understand the college experience, I understand the need got and I I've never I've never worked at Google. I don't know if they would hire me hopefully maybe as a product manager. [01:27:26] But I think if there's a community that needs this product and has that and has that will, which I think especially as Libros continues to grow and expand and change and learn, and because that's what we're doing, is we're learning right with each community. It's not just about growing. It's about learning from these from each of these communities and iterating. [01:27:52] Um, I think it's quite likely they're going to be all sorts of communities that could use this tool to improve their. Culture, so to speak, so forgive me, I'm not actually like that knowledgeable about the history of attempts of building social networks to solve the problem that you're solving, but I was made aware that there was an app app or at least a social network called Yik Yak. [01:28:20] That was had a similar kind of focus, I think the thing you've spoken about that differs between the barracks in New York is that you was defined by pronouncing it right, even good. [01:28:37] I'm glad I met the founders so I can confirm you can confirm for the that it was constraints, a geographical area versus like to the actual community. [01:28:50] And that and that somehow had fundamental like actual differences in social dynamics that resulted. But can you speak to the history of you like how does the burgs differ? What lessons have you learned from that? Oh, and I should say that I guess there was controversial. I don't know. I didn't look at the details, but I'm guessing there's a bunch of racism and hate speech and all that kind of stuff that emerged. There was an Nukak. OK, so that's an example of like. [01:29:17] OK, here's how it goes wrong when you have anonymity on college campuses, so how does the going to do better? You can get a lot of problems, content problems with the content problems go deeper than maybe what the press would reveal. There's a lot to say. [01:29:35] And part of it is parsing exactly what to talk about when it comes to Akec. [01:29:40] And when you talk about startups, I mean, you know, they say, you know, startups and you look at the postmortem, it's almost never what people think it is. And and oftentimes these things are somewhat unknowable. And the degree to which people seeking confirmation bias, somebody seeking closure, look to find a singular attribute that caused the failure. [01:30:02] It feels like the little details often make all the difference. Yes. [01:30:06] And I think I think the details are so little that as humans, we are not capable of parsing even what they are. [01:30:13] But I'll tell you also in my perspective on it, knowing that I am also a human with biases in this particular case, very significant biases. Yeah. [01:30:24] Um. I so I started building libraries for its own merits. I first I wasn't aware of it yet, but as I started to talk to people about this platform I was building, I was made aware of it and I built it from day one with a lot of the issues you had in mind. [01:30:44] The so as you said, the one difference between your characters, the geographical versus community based aspect going along with that. One thing I realized by researching social media sites is that the majority of the negative content, the content that's terrible and breaking all the rules is created by really and the people who are not reformable, so to speak, the people who are not showing the best part of the human experience. Yeah, it's a really small minority. Right. [01:31:19] I remember I was listening to the founder of 4chan talk about this, how like one guy was able to basically destroy. [01:31:28] Like large swaths of his community. Yeah, that's part of what makes it exciting for that minority is how much power they can have. So if you're predisposed to think in this way, it's exciting that you can walk into. Like I mentioned the party before, you have a party of a lot of positive people. And it feels especially if you. Don't have much power in this world, it feels exceptionally empowering just to to destroy like the lives of many. [01:32:03] And if you think this way, it's a problem. [01:32:05] But I am hopeful that you're right, that in most cases it's going to be a minority of people think it is. [01:32:13] And that's what the research has shown. And one really powerful thing is that we can really actively control who comes in and out of our community based on the 3D verification. [01:32:25] And we can also control who's not in our community because we have that lever where each account is associated with it. To you see, that's the first point I put out point out their second point is control expansion, meaning that with community moderation, we have this panel that allows the moderators to see all of the highly developed content, all of the reported content, all the content and look through it and decide what they like and what's appropriate and what's not appropriate. [01:32:56] And we have, um, we ping every moderator when there's a report. So things are taken down pretty quickly. And we have our standards and we have I think above all of that, we have a mission and it's a community based mission. You care was more of a fun up. And by its own admission, it was a place where people could enjoy themselves and could sort of yak, yak, yak, yak, you know, chit chat. [01:33:22] We have a we have a bigger purpose than that, frankly. And I think I think that shows and the people who self select beyond that up to be only and to be on Nukak respectively. The last thing I'll say is you check was very few characters. It was a Twitter esque platform and that doesn't allow for a tremendous amount of nuance, doesn't offer a tremendous amount of conversation. Librettists is much more long form. And so the kind of post that you'll get only Breck's are spam pages. [01:33:52] They're like what people are starting to realize is that they can reach a lot more people at a lot more pertinent over time, a lot more quickly. By posting their thoughts on Brexit than if they went to their school newspaper, and I think the school newspapers might be a little worried about that, but more importantly, we're connecting people in this way. [01:34:12] We're long form communication with nuance that takes into account everything that's happening in the community. Temperley. [01:34:20] Is really available, the press and, you know, not really communicable and 240 or 480 or whatever the number of characters the acts were bound to, and then you could talk about the history of the ACHAK if you want me to go further. [01:34:36] They started it. I think they were at 12 schools and then spring break it. People told their friends, look at this up. A thousand schools signed up and had active communities. [01:34:48] They had a problem on their hands and then the high schools come on board. [01:34:51] Yeah, I think a lot of the things you said ring true to me, but especially the vision one which I do think having a vision in the leadership, having a mission makes all the difference in the world, that that's both for the engineers that are building like the team that's building the AB, the moderation and users, because they kind of the mission carries itself through the behavior of the other people on the social network. [01:35:22] As a small tangent, let me ask you something about parler, much less about parler and more about HWC, so HWC removed parler from his platform for whatever reasons, doesn't really matter. But the fact that eight of us would do this was really, really bothered me personally because I saw either of us as the competing infrastructure and I always thought that part could not put a finger on the scale. And I don't know what your thoughts are like. Were you bothered by part of being removed from us and how does that affect how you think about the competing infrastructure and which Lubeck is based? [01:36:07] I was bothered not so much by Parler specifically being taken out of HWC, but more the fact that something that's like a highway, something that people rely on, that people build on top of, that people assume is going to be somewhat position agnostic, like a road that people drive on is is becoming ideologically sort of discriminatory. I just and of course, mind you, Amazon can do what it wants. It's a private company and I support the rights of private companies. [01:36:39] I just want an ethical and sort of a deep moral level. [01:36:42] I wonder like at what point? Should a company sort of be agnostic in that in that regard and let developers build on top of their infrastructure and where where where does that responsibility hold? [01:36:58] Yes, it makes you hope that there's going to be, from a capitalistic sense, competitors to us who say, like, we're not going to put our finger on the scale. I mean, and the highway is a good sort of example. It's like if a privately owned highway exactly. [01:37:15] Said, you know, we're no longer going to allow we're only going to allow electric vehicles. And a bunch of people in this world would be like, yes, because electric is good for the environment and. You know, yes, but then you have to consider the like the slippery slope nature of it, but also like the negative impact on the lives of many others and what that means for innovation and for like competition, again, in a capitalistic sense. [01:37:47] So there's some nature, there's some level to this hierarchy of our existence that we should not allow to manipulate was built on top of it. It should be truly infrastructure and it feels like compute is storage and compute. Is that where they shouldn't be messed with? [01:38:09] I haven't seen anybody really complain about it, like in terms of government, and I'm not even sure government is the right mechanism to policy and regulation to step in because again, they do a messy job of fixing things. But I do hope there's competitors to us to make them step up, because I do think, you know, I'm a fan of yours, except this service, it's a good service until this, though. Yeah. Until they rip out the thrugh. [01:38:38] And the point is, it's not that necessarily their decision was a bad one with parler in particular. It's that like the the slippery slope nature of it, but also the it takes the good actors that are creating amazing products and makes them more fearful. And when you're more fearful as the same reason that anonymity is a tool that you don't create, the best thing you could possibly create when you're fearful you don't create. [01:39:07] That's right. [01:39:08] I think we kind of talked about it a little bit, but I wonder if we can kind of revisit it a little bit. I talked to a guy named Ronald Sullivan, who's a faculty at Harvard Law professor. He was on the legal defense team because the lawyer for Harvey Weinstein and Aaron Hernandez for the double murder case. So he takes on these really difficult cases of unpopular figures because he believes like that's the way you test that we believe in the rule of law. [01:39:40] But he was there's a big protest in Harvard to get him to basically censor him and to get him to no longer be faculty, dean, all those kinds of things. And it was by a minority of students. But it was a huge blowback, obviously, in the public, but also inside Harvard, like, that's not OK. [01:40:04] He stands for the very principles that the founding of Harvard and at the principles of the founding of this country in the law and so on. But the basic argument is that. It was about safe spaces, that it's unsafe to have somebody who is basically supporting Harvey Weinstein. Right. What do you think about this whole idea of safe spaces on college campuses? Because it feels like the the mission of the is pushing back against the idea of safe spaces. I think safe spaces are fine when they're within people's private lives, within their homes, you know, within their religious organizations. [01:40:47] I think the problem becomes when the institution starts encouraging or. [01:40:53] Backing safe spaces because. What are people being safe from? And oftentimes it seems like there's this idea that the harm that's being attempted to be mitigated is the harm of confronting opinions. You disagree with opinions you might find repugnant. [01:41:13] And if this is conflated with a need for safety, then that's where the idea of liberal arts education sort of dies. [01:41:23] Of course, it's complicated and we still want to have safe intellectual environments. But the way that I hear the term safe space used today, I think it doesn't really have a place within like the intellectual context. Yeah, it's funny. [01:41:40] I mean, this is why libraries is really exciting as it's pushing those difficult conversations. And I'd love to see. Ultimately, there does seem to be an asymmetry of power that results in the concept of safe spaces and hate speech being redefined in the slippery slope kind of way, where it means basically anything you want it to mean. And it basically is used to silence people, to silence people. They're like good, thoughtful experts, so young that I would say it has not just a pragmatic purpose, which is the silencing, but also sort of an ideological purpose, which is another linguistic purpose, which is to conflate words with unsafety and harm and violence, which is what you kind of see on a cultural linguistic level is happening all around us right now. [01:42:36] Is that this idea that words are harm is very dangerous and slippery concept. I mean, it's not you don't have to slip that far to see why that's a problem. Once we start making words into violence and we start criminalizing words, we get into some really authoritarian territory, things that I think I mean myself and my background. I don't know how much we have to go into it, but things that my ancestors certainly would be worried about. [01:43:03] What's your background? [01:43:05] I'm a child of Holocaust survivors and program survivors. [01:43:09] So, yeah, I mean me as well from different directions. I come from the Soviet Union. So there's well, like in most of us, hate and love runs through our blood from our history. You mentioned Amitay is being added to the books. [01:43:25] Has it already been? Yes, it was added today. [01:43:28] Today. OK, so let me ask you. This is exciting because I don't know what your thoughts are about this, but I'll tell you from my perspective, if and a lot of folks listen to this, I would love it if you joined the ranks. It'd be interesting to explore conversations on several topics inside MIT, but one of the most. Moving that hasn't been discussed at all, except in little flourishes here and there is the topic of Jeffrey Epstein now. [01:44:07] There's been a huge amount of like impact that the connections of various faculty to Jeffrey Epstein and the various things that have been said had anonymity, but it feels like the conversation haven't had been had. It's the administration trying to clean up and give a bunch of B.S. to try to pretend like let's just hide this part like nothing is broken and nothing to see. Here is a bad dude that did some bad things and some faculty that kind of misbehaved a little bit because they were a little bit clueless. [01:44:46] Let's let's all look the other way. Harvard did this much better, by the way. They completely it's almost like people pretend like Harvard didn't have anything to do with Jeffrey Epstein. [01:44:58] But I think I'd be curious to hear what those conversations are, because there is conversations on the topic of like, well, obviously sort of sexual assault and disrespecting women and any kind of level within academia, but just women in general. That's an important topic to talk about. Very many sensitive for conversations. And the other topic is, you know, funding for research like how or like what are we OK taking money from and what are we not OK taking money from? [01:45:37] You know, there's a lot of just interesting, difficult conversations to be had. [01:45:42] I've worked with people who, you know, refused to take money from DOD, Department of Defense, for example, because in some indirect or direct way, you're funding military industrial complex, all those kinds of things. I think what Jeffrey Epstein is even more stark, this contrast of like, well, what is and isn't ethical to take money from. And I just think forget academia. I think there's just a lot of interesting deep human discussions to be had. [01:46:11] And they haven't been. And there's been somebody I don't know if you're familiar with Eric Weinstein, who has been outraged by the fact that nobody's talking about Jeffrey Epstein and nobody's having these difficult conversations. And Eric himself has had sort of complicated journey through academia in the sense that he's a really kind of renegade thinker of many kinds of ways. I'm not sure if you know who Eric is. When he heard the name, I actually checked out of that. [01:46:42] It was heartening for me to see that I was not the youngest person on the other side of the I guess so. That's hilarious. [01:46:56] But but but Eric has he's kind of a renegade thinker. [01:47:01] He's a mathematical physicist with a believer in Harvard, and he spent some time at MIT and so on. But he he speaks to the fact that sort of there's a culture of conformity and so on. And if you if you're somebody who's a bit outside of the box, a bit weird and whatever dimension of weird that makes you actually kind of interesting, that the system kind of wants to make an outcast, wants to throw you out. And so he kind of opposes the whole idea. [01:47:29] He's the perfect person to have conversations with in this kind of libbrecht kind of context of anonymity, because I'll tell you, the few conversations that came across and there were very quickly silenced and I'm troubled by it. I'm not sure what to think of it is there's a few threads inside I might like on a mailing list discussing Marvin Minsky. I don't know if you know how that is. He's an AI researcher. He's a seminal figure before your time, but one of the most important people in the history of artificial intelligence. [01:48:07] And there was a discussion on a on a on a thread that involved the interaction between Marvin Minsky and Jeffrey Epstein. That conversation was quickly shut down. One person was pushed out of MIT, Richard Stallman, who's one of the key figures in the because of that, because he wanted some clarity about the situation. But he also he spoke, like we mentioned earlier, with our grace. Right. [01:48:39] But he was quickly part of the administration because of a few people protesting and just that conversation. I guess what bothered me most is it didn't continue, it didn't it didn't expand. [01:48:54] There was no, like, complexity in and it was there was a hunger. There was clear behind the conversation, especially so for me. I'd like to understand Marvin Minsky was one of the one of the reasons I wanted to come to MIT. He passed away. But he's one of the key figures in the field that I deeply care about our artificial intelligence. [01:49:15] And I thought that his name was dragged through the mud through that situation and without ever being, like, resolved. And so it's unclear to me, like, what am I supposed to think about all this? And the only way to come to a conclusion there is to keep talking. It's like the thing we started this conversation with about truth is like is conversation. [01:49:43] So in that sense, I'd love if people only Breck's perhaps in other places. But it seems like Bluebox is a nice platform to discuss Marvin Minsky, to discuss Jeffrey Epstein, to learn from it, to grow from it, to see how we can make our MIT better, as I'm still one of the people I've always dreamed of. Being in Amitay is a dream come true in many ways, and I still believe that MIT is one of the most special places in this world. [01:50:11] Like many other universities, universities in general is truly special and I know it hurts my heart when people speak poorly of academia. I understand what they mean. They're very correct. But there is much more, in my opinion. That's beautiful about academia and that's broken. I mean, I don't know if you have something to comment. It doesn't have to be about Jeffrey Epstein. But there's these difficult things that come up that test the academic community. Right. [01:50:42] That it feels like conversation is the only way to resolve it. I think people have a natural need for closure. And it's not just I'm not as plugged into the academics we're talking about as you would be like. But I even call these days no respect for Minsky. [01:51:00] Exactly. I mean, especially in the community. [01:51:03] I'm not not necessarily a programmer, but what I will say is that. People come to bricks and we always see a huge spike in users whenever there's like a tragedy on campus or something where people need closure. Recently, there was a suicide just the other day on Yale's campus and people were just coming to pay respects and to say rest in peace and speak also about what might have led to an environment where people are drawn to these terrible results. [01:51:42] So just having a conversation is important there. Like you need people need the space. Especially when no one wants to go out and put their head above, you know, for the longest blade of grass on that one. Yeah, because of the stigma. Yeah. People need to be able to speak. Yeah, that fear really bothers me, the fear that silences people like where they self censor, where they s silence. Well, I'm. You've created an amazing place, I am kind of interested in your struggle and your journey of creating positive. [01:52:24] Incentives because it's a problem in a very different domain that I'm also interested in. Um, so I you know, I love about robotics. I love human robot interaction. And so I believe that most people are good and we can bring out the best in human nature. Social networks is a very tricky space to do that. And so I'm glad you're taking on the problem and I'm glad you have the mission that you do. I hope you succeed. [01:52:50] But you mentioned offline that you used to be into chess. [01:52:55] Tell me about your journey through chess. Sure. [01:52:57] I was a very competitive tournament player growing up till about like 13. I got for the chess fans out, got to 2000 USCF. So I was a competitive player, especially my age group. And that actually led me to poker. I was, um, I was playing a tournament. [01:53:15] And what happens is when you're like a very strong 13 year old and you're playing locally, if you want a good match, it can end up playing a lot of adults. And I ended up playing this some mid forties guy who we played a really strong game. He actually beat me. I still I still remember the game. And I don't think I could I should have played that movement to that one. [01:53:33] But after after the game, we had a postmortem. It was this me, I think I was 30 at the time. And this 40 year old like hanging over this chessboard and looking over the moves. And even at that, even at my age, it occurred to me that this guy was absolutely brilliant. Yes. And after after the postmortem, not only, by the way, in chess, but just like in the way he articulates thoughts as some people are after postmortem, I went and looked him up online. [01:53:56] I found out that he was a World Series of poker champion. [01:53:59] And was it? His name is Bill Chan. Oh, wow. And I haven't really kept up with him except one time there was another chess tournament when I was around 14 and I followed him into an elevator as he was leaving the chess hall, like pretending that I was going to go up just because I wanted to. I just wanted to talk to him. And I suggested a sequel or some changes that he could that I thought he could make for his book and was like, actually, I was thinking of doing the same thing, which is incredibly validating to my 14 or 15 year old self, but I really haven't kept up with them. [01:54:30] So to shout out to him. But and then that he wrote a book called The Mathematics of Poker that I started reading. And that, first of all, kickstarted my interest in game theory and second of all, in poker. So I started from chess and then poker and I started with Bitcoin poker and had a lot of success with that, met a lot of amazing friends I learned a ton about. [01:54:54] I mean, I think about entrepreneurship as well as taking risks, reasonable risks, positive expected value risks, and also just growing as a person and mathematician. [01:55:04] And what did you say? Bitcoin poker? Yeah, what's bitcoin poker? [01:55:09] You have to understand, I was 14 years old. Right. So how does a 14 year old with wonderful parents who care about him. [01:55:15] Yeah. And probably don't want him playing poker. Yeah. I'm going to start playing poker because I want to I wanted to challenge I love the challenge of the competition. And I realized the answer is probably Bitcoin because the implications of that and they had they had these four year old tournaments which froze. You don't know four year olds are there's these promotional tournaments that it's put on where they'll put like a few dollars in and then thousands of people sign up and the winners get like a dollar. [01:55:45] And I started there and I worked my way up. And that's amazing. [01:55:49] What's your sense about from that time to today, the growth of the cryptocurrency community? I'm actually having like four or five conversations with Bitcoin proponents, Bitcoin maximalists. And like all these, I'm just having all these cryptocurrency conversations currently because there's so many brilliant, like, technically brilliant, but also financially and philosophically brilliant people in those communities. It's fascinating with the explosion of impact, like and also if you look into the future, the possible revolutionary impact on society in general. [01:56:26] But what's your sense about this whole growth of Bitcoin? [01:56:29] I'm definitely less knowledgeable on the currency. Again, like programing. It was a means to an end. Yes, right. [01:56:36] It, um, well, I will say is that there was this amazing community that grew out of it and you'd have people who were willing to stake me or have me be their horse. And they're my backer for having never met me for. Literally for Bitcoin tournaments like full Bitcoin entry fee tournaments, and I get a percentage of the profits and they get a percentage, and to have that level of community for that degree of money, I mean, it gives you hope about the potential for, you know, humans to act in mutual best interest with a degree of trust. [01:57:12] Yeah, there's a really fascinating, strong community there. But speaking of bringing out the best in human nature, it's a community that's currently struggling a little bit in terms of their ability to communicate in a positive and inspiring way, like the Bitcoin folks. And we talk about this a lot. They I honestly think they have a lot a lot of love in their hearts and minds, but they just kind of naturally, because the world has been. Like institutions and the centralized powers have been sort of mocking and fighting them for many years, that they've become sort of worn down and cynical and so they tend to be a little bit more aggressive and negative on the Internet. [01:58:02] It's interesting in the way they communicate, especially on Twitter, and it's just created this whole community of. [01:58:09] Basically being derisive and mocking and trolling and all this kind of stuff, you but people are trying to, you know, as as the Bitcoin community grows, as the cryptocurrency community grows, they're trying to revolutionize that aspect, too. So they're trying to find the positive core and grow and grow in that way. [01:58:27] So it's a it's fascinating because I think all of us are trying to find the positive aspects of ourselves and trying to learn how to communicate in a positive way online, like the Internet has been around. Social networks have been run along. We're trying to we're trying to figure this thing out. Let me ask you the ridiculous question. [01:58:46] I don't know if you have an answer, but who is the greatest chess player of all time, in your view, since you like chess thoughts on how you define it. [01:58:54] But if you're talking about raw skill, like if you put everyone across time into a tournament together, yeah, Carson would win. I don't think that's particularly controversial. [01:59:03] Oh, you mean like with the same exact skill level. Exactly. That Magnus is the object. [01:59:08] Now, if you talk about political importance, I think Bobby Fischer is you know, he's a he's the only one that people still used to go to town on the street. They know Bobby Fischer because he was because of what he represented. Right. [01:59:21] Who do you think is more famous on the street, Garry Kasparov or Bobby Fischer? Probably in America? Both. I think so, yes. That's interesting. I think we would have to put that to the test. [01:59:32] Yeah, maybe it's maybe it's more reflective of the community that I was a part of. [01:59:36] But yeah, also in the community, you're part of, like young minds playing chess. Bobby Fischer was a superstar in terms of. [01:59:43] Yeah, I think so, because it's American. And, you know, he stood up against the big bad Russians. Yes. At the time. And, uh, you know, unfortunately, he had a very bad downfall. But, um, well, you know, for our geopolitical situation, he meant a lot. And then if you talk about compared to contemporaries, actually, I would say Paul Murphy was a bit of a throwback, was he's one of those geniuses that was just head and shoulders above everyone else. [02:00:14] Is there somebody that inspired your own play, like as a young mind? [02:00:18] Yeah, I really liked my Celtel, so like you see, or I think it was very aggressive, right? Yeah, very tactical. Yeah. Which is funny because I, I found that I was better at like sort of slow, methodical play than quick tactics. But I just I mean, there's something beautiful about the creativity. And that's something I always latched on to as being a creative player, being a creative person. [02:00:39] I mean, just doesn't really reward creativity as much as a lot of other things, especially entrepreneurial pursuits, which I think is part of the reason why I sort of grew out of it. [02:00:50] But I always was attracted to the creativity that I did see in chess. [02:00:55] So let me ask the flipside. The the other, because you said poker. Is there somebody who says ideas could be the greatest poker player of all time? I could you admire that. [02:01:08] And that's a more controversial one, because these chess players are such like first of all, this, Martin, is an objective standard. And second of all, there's like they're like almost like cultural figures to me, whereas poker players are more like life living. They feel more like, yeah, they feel more accessible. [02:01:27] But they also have like personalities like Phil identifies their vices, the quirks of humor. Like, I guess we've seen videos of them. Yeah. [02:01:39] Because it's such a recent development to say one person who I admire so much and like, if I could like have a dinner list of people that I want to have dinner with, like maybe it'll happen. [02:01:49] No, actually, I would love to have dinner with him for Chalfont, who I don't most people probably won't know. Yeah, but on this podcast. [02:01:59] But the way first of all, he democratized poker learning in like the mathematical nitty gritty. [02:02:07] How do you get good at poker type sense to the entire world? And like an unprecedented way, he was he gave he had this gift that he had learned and distilled by working with some of the greatest poker minds. And he just democratized it through his website. And I learned a ton from him. And not only that, but you just listen to him think and it's almost like a philosophical meditation, the way that he breaks things down and thinks about these different elements and has such a holistic thought process. [02:02:38] It's like watching a genius work. And, you know, he's also just a nice, fun, sociable guy that, like you can you can imagine being at your dinner table. Yeah. [02:02:48] All that combined, which is natural for a lot of poker players. Right on the murderer, to say the least. [02:02:54] Yes, I like I really like the What is the Canadian Day on the Grono. He's also a nice guy. He's also a nice guy, but he's also somebody who is able to express his thoughts about poker really well, but also in an entertaining way. He seems to be able to predict cards better than anybody I've ever seen. Like what? [02:03:13] You watch the challenge with a challenge. He he lost like a million dollars recently to Doug Polk. He lost a million dollars to Doug Polecats up online. It's really interesting. [02:03:25] Yeah. It's awesome to watch these guys work. So I know you're twenty twenty one twenty one twenty one. [02:03:34] So asking you for advice is there's a little bit funny, but uh but at the same time, not because you've created a social network, you've created a startup from nothing as we've talked about earlier. Like without knowing how to program, you've programed I mean you've taken this whole journey that a lot of people I think would be really inspired by. So given that and given the fact that twenty years from I probably laugh at the advice you're going to give now. [02:04:01] Absolutely. [02:04:02] I hope so. If I don't laugh at the advice I give now. Something desperately wrong, right? [02:04:08] Yeah. So do you have advice for people that want to follow in your footsteps and create a startup, whether it's in software app domain or whether it's anything else? [02:04:20] So I'll speak specifically about social media apps. Yes, try to keep it as near as possible so I can laugh as little as possible and I'm forty one. [02:04:30] And what I would say is that if you're like a twenty one, twenty two year old who's looking at me and being like I want to do something like this, what I would say is you probably know better than just about anyone. And if you have a feeling in yourself that this is something that I have to do and this is something I could imagine myself doing for the next ten years, because if you're successful, you are going to have to do it for the next ten years. [02:04:57] And through the ups and the downs, through the amazing interviews with Lex and through the not so amazing articles you might have with other people. [02:05:05] Right. [02:05:06] Um, and you're going to have to ride those highs and lows and you have to believe in what you're doing. But if you have that feeling, what I would say is. [02:05:14] Listen to as few people as possible, because people are experts in domains, but when it comes to like what's hot and what's what makes sense in a social context. [02:05:26] You are the authority as a young person who's going through these things and living in your sort of mildew and I mean, I've talked to at this point, you know, so many experts, experts, so many investors because. [02:05:46] So you'd be amazed at the advice they've gotten, advice they've gotten, so there's like a minefield of bad advice. [02:05:52] That's the hardest part, I think, for young people. And it's the thing when people like I help I help Yeliz all the time who ask, like I never turned down when a founder asked me to have a conversation, I never turn it down. I'm always there for them. And the number one thing I worry about is that at Yale, we're taught implicitly and explicitly that you listen to the adult in the room, you listen to the person with the highest pay grade. [02:06:20] And it's devastating because that's how innovation dies. [02:06:24] And, you know, that's intimidating to like you talk that v.c, who probably is worth a billion dollars, a billion dollars, and they're going to tell you, you know, all the all the successful startups they helped fund or even just a successful business owner is going to tell you some advice. And it's hard psychologically to think that they might be wrong. And you're saying that's the only way to succeed, because if they knew what they were doing, they would have built it themselves. [02:06:59] And what's especially hard is people go, oh, of course, you know, I'll listen to people's I'll listen to their advice, but I'll know why it's wrong and then I'll and I'll do my own thing. And that sounds pretty abstract, but sometimes you can't always even put your finger on why they're wrong. Yeah. And I think to have the conviction to say you're wrong and I can't tell you why, but I still think I'm right. It's a rare thing, especially at like it's very counterintuitive. [02:07:26] And you might even say it's hubris or arrogant, but I think it's necessary because a lot of these things are they're not things that you can really put into words until you see them in action. Like a lot of them are kind of happy accidents. [02:07:41] It has been it's been tough for me because as a person who, like, I'm very empathetic. So when people tell me stuff, I kind of want to understand them. And it's been a painful process, especially people close to me. Basically, everything I've done, and especially in the recent few years, a lot of people close to me said not to do, you know, and like my parents, too, that's been a hard one, is is to basically acknowledge to myself that you don't know, like you don't, that everything you're going to say by way of advice for me is not going to be helpful. [02:08:26] Like, I love my parents very much, but like, they're just like they don't get it. And and as you put it beautifully, it's very difficult to put your finger on exactly why. Because a lot of advice sounds reasonable. [02:08:45] That's the worst kind. Yeah. Yeah. If it if it sounds really good, that just means it's an earworm. Like that's like a song that you hear on the radio and then you're like you're humming in the car and it's like it's the same thing. The more the better it sounds the more skeptical. Yeah. [02:09:04] Reason is that is a bad drug should be very careful because like you know, the things that seem impossible, you every every major innovation, every major business seems impossible at birth. But even not just the impossible things. I think, you know, you look at like love, for example, it's very easy to give advice. To sort of point out all the ways you can go wrong or marriage, all the divorces that people go through, all the pain of years that you go through the divorce, like the system of marriage, the marriage industrial complex, all the money that's wasted, all those kinds of things. [02:09:44] But that advice is useless when you're in love. [02:09:47] I guess the point the point is just pat the person in the back and say, go get them, kid. Like, what is it? Good will hunting and went to see about a girl. [02:09:57] Oh yeah. That's a good movie. I love them. [02:10:02] But yeah that that's that took me a long time to figure out. I'm still trying to fight to it, but especially when you're young. It's hard but. Nothing in life is worth accomplishing as easy. So but I think it's really interesting you make that connection between, like, starp advice and like your parents, because it's the exact same sort of mechanism where when you're young, your parents are usually like, right? Yeah, right. And the experts are usually right. [02:10:32] And, you know, if you listen to them and you you follow their orders, you're going to go to a school like yell. Yeah. And at certain point stops making sense. And I've seen my friends at Yale go down paths because they just continued listening to their parents that I know in their heart of hearts is not the right path for them. [02:10:52] Yeah, you know, that's how I see the education system. [02:10:57] The whole point is to guide you to a certain point in your life and everybody's points different. And your task is to at that point, to have a personal revolution and create your own path. [02:11:14] But no one tells you that. Nobody tells you that because they want you to keep following the same path as they are leading you towards. Like they're not going to say your whole job is to eventually rebel. [02:11:24] Yeah, that's how that's how rebellion works. You're not supposed to be told, but that is the task. They can take you just like you said. And depending who you are, they can take you really far. But at certain point you have to rebel. That could be getting you know, that could be in your undergrad, that could be high school at eight point. [02:11:44] One thing that I think played a pretty pivotal role, and I've never really mentioned this, um, he might not even know the person, but to tell you about in sort of me actually going out and making lyrics was that I was taking this graduate level math class my sophomore year and I met this I met this student who was also in it and had considerable citations and also startup experience. [02:12:12] And I think he actually ends up being CTO of a unicorn later on. [02:12:16] I've sort of lost touch with him, but we're still Facebook friends as it as it is in the 21st century. Um, so and I was in a class and I told him I really want to I really want to make this thing, but I have no technical background. [02:12:30] And he discusses computer genius. He worked under Dan Spilman a yeah. So yeah, he's a good guy. Right. And we were doing some math together. We were doing something on discrepancy for those of you who really care about math. [02:12:45] So combinatorics, um, and he just turns me is like I think you could do it like what do you mean you think I could do is like I think you could do it. Yeah. I was like, really. But I respected this guy so much. His name was young Doug. Um, shouting Doug, I liked this guy so much that I was like, if young Doug says I can do it. And young Doug is a legit genius and he knows and he knows me because we were in two classes together and we spent a lot of time together. [02:13:13] If he thinks I can do it, then who am I to say I can't do it? [02:13:18] Yeah, you know, that's a lesson for mentorship is like, oh, he has no idea. Probably. Well, he may not even remember that interaction, which is funny, but the point is that when a crazy young kid comes up to you with a crazy dream. You know, every once in a while you should just put them in the back and say, I believe in you, like you can do it if they look up to you. [02:13:44] That means your words have power. And if you say, no, no, come on, be reasonable. Like, you know, uh, finish your school work kind of thing. Like, that's that's unreasonable to take that leap. Now, just finish your education, blah, blah, blah. Whatever, whatever the reasonable advice is, every once in a while, maybe often as a mentor you should say, you know, go see about a girl in California or whatever the equivalent. [02:14:11] This was my moment with my good will hunting with your good will hunting moment. And I miss Robin Williams was a special guy. [02:14:21] People love it when I ask about book recommendations in general, of course, your journey is just beginning, but is there something that jumps out to you? [02:14:30] Technical fiction, philosophical sci fi, coloring books, blog posts. [02:14:35] You read somewhere that an impact on your life. Video games you recommend to others. [02:14:43] Minecraft manual, manga. I mean. [02:14:47] Yeah, video. You can mention video games too. [02:14:50] If there's something that jumps out to you that just had like an impact, um, I guess I'll say I really like the book the The Work of Art, which is a book about creative resistance and the creative struggle and what it means to be creative. [02:15:04] Yeah. And part of what I see in this conversation and what you're doing is so much of the work of art. The idea is that you just keep writing and writing and writing until you get to the new crap. [02:15:17] Yeah, yeah. And yeah, just you just you just roll with it. Right. And that's sort of what happens when you have like three hour conversations with people. You can only have so much scripted or societally constructed stuff until you get to the real you and you have to show up. [02:15:34] I mean, he's that book that book is kind of painful. It's really painful. And it's not something I would recommend for every part of it, but for what it did in my life at the time. It also kind of normalized. I don't know. I part of my coming of age story is part of it's about realizing that I'm a creative person and person who needs to create that sort of a God given thing, I think, for a lot of people. [02:16:00] But it's something that I don't really feel like I can live without. [02:16:03] And part of it was realizing that even within some of these more rigid structures, it's OK that I don't sort of fit in with them. And to hear about the struggles of other creatives was something for my own self-esteem and my own growing up that was really important to me. So I don't think the book itself might be perfect. But for what it did for my life, it was really impactful. [02:16:25] Yeah, I think exactly the words may not be exactly right by way of advice, but I think the journey that a lot of creators take. By reading that book is kind of profound, he also has another one called Turning Pro, I think I mean, he in general espouses like taking it seriously. [02:16:46] Like if you have a creative mind and you want to create something special in this world, go do it. [02:16:52] It's not don't show up. [02:16:55] And so many at the blank page, so many people would like tell me like would encourage me either blatantly or through like implicit means to like basically take the apple as seriously. It's a good signal, by the way, it's a good signal because my really close friends, the ones who have always supported me, they never said that because they got it. [02:17:17] They understood that was that that was my path. And they might be skeptical. They might be like I'm in. One of my friends I remember told me, like, I was always, like, taken aback about why you were so certain this would work out. [02:17:29] And it's like I finally got it, like once I saw it, like, popping off. But like before that I just didn't get it. But, like, he still supported me. And I think I think it's a really good signal. And actually, just the fact of going through this process has made me socially feel so much more connected. And I've somewhat consolidated my social life to some degree, but it's so much more vulnerable, connected. And that's part of the creative process. [02:17:54] I have to thank for that. [02:17:55] I think there's something that's like unstoppable about the creative mind. It's like it's right there, that fire. [02:18:01] And I guess part of the. Part of the thing that you're supposed to do is let that fire burn in whichever direction and it's going to hurt. It's going to hurt. [02:18:12] Fire will hurt. But on top of a video game, she's mentioned the Stanley parable offline. [02:18:18] Is there. You said you play some video games. Is there a video game that you especially love that you recommend? I play, for example. [02:18:24] Yeah, our audience. And it's actually really in keeping with what we've been talking about. [02:18:30] It's the beginner's guide, which is what it was made by the same guy, Dave Herenton, who made the Stanley Parable, which I I briefly saw you. I just clicked the video and then I went to sleep. That's who I am. [02:18:43] And then but I briefly saw that you were looking at and it's the it's a game that is better treated is art and I think. And I don't claim to understand the creator, because that would be a cardinal sin to me of as a creative person, but. It gets to the heart of a lot of the things that we've done that we've been talking about, which is the creative mind, the game can be interpreted in a lot of ways, in a feminist way. [02:19:14] It could be interpreted as a story of friends. It could be interpreted as the story of critics versus a creative way. I like to interpret it and I don't want to give away too much. Is the story of the creative part of your mind that creates just for the sake of creating meaning the part that creates for no rhyme or reason or clear meaning? It's almost it's almost ethereal versus the part that's you could call it the editor, you could call it the pragmatist. [02:19:50] You could call it the necessary force of ego in our in our lives. We can't totally be egoless. Right. But we need to be egoless, to be creative. And how that sort of internal censure, what role does it play and how do we allow our creative minds to be creative? And yet how do we still become useful? [02:20:09] Because and it's funny that a video game could have this fascinating tension, which reminds me about the ridiculous question every once in a while ask about meaning and death so that this this whole this whole right ends. [02:20:28] You're at the beginning of the ride, but it could end any day. Actually, that's kind of the way human life works. [02:20:34] You could die today. You can die tomorrow. Do you think about your own mortality? [02:20:39] Do you think about death? Do you meditate on it? And in that context, as the creative but as a pragmatist who as running a startup, what do you think is the meaning of this whole thing? Yes, so our mortality right about. About three years ago, four years ago now, I was excited to go to Yale, I was playing six hours of squash a day, which squash is a sport I love so much. And I was really getting a lot better. [02:21:14] And I was even thinking I could maybe walk onto the Yale team. [02:21:20] And I woke up one day. I felt really, really sick. I went and I decided not to go. So I sat there and I know I wanted to. I almost did. And you'll see how the story turns out. You'll decide if I made the right choice. I decided I think this was today and I decided to get my driver's license or I had to get my driver's license. I want to get a driver's license before I, you know, just how young I am before I went off to college, because otherwise I might never get it. [02:21:52] And I'm going back. And I successfully got my driver's license. [02:21:55] Beacham and I come back to I go back to my house and I just I don't want to drive back. So I just feel so sick like things are spinning. I have the worst headache. I come home, I run right into my bed and feeling really sick to the point where I even like, asked my mom, who is the doctor? I'm like, should I check at the hospital? And she's like, you can just wait it out and she'll get better. [02:22:20] Like your mom. Yeah. [02:22:23] And then, you know, and then I at one point I look at my arms and they're like covered in this like red splotches stuff. Yeah. [02:22:30] And I'm like, oh, I think she's like, yeah, we have to go. And so I go there and they're like, you scarlet fever. And they're like, there's nothing we can do. You should just go back home. [02:22:40] So I go back home six hours later, I wake up in the morning. They'd let me out of like three a.m. They let me I come home in the morning and I feel this like a spear through my chest. [02:22:53] And I never felt anything like it, and I was it was very disconcerting when you have a because we're all used to different sorts of pain. Right. And that was sort of Pin-Up never felt before. I suppose as an athlete, you're used to like, you know, pain. So I told my parents and immediately we got back in the car. [02:23:09] We go to the same hospital I was about six hours ago, and they initially didn't want to let me in. [02:23:13] And I was like, I've just been like, oh, come in, because they're like, you're a healthy guy. Wait your turn. I'm like, no, you don't understand. I have a pain in my chest. And then they let me in. They start doing tests on me. They like put something like in my back, which is really a huge needle. [02:23:28] And I'm smiling because it's like one of the ways I reduce stress, I guess, or deal with this sort of thing and make light of it. But like know that, you know, it's definitely very scary in the moment, shocking and scary. [02:23:41] And they go and they they do a bunch of tests and they determined that a virus like attacked my heart and I had myocarditis and pericarditis and they said I had maybe twenty five to thirty five percent chance at one point of dying. [02:23:56] And so. I'm sitting in my mental hospital, I'm in the bed in my bed for about three weeks, and I'm just I'm just standing there and I had this moment also I remember very specifically where. [02:24:16] I was in so much pain that like I was crying not like emotional standpoint, but actually just purely out of the pain itself, like I could feel my heart in my chest. [02:24:28] And when I leaned back, I felt it touched my ribcage and feel horrible so I couldn't go to sleep and lean back. [02:24:34] I had to lean forward all throughout the night. [02:24:36] Right. And I'm feeling much and I'm feeling my chest. I'm feeling this terrible pain in my chest. I'm crying unstoppably. And I mean, also maybe I should mention that at the time I was someone who, like, refused to take anything into my body that wasn't natural. Yeah. And so a lot of the time I tried to be unmedicated. [02:24:55] Eventually I didn't allow them to add a little medication to my body. But there's just so much uncertainty and pain. And the first time I had to come to terms with mortality. [02:25:08] First of all, I think you still should have gone play squash. I mean, come on. I mean, you're you're serious about this. You still carry that with you? Sort of. There is power to realizing the ride can end right in very suddenly, very suddenly. Yeah, and painfully and you know, it has a pragmatic application to like what you to trajectories. You take the life. Right. [02:25:39] Something else that is worth noting is that I for the next year couldn't walk to my classes. So I get to yell. They put me in a medical single alone and I have to shuttle to all my classes. [02:25:55] I have to ask a few Professor Steven move classes so I could actually get there. [02:26:02] I can't move my book. I can't lift my book bags. I can't I can't walk up stairs. I spent like 12 hours a day in my dorm room just like staring at the walls and more and more than that, all this like. You I got to watch my body, like, deteriorate and like the muscle, like, fall off of it because I was I was taking these pills and the kind of catabolic. [02:26:30] And for an 18 year old, I mean, I think every 18 year old has feelings about their body, man or woman. And, you know, just seeing this, it's like you're watching sort of death transpire and you're also very fatigued because your heart's not at peak condition. And you think about the future and a lot of the things you enjoy have kind of been stripped away from you. [02:26:53] And I I took a meditation practice like I started with like five minutes a day at my peak. I was like 40 minutes. They kept it up consistently for about two years. And I started thinking about, like, what do I want to do? And like, what do I care about? And to get to your point, I think you're asking like, how does this carry forward, right? I think I realized that, you know, there's an end and I realized that there are things I believe and things that I believe that might not be so overtly popular, but that I truly think make the world a better place. [02:27:34] And in spite of and basically, if my conditions provided I wanted to make something that I wanted to do, something that would make me feel sort of whole in that way. [02:27:47] Yeah. [02:27:47] I mean, that's an amazing journey to take that time and to come out on the other end. Now, that's amazing. I did not realize like that there was a long term struggle. I think that's in the end, if you do succeed, we will have a profound positive impact because struggles ultimately like humbling but also empowering. [02:28:11] So I'm glad to see that. But from the perspective of the creator of the other ridiculous question, what meaning do you think about this kind of stuff? [02:28:22] Is that the, you know, the meaning of life for you, the meaning of life for us, descendants of apes in general? [02:28:32] The first thing I'd like to say is that I think part of like when we talk about the meaning of life, the part of it is the fact that we get to struggle with this question and we get to do it together for a long time. And we sometimes I think it's accepting that there's no meaning at all. And sometimes I think it's accepting that or even just passing the phrase and thinking about the meaning of life. [02:28:54] I sometimes look, I'm very young again. I hope that anything I say now is going to be very different in the future because I think mean, life has so many meetings that. [02:29:08] It'll be crazy to see what I think in 20 years about the meaning of life and the rise from the future. Cut him some slack, please do perspective, perspective, perspective. [02:29:20] Having said that, you know, I think part of what brings meaning to my life is things like this where we think about these things with people who are really, really, really on the ball and we get to connect with these people. That certainly brings me into my life. Human connection. [02:29:36] Yeah. This conversation is is just another, like echo of the thing you're trying to create in the digital space, right? Yes. That's the same kind of magic from from what I understand about what you're trying to create is the same reason I fell in love with the long form podcasting like as a fan. That's why I listen to long form podcasts. Is there something deeply human and genuine about the interchange through the voice? But I do think that connection to text can be even more powerful. [02:30:10] Like I think about letters. I still write letters to Russia. You know, there's something powerful in letters when you when you put a lot of yourself in the words you say, in the words you write as powerful, you can really communicate not just the actual semantic meaning of of of the words, but like a lot of who you are with those words and create real connection. [02:30:37] So I hope you succeed there. And listen, Ryan, I think this is an incredible conversation. I'm glad that people like you are fighting the good fight for bringing out the best in human nature in the digital space. I think that's a battle ground where the good will win, like love will win. And I'm glad you're creating technology that does just that. So thank you so much for wasting all your time for coming down. I can't wait to see what you do in the future. [02:31:08] Thanks for talking to. Thank you for having me. Bam. I mean, bigger guns. [02:31:14] Have you gotten in the vodka zero. Yeah. Thanks for listening to this conversation with Ryan Schiller, a thank you to our sponsors all form Magic Spoon, Better help and brave click their links to support this podcast. And now let me leave you with some words from George Washington. On March 15th, 1783, a freedom of speech is taken away. Then dumb and silent, we may be led like sheep to the slaughter. Thank you for listening and hope to see you next time.

本集資源與出處