特別節目·中文精讀

萊克斯·弗裡德曼:聽眾問答——2021 年 1 月 AMA

Lex Fridman: Ask Me Anything – AMA January 2021

集中回答聽眾提問:AI 的風險與前景、學術與創業的取捨、讀書習慣,以及對未來十年的判斷。

官方音訊00:00 / --:--
中文精讀由 AI 基於原始訪談改寫,非官方翻譯,可能存在偏差或錯誤;表述以原音訊與官方文稿為準。說明

如果要造一個真正能跟人類深度交流的 AI,它可能必須能夠抑鬱。

這是 Lex Fridman 在 2021 年 1 月的聽眾問答裡給出的判斷。提問的人是個長期和抑鬱搏鬥的年輕人,他問:當我們試圖開發類人的 AI,會不會撞上一堵牆,AI 自己也會抑鬱,也會出現複雜的心理問題?還是說,重寫一段程式碼、打個補丁就能解決?

Lex 的回答沒有停在“AI 當然不會抑鬱”這個安全答案上。他說,痛苦是意識的一個深層、根本的屬性,而抑鬱只是人類處境裡痛苦的一種口味。他把抑鬱比作通往智慧路上的一條暗巷。

AI 如果要像人一樣交流,就得承受人的痛苦

他的推理是這樣的:如果我們造出的系統要在“智慧”這個意義上真正成立,也就是能和人類進行有深度、有意義的互動,那它就會帶上人類處境的許多特徵、許多屬性。抑鬱是其中之一。

他承認,人類心裡有一部分總想把這個世界上所有殘酷的東西都拿掉。這也是信仰者最常問的問題:如果上帝存在,為什麼允許苦難存在?這種衝動會順理成章地延伸到工程上,我們想造一個乾乾淨淨、沒有這些毛病的系統。

但他認為,那些東西恰恰是“生而為人”這件事拆不開的一部分。要造出與人互動的智慧系統,就得讓它具備意識層面的屬性,包括人類經驗的全部神秘和不確定。而這裡面,有各種口味的痛苦,抑鬱是其中之一。

他用“陰與陽”來形容這件事。愛、美、喜悅,和痛苦、困惑、情緒的起落,是終身的伴侶。他在播客裡反覆觀察到:真正有意思的東西,往往發生在有分歧的時候,發生在有一點動盪、有推有拉、有人改變主意的時候,甚至只是自己的想法在對話中慢慢變形的時候。這種“來回擺盪”,才是對話的價值所在。

要注意他劃了一條界線。那些在具體任務上比人類更聰明的系統,不需要具備這些東西。需要的是那些“走在我們中間”的系統。對它們,他說得挺直白:不幸的是,抑鬱必須成為經驗的一部分,或者說,抑鬱的可能性必須成為經驗的一部分。

這段話容易被誤讀成 AI 威脅論的變體。它講的其實是另一個問題:我們想要的那種“像人一樣”的智慧,本身是不是就打包了一整套人的脆弱?如果你只想要能力,不要脆弱,那你得到的可能是一個無法真正理解人的東西。

從俄羅斯到美國:移民教會他的第一課

有個在美留學的印度學生問他:作為一個移民,你是怎麼融入的?你覺得自己屬於這裡嗎?

Lex 說,“你覺得自己屬於這裡嗎”這句話,莫名地戳中了他。也許是因為夜深了,也許是因為咖啡喝多了。

他小時候在俄羅斯是個受歡迎的孩子。搬到美國之後,他變成了反面。他覺得自己是個徹頭徹尾的局外人。他覺得他落腳的那個地方,更看重物質佔有,而不是對他來說真正有意義的東西:人與人的連線,友誼,還有知識,數學和科學發現這些東西。價值觀的重心不一樣,這就成了他自我放逐的催化劑。

他進入了一段陰鬱的時期。一邊學英語,一邊開始讀更偏哲學的書。他記得第一本用英文讀完的是《記憶傳授人》(The Giver),那本書幫他開始思考這個世界。

接下來這一段是整期節目裡最重的部分。

他說他很幸運,在童年時代那麼愛身邊的人,在俄羅斯有那麼多親密的朋友,以至於他從來沒有注意到一件事:我們每個人到底有多孤獨。移民經歷讓他第一次直面這個硬邦邦的人類真相。

我們獨自出生,獨自生活,獨自死去。哪怕在最愛的人懷裡,我們從根本上仍然是孤獨的。我們的念頭、希望、恐懼,都被困在兩耳之間這個有意識的肉身容器裡。(Lex Fridman)

這個認知讓他恐懼,同時也讓他解放。而就在同一時刻,他意識到,那種從與他人的連線中感受到的美好,是一份禮物,把他從這個黑暗的認知裡帶走。他打了個比方:愛幾乎是對生活現實、對生活泥沼的一種逃離。

於是旅程就這麼開始了。他愛人類的心智,也對人類心智充滿好奇,這兩件事和程式設計的愛好長在了一起。小時候寫小程式,大學時造機器人,一路都是同一個興趣的不同出口。

他說,移民經歷給他的禮物,是那種被剝奪之後才懂得的珍惜。因為被連根拔起,他才有機會真正看見人與人的連線有多珍貴,才會主動去找它,找到的時候也更感恩。與此同時,一種好奇心開始冒泡:如果從這種對連線的渴望出發去看人工智慧系統,會是什麼樣子?

所以他關心的東西換了位置。他不再問“這個程式能不能完成某個任務”,他開始問“這個程式能不能承載我作為人體驗到的那種豐富性”。他談愛的時候,背後其實有這個回聲。

他把這件事總結成一句很重的話:很不幸,深度感恩的第一步,往往是失去。

如果對面坐著一個外星人,該問什麼

“你會問外星人什麼問題”,這問題聽起來像酒吧閒聊,但 Lex 認真當成了思想實驗來做,而且答得很盡興。

第一個問題,他會問建議。假設這個外星人來自一個比我們古老得多、也智慧得多的文明,他會問:作為一個物種、一個文明,我們該做些什麼,才能長久地活下去並且繁榮?他很想知道,在外星人的視角里,地球上哪些事正在把我們拖進麻煩。

順著這條線,他會問“大過濾器”。你們文明的歷史上,有哪一次差點把整個物種毀掉?放到人類身上,那就是核時代,以及歷史上那幾次可能演變成全面核戰的時刻。他想知道對方的答案裡會不會提到 AI,會不會提到病毒,會不會提到一些人類根本沒想到過的東西。

第二個問題關於差異。他會問:你們那兒有愛嗎?有死亡嗎?有必死性嗎?他猜,假如一個物種全員永生,“必死性”可能根本不是一個能成立的概念,儘管它們可能仍然有某種強制的篩選機制,類似演化。

然後是意識。他想把這個問題拆開:主觀體驗這件事,究竟是演化給我們的一個自我中心、誇張、其實一點也不特殊的怪癖?還是大腦為了把自己當成一個獨立個體而開發出的一個有用功能?他想搞清楚,外星人的智慧和意識是不是分離的。人類身上,這兩件事緊緊纏在一起,但在別的地方,它們可能完全不是一回事。

“所以這一組問題包括智慧、意識、愛和死亡,全是熱門曲目。”

接下來是物理。他會盯著外星人的眼睛(如果它們有眼睛),判斷我們雙方是否真的能共用同一套數學和物理學的語言。他會問那些大謎題:宇宙外面是什麼?為什麼是有而不是無?為什麼會有“東西”,而“東西”之外又是什麼?

他有點猶豫要不要問“為什麼”這類問題,但還是會試幾個,看看能不能得到一個像樣的答案。然後他會問更具體一點的:宇宙是由什麼構成的?暗物質、暗能量到底怎麼回事?現實的基本構件是什麼?支配現實的物理定律是什麼?

他還想偷偷塞進一個問題:能不能給點提示,告訴我們統一物理定律的方向對不對?我們是不是在量子力學和廣義相對論上走對了路?

換一個角度,他會問黑洞的奇點,或者大爆炸最開始的那一刻,那些定律全部統一的地方,究竟需要什麼樣的物理才能完整描述。

物理聊到這個份上,是問“有沒有神”的好時機。他可能會換個說法:有沒有一箇中心設計者,或者一個設計師團隊,啟動了宇宙並且在持續管理它?他還會問“模擬”這個角度:把宇宙看成一次計算、一臺做資訊處理的計算機,這說法聽起來耳熟嗎?

然後是最實際的問題:你們用什麼計算機?你們玩什麼遊戲?你們平時靠什麼消遣?“你常來這兒嗎”這種開場白他就不提了,那只是吧檯閒聊。

再往下是他個人最感興趣的、偏工程的問題。怎麼造超級智慧?怎麼接近光速甚至超過光速?你們是怎麼到這兒來的?能量問題:怎麼駕馭一顆恆星、多顆恆星、整個銀河系所有恆星的能量?以及,我們能穿越時間嗎?怎麼造時間機器?這是不是個好主意?

他給這一整串問題加了個前提:有些知識不是力量,是負擔,會通向自我毀滅。所以在問之前,他會先問對方:如果你告訴我答案,我會不會反而更糟?

他還想從自己的私人題庫裡掏出一道題:P 是否等於 NP。這是理論電腦科學最大的問題之一,也是整個數學的大問題。他說,我只要答案,是或不是,剩下的我自己來。

他不會問投資建議,因為他覺得外星人大概認為“錢”這個概念本身就很蠢。但他可能會問比特幣:長期看是好的投資嗎?數字貨幣整體呢?

最後他一定會問:Elon Musk 是你們的人,還是另一個物種?

36 歲轉行計算機,第一步不是選方向

提問者 36 歲,做醫療技術和研究,想轉到電腦科學。

Lex 的第一條建議跟職業規劃無關:找一個簡單的專案,允許自己為它興奮起來。玩得開心,愛上它,為你做出來的東西感到自豪。

他強調“簡單”這兩個字。別一上來就野心太大。他相信,大多數人只要肯給自己這個機會,都能從創造一個小小的東西里獲得巨大的快樂,哪怕只是跟著教程做。創造本身的快樂就在那兒,等著你去取。

這也是電腦科學最神奇的地方之一:它讓你能造出幾乎像獨立實體一樣的東西。程式就是這樣的東西。

然後他給了一條自己走過的路。

第一步,基礎軟體工程。挑一個超級流行、門檻低的語言,Python 或 JavaScript,先寫一個 hello world,再稍微複雜一點點。

第二步,用剛學會的工具,做一個能自動化你自己電腦操作的東西。換個說法:寫幫你操作電腦的指令碼。比如你經常要找某些檔案,或者想把資料夾結構自動整理一遍,或者批次重新命名檔案。

他自己就有這麼個指令碼:找出所有檔名裡帶空格的檔案,確認之後把空格改成下劃線。這類小助手指令碼他到處都有,用起來特別爽,因為每天都能用到,而且是你自己造的,讓你的生活輕鬆了一點點。在他眼裡,這就是快樂的來源,餵養著他對程式設計的愛。

第三步,分成兩支:演算法,和資料科學。這兩邊都裝滿了值得愛上的漂亮東西。演算法這邊,你可以享受把演算法越寫越高效的樂趣。資料這邊,學怎麼處理不同的資料集、清洗、重組、做各種統計和加工。這時候還沒到機器學習,只是把資料視覺化、跟資料打交道。

而到了這一步,職業就開始出現了。有大量工作崗位就是用計算技術來加工、視覺化、解釋、聚合、分析資料,也就是資料科學。這條路很酷,學習曲線很平緩,逼自己一把的話,幾周幾個月就能入門,用不了幾年。

熟悉了資料科學,往上走就很自然:做點模板式的機器學習、監督學習專案,再往更具體、更有用、更前沿的方向走,強化學習,甚至進入物理系統,真的去造機器人。他提到,回頭看好像自己在搭一個很複雜的東西,但其實每一步都可以是極小的專案,機器人專案也一樣。可以造一個只做基礎任務的小機器人,也許加一點基礎計算機視覺,這是學機器人、學系統程式設計的好辦法。

走到這裡,你才開始看清楚,哪條職業路徑讓你興奮。

他特別強調兩項技能:熱情,和 Google。

他把熱情當技能看。允許自己興奮,找到能讓自己興奮的事,允許自己興奮起來,這本身就是進步的核心部分。

為什麼提 Google?因為在很多領域,尤其是電腦科學、軟體工程、機器學習,網上優秀的資源太多了,真正關鍵的能力變成了:你有多擅長找到那個恰好能讓你邁出下一步的頁面和資料。這本質上是一種“我該怎麼搜”“我該點哪個連結”的能力。聽著有點可笑,但這是現代學生、終身學習者最核心的技能之一。

熱情加 Google,允許自己愛上一個專案,然後一步一步往下走,靠一個好搜尋引擎和一點好奇心。

他最興奮的機器人形態,不在物理世界裡

雙足、四足、機械臂、人形,還是更冷門的東西?

Lex 說這題很難,因為他真的很喜歡機器人。但他認為,那份愛誕生在軟體裡,硬體只是讓它更好玩一點。

所以他最興奮的進展,其實發生在模擬世界裡,而且他判斷這個格局還會持續相當長一段時間。

就人機互動而言,他認為真正令人興奮的機器人,是活在虛擬世界裡的那些,在虛擬現實裡,甚至只是在螢幕上。我們會看到越來越多這樣的實體:類人的實體,或者那些我們忍不住要把意識、靈魂投射上去的實體,生活在數字世界裡。然後慢慢地,這些實體在物理空間裡獲得形體,他猜多半是人形。

但人形太難了。要造出真實、自然、令人滿足的體驗,工程難度極高。儘管如此,這仍然是他心目中最多人興奮的形態。他也很喜歡波士頓動力的機器狗 Spot,從養寵物的角度來說很令人興奮。

他的判斷很明確:物理空間裡的挑戰,比數字空間裡同樣的挑戰要難上好幾個數量級。所以數字模擬裡的機器人會進步得快得多,對世界的影響規模也大得多,尤其是當虛擬世界越來越多的時候。這裡的虛擬世界不一定指 VR 或 AR,指的是那些能讓你與 AI 系統在數字空間裡互動的媒介。他把“數字空間裡具備人形或半人形形態、能被我們投射情感、能在人的層面與我們建立連線的實體”本身,就當成一種形態。

愛因斯坦說幸福是豬的理想,Lex 不同意

有人搬出愛因斯坦那句話:我從不把安逸和幸福本身當作目的,這種倫理基礎我叫它豬的理想。

Lex 把這句原文唸了一遍。愛因斯坦說,照亮他道路的、一次次給他新勇氣去愉快面對生活的理想,是善、美和真。沒有志同道合者的親緣感,沒有對客觀世界的專注,沒有在藝術和科學領域裡永遠無法企及的東西,生活會讓他覺得空虛。人類努力的那些陳腐目標,佔有、外在的成功、奢侈,在他看來都可鄙。

Lex 說,他通常在哲學問題上同意愛因斯坦,物質佔有那部分他也認同。但他認為愛因斯坦不公平地攻擊了“幸福”這個詞,而且順帶也冤枉了豬。他想替幸福辯護,也想替豬辯護。

他的第一條反駁:幸福是個能裝下很多東西的詞。愛因斯坦這裡其實把它當成了享樂主義的同義詞,用了一個非常窄的定義。而 Lex 認為幸福比直接的快感大得多,它包含快感,也包含更有意義的、更深的生命充實感。他想把這個詞奪回來。

第二條,也是他真正的立場:幸福從來都是好好生活的副產品,它本身不該變成目標。一旦被設成目標,人就容易迷路。這也許正是愛因斯坦部分想說的。

但他認為幸福是極好的進度訊號。當你把自己扔進戰鬥裡,專注在卓越、進步、自我挑戰和持續成長上,那麼你的日常幸福感的滑動平均值,按幾周幾個月來平均,就是一個衡量你狀態好不好的好指標。

採集這個訊號的具體做法,是感恩。坐下來想一想,自己有多感激,起點在哪,現在走到哪,取得了什麼進展。

所以他看重的從來都是幾周幾個月尺度上的均值,一時的快感說明不了什麼。如果這個平均值上不去,那你大概是迷路了。

他把自己的版本壓縮成一句話:掙扎是過程,幸福是度量。

日常生活就是不斷地掙扎著變強,而它的另一面,是對生活有多美好、走了多遠、以及“有機會去掙扎”這件事本身的感恩。“你必須想象西西弗是幸福的。”

回頭看,他的大部分日子是真的為活著而高興。所以追求幸福是件好事,只要別把它做成享樂主義式的區域性最優。順便,他還表達了對豬的敬意:豬是最聰明的動物之一,他到現在還抱著一個希望,也許豬或者海豚早就把生活想明白了,比人類明白得多。在“追求幸福”和“豬很聰明”這兩件事上,他和愛因斯坦暫時分道揚鑣。

他怎麼挑嘉賓

這個過程很難,而且隨著時間在演化。

首要條件:這個人對他做的事真的有熱情。熱情可以有一萬種表現形式。他說自己經常面無表情,但他確實對所做的事充滿熱情,只是表達方式不一樣。

和熱情並列的,是這個人得欣賞、享受、被長篇對話這種形式吸引,願意用它來表達自己的熱情。這不是所有人都行。有些人更喜歡用文字表達自己的熱情、興趣、專業和想法,文字可以反覆編輯好幾輪,而長對話幾乎沒有剪輯空間。

然後他會確認:這個人是不是真的想上“這個”播客。世界上有那麼多優秀的播客,他們談吐、對話、講解的能力比他強得多,這讓他既謙卑又受激勵。如果對方根本沒聽過這檔節目,或者聽了但對他這種怪異的調性無感,一個總穿西裝、說話慢、愛問怪問題的傢伙,那就沒有理由聊。

反過來,如果對方被這種怪異吸引,那就有可能發生點魔法:他的怪異和對方的怪異撞在一起,產生兩個人都驚訝的新東西。

他越來越想找跟他不一樣的人,各種意義上的多元:背景、世界觀、性格。你能預感到某種味道會衝突,像巧克力配鹽,但也可能變成菠蘿披薩,確實有人愛。他承認這種嘗試有代價,但他更願意去找,因為那裡面藏著一次魔法般對話的可能性。

他也正面回應了“給平臺”的批評。有人問:如果某個嘉賓持有爭議觀點,你為什麼要給他一個平臺,讓他的觀點傳播得更廣?他說他理解也共情這種看法,但他不喜歡。他的邏輯是:如果他現在算成功,那恰恰是問題所在,因為他並不擅長這件事,尤其是困難的對話。但如果他成功了,世界觀之間的張力、人格之間的碰撞,會產生智慧。

所以他真的想跟很有挑戰性的人聊,想進行真正困難的對話,包括跟社會邊緣的人聊。他說得很清楚:他不怕被 cancel。他真正擔心的,是自己在一場重要而困難的對話裡表現得很糟。如果因為他做得差,沒能給世界增加愛、知識或啟發,反而助長了分裂,那才是問題。分裂的源頭不在嘉賓身上,而在他沒能催化、沒能引匯出一場有啟發的對話。

他坦白自己對話的能力不算好,一直在努力改進。所以嘉賓選擇裡有一部分是關於對話難度的:他有沒有為那個難度做好準備。有些對話可能需要幾年時間去準備,純粹是智識上的準備。他提醒大家別忘了,他只是一個工程師,有些困難的話題他做不好。

所以他一邊拼命學習,往奧弗頓窗外看,去探索困難的想法,一邊積累那種由聲譽帶來的自由度,好讓他能承擔風險、犯錯,也希望能讓社群裡的人們允許彼此在對話中犯錯。

他把這總結成一種組合:極致的充分準備,加上允許自己犯錯。像卓越和“毫不在乎”的結合體。

怎麼在敵意麵前保持樂觀

提問的人說,他看到一點希望,但一看到圍繞那件事的爭吵,希望就消失了。

Lex 說他儘量忽略世界的噪音,忽略此時此刻的爭吵。他發現,如果你給自己一個機會去看人有多 amazing,那些人就會顯露出 amazing 的一面,你就會看見。只要你給自己機會去看,你就能看見。

他把兩件事當成超能力:對事物有多美好的感恩,和對事物能變得更好多少的樂觀。

這首先是讓生活變得好玩。放到創造這件事上,任何創造者都需要它當燃料。要造新東西,尤其是別人說造不出來的東西,樂觀是必要前提,它提供能量、動力、靈感,讓你能撐過幾個月、幾年,守住那團相信的火。

第二條是環境管理。在個人生活裡、在閱讀裡、在交談裡,他儘量讓自己被同樣充滿樂觀的人包圍。

他毫不掩飾地承認自己是一大堆人的粉絲,尤其是那些大思想家、工程師、科學家、各行業的創造者。他隨口就能報一串:Chris Lattner 總能讓他笑,是世界上最好的工程師之一;Jim Keller 也是這一類,性格不同,但同樣是深刻、善良、傑出的人;Elon Musk 是樂觀的化身;George Hotz 那種混沌的思維風格跟他自己完全不同,但很有啟發;Joe Rogan 多年來是他的榜樣,一個不把自己太當回事的人,一個成功但不充斥嫉妒和嘲諷、轉而支援他人、欣賞他人的人。

他也提到更“暗”的那一側:Dan Carlin 常被當成悲觀的人,但他認為 Carlin 是樂觀的,只是他太深地浸泡在人類歷史的泥沼和黑暗裡,所以講出來的東西聽起來像對人類文明深深犬儒。可在他與 Carlin 的對話裡,雖然 Carlin 的用詞說自己並不總是樂觀,但他的心、他的精神明顯是樂觀的,那裡有對人類的希望。

還有 Stephen Wolfram、Sean Carroll(他對物理的一切的那種愛太驚人了)、Eric Weinstein(他愛幾何形狀的一切,愛對稱與不對稱、拓撲、時空可見與不可見維度裡那些奇怪的曲率)、Josh Bach(他的意識流充滿才華,Lex 說自己那顆 Commodore 64 的腦子每次處理他那個 Pentium 都會燒掉)。

那麼噪音滲進來了怎麼辦?他說,這就是冥想派上用場的地方。他不會完全無視它,因為那在他看來像在逃離世界,不建設性。他把噪音接進來,但不讓它停留。遇到刻薄、被釣魚、或者破壞性的批評,他從中挑出能用來成長、能啟發自己的碎片,剩下的放掉。

這是一塊要練的肌肉。每隔一段時間,就徹底斷開,在自然的簡單寂靜裡給大腦充電。

過去幾年,他改變了哪些看法

他說自己一直在變,思維像量子系統一樣不停流動。他挑了幾個穩定的大轉向。

第一個是致幻劑。他一直覺得這東西迷人,但過去幾年的轉變是往希望的方向:他開始認為致幻劑能真正進入科學的領域,已經有不少地方在大規模開展研究。這讓他興奮,因為他感覺那是通往神經科學的另一個視角,能幫我們理解心智如何運作,也可能幫我們把人類心智裡那些特別之處,工程化進 AI 系統。

第二個是社交媒體。他過去一直覺得它對社會的壞影響很複雜,但會被很多正面效應平衡掉,比如構建社群、給普通人發聲的機會。現在他越來越覺得,社交媒體可能把人類文明帶向的破壞性軌跡,比他原先估計的寬得多、也嚴重得多。他提到了 AI 生存風險那個話題:過去兩年,他越來越把社交媒體看作 AI 最大的威脅,同時也看作最大的可能性集合。軌跡的集合比預期寬,而它由平臺驅動、管理、引導,這也是他一直在做的事。

第三個最大的轉變:地外生命、智慧、意識,值得嚴肅的科學研究。

他對意識的看法本來就是這樣:我們缺少工具,在理解、工程化意識這件事上還處在極早期。地外生命也一樣。無論是試圖與遙遠文明通訊的努力,還是監聽,還是探測遙遠系外行星是否宜居、上面是否有生命形式,工具都很粗糙。還有那幾十萬起 UFO 目擊報告,現在終於開始有一些高解析度的感測器資料了。所有這些理解都還在極早期。

他真正改變的是這個認識:科學家對意識和地外生命這兩個領域關上大門,會阻止我們發現新東西。當你對這些迷人、啟發人、神秘的探索關上心門,你就把這些話題的探索權,交給了沒有裝備好去探索它們的人,一些只是好奇的心靈。他強調,那些好奇的心靈是神奇的、有啟發的,他自己就是其中一個。但科學的嚴謹、工具和經費,才能把這些領域徹底開啟,給我們更好的資料和理解,甚至帶來理解意識、理解地外生命、理解智慧與生命形式的全新正規化。

他說,David Fravor 那些飛行員看到“Tic Tac”UFO 的對話,還有 2017 年那些資料剛出來時 Avi Loeb 的看法,以及更認真地思考德雷克方程、思考那些引數不確定性裡埋著的各種可能性,都讓他睜開眼睛,看到這個宇宙有多神秘、多奇妙,而我們瞭解得有多少。

他還提到一個更微妙的點:對那些我們知之甚少的謎題保持開放,本身會反過來影響一個工程頭腦的生產力和創造力。把心開啟、去想那個理解之外的小盒子外面有什麼,會讓你造出什麼?會有什麼想法來拜訪你,讓你造出全新的東西?

他很清楚自己走在這條線的哪一側:他首先是科學家、工程師,想待在那個世界裡。但他真的想培養一顆開放的心和孩子般的好奇。他也希望在其他科學家身上看到這一點,因為這就是科學該有的樣子。增量進步對科學至關重要,但它必須和孩子般的好奇、和打破框架的開放思維捆在一起,後者才能帶來扔掉所有愚蠢引用的正規化轉移,建立全新的科學,讓過去幾十年的工作在對比之下顯得無意義。

肉食、生酮與禁食:一場只有一名受試者的實驗

他的入口是格鬥。他從小打有重量級別的搏擊專案,要一直琢磨怎麼在上學的同時把身體和心理狀態調到最好,同時還要減重。所以他對各種飲食產生了濃厚的興趣。

他從來沒把飲食當成給別人開的處方。他一直把自己看成一位營養科學家,做一場只有一名受試者的研究:只研究自己,不外推到別人,只是搞明白什麼讓他狀態好、什麼讓他表現最好。

大概 15 年前,他發現了間歇性禁食的力量。他早年練力量舉,在那個“一天吃六七頓小餐、雞胸西蘭花”的世界裡,後來發現可以一天只吃一頓,當天還能訓練兩三次,而且精力更足、更專注、表現更好。他說這徹底顛覆了他的認知。

禁食是他最大的正規化轉移。它讓他意識到,他得更好地研究自己,不斷嘗試新東西,給自己機會去發現那些能徹底改變生活、讓身體和大腦運轉得更好的東西。

禁食這件事他是從超耐力運動員那個圈子學來的,也正是在那裡接觸到“脂肪適應型運動員”的概念:你可以把脂肪當作能量來源。然後很快就發現,有類似生酮這種極低碳水的飲食,能讓你在體力和腦力上都表現不錯。

他承認,一開始這一切聽起來都有點瘋。他從小被教育低脂是好的、高脂是壞的,所以吃含脂肪的東西總覺得怪,好像那是一種廉價餐,算不上一頓正經飯。但當他認真試了一次,把電解質和水都補對,感覺就非常好,立刻感受到一大堆好處,然後就一直這麼吃下來了。

他列了自己體會到的好處。

體力上,能量水平更穩定,運動時更有勁。爆發性動作(大重量、柔術、摔跤、格鬥)和長時間耐力運動都受益。

但他最大的好處是精神專注。尤其在格鬥類專案裡,身體感覺當然重要,但腦子能不能真正專注在技術上更重要。生酮加禁食,讓他能達到一種更穩定、更持久的專注,這對訓練有用。有趣的是,這對工作同樣有用:深度工作、長時間思考,無論是程式設計、寫作,還是坐在一張紙前面設計新系統。那種專注裡有一種乾淨的感覺,他特別喜歡。

適應之後,他發現自己一天裡心情好的小時數變多了。他承認自己也會煩躁,睡眠不足的時候,或者事情就是不順的時候,總有煩躁的時段。但他憑感覺判斷,在生酮狀態下,他覺得日子不錯、感啟用著的小時數更多。

其他好處:睡得更好,更容易入睡(也許跟吃的總量少有關,他說不準);訓練帶來的關節小疼痛似乎少了;因為能量穩定,跳過一餐變得很容易,這又是通往更長時間禁食的好入口。

他把最大的解放感放在最後:食物不再是驅動一天的執念。他回憶一天吃很多餐的時候,會發現自己老在想食物,食物在結構他的一天,影響他談論什麼、思考什麼。你不那樣想的時候是察覺不到的。而生酮加禁食之後,你可以把一天裡很長的時間用來做自己熱愛的事,食物根本不進入你的念頭和活動。

他也說了代價。他喜歡大份量進食帶來的滿足感,而生酮整體食物體積小,身體不喊餓,但沒有那種真正的飽腹感。好處是你感覺更輕、不脹。社會場合裡,生酮過去不太友好,因為大多數“好玩的食物”都帶大量碳水,在聚會和餐廳裡,你不吃就顯得在自我限制、不參與。他說這正在改變,人們接受度高多了。比如在麥當勞可以只點牛肉餅,一塊五一個,據他經驗沒人會奇怪地看你。

他特意收住了。他說他不想談太多,因為這套東西只是讓他自己感覺很好、腦子專注、身體表現好,但他不確定要不要推薦給別人。他強烈建議你去試,但他不願意下結論說這套飲食對所有人都好,他確實不知道那麼多。

他還補了一句:這樣說聽起來也不對。他一輩子愛吃肉,吃很多肉的時候狀態最好,但他也在想純素在倫理上的那一面,正在讀相關的東西,這是一段還在進行中的旅程,也許未來他的想法還會變。但到目前為止,很多年了,他很享受生酮,生酮和肉食的混合。

最黑暗的時刻,和他恢復的方式

他說總的來說他熱愛生活,所以談這些有點難。他簡短地說,最黑暗的時刻,是他把信任交出去、把心開啟給別人,結果發現對方並沒有活成他們最好的版本,或者並沒有他以為的那種了不起的人。

他說他的心在生活中被小規模地打碎過,像很多人一樣。但希望之火還亮著,也許更亮了。

關於恢復,他的方法很樸素:對那些人有過的美好時刻保持專注,那些時刻總是存在的,為此感恩,不去糾纏負面的部分。他只記得好的時候。這就是他恢復的方式,也是他保持樂觀、保持心敞開著、願意為未來那些了不起的人再冒一次險的方式。他說他的心肯定還會被摔碎,也許未來很多次,但他認為這個險永遠值得冒。

他引了馬可·奧勒留的一句話:愛你命運帶給你的那些人,全心全意地去愛。

他說,這大概就是我們能做的全部了。

整期節目到這裡結束。凌晨 4 點 20 分,他說這是個結束的好時間,也許是最好的時間。

順著他關於愛因斯坦和豬的那段話,他最後留了一句丘吉爾:我喜歡豬。狗仰視我們,貓俯視我們,而豬把我們當平等的。

如果你讀到了這裡,可以試著做這幾件事

  • 挑一個你一直想學但覺得“太晚”的領域,別先選方向,先寫一個十行以內的小指令碼,解決你自己電腦上一個每天都會遇到的小麻煩。用起來的那一刻,你會知道要不要繼續。
  • 把“我該怎麼搜”當成一項正經技能來練。遇到卡點時,先花五分鐘只想一件事:能讓我邁出下一步的那個頁面,會用什麼詞描述它。
  • 給自己裝一個幸福儀表盤。別測當天的心情,按週記錄一次,問自己這段時間的均值。如果連續幾周偏低,別再把它歸因於情緒,先當作路線問題來檢查。
  • 對批評做一次分揀。把收到的負面反饋拆成兩類:能用來改進的具體碎片,和純情緒的部分。前者留下,後者在當天結束前放掉。
  • 如果你在做需要長期堅持的創造,主動管理你的資訊環境。取關那些只讓你憤怒卻給不出路徑的賬號,把注意力交給那些讓你想動手的人。
  • 對一兩個你原本覺得“不科學”的領域留一點開放。留出這點開放,未必是為了相信它,真正的作用是不

    • 對一兩個你原本覺得“不科學”的領域留一點開放。留出這點開放,未必是為了相信它,真正的作用在於不讓自己的思維被已知的邊界鎖死。那些看起來沒什麼用的好奇心,往往是新想法的入口。
    • 把“允許自己犯錯”寫成一條明確的原則,而不是靠臨場勇氣。Lex 說他真正怕的是自己在一場重要的對話裡做得很差,怕的是沒能給世界增加愛和知識。這種怕比“被批評”有用得多。挑一件你在意的事,提前想清楚:如果搞砸了,我具體擔心的是什麼?把那個具體的東西寫下來,其餘的噪音就可以放掉。
    • 如果你最近狀態不好,先別急著歸因於自己不夠努力。問一個更樸素的問題:我現在把信任交給誰,又把注意力交給誰?最黑暗的時刻往往和錯付的人有關,恢復的路徑也往往和記得那些好時刻有關。

    這期 AMA 從凌晨錄到四點二十,Lex 說這是個結束的好時間,也許是最好的時間。整期內容散得很,AI 的痛苦、移民、外星人、轉行、幸福、飲食、心碎,看起來毫無關係。但把它們放在一起看,其實一直在回答同一個問題:一個人怎麼在知道世界有多難的前提下,還願意把心開啟,還願意做事,還願意對別人抱有期待。

    他的答案不復雜。掙扎是過程,幸福是度量。找一個簡單的專案,允許自己為它興奮,然後一步一步往下走。

文稿由本站用語音識別模型(基於官方釋出音訊)機器轉寫,可能有識別錯誤,人名與數字請以音訊為準。
[00:00:00] The following is an AMA episode where I answer a few questions the folks asked on on YouTube and other social networks, I'll try to do these episodes on occasion if it's of interest to anyone at all. Quick mention of our sponsors, Brooklyn and Sheets, indeed hiring website Express EPN and their gun muzzle recovery device. So the choice is sleep, employment, privacy or muscle recovery. Choose wisely, my friends, and if you wish, click the sponsor links below to get a discount to support this podcast. [00:00:38] As usual, I'll do a few minutes of ads now and no ads in the middle. I try to make this interesting, but I'll give you time stamps. So if you skip, please to check out the sponsors by clicking on links in description. It's the best way to support this podcast. This episode is brought to you by Brooklynese Sheets. Sleep has increasingly become a source of joy for me with a sleep, self-cleaning bed, and now these incredibly smooth, buttery, smooth, as they call them, cozy Brooklynese sheets. [00:01:09] I've often slept on the carpet without anything but a jacket and jeans, so I'm not exactly the world's greatest expert in comfort. But these sheets have been an amazing upgrade over anything I've ever used, even the adult sheets I've actually purchased at some point in my life. There's a variety of colors, patterns and material variants to choose from. [00:01:31] They have over fifty thousand five star reviews. I'm a sucker for those, by the way. In other words, people love them, so they suggest they should do something nice for yourself to start the New Year. To help you with that, Brooklyn has a special offer. Go to Brooklyn and Dotcom and use promo code leks to get twenty five dollars off when you spend one hundred dollars more plus free shipping, that's Brooklyn and dotcom and enter promo code leks to get twenty five bucks off. [00:01:59] You spend one hundred dollars or more plus free shipping. I guess I said that twice in Brooklyn and dotcom and use promo code leks at checkout. This episode is brought to you by indeed a hiring website, I've used them as part of all the hiring efforts I've done for the engineering teams I've led in recent years. The main point is to go from the initial posting to a shortlist of great candidates as quickly as possible. That's what they accomplished. That's what they help you with. [00:02:30] They search through millions of resumes and instantly show you good candidates and indeed delivers four times more hires than all of the job sites combined, according to Talent Nest. So that's the first really difficult step, which is getting a good pool of candidates. I think the most important part is the final steps in figuring out out of that pool, which is the actual perfect candidate. [00:02:54] And you do that by going through the interviewing process. But that's on you or that's on me if I'm hiring. I've learned a lot about this process myself. I actually kind of enjoy the engineering aspect of this process. But honestly, I think it's more art than science. [00:03:10] Anyway, right now, listeners get a free 75 dollar credit to upgrade your job post if you go to indeed Dotcom Friedman. [00:03:21] However, the hackie spell my last name, this is indeed the best offer available anywhere. Get a free certified credit and indeed slash Friedman indeed. Dot com slash Friedman. Yes, that's spelled F.R. I.D. man there is no E in there, but you can just click the link in the description. Offer is valid through March 31st of this year. Terms and conditions apply. I've never actually said that in an ad terms and conditions apply, I assume, as all proper citizens must. [00:03:53] You've read all the terms and conditions, of course. This show is also brought to you by Express VPN. Most of us have very little choice of an ISP Internet service provider. They operate like monopolies in the regions they serve. They then use this monopoly power to take advantage of customers, data caps, streaming throttles. The list goes on. But worst of all, many ISPs log your Internet activity and sell their data, which they can legally onto other Big Ten companies or advertisers to prevent ISPs from seeing my Internet activity. [00:04:29] I protect my devices with Express VPN. I've been using it for many years on Windows, yes, Windows, Linux and Android, but it's available everywhere else, too. For me, it has been fast and easy to use. One big power on button has fun. The press. Probably my favorite intuitive design of an app doesn't try to do more than it needs to, but it gets the job done. That's a sign of a good design. [00:04:55] Go to express VPN dot com slash blackspot to get an extra three months free and a one year package that's express dot com slash legs pod. This show is brought to you by Dragun, a hand-held percussive therapy device that I use after hard running or bodyweight exercise sessions for muscle recovery and easing muscle tension. A lot of elite athletes use it, but it's also good for regular folks like me. It's surprisingly quiet. Easy to use comes with a great app that guides it through everything you need to know. [00:05:28] I'm ramping back up and the whole exercise thing, cutting a bit of weight, either running or doing body weight exercises, often both. There are several reasons for this, but mostly running is great at getting me to let go of any silly negative thoughts I might be holding onto anyway. Their gun as a part of the muscle recovery in this process. Try them for thirty days. There is no substitute for the Therrell Gunjan for within Olad screen personalize their gun app and the quiet power you need. [00:06:00] That sounds really badass but also happens to be true. [00:06:03] Starting at one hundred and ninety dollars. [00:06:06] Go to third gunda council flex that's there. Their gun dotcom slash flex. And now on to the AMA episode with the questions and the answers. The question is, Lex, I'm a young man that has battled with depression. Do you think when trying to develop a human like A.I., we will reach a stumbling point or the A.I. themselves suffer from depression and other complex mental issues? Do you think it will be a simple fix, like rewriting a piece of code or a new patch or update or maybe when trying to create something human like with high fidelity? [00:07:03] You need to leave then the possibility of the A.I. suffering from such complex mental issues that a human can. What are your thoughts generally and philosophically about AI suffering from depression? [00:07:16] I think that suffering is a deep, fundamental property of consciousness. I would like to probably say quite a bit about depression. I have friends who suffer from depression, but. That's for another time. That's when we talk about depression in humans. I think depression is just one flavor of suffering that is part of the human condition. I see it as a kind of. Dark side street on the path to intelligence. So in terms of robots suffering, if we are to create systems that are truly intelligent in the way that they're able to interact in an intelligent and deeply meaningful ways with other humans is going to have many of the properties, many of the characteristics of the human condition, of the full human experience. [00:08:12] And I think depression is part of that. There's, of course, a part in us humans that longs to remove all that is cruel in this world. That's why people that believe in God. Often the biggest question is of why does God allow there to be suffering in the world? There's this longing to understand why is there so much unfairness in this world? And so building on that, there's an inclination to then in our systems engineer something that is void of those things that we can understand why that's part of the human condition. [00:08:50] But I think it is intricately part of the experience that is to be human. And I think if we were to build intelligence systems that are interacting with humans, there has to be in some ways, properties of consciousness Bakhtin and afford to have properties of consciousness Bakhtin. [00:09:09] We have to have the full mystery and uncertainty of the human experience, which, yes, includes all the different flavors of suffering, of which depression is part, I think the ying in the yang in all of its versions, the ups and downs of moods, but also the more sort of rational intellectual interpretations of different concepts that are less sort of dramatic all have to oscillate back and forth. I think that's where the interesting aspect of interactions happens. Just going to have conversations in the podcast. [00:09:42] That interesting stuff happens when there's disagreements, when there's a bit of turmoil, when there's a push and pull, when there's a changing of minds or even just a morphing of your own opinions about something, your own thoughts. I think that's part of it. So I really do think all of that mess of humanity has to be engineered in into AI systems that are interacting with humans and are trying to create meaningful interactions as humans. [00:10:10] There's, of course, a huge amount of systems that are going to be more intelligent than humans are particular tasks. Those are not need to have those properties of the human experience like suffering and all those kinds of things. But for the ones that move among us, I think, unfortunately, depression has to be part of the experience or the possibility of depression has to be part of the experience. Of course, I tend to focus on the positive aspects of the human experience, like like love, beauty, joy, all all of those kinds of things. [00:10:44] But it's the yin and the yang. They go together. There are lifelong partners, unfortunately. I think now, of course, all of this is just hypothesis. And most my answers to all these questions are going to be just my own thoughts. But I am thinking about all this from an engineering perspective and maybe I'll have more to say in the future about how we actually build these kinds of things into our systems that interact with humans. Thanks for the great question. [00:11:14] It's tough on. Question is, Lex, I was wondering if you would be willing to talk about your immigrant experience. I myself started off as an international student studying and working in America, not from Russia and from India. But there was a constant push and pull that I experienced. Given my life circumstance, I would be curious to hear how you assimilated. Do you feel like you belong, etc.. [00:11:40] Thank you for the AMA. OK, your statements about do you feel like you belong? Hit hard for some reason. Maybe it's because late at night, maybe because I'm a bit over caffeinated, maybe with pops to mind to focus on is the aspect of loneliness, the aspect of belonging. [00:12:02] I think a lot of us in the early teenage years go through that process of feeling like an outsider, an outcast of different kinds. [00:12:11] I think it hit me the hardest personally because I was a popular kid in Russia. And when we moved here, I went to the opposite of being popular or feeling like that. I felt like an outcast. The place I moved to in America had more of an emphasis. Maybe it's a cultural thing of emphasizing material possessions over to things that were deeply meaningful to me, which is human connection like friendship and also knowledge, like mathematics and scientific discovery, all those kinds of things. [00:12:47] It's just the emphasis of what was valued was different. And that, for me was a catalyst to feel like a total outcast as opposed to being this person who looks out into the world and enjoys the beauty of the world. I kind of went to this brooding phase of, first of all, learning the English language, but starting to read books, more philosophical books. [00:13:08] The first one I remember reading in English was The Giver, the sort of help me start thinking about this world. I was so fortunate. To be so in love with people for so long and have close friends in Russia that I didn't notice in my childhood. How deeply alone we all are. So for me, the immigrant experience involved in a small way, at least the first, realizing that hard human truth that we all. Are born alone, live alone, die alone, even when we're in the arms of somebody we love. [00:13:53] We're still somehow fundamentally alone. With our thoughts, their hopes, with our fears trapped in this conscious meat vessel between our ears. I think the immigrant experience for me was the catalyst to realizing. And being terrified and also liberated by the idea that. I'm alone in this world. And at the same time was the realization that this beautiful feeling I felt from the connection to other humans was this gift that. Took me away from this dark realization, so it's almost that love is kind of escape from the reality of life, from the muck of life. [00:14:53] And so the journey began in that way to think about this world in this way, both the burden of being alone, coupled with the frequent escape from that feeling by being lost in the company of friends or loved ones. [00:15:09] So early on, coupled with this love of the human mind and curiosity about the human mind, was the love of programming and actually building little programs and aging systems, of course, building robots and college and so on. [00:15:24] I think the gift of the immigrant experience of feeling like the outcast was the love of experiencing the deep connection with others, like a deep appreciation of it when it's there. I guess because it was taken away, because I was ripped out of it through moving here, I got to really appreciate it and start becoming cognizant of it, where I can start looking for it and be more grateful when I do have it. [00:15:53] And at the same time, a kind of curiosity started boiling up of the perspective on artificial intelligence systems from that kind of longing for connection. So as opposed to looking at robots or systems or even just programs that accomplish a particular task. Can these programs accomplish the same richness of task and richness of experience that I came to appreciate as a human being? You know, so when I talk about kind of love. It's there's echoes of that in my longing of the kind of experiences I would like to create in artificial intelligence systems that was born out of the immigrant experience of the loss of. [00:16:44] Childlike innocence, experience of all of it combined, of starting to read books and thinking deeply about this world experience, all of that coupled and I really think sometimes, unfortunately, the first step of deep gratitude is loss. [00:17:02] So for me, I lost quite a bit during that time. And through that loss, I was able to discover the things that I truly appreciate about life. So let me leave it at that. Question is, if you were able to ask an alien some questions, what would they be? This is a really good question and. I find it to be actually a really good thought experiment. Let me put out some candidate questions out there and see what sticks. [00:17:32] The first I'll probably ask for advice for the human species as a whole, for civilization of what we might do to survive and prosper for a long time to come. Assuming the alien is from a civilization that's far older than ours, are far wiser. I think there could be some really interesting, clear statements about the things we're doing here on Earth that are getting us into trouble from an alien perspective. [00:18:05] So I think that's the number one thing. And maybe I'll bring up like along those lines, bring up questions of great filters. Like, you know, if you look at the history of your civilization, when did you almost destroy the entirety of your species? It would be like informative from a historical perspective to see like, you know, for us, that's currently what the nuclear age and the few moments in the history that could have resulted in an all out nuclear war. [00:18:34] It'd be interesting to see if they mentioned something about ajai, something about viruses or wars or just things that don't we don't even think about. So I guess question number one would be like some basic life advice, hoping that this alien is like a novel type character who can like in a crisp, short way, give some profound advice. [00:19:00] Second, I would probably ask that this is a very selfish conversation because it's just following along the things on top of my head that follow my curiosity. I would ask about the difference between their civilization and ours. I would ask whether they have some of these things that make us human, like love, like do you guys have love where you come from? Do you have death? Mortality? You know, I suspect it's possible to have mortality, not even be a concept that makes any sense to an alien species, that, of course, everybody is immortal and there might be some kind of enforced selection mechanism like evolution in general. [00:19:43] I would ask about consciousness, try to like tease apart the question of like this thing of subjective experience is, is this some kind of self-centered, weird, overdramatized quirk of evolution that we have that's not actually special at all? And then we make a kind of big deal about it, that some kind of useful feature of our brain to think of ourselves as individuals, that's completely silly. [00:20:13] It would be interesting to try to tease apart whether they have consciousness and what form their intelligence takes that is distinct from consciousness in the way that we think of humans as being conscious entities that are also able to do intelligent things. Are those intricately connected and are those separate? It'd be interesting to sort of tease that a part of how their alien minds work. So that includes intelligence, consciousness, love and death. All the greatest hits. OK, then I'll probably go to physics. [00:20:49] Of course you got to ask about physics. I would look into the aliens eyes if they have eyes and try to determine if if we can actually even find the same language of mathematics, of physical sciences in general. I'll probably ask about the big mysteries of physics and science, of what's outside our universe. Why is there something rather than nothing? Why is there stuff and what's outside the stuff we think of as stuff? So like what's outside the universe? [00:21:23] I'd be hesitant to ask the why questions, but I'll try a few out to see. Maybe there is a good answer to the why questions of like why did it start? Like why is there something rather than nothing? Then I would probably ask slightly more detailed about what's the universe made of, like what's up with this dark matter and dark energy stuff like what are the basic building blocks of reality and what are the laws of physics that govern that reality? [00:21:52] So I would of course, ask kind of sneak in there and just like casually, can you maybe give a few hints of how to unify? [00:22:00] First of all, we're on the right track in terms of quantum mechanics and general relativity. And then how do you unify all the laws of physics? Maybe sneak in there? In a different angle, trying to ask about the singularity in the black hole or maybe what happens at the very beginning of the Big Bang, like where those laws are all unified, maybe trying to get a sense of what are the kind of physics required to fully describe these events. [00:22:32] I think the physics discussion would be a good time to ask, is there a God, maybe not use the word, but instead say, is there a kind of a centralized designer or team of designers that have, like, launched the universe and are actively managing the universe? And of course, another version of asking that I would probably talk about the simulation of looking at the universe as we see it, as a computation, as a computer that's doing information processing, see if that rings a bell to the alien, if there's a connection to that in general, would ask about what kind of computers you have and also what kind of computer games that would be really useful, like what do you do for fun? [00:23:15] You come here often, but that's like usual icebreakers. Of course, I'm not mentioning those. That's just like chatter at the bar. [00:23:21] So I guess outside the big physics questions, I would ask the more engineering centric questions. First my interest. I abar superintelligence. How do we build superintelligent systems, ones that are far more intelligent than humans? [00:23:37] How do we travel close to the speed of light or faster than the speed of light, like how do the aliens get to where we're at that we're meeting and talking relays? There'll be a question of energy. How do we harness the energy of a sun or multiple suns or all of the suns in our galaxy? And then also kind of an engineering question, can we travel through time? And if we can, how do we build a time traveling machine? [00:24:06] And is it a good idea? I think a lot of these questions will be appended with a sort of caveat of like, if you know the answer to this question, will I be better off if you told me this answer? Sometimes knowledge is not power. Sometimes knowledge is a burden that leads to self-destruction. So we're going to be careful about that. Of course, as the hand gets tired of talking to me at this intergalactic bar, probably gets up, sort of politely starts walking away. [00:24:37] Well, I would definitely ask some questions. You know, from my own personal knowledge bank is P equals and P. Good question, theoretical computer science, one of the big questions, all mathematics, I just need to know the answer is give me the answer. I'll work from there. OK, we'll figure out. [00:24:58] The rest is the answer. Yes or no? Probably won't ask for investment advice, probably thinks that the whole concept of money is silly, but I might ask about Bitcoin. [00:25:11] Good long term investment or bad? You think? The digital currency in general, and, of course, will probably ask, is Elon Musk one of you guys or a different species? Do you know which galaxy, which group of planets plastic came from? It'd be nice to sort of localize things. Is there others like it to visit and build companies? Just get some of the details. The same has suddenly become ridiculous, but I think it's a really nice thought experiment, and I'll think about this a little bit more. [00:25:44] I'm sure there is a list of really precise questions that could most efficiently unlock the mysteries before the human race. They're both useful for our progress and useful for our survival. Question is, what advice would you give an intermediate life stage, 36 year old who wants to career pivot from medical technology and research to computer science? The first by computer science, I think you mean the broad field that includes software engineering, machine learning, robotics, just computing in general, maybe with less emphasis on the mathematical size, like theoretical computer science. [00:26:27] I think the best advice on this that I could give is. Find a simple project to get excited about and allow yourself to get really excited by it. Have fun, fall in love with it, be proud of the thing you create. And I should say there's a big emphasis on the simple don't go super ambitious. I believe that most people, if they allow themselves, can derive a huge amount of joy for creating some simple little things, even if it's following editorial. [00:27:00] If you just allow yourself to experience the joy of creation, it's there for you. [00:27:06] That's that's one of the magical things about computer science, is it allows you to create things that are almost like entities on their own. That's what programs are. So I think a career in computer science starts first with allowing yourself to be passionate and getting that stoking that flame. And allowing it to build so it's not about any of the practical like which job do I get, what thing I work on is just really giving yourself over to the simple passion of creating stuff. [00:27:41] I think there's just a quick set of steps that I think I followed early on that I would also recommend you at least consider following is first is basic software engineering. [00:27:53] So finding maybe Python or JavaScript like super popular, accessible programming language and build just like a hello world program or something, just a little bit more complicated, but not much more beyond that is using that newly acquired set of tools of programming build something that automates something you do on the computer? Maybe another way to phrase that is just like scripts that are helping you in your interaction with the computer. So maybe finding different files in your computer that you try to look for often or reorganizing things in an automated way like folder structures or maybe renaming files. [00:28:38] Like I have a script that finds all the files that have. Spaces in the following, and it renames them after confirmation to underscores all those kinds of things. There's a bunch of little helper scripts I have all over the place, and those are just really joyful because you get to use them every day. And it's something that you've created that made your life a little bit easier. I for me, at least, that's a source of joy that helps feed that like love of programming, of just being a part of the computing of the computer science world. [00:29:13] And I've been doing that really my whole life. [00:29:16] It started with C and C++, but now it's a lot of other languages, primarily Python and yes, JavaScript. Next is a branching into two separate little worlds and computer science of algorithms. And then like data science, I think both are full of beautiful things to fall in love with. [00:29:39] The thing you can really enjoy with algorithms is learning how to build more and more efficient algorithms. [00:29:46] On the data side is learning how to process different data sets, how to clean them up, how to reorganize them and do different kind of statistics on them, processing on them. So we're not even talking about machine learning yet. It's just being able to visualize those days as all this kind of stuff, just working with data. [00:30:07] And now we're starting to talk about career because there's a lot of jobs that have to do with the use of computing techniques to process, visualize and interpret, aggregate, analyze data. So I guess you would call that field data science. So that's a really cool career trajectory. And there's so many cool things to get into with, I think a very reasonable small learning curve that you can really, if you push yourself, do within weeks, maybe months, not years. [00:30:42] And once you become comfortable with the data science world, you can start building on top of that quite naturally, doing some boilerplate machine learning, supervised learning projects and then building out into more specific, more useful, more novel cutting edge applications of machine learning, reinforcement learning, that whole world, maybe even taking that into physical systems of actually building robots. As you backtrack, it sounds like I'm building towards something super complicated because not all of these can be really small projects, even robotics projects. [00:31:17] You can build a little robot that doesn't basic task, maybe just a basic computer vision. And it's a nice way to learn on the robotics side and better systems programming. So it's just getting more comfortable with hardware and seeing like if that's something you're interested in or in the data science side, where you sticking much more to the software, both of those, you now start to figure out what is exciting career possibility. [00:31:43] I think two things even I would even see my skills are important here, passion and Google. I see passion as a skill because it's allowing yourself to be excited, finding things you could be excited about and allowing yourself to be excited and seeing that is actually a central part of progress is allowing yourself to be excited. And the reason I mentioned Google is because I find that in a lot of fields, but especially in computer science or software engineering or machine learning, there's so many amazing resources out there that the key skill actually ends up being is how good are you at discovering the exact page and resources that is allowing you to take the next step in your journey of exploration, of learning? [00:32:31] And that's fundamentally a skill of how do I Google the right thing? What pages do I click on and all those kinds of things? I think it sounds almost kind of ridiculous to say that's a skill, but that is one of the most essential skills of the modern day student. Lifelong student is how to Google. So, yeah, passion and Google allow yourself to fall in love with the project and keep taking the next step. The next step, next step with the help of a good search engine and a bit of curiosity. [00:33:08] Question is what form factor of robots are you most excited about for the future bipeds quad's arms humanoids, maybe something else more obscure. This is a really tough question because I really like Roberts. I think that love is born in software. And the hardware stuff just makes a little more fun, so I think the things I'm really excited about, even in terms of form factors, is in the software. [00:33:39] I think much of the exciting developments in robotics is actually simulated worlds currently, and I think they'll be true for quite a while to come. [00:33:49] And so I think in terms of human robot interaction, the robots there will be really exciting are the ones that live in virtual worlds, like in virtual reality or even just on a screen. So I think what we would see more and more is entities, human like entities or entities that allow us to anthropomorphize a consciousness, a spirit onto them living in the digital world. I think that's what I'm really excited about, and of course, slowly, those entities taking a form in the physical space in terms of I think probably the humanoid form. [00:34:32] Unfortunately, though, very difficult to engineer and create a realistic and natural fulfilling experience with, I think it's still probably the most to me exciting form, although I do really like Boston Dynamics spot the robot dog. [00:34:53] From kind of having a pet perspective is a really exciting for, again, very difficult to do stuff in the physical space, it's it's a huge challenge that, as far as I can tell, several orders of magnitude more difficult than the same challenge in the digital space. So I just see the digital simulator robotics advancing much quicker and having a much larger scale impact on the world. Especially if we start seeing more and more virtual worlds being created. And that doesn't necessarily mean virtual reality or like augmented reality. [00:35:32] It just means ability and mediums within which you can interact with artificial intelligence systems in the digital space. And I do see that as a form factor, which is entities in digital space, having a humanoid or semi humanoid form, something that we can anthropomorphize, something we can connect with on a human level. [00:35:56] Question is on the topic of suffering and growth, is happiness a healthy pursuit, or do you agree with Einstein's view on happiness as the aspiration of a pig? [00:36:10] OK, let me quickly look up the Einstein quote here that you reference about a pig and happiness. [00:36:17] Einstein writes, I have never looked upon ease and happiness as ends in themselves. This critical basis I call the ideal of a pig sty. The ideals that have lighted my way and time after time have given me new courage to face life cheerfully have been kindness, beauty and truth without the sense of kinship with men of like mind, without occupation, with the objective world, the eternally unattainable in the field of art and scientific endeavors, life would have seemed empty to me. [00:36:51] The trite objects of human efforts, possessions, outward success, luxury have always seemed to me contemptible. [00:37:03] OK, where do I start with this, I think I usually agree with Einstein, especially when he talks philosophy on most things, and I do hear as well in terms of material possessions and all those kinds of things. But I think he unfairly attacks the word happiness and also Pigs' me disagree with Einstein and try to defend the word happiness and also maybe defend Pigs' if I can somehow figure that out. [00:37:30] So the word. Happiness, I think, is one of those words that could mean a lot of things to a lot of people, and I think in this case, Einstein is using it as almost or the pursuit of happiness as a kind of synonym for hedonism. So kind of very narrow definition of what happiness is. I think I see happiness as. [00:37:55] Indicator that is much bigger than than direct pleasures, but as a word that includes those pleasures, but also includes more meaningful, deep fulfillment in life. And so I'd like to reclaim the word happiness is a good thing, which is slightly implied in this discussion that happiness is a kind of distraction that shouldn't be thought about. [00:38:21] I do think that happiness is a side effect of a life well lived, not a goal. I think the moment it becomes a goal in itself, I think it's easy to lose your way and perhaps that's what in part Einstein means. But I do think it's a really good signal of progress, happiness, so in, um, losing yourself in the focus of battle, of just focusing on excellence and progress and improving and challenging yourself and growing all the time. [00:39:00] I think a kind of a running average measure of your happiness day to day happiness. You like average that over a period of weeks and months is a good measure of how you're doing. [00:39:18] And I think a more like actionable process of collecting that signal is a process of just gratitude, of sitting back and thinking how grateful I am, how great for you are, for for how you start and how it's going for the progress that you've made. [00:39:38] So I do think it's a good signal, not momentary happiness, but over a period of time, several weeks or months, if there's not happiness, that you've probably lost your way as well. So it's a useful signal, not a goal in itself, but a useful signal. And, you know, kindness, beauty and truth, as Einstein puts it, are good ideals. But they're a bit ambiguous in a practical day to day sense. [00:40:08] I share them, of course, but I think practically, if I were to put it into words, at least for myself, struggle is the process and happiness is the measure. So day to day life actually looks like a constant struggle to improve yourself and then. The flip side of that is the gratitude of how amazing life is, the progress we've made, but also just the opportunity to struggle. As you know, you have to imagine Sisyphus happy. [00:40:49] And ultimately, when I look back on my life, most days are spent truly happy to be alive. So in that sense, the pursuit of happiness is a good one. So not hedonistic in the moment. Local optima of kind of pleasure, but more like stepping back, looking at the running average over the past few weeks and months and making sure you're at a good level. [00:41:21] So that's a bit of a disagreement with Einstein. And I also have to say that I think pigs are one of the most intelligent animals, some still holding out for the possibility that pigs or maybe dolphins have life figured out quite a bit better than us humans. So on those two things, the pursuit of happiness and on the brilliance of pigs, me and I find part ways for a brief moment. Question is, hey, Lex, I was curious how you pick people to come on to the podcast. [00:42:00] I think this process is actually quite difficult and it evolved over time, so let me mention a few factors, I think. First and foremost, it's important that a person is really passionate about what they do, and that passion can take all kinds of different forms. I know I sometimes all the time completely lack emotion in my face, but I truly am passionate about the things I do. And so that passion can express itself in different ways. [00:42:33] And so coupled with that passion, I look for people who are sort of not only passionate, but they appreciate, enjoy, are drawn to the long form conversation format as a way to express their passion, which is not everybody. Some people love to express their passion, their interest, their expertise, their ideas in written form. Maybe that's more kind of edited over several passes of editing versus a conversation format, especially long form conversation with there's very little editing. [00:43:07] In addition to that, I'm also try to make sure the person actually wants to come on to this particular podcast. You know, there's so many amazing podcasts out there and it's also just surprising to see how much better they are than me at talking and conversations, explaining stuff. It's humbling. It's also inspiring because it pushes me to kind of improve seeing what's possible. [00:43:32] So I don't know if people don't actually. Listen to this particular podcast, or at least have listened a little bit and are not drawn to the particular flavor of weirdness that is me, like some kid wears a suit all the time and like, mumbles, speak slowly, ask these weird questions. [00:43:54] I mean, if they're not drawn to whatever the hell that weird mystery is of this particular human, then there's no reason to to talk if they're drawn. [00:44:04] I think there's a possibility of something magical happening me with my weirdness and then with their weirdness kind of colliding in interesting ways, that creates something new that both of us are surprised by. And on that topic, more and more, I'm looking for people that are different than me, and that means the full spectrum of diversity. So it could be different backgrounds, different world views, different personalities. Like you can tell there will be a clash of flavors like chocolate and salt, but it can also turn out to be like a pineapple pizza that actually some people love. [00:44:45] But I don't understand. It doesn't even it doesn't make any sense why it doesn't make any sense. So it could be, you know, taking that risk of embracing that clash. And the chemistry can sometimes result in a pineapple pizza. [00:45:00] So there's a cost of that risk. But I, I seek it out more because I think that's the possibility of some magical experience of a magical conversation. [00:45:10] And on that topic, I should mention, there's this kind of idea of platforming, which is I've been fortunate enough to have sort of. [00:45:19] Enough listeners and viewers that the question of platforming even comes up, meaning if you have this kind of guest with these kind of controversial viewpoints, why give them a platform that further spreads their viewpoints? And I understand I empathize with this kind of view, but I don't like it because to me, if I'm successful now, that's the problem. I'm not very good at this thing, especially challenging conversations, so but if I'm successful that the tension in the world views the tension and personalities, the clash will create wisdom. [00:46:08] So I really want to talk to very challenging people. I want to have really difficult conversations. And that means talking to people that are at the outskirts of society. I think it's something that I'm thinking about a lot. It's important to say that I'm not afraid of being canceled. I do think I'm afraid or perhaps the better word is concerned about doing a terrible job on an important, difficult conversation. Where as a result of me doing a terrible job, I don't add love or knowledge or inspiration to the world, but fuel further division, not because of the guests I have on, but because of my failure to. [00:47:05] Catalyse and like, steer an inspiring conversation. I see my skill in conversation is not. I mean, I don't know how to put it nicely, but not very good, I'm striving to improve constantly. So some of the guest selection has to do with the difficulty of the conversation. And how prepared I am for that level of difficulty, I think the way I think about difficult conversations is some of them might take years to prepare for just intellectually. [00:47:42] There's there's certain people and certain spaces of ideas that takes a lot of time. [00:47:48] You have to remember that I'm just an engineer. I have a set of things that preoccupied my mind for years and there's a lot of difficult topics that I just won't do a good job of. [00:48:03] So part of it is I have to work hard, to learn more, to kind of constantly look outside the Overton Window to try to explore difficult ideas and at the same time build enough sort of reputation driven freedom to take risks and make mistakes or try to inspire people in the community to allow me to allow each other, all of us, to make mistakes in conversation. [00:48:31] So it's the coupling of extreme thorough preparation and allowing yourself to make mistakes. It's like excellence and not giving a damn combined. [00:48:44] But overall, the thing I'm concerned about and I take back the fear, I'm not afraid of it. I'm just concerned of doing a bad job of conversation. I'm not concerned of being canceled or derided or criticized after having done a reasonably good job. [00:49:05] I'm concerned. I myself, it is a matter of cancer, not just when I look in the mirror, when I look at the results of the conversation being a failure. Something that doesn't add love to the world, but something adds derision and also this is the problem with words. I don't even like how I'm expressing myself currently. I really try not to have some kind of agenda or strategy going into a conversation. I really want to be fragile. [00:49:36] open-Minded almost boring and naive and just giving my trust to a person, even when I challenge or play devil's advocate, all those kinds of things. [00:49:46] I really want to place trust in the mutual respect and the love that the person gives, and I trust that they won't take advantage of that. And so some of the guest selection. Has to do with do I have enough trust yet that this person won't take advantage of my open mindedness, of my childlike curiosity, all those kinds of things. So but all of this is just a giant learning experience. I do want to be careful not to let my curiosity run or should I say too far ahead of me where my preparation doesn't meet the level of curiosity. [00:50:32] So, again, like I said, I'm willing and I'm trying to be more and more willing to take risks and make mistakes in conversations. But I'm also not letting myself off the hook in terms of the level of preparation I put. And I really hope that we give each other the freedom and our patience with each other in nuanced conversation. That's what seems to be really missing in public discourse, is this kind of patience and allowing each other to make statements that we later change your mind on and not putting that statement on this kind of scarlet letter that forever puts us in a bin of red or blue or some other bin. [00:51:22] So I'm trying to navigate all of this while still being naive and open minded as best I can. Question is, Hilex, I was wondering how you managed to remain optimistic in the face of adversity when you encounter hostile people that don't want to even consider offering constructive criticism and would rather try to tear you down and force their ideology. I find pieces of hope for short periods of time and then they fade after I see the arguments surrounding whatever brought about hope to begin with. [00:51:54] I guess to put it simply, how do you hold on to hope and optimism? Thank you for the question. It's probably a lot to be said about this, but I'll try to keep it brief and simple. I tried to ignore the noise of the world, the the bickering of the moment, I find that if you give yourself a chance to see how amazing people are. [00:52:21] That those people will reveal themselves to be amazing. That you will see it. That if you give yourself a chance to see it, you will see it, I see it. And I see gratitude for how amazing things are and optimism for how much even better things could be as a kind of superpower. [00:52:51] It makes life exciting in a way that first is just fun to live and to from just a productivity perspective, as an engineer or anybody who creates anything, it's fuel to create. I believe that to create new things. And especially for things that others will say is not possible to create. I find that optimism is a necessary precondition to give you the energy, the fuel, the drive, the inspiration to go for months, for years, to carry the fire of belief that that's where that optimism truly is a super power that enables that kind of perseverance. [00:53:40] So I think the most important thing is it makes life more exciting and fun and it's a good productivity hack. It's the second thing you assess. [00:53:53] How so I tried to my personal life. And the influences I take in the books I read and and the people I talk to, I try to surround myself with people that are also full of optimism. [00:54:06] And in general, I'm unapologetically a fan of a lot of people, especially sort of big thinkers, while the engineers and scientists and creators of all walks of life, people that shine in ways that surprised me or excite me, there's really thousands, to be honest, staff. [00:54:28] The top of my head, even people I talk to on this podcast, Chris Laettner always brings a smile to my face, one of the greatest engineers of the world, Jim Kellers, from that ilk as well, though slightly different personalities, but also inspires me and makes me smile such a deep and kind and brilliant human being along that line of engineers. Elon Musk, of course, also the embodiment of optimism about this world, is an inspiration and then maybe down the dimension of more. [00:55:06] While even George Hotz with a chaotic style of thinking as very different than my own, but one that I find just inspiring, of course, Joe Rogan for me has been for many years a kind of example of somebody who doesn't take themselves too seriously like he's been for a lot of people. He has been, for me, a role model for a successful life that's not full of jealousy and kind of derision, but it's more being supportive of others, being a fan of others, all those kinds of things. [00:55:43] I mean, and on the darker side, Dan Carlin, of course, you often think of him as optimistic, but I truly think he's optimistic. [00:55:53] He's just been so deeply soaking in the muck, the darkness of human history, that I think sometimes the things he talks about come off as. As deeply cynical about the future of human civilization, but they're not, there's the shining optimism to him. And I wasn't in my conversation with him, even though his words were saying that he's not always optimistic. I think his heart, his spirit was clearly optimistic. There's a hope for us in him. And at least to me, that's that's what I see in a to me, that hope glows pretty bright in the stuff that he creates and the passion he has for human history. [00:56:38] And, of course, the scientist Stephen Wolfram and the computer science side. [00:56:45] I can't tell you how much I love Sellier Tomalis, Sean Carroll, the way he loves everything about physics is incredible. [00:56:54] Communicator Eric Weinstein, the way he loves everything, geometrical shapes of all things, whether they're mathematical or whether they're connected to physics. [00:57:05] Just his love for symmetry, asymmetry, for topology, for the weird curvature of things in the visible dimensions of space time or the invisible ones. And that's just the kind of people I've talked to on this podcast. Of course, Josh Obock, whose flow of consciousness is full of so much brilliance, it breaks my brain any time I try to process my Commodore 64 brain takes in his Pentium. I don't know what the analogy is, but it always breaks my brain. [00:57:38] I'm especially inspired by the creations of software engineers, for example, because there's an inherent optimism to the creative process. A lot of people in the cryptocurrency space, like we talk beta and the constant inspiration, it goes on and on and of course, the hundreds, probably thousands of dead folks from does the Yassky Freud. [00:58:00] Young Cummo has a. Keroack, everybody, I mean, I just kind of feel like I exist in this world of people that are excited about the future, and then, of course, the noise of the world that is lost in the bickering of the moment can seep in. [00:58:25] And that's where a kind of meditation comes in. I don't fully ignore it, I think. That's kind of running away from the world in a way that I don't find constructive, at least at this time in my life. I I just take it in, but don't let it linger if there is any kind of harshness or trolling or just maybe destructive criticism. I, I try to pick from it pieces that I can use to grow to inspire me and let the rest go. [00:58:58] And that's the kind of muscle you have to build. And every once in a while, just disconnect from it all and and recharge the mind in a way from just simple silence of nature. The question is, what is something you change your opinion about in the past few years? [00:59:19] Thank you for everything you're doing. Love from Brussels. I love Belgium. [00:59:23] Thank you for that question and the kind words I changed my mind and a lot of things and I changed my mind all the time. I'm in a constant flux. I'm constantly learning. [00:59:33] I guess my mind is the quantum mechanical system, but I can mention a few things that have been stable, big shifts in my thinking, at least over the past year or two, especially related to the podcast. [00:59:48] So on the topic of psychedelics, I've always found those fascinating. What I've changed my mind over the past couple of years is a hopeful message. [00:59:57] I think that psychedelics can actually enter the realm of science and that there's a bunch of places they're starting to conduct large scale research studies on psychedelics. And that's really exciting to me because I have a sense that that's just another perspective into the world of neuroscience that will help us understand the way the mind works and potentially how to engineer different aspects of what makes the human mind so special in our artificial intelligence systems. [01:00:28] On the topic of social media, I've changed my mind over the past two years, I always felt that it had. A bunch of complicated bad influences on society, but they were balanced with a lot of positive effects that build community to give people a voice, all those kinds of things more and more. [01:00:47] I'm starting to think that the the possible set of destructive trajectories that social media can take, human civilization is much wider, much more destructive than I accounted for. So it's something that I worry about, you know, in the space of existential risk, of artificial intelligence that people talk about. [01:01:10] I think my mind more and more over the past two years has been focused on social media as the greatest threat of artificial intelligence. I also think is the greatest set of possibilities. So what I want to say is it's the set of trajectories is wider than I expected, the set of possible trajectories in society. My goal as driven by, managed by, directed by our platforms. Hence has been something that I've been working on to see if I can help. [01:01:42] The biggest thing that probably changed my mind on is that extraterrestrial life intelligence consciousness is worthy of serious scientific investigation. It's similar how I felt before about consciousness. Human consciousness is that we lack the tools and we're very early in our ability to explore, to understand, to engineer consciousness. And the same with extraterrestrial life. The tools are very crude in terms of the city efforts of trying to communicate with far away civilizations. Also the the listening. Then there's the detection and far away exoplanets and whether they're habitable and life forms on those planets. [01:02:30] Also, the hundreds of thousands of reports of UFO sightings actually getting some high resolution sensory data around that. So we're in the very early days of any of that kind of understanding. But what I've changed my mind on. Rather, what I've come to understand is closing my mind, closing the mind of other scientists to these fields of consciousness and extraterrestrial life. Prevents us from actually discovering new things. Basically, what happens when you close your mind to these fascinating, inspiring, mysterious pieces of exploration, you leave the exploration of these topics to people that are not well equipped to explore them. [01:03:17] They're just curious minds. And by the way, those curious minds are magical and they're inspiring. And I'm one such curious mind. [01:03:26] But the rigors of science, the tools of science, the funding of science can can crack these wide open and give us better data, better understanding inspired, totally new ways of thinking about consciousness, about extraterrestrial life, have entire paradigm shifts of the way we approach our understanding of intelligence of life forms in general. [01:03:53] And there's a lot of things that kind of opened my eyes to the fascinating world, the David favor conversation of the pilots that saw the Tic-Tac UFO the was just recent, a more and more conversation, but that was in twenty seventeen. I remember seeing Avila's thoughts about a more and more when I first came out and even just thinking about the Drake equation more seriously and think about the different possibilities built into the uncertainty of the parameters, just opened my eyes to the mystery and the wonder of the amazing universe we're in and how little we know about it. [01:04:35] And so I've definitely kind of become much more intellectually open to the exploration of what extraterrestrial life might look like, what are the ways we might be able to communicate with it, how we might be able to understand it, what does it teach us about ourselves? And also importantly, this very fascinating psychological effect of being open to these mysteries that we know very little about. What does that do to the actual productivity, the the creative output of an engineering mind, that opening your mind in this way to think outside of the little box of things we understand? [01:05:22] Well, what does that do in terms of the things you might be able to build? The ideas that might visit you and result in you being able to build something totally new. [01:05:37] I think all of that changed my mind about aliens. [01:05:39] That's why I've been having conversations about extraterrestrial life. I'm, of course, very careful walking down this line because I am first and foremost a scientist, an engineer, and I want to stay in that world. [01:05:51] But I really do want to cultivate an open mind and a childlike curiosity. And I generally hope to see that in other scientists as well. That's what science is all about. [01:06:03] I think incremental progress is essential for science, but it has to be coupled to that childlike wonder about the world and and open minded out of the box, thinking the results in a major paradigm shift that throw all those silly citations out the window and build totally new sciences, totally new approaches that make everything we did in the decades past meaningless or actually counterproductive. [01:06:33] So they have to be cobbled together, incremental progress and. First principles, deep thinking, the results and paradigm shifts. Question is, what was your decision behind going on the diet, mainly meat based and how has it helped you? So the decision or rather process of discovering the dyes that work for me has to do with the fact that I wrestled the combat sports my whole life that has weight classes. So you're constantly figuring out how to perform optimally, physically and mentally while going to school and so on, while also cutting weight. [01:07:13] So grounded in that, I've developed a fascination with different diets. I've never thought about diet as a prescriptive thing for others. I've always thought of myself as a kind of nutritional scientist running a study of end of one, just studying myself and not trying to extrapolate to others, just understanding what makes me happy, what makes me perform the best. And that's where that journey took. I've tried everything. I think about 15 or more years ago, I discovered the power of intermittent fasting or fasting in general, and I can talk about that forever. [01:07:48] I used to do a lot of weight lifting, sort of power lifting, all that kind of stuff in in the world of like men's health or rather men's muscle and fitness, kind of where you eat six, seven times a day, small meals, chicken and broccoli, that kind of stuff in that kind of world to realize that you can eat once a day and still train two, three times that day and actually have more energy, more focus and perform better than you ever have was mind blowing. [01:08:21] So I think fasting was the biggest. [01:08:25] Like paradigm shift for me, because it made me realize that I really need to study myself better, try new things all the time to allow myself the opportunity to discover something that's totally transformative in my life, makes my life easier, makes my body my mind work better. All that kind of stuff. I discovered intermittent fasting and fasting in general from the ultra endurance athletes world. And that's where also I came across the ideas of fat adapted athlete, which is this kind of idea that you can use fat as an energy source and then quickly discover that there is diets similar to like Akito Diet that are extremely low carb that could allow you to perform well, physically and mentally, all those kinds of things. [01:09:12] I think it all sounded a little bit crazy to me. I grew up thinking low fat is good, high fat is bad. So it's always weird to eat something with fat in it. And for it not to be like a cheap meal or something, but to be something that's part of the diet. So it was strange, but once I gave it a chance and did it properly with all the electrolytes and water and all those kinds of things, you can look it up when you do it properly. [01:09:38] It just felt great. And there was just a huge number of benefits I felt immediately. And I've been doing it ever since. So let me maybe quickly communism pros and cons of the killer diet. And again, this is all personal experience. I don't want to extrapolate this to others, but I do encourage people to try to explore to be their own scientists of their own body. So for me, prose is the physical energy. [01:10:05] First of all, the energy levels are more stable. But also I just feel more energized for exercise. This is both for like explosive movements, you know, heavy lifts or jujitsu, grappling, judo, wrestling, all those kinds of things. [01:10:21] And also for prolonged endurance exercise. I find both a really benefit for me, I think for explosive exercise. The biggest benefit for me is the mental focus, at least the way I approach like the grappling sports. But even lifting it certainly very important how my body feels. But it's also important that the mind is really focused on the technique. And I find that the biggest benefit of chiral combined with fasting is that my mind can achieve a greater level of stable, prolonged focus, which is useful for exercise. [01:10:59] Funny enough for me, obviously, it's really useful for work, for deep work sessions, for thinking deeply, for prolonged periods of times, whether that's programming, whether that's writing or whether that's sitting behind a sheet of paper and designing new systems. It's both the energy of mental focus and the kind of clarity I know how to put it, but there's just a clean this to the focus that I really enjoy. Also, when you acclimate to it, I find that the sort of number of hours in the day that I have a positive mood is just larger. [01:11:36] I can be cranky sometimes for sure. [01:11:40] I'm sleep deprived or especially when stuff is just not working now. So there will always be parts of the day when I'm cranky, but it just feels I haven't quantify it. But I'm pretty sure, sort of anecdotally speaking, that the number of hours I feel just good about the days is grateful to be alive, is higher with with Kyra. [01:12:01] Other benefits are better sleep. I fall asleep easier. That might have to do with just a lower volume of food. I don't know, but I enjoy naps and sleep better. There's also just in general, like small aches and pains from joints. When you're exercising, all that kind of stuff seems to be less Ankita. So that's just my own personal experience. Also, when you're doing fasting in Cairo because of the stable energy, you find that you can actually skip meals quite easily. [01:12:33] And so that gives you a nice gateway into fasting for longer periods of time, if you like. There's a lot of benefits, the fast and they could talk about it. That's for another time. But in general, it gives you this freedom to live life, to enjoy life and not be so obsessed about food. I think that's the biggest liberating thing about Cairo, is that if you do the Cairo diet while. That food ceases to be a kind of habitual obsession that drives the progress of the day the more of the day is spent, kind of lost in the passions and the things you love doing. [01:13:12] I just found that when I was doing the kind of many meals a day. I I would find myself thinking about food a lot like it drove the structure of the day, it influenced a lot of the things I would talk about and think about. You don't really think of it that way until it's gone. And you notice, like with Chihiro and Fast thing, that you can spend really long hours of the day just doing some cool stuff that you love. [01:13:42] And food doesn't come into play in your in your mind and your actual activity. [01:13:48] So my personal sort of karns of the day is I enjoy eating like higher volume. It gives you a feeling of fullness. And I think with a diet is lower volume of food in general. You're still full in terms of your body not saying you're hungry, but there's not a feeling of real fullness. And that's also a benefit because you just feel better, you feel lighter, less bloated and so on. I find this is actually changing a lot, but chiral used to be a little bit less socially friendly. [01:14:24] Most of the fun foods, foods associated with kind of just like going crazy at parties or restaurants and so on, have a ton of carbs. And so in social settings, it's had often feel like you're being restrictive and not partaking in the fun if you're doing Karadi. I think that's changing a lot. People are becoming much more accepting of it. For example, McDonalds, you can order just the beef patties for a dollar fifty, as I've talked about. [01:14:54] And people don't look at you weird, at least in my experience. If you just get the burger without a bun, another kind kid on Carnival just doesn't sound healthy. So I usually try not to talk about it too much because it just makes me feel really good. My mind focused, my body performs well, but I don't know if I want to sort of prescribe it to others. [01:15:18] It's definitely something I recommend you try, but I just don't feel like conclusively saying this diet is great for everybody. I really don't. I certainly don't know enough to be able to say that. [01:15:27] And also it just doesn't sound right to say that. And while I've loved meat my whole life, I feel the best when I eat a lot of meat. I do think about the ethical side of veganism is something I'm reading about now, I'm thinking a lot about. It's an ongoing journey, perhaps I'll have more to say, more of my mind to be changed in the future, we'll see. But for now, for many years now, I've been really enjoying the keto diet, a mix of ketone Carnivore does. [01:16:04] We'll see what the future holds. [01:16:06] What was the darkest time in your life and what did your road to recovery look like? In general, I love life, so it's difficult for me to talk about these kinds of things, but let me briefly say that I think the darkest times have been when I've put my faith. And people. When I open my heart to them. And they turned out not to be the best versions of themselves or maybe the kind of amazing people that had hope. [01:16:41] I thought they might be. So my heart has been broken in small ways in my life, as I'm sure it has been for many people, but the fire of hope still burns bright, perhaps even brighter. You mentioned road to recovery. I think with the people I mentioned, I focus on the positive moments and there always are and just have gratitude for those and just don't linger on the negative. I just remember the good times. That's how I recover. [01:17:22] That's how I keep my optimism and that's how I keep my heart open for future amazing people to take the risk. And I'm sure my heart will be broken again, perhaps many times in the future. But I think it's always worth the risk. I like the I wrote this down the Marcus Aurelius quote, Love the people with whom fate brings you together and do so with all of your heart. I think that's all we can do. I hope some of these answers were at least somewhat interesting or useful. [01:17:58] If so, I'll try to do it again in the future. It is currently. For as for 2001, when I started saying that sentence was 420 a.m.. A good time to end as any, perhaps the best. Good night. I love you all. Thanks for listening to this Aimé episode and thank you to our sponsors, Brooklyn and Cheat's indeed hiring website, Express EPN and their gun muzzle recovery device. So the choice is sleep, employment, privacy or muscle recovery. [01:18:35] Choose wisely, my friends, and if you wish, click the sponsor links below to get a discount to support this podcast. And now, since we talked about Einsteins, thoughts about happiness and pigs, let me leave you with some words from Winston Churchill. I'm fond of pigs, dogs, helicopters, cats. Look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals. Thank you for listening and hope to see you next time.

本集資源與出處