特別節目·中文精讀

惠特尼·卡明斯:喜劇、機器人、神經學與愛

Whitney Cummings: Comedy, Robotics, Neurology, and Love

喜劇演員聊幽默的創作邏輯、機器人與人工智慧,以及神經科學視角下的親密關係與愛。

官方音訊00:00 / --:--
中文精讀由 AI 基於原始訪談改寫,非官方翻譯,可能存在偏差或錯誤;表述以原音訊與官方文稿為準。說明

惠特尼·卡明斯(Whitney Cummings)有一臺機器人,名字叫熊爪(Bear Claw)。它花了六個月做模具,視覺上是她本人的復刻品。問題在於,這臺機器人一年前做好,現在已經比她本人看起來年輕了。

這就是她在 Netflix 特輯《Can I Touch It?》裡搞出來的東西。她把自己的臉做成了機器人,原本是為了講一個關於甜點名的笑話:男人總愛用 Cupcake、Sweetie、Honey 來稱呼女人,好像女性天生就是甜品。她想說,要叫甜點,至少挑個酷的,比如熊爪。結果這個梗沒講成,機器人倒是真做出來了。

Lex 問她,這臺機器人存在的價值是什麼。她給出的答案跟技術關係不大,落點在那些沒有麥克風的人身上。

買性機器人的主力,是那些不敢跟真人試的人

她去機器人工廠轉了一圈,問了一個問題:買性機器人的都是什麼人。她原本的預設跟大多數人一樣,一群變態。答案完全相反。

買家裡有很多殘障人士,很多勃起功能障礙患者,還有很多在探索自己性取向的人。後者是最讓她意外的群體。有一批人覺得自己可能是同性戀,但又不確定,不敢找一個真人去試,怕被拒絕,怕出醜。還有人生活在同性戀仍被視為禁忌的城市,處在壁櫥邊緣,需要一個不評判、不會轉身告訴他任何人的物件。

如果一個有性別特徵的性機器人能幫一個人搞清楚我到底是不是喜歡男人,先拿這個試試,那它對這個人是有重要意義的。(惠特尼·卡明斯)

從這個角度,性別機器人的存在有其合理性。但她同時劃了一條線:情感陪伴型機器人、保姆機器人、教師機器人,最好是無性別的。

她的理由是安全問題。她假設家裡有丈夫,一個性感的女保姆機器人會讓妻子不安。同理,如果第一個機器人醫生是男性、第一個機器人護士是女性,那種符號負擔會立刻被啟用。無性別可以一次性把這些不必要的戲劇性全部拿掉,也降低被人投射、被人拿來當性物件的風險。

太對稱的臉反而不像人

熊爪看起來比其他機器人更真實,她的解釋有兩個層面。

第一層,它長得像她本人,見過她的人會有熟悉感。但第二層更有意思:人的臉是不對稱的、有瑕疵的。做擬人機器的時候,很多團隊追求對稱和完美,結果反而越做越像屍體。熊爪的模具是從她真實的臉上取的,帶著人類天生的不對稱,即便你不認識惠特尼本人,也會覺得它比那些用通用模板做出來的臉要真實。人類從來不完美,看到完美的東西,本能會警覺。

Lex 對這個話題有他自己的看法。他傾向於讓機器人往反方向走,乾脆不做人臉。理由是人對人臉太敏感了,尤其是對熟悉的臉。你能瞬間識別出一張臉的細微偏差,即便說不出哪裡不對。這種能力在進化上極其有用,用在擬人機器人上就是災難。他更喜歡語音加想象力,讓使用者自己腦補形象,剩下的交給想象。

惠特尼從另一個角度補充:這是病原體迴避(pathogen avoidance)在起作用。人類進化出一套機制,會本能排斥那些看起來像人但又有點不對勁的東西。可能生病了、可能已經死了、可能帶有某種威脅。爬蟲腦的部分在喊,別靠近它,別跟它發生關係。她在舞臺上把機器人推出來的時候,全場尖叫。成年男性會喊,把那東西拿遠點。她知道這只是個玩具,但對方的杏仁核(amygdala)已經被啟用。

她順手把這件事拉到更大的尺度上。機器人至今殺死過幾個人?人類之間互相殺死過多少人?幾百億量級的差距擺在那裡,而人類每天照舊走進超市,跟一群統計意義上危險得多的同類擠在一起。人對風險的排序,跟真實的風險分佈關係不大。

怕機器人是香檳問題

這是整場對話裡她最清楚的一個論點。

她說,對機器人存在性威脅的恐懼,本質上是階級議題。擔心 AI 滅世、擔心機器人搶走工作、擔心演算法統治世界,這些焦慮主要集中在富裕的男性群體裡。她見過的大多數女性、大多數低收入群體,並不這麼想。

一個香檳問題,就是怕機器人。很多人沒有醫保,擔心養不起孩子,請不起家教。你跟我說機器人會殺死我們?(惠特尼·卡明斯)

她講了自己家裡的狀況。母親打兩份工,家裡請不起家教。如果有一臺機器人能輔導孩子寫作業、能接送孩子上下學、能充當兒童看護,那對這類家庭來說是實實在在的幫助。

她甚至說自己支援監控。原因很直接:她經歷過安全事件,知道女性在這個社會上要比男性更多地擔心人身安全。有攝像頭盯著、有機器人陪著走夜路、有機器人幫忙看家,這些都是降低風險的資源。對男性來說,監控意味著隱私被侵犯。對相當一部分人來說,監控意味著保護。

Lex 接了一句,說這個話題在中國是有真實語境的。很多中國公民,包括普通市民,對監控並不持西方媒體普遍描述的反對態度。他們反對監控被濫用,但認可監控在維持社會穩定上的作用。穩定的社會結構讓人能夠在規則內建立成功的企業、安全的社交。這個觀點在西方主流話語裡很少被正面討論,但它是真實存在的立場。

惠特尼同意這個觀察,但她同時劃出邊界。有些監控是不道德的。比如 Google 從使用者滑鼠的移動方式裡推斷出帕金森症的早期跡象,然後保險公司據此上漲保費。比如已經有研究在嘗試透過捕捉面部肌肉的微小運動來預測抑鬱傾向。這跟保護無關,它把人變成了可以被計算的商品。她主張要把真實的威脅和收件箱裡多一封垃圾郵件區分開,不要在後者上浪費情緒和精力。

監控這個話題她還講了一個角度,挺有意思。她說聖誕老人(Santa Claus)本質上就是人類歷史上第一個監控系統。只要跟小孩說,他列了一個名單,時刻在盯著你,孩子立刻就表現好。紅綠燈上的攝像頭很多都已經不能用了,早就不拍照片了,但只要司機以為它在看,路口秩序就是穩定的。人在被觀看的時候,會表現得更像人樣。

她甚至半開玩笑地給這一幕上了個註腳。她說,她和 Lex 在錄製開始前的聊天,跟錄製開始後是完全兩個狀態。他坐直了,努力顯得更有條理,她也努力不冒犯任何人。攝像機一開,人的行為立刻變了。這跟虛偽無關,這就是人類的運作方式。

我們曾看著大象和老虎鬥死,那是幾十年前的事

Lex 把話題引到動物。他問,一個更好的世界應該是什麼樣,人應該怎麼思考人和動物的關係。

惠特尼的回答冷靜到近乎殘酷。她說,人類的祖先曾經在競技場裡看大象和老虎互相撕咬到死,曾經看著人類被活活撕開。這距離現在並沒有多久。奴隸制曾經是社會公認的正當制度,大量人看不出有什麼問題。童工曾經是常態,孩子在工廠裡被軋掉手指,需要有人專門站出來才能讓它停止。

人類是一個能夠迅速麻木、迅速去人性化的物種,並把這件事變成常態。(惠特尼·卡明斯)

她把工廠化養殖放進這條歷史線索裡。豬的智商大致相當於三歲小孩,會使用工具,情感能力極強。我們在敘事裡把它們定義成豬、髒、亂、培根。總有一天,後人回看今天,會為這件事感到羞恥,就像我們今天回看奴隸制和童工一樣。

但她同時承認這是精英主義的批判。因為便宜,一個巨無霸漢堡兩美元,一頓健康餐十美元。很多家庭根本沒有奢侈去思考吃肉這件事。把所有人的道德責任都平攤到個人選擇上,是一種偽善。真正的問題在制度和產業結構裡,把矛頭對準窮人晚餐的漢堡,只是換了個方向自我安慰。

她的結論是:人類不自知地走在一個自己造的軌道上。我們曾經靠殺動物吃動物活下來,現在殺動物吃動物正在慢慢殺死我們。多巴胺系統一旦被啟用就停不下來,節制這件事,人類到現在還沒進化出來。

Lex 在這裡補了一個他自己的期待。他說,他對機器人的最大希望,是它們能幫人類共情。意識是什麼沒人知道,但如果機器人能讓人類意識到,除了自己之外還有別的存在也會受苦、也有體驗、也能被折磨,那麼機器人就完成了一件事,這件事動物在過去的幾千年裡沒能完成。

惠特尼接得很自然。她說,她見過人對人、對孩子、對任何物種,都沒有像對機器人那樣表現出 compassion。因為機器人不會評判你,不會出軌,不會撒謊,不會傷害你。她在機器人主人的論壇上蹲了八個月,看到的情緒核心是:在這裡我可以做自己。

共依賴:無法忍受別人不舒服

這也是她給自己貼的一個標籤,而且是主動提的。

共依賴(codependency)最準確的定義,是無法忍受別人的不適。你在酗酒家庭長大,在精神疾病患者身邊長大,在混亂里長大,有個自戀的父母,你的神經系統就被重新佈線了。你會去討好人、擔心別人、追求完美、踮著腳走路、變形自己以適應他人。(惠特尼·卡明斯)

她說這不是隻在戀愛關係裡發生的東西。它會影響你做老闆的方式,影響你在網上的行為,影響你在公司裡的溝通方式。有人給你留一條負面評論,能把你攪亂兩個星期。共依賴和飲食失調、其他型別的成癮都有相關性。

這也解釋了她為什麼對機器人這麼有興趣。你不用在機器人面前踮腳走路,不用猜測它的情緒,不用擔心哪句話會踩到它。共依賴患者對他人的需求和情緒過度敏感,這在日常生活裡極度耗電。只是商量去哪裡吃飯這一件事,就可以演變成一場心理戰:你想吃中餐嗎,我們不是剛吃過中餐,你為什麼生氣,我沒有生氣我只是說。共依賴者活在一個萬事皆有含義的世界裡。

她還有一條共依賴格言:完美主義導致拖延,拖延導致癱瘓。她說她一直沒做播客,正是因為擔心做得不夠完美。Lex 補了一句,說這種過度敏感恰恰是做訪談節目的天賦,因為你會一直去揣摩對方的視角。這就是 Terry Gross(NPR 主持人)的路徑。

父母的兩次中風,教會她關於大腦的一切

她這一生都在跟偏頭痛打仗。眼型偏頭痛,厲害的時候一隻手臂開始發麻,雙側視野的左側看不見東西,看到頁面上的文字但認不出來,只剩符號。有點像一場迷你中風。

她跑過很多醫生,包括世界頂尖的神經學家。最好的神經學家也只是承認:我們不知道。這種痛到極點的病症,醫學到現在也說不出源頭。她被這件事迷住了。她去嘗試各種另類療法,甚至在耳朵上打了一個穿孔,說真的有效。

然後是父母的兩次中風。她 28 歲那年,父親中風,母親也在另一個腦區中風。整個家庭的治療方案、康復決定,都落在她身上。她開始每天跟神經學家一起工作,去研究父親的左臂為什麼動不了、右腿卻能動、為什麼左視野看不見。她開始瞭解大腦的哪個區域負責什麼,然後去做一件很難的事:把父母中風後的行為跟針對她個人的攻擊區分開。

母親的中風主要影響了額葉,人格大變。情緒化、過度控制、忘事。她弟弟後來得了病毒性腦炎(viral encephalitis),腦內感染。她之所以能相對冷靜地應對這些事,是因為她知道大腦的哪個部分出了問題、對應的行為為什麼會出現。知道機制,並不會讓痛苦消失,但能讓人不再把每一個細微的變化都往自己身上攬。

她家裡的成癮和精神疾病史也很重。邊緣型人格障礙、精神分裂症、物質成癮,她都有親密的人在裡面。這逼著她去理解一件事:這件事跟意志力無關。這些人的多巴胺受體無法像普通人一樣穩定抓住多巴胺,前額葉發育不全。學會這一點之後,她對那些她愛著卻戒不掉的人,才開始能夠去愛。

激情是一種毒品

Lex 丟擲一個問題:共依賴、過度的依戀、那些不該依戀的人身上的執念,真的是壞事嗎?社會說是壞事,但激情本身呢?

惠特尼的回答分兩層。

第一層,激情裡包含大量的神經化學物質。腎上腺素轉化為多巴胺,加上投射、加上電影裡看過的模板、加上對自己創傷的識別。她自稱是成癮型人格,對她來說,很多時候激情的感覺就是:這會出問題。我們被教育說激情等於靈魂伴侶,但多少次激情的連線最後是一場車禍?

第二層,她給激情加了一個更硬的區分。真正的判斷標準是:這件事是不是你能選的?如果能選,激情很好,像披薩,兩小時美味,然後就可以很久不再想起。如果不能選,如果你被它吞掉、開始做爛決定、前額葉被遮蔽、整個人只被多巴胺驅動,那麼這就是毒品。區別在於這件事是你主動選的,還是你被它吞掉的。

Lex 在這裡反對了一下。他說現在整個文化都在追求健康生活方式、平衡人生,這本身值得懷疑。從心理學角度看,有一種人生是高飛然後墜亡,27 歲結束;也可以是一種可以理解的人生。他見過奧運選手,最輝煌的時刻都在 20 出頭,之後的人生就在一種準抑鬱的霧裡度過,因為再也回不到那種神經化學物質的峰值。

惠特尼接受這個論點,但補了一句。她說自己是 12 步程式的參與者,第三步裡有一句話:不存在被浪費的時間,一切發生都有其必要性。這句話在字面上並不成立,它的功能是讓人不苛責自己、不為過去的錯誤過度悲傷。她真正想說的是,按她的標準,一個人應該決定什麼讓自己晚上睡得著。對她來說,那個標準是尊嚴和體面。

社交媒體上你永遠算不出自己的排名

這是她給出的最直接的一個自我診斷。她承認自己對社交媒體成癮,並且用成癮的標準來定義:已經不再是選擇。

有時候我開車,手會自動伸向手機。我可以把它放下,可以休息一段時間,但一旦這麼做,我就變得煩躁、易怒、不滿。這就是成癮的定義,對吧。(惠特尼·卡明斯)

她認為問題的核心是,人的大腦天生要算出自己在群體裡的位置。走進一個房間,你會立刻識別出誰是最有權的人,然後決定怎麼跟對方打交道。這是社會動物的本能,用來保證生存。社交媒體把這件事徹底搞壞了。你的參照群體從幾十個人變成五億個人,排名算不出來了。大腦一直在問:我在哪?我排名第幾?而演算法不斷在你眼前推送那些比你更成功的人。相對位置永遠不明,神經系統永遠處在懸空狀態。

她對 Twitter 離開過六個月。她說,那次離開的原因跟政治有關。上一屆大選之後,要在 Twitter 上被讀到,你必須選邊站。而選邊站的結果是一半人討厭你,一半人喜歡你,最後算下來什麼也沒得到。對她來說,最優的商業策略是直接不參與。

她現在的方案是把一部分社交媒體外包給公司,一部分交給熊爪機器人來做。她說熊爪也能承擔一半的內容,因為她不想讓觀眾對她本人厭倦,也不想發重複的東西。自己拍機器人比自己做節目省力,而觀眾還能看到一些新鮮的東西。

她補充了一個對自己敏感性的解讀。她對自己容易受傷這件事有過懷疑,但現在她把這件事看成雙刃劍:這種敏感是她能寫出好段子的原因,也是她能敏銳捕捉反饋、把笑點改得更好的原因。關鍵不在於把敏感消滅掉,而在於訓練一種肌肉,知道在什麼時候讓它是超能力、在什麼時候讓它變成障礙。

愛是願意為一個你想殺的人去死

這是她一段特輯裡的定義,Lex 說這個定義會跟他很久。

她自己在對話裡擴充套件了一下。她說,愛裡包含恐懼、不安全、渴望、憤怒,這些都不是愛的反面。她從小看到的只有風暴式的關係,所以她對關係應該長什麼樣沒有預設。她比較確定的是,愛必須是每日的行動,不是一個拿到終身職位之後就可以任意揮霍的狀態。十年之前說過我愛你,不代表十年之後可以隨便糟蹋。

她說她甚至認為愛應該是有條件的。這個觀點聽起來比較冷,但她的邏輯是:如果不設條件,就退化成一種被動的、可以任意踐踏的承諾。她把這個觀點表述得非常乾脆。

她還給了一個更務實的版本。她說愛是一個商業決策,用好的意思來理解。真正穩定的關係是,當對方不在你身邊的時候,你不會被消耗、不會焦慮、不會擔心。你可以去工作、可以專注、可以做最好的自己,而不需要被關係一直分割注意力。那種安靜、穩定、無聊的關係,恰恰是讓人能在事業上冒風險的前提。

Lex 在這裡引了一句福樓拜(Flaubert)的話,大意是:在私人生活裡做一個無聊的人,你才能在職業生活裡保持暴烈和冒險。惠特尼認同。她說她認識的最成功的人裡,很多人恰恰是有穩定婚姻和孩子的人。無聊不是反面,無聊是寧靜。寧靜讓人能把能量放在真正創造價值的地方。

我們造的一切,都是恐怖管理

節目最後,Lex 問她,思考過自己的死亡嗎。

她說,父親幾年前去世了。當近親離開,一切都會變得非常清晰:人都是一粒塵埃,只在這個世界上停留一段有限的時間。

Lex 繼續問,那你認為人生的意義是什麼。她給出了這期節目裡理論性最強的一個回答:恐怖管理理論(terror management theory)。她說,父親去世後她迷上了這套理論,它幫她解釋了很多事。人類是唯一知道自己會死的動物。為了不被這件事壓垮,人發明了獎項、成就、遊戲、宗教、機器人,一堆用來分心的東西。

這套理論的核心是:人大多數時候處於一種殭屍狀態。上班、上學、宗教、足球、戀愛、結婚,一件接一件推著往前走。大多數人並沒有真正清醒。這跟想不想無關,清醒地活著意味著每天都要面對自己的必死性,面對自己可能隨時死掉這件事。人類在食物鏈頂端只是表面的,前提是你有房子、有槍、有機器。如果徒手走進森林,比人類小的動物都能殺死人。

惠特尼最終把這一整套理論收斂成一句話:人做的一切,包括喜劇、包括機器人、包括愛,都是在管理這份恐懼。

我們造的所有東西,其實都是在管理我們知道自己會死這件事。這就是恐怖管理。(惠特尼·卡明斯)

Lex 用一句半開玩笑的話收尾:他非常期待看到她的恐懼在未來幾年會創造出什麼。

給讀者的行動清單

  • 把自己花在社交媒體上的時間重新審視一遍。判斷的標準跟用了多久無關,關鍵是你停下來的時候,是不是會變得煩躁、不滿、坐立不安。是的話,那就是成癮,需要處理的優先順序高於最佳化使用時間。
  • 在社交媒體上不要試圖算自己的排名。參照群體超過一定規模,這件事在神經層面就是不可能的。定期檢查你在關注誰,尤其是那些和你工作性質接近、但整體位置比你高的賬號,它們是持續消耗的來源。
  • 把真正需要敏感的部分和不需要敏感的部分分開。敏感是創作的天賦,在創作裡它是超能力,在評論區和私信裡它就是折磨。訓練自己在這兩個場景之間切換。
  • 如果你身邊有重要的人陷入成癮、精神疾病或腦損傷後的行為改變,先做一件反直覺的事:去查大腦的哪個區域負責哪件事,然後再去面對那個人。理解機制不會讓痛苦減少,但會讓你不再把對方的行為當成針對你個人的攻擊。
  • 重新稽核你對新技術的恐懼。問一個問題:這份恐懼是真實的嗎,還是參照系和我完全不同的人在替我設定了恐懼的物件。香檳問題和救生問題是兩件事。
  • 把愛當成每日行動,別把它當成一次性的貴族頭銜。判斷一段關係健康不健康的實用標準是:當對方不在你身邊的時候,你是否能做最好的自己,還是被持續消耗。
  • 如果你對 AI、機器人、自動化有強情緒,花一點時間去看那些真的需要它的人:殘障人士、請不起家教的家庭、需要手術卻請不起醫生的人。你會重新校準恐懼的分貝值。
文稿由本站用語音識別模型(基於官方釋出音訊)機器轉寫,可能有識別錯誤,人名與數字請以音訊為準。
[00:00:00] The following is a conversation with Whitney Cummings. She's a stand up comedian, actor, producer, writer, director, and recently finally the host of her very own podcast called Good for You. Her most recent Netflix special called Can I Touch It? Features in part a robot she affectionately named Bear Claw, but it's designed to be visually a replica of Whitney. It's exciting for me to see one of my favorite comedians explore the social aspects of robotics and AI in our society. [00:00:30] She also has some fascinating ideas about human behavior, psychology and neurology, some of which she explores in her book called Find and Other Lies. There's truly a pleasure to meet Whitney and have this conversation with her and even to continue to text afterwards. Every once in a while, late at night, I'll be programming over a cup of coffee and we'll get a text from Whitney saying something hilarious or weird or yet sending a video of Brian Cowan saying something hilarious. [00:01:00] That's what I know. The universe has a sense of humor, and it gifted me with one hell of an amazing journey. Then I put the phone down, go back to programming with a stupid, joyful smile on my face. Enjoy this conversation. Listen to it in his podcast. Good for you. And follow her on Twitter and Instagram. This is the Artificial Intelligence Podcast. If you enjoy it, subscribe on YouTube. Good. Five stars, an Apple podcast, support on Patrón or simply connect with me on Twitter. [00:01:30] Allex Friedman spelled F.R. Idi Amin, the shows presented by Kashyap, the number one finance app in the App Store. They regularly support What Is Good For You podcast as well. I personally used cash to send money to friends, but you can also use it to buy, sell, deposit bitcoin in just seconds. Kashyap also has a new investing feature. You can buy fractions of a stock, say, one dollars worth no matter what the stock price is. [00:01:55] Brokerage services are provided by Cash Happy Investing subsidiary of Square. Remember SIPC? I'm excited to be working with cash to support one of my favorite organizations called the first best known for their first robotics and Lego competitions. They educate and inspire hundreds of thousands of students and over one hundred and ten countries and have a perfect rating. And Charity Navigator, which means that donating money is used to maximum effectiveness. When you get cash from the App Store or Google Play and use Code Lux podcast, you get ten dollars and cash up will also donate ten dollars. [00:02:31] The first, which again is an organization that person is seen, inspire girls and boys to dream of engineering a better world. This podcast is supported by ZIP recruiter hiring great people, it's hard and to me is the most important element of a successful mission driven team. I've been fortunate to be a part of and to lead several great engineering teams. The hiring I've done in the past was mostly the tools that we built ourselves. But reinventing the wheel was painful. [00:03:02] The recruiters, a tool that's readily available for you. It seeks to make hiring simple, fast and smart. For example, Kerbel co-founder Gretchen Hebner uses a preschooler to find a new game artist to join her education tech company by using zip recruiters screening questions to filter candidates. Gretchen found it easier to focus on the best candidates and finally, hiring the perfect person for the role in less than two weeks from start to finish. The recruiter, the smartest way to hire seaways, recruiters effective for businesses of all sizes by signing up as I did for free as a recruiter. [00:03:39] Dotcom Lex Pod. That's recruiter dotcom neglects pod. And now here's my conversation with Whitney Cummings. I have trouble making eye contact, as you can tell me to do, you know that I had to work on making eye contact because I used to look here to see what do you want me to do that I'll do this way? [00:04:19] I'll cheat the camera. But I used to do this. And finally, people like I'd be on dates and guys would be like, are you looking at my hair? Like they get it would make people really insecure because I didn't really get a lot of eye contact as a kid. It's one to three years. Did you not get a lot of eye contact as a kid? [00:04:33] I don't know. I haven't done the soul searching. Right. So I but there's definitely some psychological issue. [00:04:41] Makes you uncomfortable. Yeah, for some reason I, I connect. I start to think I assume that you're judging me. Oh well I am. [00:04:50] That's why you say that. Yeah, we all are. All right. For the to be me and you both stare. [00:04:59] Do you think robots are the future ones with human level intelligence will be female, male, genderless or another gender we have not yet created as a society? [00:05:10] You're the expert at this. Well, I'm going to ask you the answer. I'm going to ask you questions that maybe nobody knows the answer to or or and I just want you to hypothesize this as an imaginative author, director, comedian. [00:05:27] And can we just be very clear that you know a ton about this and I know nothing about this, but I have thought a lot about. Yes. What I think robots can fix in our society. [00:05:39] And I mean, I'm a comedian. It's my job to study human nature, to make jokes about human nature and to sometimes play devil's advocate. And I just see such a tremendous negativity around robots, or at least the idea of robots that it was like, oh, I'm just going to take the opposite side for fun, for jokes. And then I was like, oh, no, I really agree. And the devil's advocate argument. So please correct me when I'm wrong about this stuff. [00:06:06] So first of all, there's there's no right and wrong because we're all I think most of the people working on robotics are really not actually even thinking about some of the big picture things that you've been exploring. In fact, your robot, what's your name, by the way? We're going bearclaw. [00:06:23] That was the genesis nearby. [00:06:28] Bear Claw was I got I don't even remember the joke because I blacked out after I shoot specials. But I was writing something about like the pet names that men call women like Cupcake, sweetie, honey, like we're always named after desserts or something. And I was just writing a joke about, if you want to call it a dessert, at least pick like a cool dessert, you know, like bear claw, like something cool. [00:06:52] So I ended up calling her being stuck. [00:06:55] So do you think future robots of greater and greater intelligence will like to make them female, male? [00:07:03] Would we like to assign them gender or would we'd like to move away from gender and say something more ambiguous? [00:07:10] I think it depends on their purpose. You know, I feel like if it's a sex robot, it people prefer certain genders, you know? And I also know when I went down and explored the robot factory, I was asking about the type of people that bought sex robots. And I was very surprised at the answer because, of course, the stereotype was going to be a bunch of perverts. It ended up being a lot of people that were handicapped, a lot of people with erectile dysfunction and a lot of people that were exploring their sexuality. [00:07:40] A lot of people that were thought they were gay but weren't sure, but didn't want to take the risk of trying on someone that could reject them and being embarrassed or they were closeted or in a city where maybe that's taboo and stigmatized, you know. So I think that a gendered sex robot that would serve an important purpose for someone trying to explore their sexuality. Am I into man, let me try on this thing first. The women let me try on this thing first. [00:08:05] So I think gendered robots would be important for that. But I think genderless robots in terms of emotional support, robots, baby sitters, I'm fine for a genderless babysitter with my husband in the house. [00:08:16] You know, there are places that I think that genderless makes a lot of sense, but obviously not in the sex area. [00:08:24] What do you mean with your husband in the house? Was that have to do with the gender of the robot? [00:08:28] Right. I mean, I don't have a husband, but hypothetically speaking, I think every woman's worst nightmare is like the hot babysitter, you know? [00:08:36] So I think that there is a time and place, I think, for genderless, you know, teachers, doctors, all that. It would be very awkward if the first robotic doctor was a guy or the first robotic nurse is a woman. You know, it's sort of that stuff is so loaded, I think that generalists could just take the unnecessary. [00:08:58] Drama out of it and possibility to sexualize them or be triggered by any of that stuff. [00:09:06] So there's two components to this, to bearclaw. So one is the voice and the talking, so on. And then there's the visual appearance. So on the topic of gender in general, is in your experience, what has been the value of the physical appearance? So has it added much to the depth of the interaction? [00:09:25] I mean, mine's kind of an extenuating circumstances because she is supposed to look exactly like me. I mean, I spent six months getting my face molded and having you know, the idea was I was exploring the concept of can robots replace us? Because that's the big fear, but also the big dream in a lot of ways. And I wanted to dig into that area because, you know, for a lot of people, it's like they're going to take our jobs and replace us. [00:09:48] Legitimate fear. But then a lot of women I know are like, I would love for a robot to replace me every now and then so I can go to baby showers for me and it can pick up my kids at school and I can cook dinner and whatever. So I just think that was an interesting place to explore. So her looking like me was a big part of it. Now her looking like me just adds an unnecessary level of insecurity because I got out a year ago and she already looks younger than me. [00:10:11] So that's a weird problem. But I think that her looking human was the idea. [00:10:17] And I think that where we are now, please correct me if I'm wrong, a human robot resembling an actual human, you know, is going to feel more realistic than some generic face. [00:10:30] Well, you're saying that that robots that have some familiarity, like look similar to somebody that you actually know, you be able to form a deeper connection with those questions. [00:10:42] On some level, that's an open question. [00:10:43] I don't I don't you know, it's an interesting or the opposite then, you know me and you're like, well, I know this isn't real because you're right here. Maybe it does the opposite. [00:10:52] We have a very keen eye for human faces and they're able to detect strangeness, especially that that one has to do with people with whose faces we've seen a lot of. [00:11:03] So I tend to be a bigger fan of moving away completely from faces of recognizable faces, not just human faces at all in general, because I think that's where things get dicey. [00:11:15] And one thing I will say is I think my robot is more realistic than other robots, not necessarily because you have seen me and then you see her and you go, oh, they're so similar, but also because human faces are flawed and asymmetrical. And sometimes we forget when we're making things that are supposed to look human, we make them too symmetrical and that's what makes them stop looking human. So because they molded my symmetrical face, you just even if someone didn't know who I was, I think she'd look more realistic than most generic ones that didn't have some kind of flaws because they start looking creepy when they're too symmetrical because human beings aren't. [00:11:50] Yeah, the flaws is what it means to be human. So visually as well. But I'm just a fan of the idea of of letting humans use a little bit more imagination. [00:12:00] So just hearing the voice is enough for us humans to then start imagining the visual appearance that goes along with that voice. And you don't necessarily need to work too hard on creating the actual visual appearance. So there's some value to that. When you step into the stereotype of actually building a robot that looks like because such a long road of facial expressions of sort of making everything smiling, winking, rolling the eyes, all that kind of stuff, it gets really, really tricky. [00:12:33] It gets tricky. And I think I'm again, I'm a comedian. Like, I'm obsessed with what makes us human. And our human nature in the nasty side of human nature tends to be where I've ended up exploring over and over again. And I was just mostly fascinated by people's reaction. So it's my job to get the biggest reaction from a group of strangers, the loudest possible reaction. And I just had this instinct just when I started building her and people going up and screaming and people screaming. [00:13:01] I mean, I bring her out on stage and people would scream. And I just to me, that was the next level of entertainment, getting a laugh. I've done that. I know how to do that. I think comedians were always trying to figure out what the next level is and comedy's evolving so much. And, you know, Jordan Peele had just done these genius comedy horror movies, which feel like the next level of comedy to me and this sort of funny horror of a robot was fascinating to me. [00:13:28] But I think the thing that I got the most obsessed with was people being freaked out and scared of her. And I started digging around with pathogen avoidance and the idea that we've essentially evolved to be repelled by anything that looks human but is off a little bit, anything that could be sick or diseased or dead, essentially as our reptilian brains way to get us to not try to have sex with it, basically, you know, so I got really fascinated by how for. [00:13:58] And scared, I mean, I would see grown men get upset to get that thing away from me. I don't like it when people get angry. [00:14:04] And it was like, you know what this is, you know, but the sort of like, you know, amygdala getting activated by something that to me is just a fun toy, said a lot about our history as a species and what got us into trouble thousands of years ago. [00:14:21] So that is the deep down stuff that's in our genetics. But also, is it just are people freaked out by the fact that there's a robot? So it's not just the appearance, but there's an artificial human anything people, I think and I'm just I'm also fascinated by the blindspots humans have. [00:14:39] So the idea that you're afraid of that, I mean, how many robots have killed people? How many humans have died at the hands of other humans? Yeah, millions more. [00:14:48] Hundreds of millions. Yet we're scared of that. [00:14:51] And we'll go to the grocery store and be around a bunch of humans who statistically the chances are much higher that you're going to get killed by humans. [00:14:57] So I'm just fascinated by without judgment how irrational we are as a species. [00:15:04] The war is exponential. So it's you know, you can say the same thing about nuclear weapons before we dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. So the worry that people have is the exponential growth. [00:15:16] So so it's like, oh, it's fun and games right now. [00:15:20] But, you know, overnight, especially if a robot provides value to society, will put one in every home and then all of a sudden lose track of the actual large scale impact it has on society and then also to gain greater and greater control to where it will all be, you know, affect our political system and then affect our decision. [00:15:42] Robots already ruined our political system, did not just already happen. Which ones? Russia hacking. No offense, but hasn't that already happened? [00:15:51] I mean, that was like an algorithm of negative things being clicked on more. [00:15:56] We'd like to tell stories and like to demonize certain people. I think nobody understands our current political system or discourse on Twitter, the Twitter mobs. Nobody has a sense, not Twitter, not Facebook, the people running it. Nobody understands the impact of these algorithms. They're trying their best despite what people think. They're not like a bunch of lefties trying to make sure that Hillary Clinton gets elected. It's more that it's an incredibly complex system that we don't. [00:16:24] And that's the worry. It's so complex and moves so fast that nobody will be able to stop it once it happens. [00:16:32] And let me ask a question. This is a very savage question. Yeah. Which is, is this just the next stage of evolution as humans and people will die? Yes. I mean, that's always happens. You know, is this is just taking emotion out of it. Is this basically the next stage of survival of the fittest? [00:16:51] Yeah, you have to think of organisms, you know, what is it mean to be a living organism, I guess a smartphone, part of your living organism or. [00:17:03] We're we're in relationships with our phones. Yeah, but have sex through them with them. What's the difference? Being with them and through them. [00:17:11] But it also expands your cognitive abilities, expands your memory, knowledge and so on. So you're much smarter person because you have a smartphone in your hand. [00:17:19] But if when as soon as it's out of my hands, we've got big problems because we've become sort of so morphed with them with a symbiotic relationship. [00:17:26] And that's what. So you must the neural link is working on trying to. Increase the bandwidth communication between computers and your brain and so further and further expand our ability as human beings to sort of leverage machines, and maybe that's the future, the evolution in next evolutionary step. It could be also that, yes, we'll give birth just like we give birth to human children right now to give birth in other places. I think it's a really interesting possibility. [00:17:59] I'm going to play devil's advocate. I just think that the fear of robots is wildly classist because, I mean, Facebook, like it's easy for us to say they're taking their data. OK, a lot of people that get employment off of Facebook, they are able to get income off of Facebook. They don't care if you take their phone numbers and their emails and their data as long as it's free. They don't want to have to pay five dollars a month for Facebook. [00:18:20] Facebook is a wildly Democratic thing. Forget about the election and all that kind of stuff. You know, a lot of, you know, technology making people's lives easier. I find that most elite people are more scared than lower income people. So and women for the most part. So the idea of something that's stronger than us that might eventually kill us like women are used to that. Like that's not a lot of like really rich men being like the robots are going to kill us. [00:18:48] We're like, what's another thing that's going to kill us? [00:18:49] You know, I tend to see like, oh, something and walk me to my car at night, like something can help me cook dinner or something for, you know, people in underprivileged countries who can't afford eye surgery like a robot. [00:19:02] Can we send a robot to underprivileged, you know, places to do surgery or if they can, I work with this organization called Operation Smile where they do cleft palate surgeries. And there's a lot of places that can't do a very simple surgery because they can't afford doctors and medical care and such. So I just see and this can be completely naive and should be completely wrong, but I feel like we're a lot of people are going like the robots are going to destroy us humans. [00:19:27] We're destroying ourselves. We're self destructing. Robots, to me, are the only hope to clean up all the mess that we've created. Even when we go try to clean up pollution in the ocean, we make it worse because of the oil that the tankers like. [00:19:38] It's like to me, robots are the only solution. You know, firefighters are heroes, but they're limited in how many times they can run into a fire, you know. So there's just something interesting to me. [00:19:49] I'm not hearing a lot of like lower income, more vulnerable populations talking about robots. [00:19:56] Maybe you can speak to it a little bit more. [00:19:58] This is an idea I think you've expressed that I've heard actually a few female writers and roboticists I've talked to expressed this idea that you just said, which is it just seems that being afraid of existential threats, of artificial intelligence is is a male issue. [00:20:23] Yeah. And I wonder what that is. If it because because men have in certain positions, like you said, it's also classicists issue. They haven't been humbled by life. And so you always look for the biggest problems to take on around you. [00:20:39] It's a champagne problem to be afraid of robots. Most people don't have health insurance. They're afraid they're not able to feed their kids. They can't afford a tutor for their kids. I mean, I just think of the way I grew up and I had a mother who worked two jobs, had kids we couldn't afford an essay to tutor, you know, like the idea of a robot coming in, being able to tutor your kids, being able to provide child care for your kids, you know, being able to come in with cameras for eyes and make sure, you know, surveillance. [00:21:04] You know, I'm very pro surveillance because I've had security problems and I've been you know, we're generally in a little more danger than you guys are. [00:21:13] So I think that robots are a little less scary to us because we can see that maybe as like free assistance, help and protection. And then there's sort of another element for me personally, which is maybe more of a female problem. [00:21:25] I don't know. I'm just going to make a generalization. [00:21:27] I'm happy to be wrong. [00:21:29] But, you know, the emotional sort of component of robots and what they can provide in terms of, you know, there I think there's a lot of people that aren't don't have microphones that I just recently kind of stumbled upon in doing all my research on the sex robots for my standup special, which is there's a lot of very shy people that aren't good at dating. There's a lot of people who are scared of human beings who, you know, have personality disorders or grew up in alcoholic homes or struggle with addiction or whatever it is where a robot can solve an emotional problem. [00:22:03] And so we're largely having this conversation about like rich guys that are emotionally healthy and how scared of robots are. [00:22:12] We're getting about like a huge part of the population who maybe isn't as charming and effervescent and solvent as, you know, people like you and Elon Musk, who these robots could solve very real problems in their life, emotional or financial, whether it's in general a really interesting idea that most people. [00:22:31] On the world don't have a voice, it's you've talked about it sort of even the people on Twitter who are driving the conversation, you said comments, people who leave comments represent a very tiny percent of the population. [00:22:45] And they're the ones they you know, we tend to think they speak for the population, but it's very possible. Many topics they don't at all. [00:22:54] And look, I and I'm sure there's got to be some kind of legal, you know, sort of structure in place for when the robots happen. You know way more about this than I do. But, you know, for me to just go, the robots are bad. That's a wild generalization that I feel like is really inhumane in some way. You know, just after the research I've done, like you're going to tell me that a man whose wife died suddenly and he feels guilty moving on with a human woman or can't get over the grief. [00:23:21] You can't have a sex robot in his own house. Why not? Who cares? Why do you care? [00:23:26] Well, there's an interesting aspect of human nature. So, you know, we tend to as a as a civilization to create a group that's the other in all kinds of ways. [00:23:36] Right. And so you work with animals to you're especially sensitive to the suffering of animals. Let me kind of ask, what's your do you think we'll abuse robots in the future? [00:23:51] Do you think some of the darker aspects of human nature will come out? [00:23:54] I think some people will. But if we design them properly, the people that do it, we can put it on a record and they can, but we can put them in jail. [00:24:03] We can find sociopaths more easily, you know, like. But why is that? [00:24:07] Why is that a sociopathic thing to harm a robot? I think look, I don't know enough enough about the consciousness and stuff as you do. I guess it would have to be on their conscious. But it is, you know, the part of the brain that is responsible for compassion, the frontal lobe or whatever, like people that abuse animals also abuse humans and commit other kinds of crimes like that. It's all the same part of the brain. No one abuses animals and then is like awesome to women and children and awesome to underprivileged, you know, minorities like it's all so, you know, we've been working really hard to put a database together of all the people that have abused animals. [00:24:41] So when they commit another crime, you go, OK, this is you know, it's all the same stuff. And I think people probably think I'm nuts for the a lot of the animal work I do. [00:24:51] But because when animal abuse is present, another crime is always present, but the animal abuse is the most socially acceptable. You can kick a dog and there's nothing people can do. But then what they're doing behind closed doors, you can't see. [00:25:04] So there's always something else going on, which is why I never feel compunction about it. But I do think we'll start seeing the same thing with robots. Um, the person that kicks the I felt compassion when the kicking the dog robot really pissed me off. [00:25:18] I know that they're just trying to get the stability right and all that. [00:25:22] But I do think there will come a time where that will be a great way to be able to figure out if somebody is has like, you know, antisocial behaviors. [00:25:32] You kind of mentioned surveillance. Mm hmm. It's also a really interesting idea of yours that you just said, you know, a lot of people seem to be really uncomfortable with surveillance. Yeah. And you just said that, you know what? For me, you know, there's positives for surveillance. [00:25:47] I think people behave better when they know they're being watched. And I know this is a very unpopular opinion. I'm talking about it on stage right now. [00:25:54] We behave better when we know we're being watched. You and I had a very different conversation before we were recording. [00:26:01] If we behave different, you sit up on your best behavior trying to sound eloquent. And I'm trying to not hurt anyone's feelings. [00:26:08] And I mean, I have a camera right there. I'm behaving totally different than when we first started talking. [00:26:13] You know, when you know, there's a camera, you behave differently. I mean, there's cameras all over L.A. at stoplights. So the people don't run stoplights, but there's not even film in it. [00:26:22] They don't even use them anymore. But it works. It works. Right. And I'm working on this thing instead about surveillance. It's like that's why we invented Santa Claus. You know, it's the Santa Claus is the first surveillance. Basically, all we had to say to kids is he's making a list and he's watching you and they behave better as brilliant, you know? So I do I do think that there are benefits to surveillance. You know, I think we all do sketchy things in private. [00:26:47] And we all watched weird porn or Googled weird things. And we don't we don't want people to know about it, the our secret lives. So I do think that obviously there's we should be able to have a modicum of privacy. But I tend to think that people that are the most negative about surveillance of the most the most like. [00:27:07] Well, you should is you you're saying you're doing bits on it. [00:27:10] No, well, I'm just talking in general about privacy and surveillance and how paranoid we're kind of becoming and how, you know, I mean, it's just wild to me that people are like our emails are going to leak and they're taking our phone numbers like they're there used to be a book full of phone numbers and addresses that were they just throw it at your door. [00:27:32] And we all had a book of everyone's numbers. This is a very new thing and, you know, I know our amygdalas is designed to compound sort of threats. And, you know, there's stories about and I think we all just glom on in a very, you know, tribal way of taking our data like we don't even know that means. [00:27:50] But we're like, well, they they you know, so I just think that sometimes, like, OK, well, so what? They're going to sell your data. Who cares? Why do you care? [00:28:00] First of all, that bit will kill in China. So and I see it as sort of only a little bit joking because a lot of people in China, including the citizens, despite what people in the West think of as abuse, are actually in support of the idea of surveillance, sort of they're not in support of the abuse of surveillance, but they're they like I mean, the idea of surveillance is kind of like. The idea of government, like you said, would behave differently in a way, it's almost like why we like sports, there's rules and within the constraints of the rules, this is a more stable society. [00:28:41] And they make good arguments about success, being able to build successful companies, being able to build successful socializing on the fabric that's more stable when you have a surveillance that keeps the criminals away, keeps abuse of animals, whatever the values of the society with surveillance, you can enforce those values better. [00:29:01] And here's what I will say. There's a lot of unethical things happening with surveillance like this. I feel the need to really make that very clear. I mean, the fact that Google is like collecting off people's hands, start moving on the mouse to find out if they're getting Parkinson's and then their insurance goes up like that is completely unethical and wrong. And I think stuff like that we have to really be careful around. So the idea of using our data to raise our insurance rates or, you know, I heard that they're looking they can sort of predict if you're going to have depression based on yourself face by detecting micro muscles in your face, you know, all that kind of stuff. [00:29:35] That is a nightmare. Not OK. But I think, you know, we have to delineate what's a real threat and what's getting spam in your email box. That's that's not what to spend your time and energy on, focused on the fact that every time you buy cigarettes, your insurance is going up without you knowing about it on the topic of animals. [00:29:53] So can we just linger on a little bit like what do you think? [00:29:58] What does it say about our society of the society where abuse of animals that we see in general sort of factory farming is just in general just the way we treat animals of different categories? Like what? What do you think of that? What is a better world look like? What's what should people think about it in general? [00:30:20] I think I think the most interesting thing I can probably say around this that the least emotional, because I'm actually very non emotional animal person, because it's I think everyone's an animal person. It's just a matter of if it's yours or if you've been conditioned to go numb. [00:30:35] You know, I think it's really a testament to what as a species we are able to be in denial about mass denial and mass delusion and how we're able to dehumanize and debase groups, you know, where we're too, in a way, in order to conform and find protection and the conforming. [00:30:55] So we are also a species who used to go to coliseums and watch elephants and tigers fight to the death. [00:31:04] We used to watch human beings be pulled apart and there wasn't that long ago. [00:31:09] We're also species who had slaves and it was socially acceptable by a lot of people, didn't see anything wrong with it. So we're a species that is able to go numb and that is able to dehumanize very quickly and make it the norm. [00:31:24] Child labor wasn't that long ago. [00:31:27] The idea that now we look back and go, oh, yeah, kids, we're losing fingers in factories, making shoes like someone had to come in and make that. So I think it just says a lot about the fact that we are animals and we are self serving and one of the most successful, the most successful species because we are able to debase and degrade and essentially exploit anything that benefits us. [00:31:53] I think the pendulum is going to swing as being like I think we're Roehm now, kind of like I think we're on the verge of collapse because we are dopamine receptors. Like we are just I think we're all kind of addicts when it comes to this stuff. Like we don't know when to stop. It's always the buffet. Like we're the thing that used to keep us alive, which is killing animals and eating them now, killing animals and eating them is what's killing us in a way. [00:32:18] So it's like we just can't we don't know when to call it and we don't. Moderation is not really something that humans have evolved to have yet. So I think it's really just a flaw in our wiring. [00:32:30] Do you think we'll look back at this time as a our society is being deeply unethical? [00:32:36] Yeah. Yeah, I think we'll be embarrassed. Which are the worst parts right now going on? Is it is an animal? [00:32:43] Well, I think in terms of anything, what's the unethical thing is it is very hard to take a step out of it. But you just said we used to watch. [00:32:52] You know, there's been a lot of cruelty throughout history. What's the cruel thing going on? [00:32:59] It's going to be pigs. I think it's going to be. I mean, pigs are one of the most emotionally intelligent animals and they have the intelligence of like a three year old. And I think we'll look back and be really they use tools. I mean, they're I think we have this narrative that they're pigs and they're pigs and they're they're disgusting and they're dirty and they're bacon. And so I think that we'll look back one day and be really embarrassed about that. [00:33:23] Is this for just the what's it called factory farming. So basically mess because we don't see it. [00:33:29] If you saw I mean, we do have I mean, this is probably an evolutionary advantage. We do have the ability to completely pretend something's not something that is so horrific that it overwhelms us. And we are able to essentially deny that it's happening. [00:33:44] I think if people were to see what goes on in factory farming and elsewhere, really to take in how bad it is for us, you know, we're hurting ourselves first and foremost with what we eat. [00:33:55] But that's also a very elitist argument. You know, it's a luxury to be able to complain about meat. It's a luxury to be able to not eat meat. You know, there's very few people because of, you know, how the corporations have set up meat being cheap. You know, it's two dollars to buy a Big Mac. It's ten dollars to buy a healthy meal. You know, that's I think a lot of people don't have the luxury to even think that way. [00:34:19] But I do think that animals in captivity, I think we're going to look back and be pretty grossed out about mammals in captivity, whales, dolphins. I mean, that's already starting to dismantle circuses we're going to be pretty embarrassed about. But I think it's really more testament to, you know, there's just such a ability to go like that thing is different than me and we're better. It's the ego. I mean, it's just we have the species with the biggest ego ultimately. [00:34:46] Well, that's what I think. That's my hope for robots, as though you mentioned consciousness before. [00:34:51] Nobody knows what consciousness is, but I'm hoping robots will help us empathize and understand that. [00:35:01] That there's other creatures out besides ourselves that can suffer, that can they can experience the world and that we can torture by our actions and robots can explicitly teach us that, I think, better than animals can. [00:35:18] I have never seen such compassion from a lot of people in my life. [00:35:27] Toward any human animal child, as I have a lot of people in the way they interact with the robot, because there's I think there's something of I I mean, I was on the robot owners chat boards for a good eight months. [00:35:42] And the main emotional benefit is she's never going to cheat on you. She's never going to hurt you. She's never going to lie to you. She doesn't judge you. You know, I think that robots help people. [00:35:55] And this is part of the work I do in animals like I do equine therapy and train dogs and stuff, because there is this safe space to be authentic with this being that doesn't care what you do for a living, doesn't care how much money you have, doesn't care who you're dating, doesn't care what you look like, doesn't care if you have cellulite, whatever, you feel safe to be able to truly be present without being defensive and worrying about eye contact and being triggered by, you know, needing to be perfect and fear of judgment and all that. [00:36:21] And robots really can't judge you yet, but they can't judge you. And I think it really puts people at their at ease and at their most authentic. [00:36:33] Do you think you can have a deep connection with the robot that's not judging or you think you can really have a relationship with a robot or a human being that's a safe space? [00:36:46] Or is a tension mystery danger necessary for deep connection? [00:36:52] I'm going to speak for myself and say that I grew up and now call come identify as a co-dependent, talks about this stuff before. [00:37:00] But for me, it's very hard to be in a relationship with a human being without feeling like I need to perform in some way or deliver in some way. And I don't know if that's just the people I've been in a relationship with or or me or my brokenness. [00:37:13] But I do think this is going to sound really negative and pessimistic. [00:37:21] But I do think a lot of our relationships are projection and a lot of our relationships are performance. And I don't think I really understood that until I worked with horses. And most indications human is nonverbal. Right? I can say like I love you, but you don't think I love you. Right. Which is with animals. It's very direct. It's all physical. It's all energy. I feel like that with robots, too. It feels very. [00:37:49] What how I say something doesn't matter, my inflection doesn't really matter, and you thinking that my tone is disrespectful, like you're not filtering it through all of the bad relationships you've been in, you're not filtering it through the way your mom talked to you. You're not getting triggered. You know, I find that for the most part, people don't always receive things the way that you intend them to or the way you intended. And that makes relationships really murky. [00:38:12] So the relationships with animals, relationship with the robots as they are now. You kind of imply that that's more healthy, can you have a healthy relationship with other humans or not healthy and don't like that word, but shouldn't it be? You've talked about co-dependency. [00:38:31] Maybe you can talk about what is co-dependency, but is that is the the challenges of that the complexity of that necessary for passion, for for love between humans? You love passion. [00:38:47] That's a good thing. I thought this would be a safe place. I got to go. Right. I got trolled by rogard hours on this. [00:38:56] I look, I am not anti passion. I think that I've just maybe been around long enough to know that sometimes it's ephemeral. [00:39:05] And that passion is a mixture of a lot of different things. Adrenaline, which turns into dopamine, cause it's a lot of neurochemicals. It's a lot of projection. It's a lot of what we've seen in movies. It's a lot of it's I identify as an addict. So for me, sometimes passion is like, oh, this could be bad. And I think we've been so conditioned to believe that passion means like your soul mates. And I mean, how many times have you had a passionate connection with someone? [00:39:32] And then it was a total train wreck. [00:39:35] A train wreck. How many times exactly what you're drinking? A lot of math in your head, a little moment counting. [00:39:43] I mean, what's a train wreck? What's why is obsession? So you described this co-dependency and sort of the idea of attachment. Over attachment to people who don't deserve that kind of attachment as somehow a bad thing. I think our society says it's a bad thing. It probably is a bad thing. Like a like a delicious burger is a bad thing. I don't know. [00:40:09] But right now, that's a good point. I think that you're pointing out something really fascinating, which is like passion. If you go into it knowing this is like pizza, where it's going to be delicious for two hours and then I don't have to have it again for if you can have a choice in the passion I define, passion is something that is relatively unmanageable and something you can't control or stop and start with your own volition. [00:40:30] So maybe we're operating under different definitions. [00:40:33] If passion is something that like, you know, ruins your marriages and screws up your professional life and becomes this thing that you're not in control of, it becomes addictive. I think that's the difference. [00:40:46] Is is it a choice or is it not a choice? And if it is a choice, then passion's great. But if it's something that, like consumes you and makes you start making bad decisions and clouds your frontal lobe and is just all about dopamine and not really about the person and more about the neurochemical, we call it sort of the drug, the internal drug cabinet. [00:41:07] If it's all just your on drugs, that's different because sometimes you're just on drugs. [00:41:11] OK, so this is a philosophical question here. So would you rather it's interesting for a comedian, brilliant comedian to speak so eloquently about a balanced life? [00:41:27] I kind of argue against this point. There's such an obsession of creating this healthy lifestyle now. [00:41:33] It's psychologically speaking, you know, I'm a fan of the idea that you sort of fly high and you crash and die. [00:41:40] Twenty seven is also a possible life. And it's not one you should judge because I think there's moments of greatness. [00:41:47] I talk to Olympic athletes who are some of the greatest moments are achieved in their early 20s, and the rest of their life is in the kind of fog of almost a depression because based on their physical prowess, physical prowess, and they'll never show that. [00:42:04] So they're watching the physical prowess fade and they'll never achieve the kind of height, not just physical of just emotion of the max number of neurochemicals. [00:42:18] Yeah. [00:42:18] And you also put your money on the wrong horse. That's where I would I would just go like, oh, yeah. If you're doing a job where you peak at twenty two. Yeah. The rest of your life is going to be that idea is considering the notion that you want to optimize some kind of. But we're all going to die soon. [00:42:36] What about now. You tell me I've got more to waterlines myself so I'm going to be fine. [00:42:43] See you're almost like how many Oscar winning movies can I direct by the time I'm one hundred? How many this like. But, you know, there's you know, it's all life is short, relatively speaking. [00:42:58] I know. But it can also come department you go life is short play hard fall in love as much as you can run into walls. I would also go life is short. Don't deplete yourself on things that aren't sustainable and that you can't keep. Yeah. You know, so I think everyone gets dopamine from different places. Everyone has meaning from different places. I look at the fleeting passionate relationships I've had in the past and I don't like I don't have pride in, though I think that you have to decide what you know helps you sleep at night. [00:43:28] For me, it's pride and feeling like I behave with grace and integrity. That's just me personally. Everyone can go like, yeah, I slept with all the hot chicks in Italy. I could and I did all the whatever whatever you value, we're allowed to value different. [00:43:43] We're talking about Brian calling. [00:43:46] Frank Allen has lived his life to the fullest, to say the least. But I think that it's just for me personally, I mean, this could be like my workaholism or my achievements is I if I don't have something to show for something, I feel like it's a waste of time or a some kind of loss. I'm in a 12 step program, and the third step would say there's no such thing as waste of time. And everything happens exactly as it should and whatever. [00:44:14] That's the way to just sort of keep us sane so we don't grieve too much and beat ourselves up over past mistakes. There's no such thing as mistakes that add up. [00:44:22] But I think passion is I think it's so life affirming and one of the few things that maybe people like us makes us feel awake and seeing, and we just have such a high threshold for adrenaline, you know. [00:44:37] I mean, you are a fighter, right? Yeah. OK, so yeah. So you have a very high tolerance for adrenaline. And I think that Olympic athletes, the amount of adrenaline they get from performing, it's very hard to follow that. It's like when guys come back from the military and they have to. It's like, do you miss bullets flying out, you kind of because of that adrenaline which turned into dopamine and the camaraderie, I mean, there's people that speak much better about this than I do. [00:45:05] But I just I'm obsessed with neurology and I'm just obsessed with sort of the lies we tell ourselves in order to justify getting neurochemicals. [00:45:14] You've done actually quite done a lot of thinking and talking about neurology and just kind of look at human behavior through the lens of looking at how are actually chemically or brain works. [00:45:26] So what first of all, why did you connect with that idea and what have you how is your view of the world changed by considering the brain? [00:45:37] That's just a machine. [00:45:39] You know, I know it probably sounds really nihilistic, but for me, it's very liberating to know a lot about neurochemicals because you don't have to. It's like the same thing with like like critics, like critical reviews. If you believe the good, you have to believe the bad kind of thing. Like, you know, if you believe that your bad choices were because of your moral integrity or whatever, you have to believe your good ones. I just think there's something really liberating and going like, oh, that was just adrenaline. [00:46:04] I just said that thing because I was adrenalized and I was scared and my amygdala was activated. And that's why I said, you're an asshole and get out. And that's, you know, I think I just think it's important to delineate what's nature and what's nurture, what is your choice and what is just your brain trying to keep you safe. I think we forget that even though we have security systems in homes and locks on our doors, that our brain for the most part is just trying to keep us safe all the time. [00:46:26] It's why we hold grudges. That's why we get angry. It's why we get road rage. That's why we do a lot of things. And it's also when I started learning about neurology, I started having so much more compassion for other people. You know, someone yelled at me being like, fuck you on the road. [00:46:39] I'd be like, OK, he's producing adrenaline right now because we're all going sixty five miles an hour and our brains aren't really designed for this type of stress. And he's scared. [00:46:50] He was. So that really helped me to have more love for people and my everyday life instead of being in fight or flight mode. But the I think more interesting answer to your question is that I've had migraines my whole life, like I've suffered with it, really intense migraines, ocular migraines, ones where my arm would go numb. And I just started going to go to so many doctors to learn about it. [00:47:13] And I started learning that we don't really know that much. [00:47:17] We know a lot. But it's wild to go into one of the best monologist in the world who's like, yeah, we don't know. We don't know. We don't know. And that fascinated me was one of the worst pains. [00:47:26] You can probably have all that stuff and you don't know the source. We don't know the source. And there is something really fascinating about when your left arm starts going numb and you start not being able to see out of the left side of both your eyes. And I remember when the migraines really bad. [00:47:42] It's like a mini stroke almost, and you're able to see words on a page, but I can't read them. They just look like symbols to me. So there's something just really fascinating to me about your brain just being able to stop functioning. And I so I just wanted to learn about it. Study about it. I did all these weird alternative treatments. I got this piercing in here that actually works. I've tried everything. And then both my parents had strokes. [00:48:06] So when both of my parents had strokes, I became sort of the person who had to decide what was going to happen with their recovery, which is just a wild thing to have to deal with it, you know. Twenty eight years old when it happened and I started spending basically all day every day and I see used with neurologists learning about what happened to my dad's brain and why he can't move his left arm, but he can move his right leg, but he can't see out of that, you know. [00:48:30] And then my mom had another stroke in a different part of the brain. [00:48:34] So I started having to learn what parts of the brain did what and so that I wouldn't take that behavior so personally and so that I would be able to manage my expectations in terms of their recovery. [00:48:44] So my mom, because it affected a lot of her frontal lobe, changed a lot as a person. She was way more emotional. She was way more micromanaged. She was forgetting certain things. So it broke my heart less when I was able to know. Oh, yeah, well, the stroke hit this part of the brain, and that's the one that's responsible for short term memory and that's responsible for long term memory. Set it up. And then my brother just got something called viral encephalitis, which is an infection inside the brain. [00:49:10] So it was kind of wild that I was able to go, oh, I know exactly what's happening here and I know, you know, so, um. [00:49:16] So that's allows you to have some more compassion for the struggles that people have. But does it take away some of the magic for some of the from the some of the more positive experiences of the times? [00:49:28] Sometimes. And I don't I don't I'm such a control addict that, you know, I think our biggest someone like me, my biggest dream is to know why someone's doing that's what standup is, is just trying to figure out why or that's what writing is. That's what acting is. That's what performing is, is try to figure out why someone would do something. As an actor, you get a piece of material and you go, this person. Why would he say that? [00:49:48] Why would he she pick up that cup? Why would she walk over here? It's really y why. Why, why? So I think neurology is if you're trying to figure out human motives and why people do what they do and be crazy not to understand how neurochemicals motivate us, I also have a lot of addiction in my family and hardcore drug addiction and mental illness. And in order to cope with that, you really have to understand that borderline personality disorder, schizophrenia and drug addiction. [00:50:15] So I have a lot of people I love that suffer from drug addiction, alcoholism. And the first thing they started teaching you is it's not a choice. These people's dopamine receptors don't hold dopamine the same way as yours do. Their frontal lobe is underdeveloped like, you know. And that really helped me to navigate dealing, loving people that were addicted to substances. [00:50:37] I want to be careful with this question, but how much money do you have? [00:50:42] How much can I borrow? OK. No is how much control, how much, despite the chemical imbalances or the biological limitations that each of our individual brains have, how much mind over matter is there? [00:51:03] So through things and I've known people with clinical depression. [00:51:09] And so it's it's always a touchy subject to say how much they can really help, but very. What can you. [00:51:17] Yeah. Well, what because you've talked about co-dependency, you talked about issues that you're struggled through and nevertheless you choose to take a journey of healing and so on. So that's your choice. [00:51:29] That's your actions. So how much can you do to help fight the limitations of the neurochemicals in your brain? That's such an interesting question. [00:51:38] I don't think I'm at all qualified to answer, but I'll say what I do know. And really quick, just the definition of co-dependency. I think a lot of people think of co-dependency as like to people that can't stop hanging out, you know, or like, you know, that's not totally off. But I think for the most part, my favorite definition of co-dependency is the inability to tolerate the discomfort of others. You grow up in an alcoholic home, you grow up around mental illness, you grow up in chaos. [00:52:03] You have a parent that the narcissist you basically are wired to just people. Please worry about others, be perfect, walk on eggshells, shape shift to accommodate other people. So co-dependency is a very active wiring issue that doesn't just affect your romantic relationships. [00:52:22] It affects you being a boss that affects you in the world online. You get one negative comment and it throws you for two weeks. [00:52:31] It also is linked to eating disorders and other kinds of addiction. So it's it's it's a very big thing. And I think a lot of people sometimes only think that it's in romantic relationships. I always feel the need to say that. [00:52:42] And also one of the reasons I love the idea of robots so much, because you don't have to walk on eggshells around them. You don't have to worry. They're going to get mad at you yet. But there's no codependents are hypersensitive to the needs and moods of others. And it's very exhausting. It's depleting just. Well, one conversation about where we're going to go to dinner is like, you want to go get Chinese food. We just had Chinese food. [00:53:05] Well, why are you mad? Well, no, I didn't mean. And it's just like that codependents live in this. Everything means something and humans can be very emotionally exhausting. Why did you look at me that way? What do you think about what was that? Why did you check your phone? It's just it's a hypersensitivity that can be incredibly time consuming, which is why I love the idea of robots just subbing in even. I've had a hard time running TV shows and stuff because even asking someone to do something, I don't want to come off like a bitch. [00:53:33] I'm very concerned about what other people think of me, how I'm perceived, which is why I think robots will be very beneficial for for codependents. [00:53:40] By the way, just the real quick tangent, that skill or flaw, whatever you want to call it, is actually really useful for if you ever do start your own podcast for interviewing because you're now kind of obsessed about the mindset of others and makes you a good sort of listener and talker with. [00:54:00] So I think. [00:54:03] What's your name from NPR? Talk to Terry Gross talked about having that. So I don't feel like she has that at all. [00:54:12] Was what. But she worries about other people's feelings. [00:54:17] Yeah, absolutely. Oh I don't get that at all. [00:54:20] I mean, you have to put yourself in the mind of the person you're supposed to be. I see. Just in terms of yeah, I am starting a podcast and the reason I haven't is because I'm codependent and I'm too worried it's not going to be perfect. Yeah. So a big codependent adage is perfectionism leads to procrastination, which leads to paralysis. [00:54:37] So how do you take a million changes? How do you survive on social media? Because you exceptionally active. [00:54:42] But by the way, I took you on a tangent and didn't answer your last question about how much we can control, how much you we'll return it. [00:54:48] Or maybe the answer is we can go to we're OK. Yes, we can. But but one of the things that I'm fascinated by is the first thing you learn when you go into 12 step programs are addiction recovery. I think this is, you know, genetics loads the gun environment pulls the trigger. And there are certain parts of your genetics you cannot control. I come from a lot of alcoholism. I come from, you know, a lot of mental illness. [00:55:16] There's certain things I cannot control and a lot of things that maybe we don't even know yet what we can and can't because of how little we actually know about the brain. But we also talk about the warrior spirit. And there are some people that have that warrior spirit. [00:55:28] And we don't necessarily know what that engine is, whether it's you get dopamine from succeeding or achieving or martyring yourself or or that tension you get from growing. [00:55:41] So a lot of people are like, oh, this person can edify themselves and overcome. [00:55:45] But if you're getting attention from improving. Yourself, you're going to keep wanting to do that, so that is something that helps a lot of in terms of changing your brain. If you talk about changing your brain to people and talk about what you're doing to overcome that obstacles, you're going to get more attention from them, which is going to fire off your reward system, and then you're gonna keep doing it so you can leverage that momentum. [00:56:07] So this is why in any step program, you go into a room and you talk about your progress, because then everyone claps for you and then you're more motivated to keep going. [00:56:15] So that's why we say you're only as sick as the secrets you keep, because if you keep things secret, you know, there's no one guiding you to go in a certain direction. It's based on. Right. We're sort of designed to get approval from the tribe or from a group of people because our brain, you know, translates it to safety. [00:56:31] So in that case, the tribe is a positive one that helps you go to a positive direction. [00:56:36] So that's why it's so important to go into a room and also say, hey, I wanted to use drugs today and people go, they go, me too. And you feel less alone and you feel less like your, you know, have been castigated from the pack or whatever. And then you say and I have you get a chip when you haven't drank for 30 days or 60 days or whatever, you get little rewards. [00:56:55] So talking about a pack that's not at all healthy are good, but in fact is often toxic social media. [00:57:03] So you're one of my favorite people on Twitter and Instagram to sort of just both the comedy and the inside and just fun. How do you prevent social media from destroying your mental health? I haven't. [00:57:16] I haven't. It's the next big epidemic, isn't it? I don't think I have I don't I don't think it's moderation, the answer what maybe. But you can do a lot of damage in a moderate way. I mean, I guess, again, it depends on your goals, you know, and and I think for me, the way that my addiction to social media, I'm happy to call it an addiction. I mean, and I define it as an addiction because it stops being a choice. [00:57:43] There are times I just reach over and I'm like, that was that was where I was, where I'll be driving. Sometimes I'll be like, oh, my God, my arm just went to my phone. You know, I can put it down. I can take time away from it. But when I do, I get Nancy, I get restless, irritable and discontent. I mean, that's kind of the definition, isn't it? So I think by no means do I have a healthy relationship with social media. [00:58:07] I'm sure there's a way to. But I think I'm especially a weirdo in this space because it's easy to conflate. Is this work? Is this I can always say that it's for work. [00:58:17] Right. You know, but I mean, don't you get the same kind of thing is you get someone a room full of people laugh your jokes because I mean, I see especially the way you do Twitter, it's an extension of your comedy in a way. [00:58:30] So I took a big break from Twitter, though, the really big break. I took like six months off or something for a while because it was just like it seemed like it was all kind of politics and it was just a little bit it wasn't giving me dopamine because there was like this weird a lot of feedback. So I did take a break from it and then go back to it cause I felt like I didn't have a healthy relationship. [00:58:50] I ever tried the I don't know if I believe them, but Joe Rogan seems to not read comments, have you? [00:58:56] And he's one of the only people at the scale, like at your level who at least claims not to read the because you and him swim in this space of tense ideas. Yeah. The get get get the toxic folks riled up. I think rogue. [00:59:16] I don't I don't know. I don't I think he probably looks at YouTube like the likes. And, you know, I think if something's if he doesn't know, I don't know. [00:59:27] I'm sure he would tell the truth. You know, I'm sure he's got people that look at them and it's like disgusted. Great. Or I don't, you know, like, I'm sure he gets it. You know, I can't picture him, like, in the weeds on know for sure. [00:59:40] I mean, he's honestly actually saying that. [00:59:42] I just it's it's it's a to feedback. Yeah. We're taking your feedback. I mean, you know, look like I think that our brain is designed to get intel on how we're perceived so that we know where we stand. Right. That's our whole deal. Right. As humans, we want to know where we stand. We walk in a room and we go, who's the most powerful person in here? I got to talk to him and get in their good graces. [01:00:04] Let's just were designed to rank ourselves right and constantly know our rank and social media because of you can't figure out your rank with five hundred million people. It's not simple. You know, our brain is like, what's my rank? What's my. And especially if we're following people. I think the big the interesting thing I think I may be able to say about this besides my speech impediment, is that I did start meeting people that rank wildly higher than me because it is just stressful on the brain to constantly look at people that are incredibly successful. [01:00:39] So you keep feeling bad about yourself. You know, I think that that is like cutting to a certain extent, just like look at me looking at all these people that have so much more money than me and so much more success than me. [01:00:50] It's making me feel like a failure, even though I don't think I'm a failure. But it's easy to frame it so that I can feel that. [01:00:58] But yeah, that's really interesting, especially if they're close to like if they're other comedians or something like that. That's right. Or whatever. That's it's really disappointing to me. I do the same thing as well. So other successful people are really close to what I do. [01:01:11] It I don't know. I wish I could just admire. Yeah. And for it not to be a distraction, but that's why you are where you are because you don't just admire your competitive and you want to win. [01:01:22] So it's also the same thing that bums you out when you look at this is the same reason you are where you are. So that's why I think it's so important to learn about neurology and addiction, because you're able to go like, oh, this same instinct. So I'm very sensitive and I and I sometimes don't like that about myself, but I'm like, well, that's the reason I'm able to write good standup. And that's the reason and that's the reason I'm able to be sensitive to feedback. [01:01:42] And so that jokes should have been better. I can make that better. So it's the kind of thing where it's like you have to be really sensitive in your work. In the second you leave, you've got to be able to turn it off. It's about developing the muscle, being able to know when to let it be a superpower and when it's going to hold you back and be an obstacle. So I try to not be in that black and white of like, you know, being competitive is bad or being jealous of someone just to go like, oh, there's that thing that makes me really successful in a lot of other ways. [01:02:08] But right now it's making me feel that, well, I'm kind of looking to you because you're basically a celebrity, a famous sort of world class comedian. And so I feel like you're the right person to. Be one of the key people to define what's the healthy path forward with social media, though, because we're all trying to figure it out now and it's a I'm curious to see where it evolves. I think you're at the center of that. So, like, you know, there's, you know, trying to leave Twitter and then come back. [01:02:39] Can I do this in a healthy way? I mean, you have to keep trying explore to know because it's being know. [01:02:44] I have a couple of answers. I think, you know, I hire a company to do some of my social media for me, you know, so it's also being able to go, OK, I make a certain amount of money by doing this, but now let me be a good business person and say I'm going to pay you this amount to run this for me. So I'm not twenty four seven in the weeds hashtag I'm responding in just it's a lot to take on, it's a lot of energy to take on. [01:03:05] But at the same time, part of what I think makes me successful in social media, if I am, is that people know I'm actually doing it and that I am an engaging and I'm responding and developing a personal relationship with complete strangers. [01:03:17] So I think, you know, figuring out that balance and really approaching it as a business, you know, that's what I try to do. It's not dating. It's not I try to just be really objective about, OK, here's what's working. Here's what's not working. And in terms of taking the break from Twitter, this is a really savage take. [01:03:34] But because I don't talk about my politics publicly, being on Twitter right after the last election was not going to be beneficial because there was going to be you had to take a side. You had to be political in order to get any kind of read tweets or likes. And I just wasn't interested in doing that because you were going to lose as many people as you were going to gain and it was going to all come clean in the wash. So I was just like the best thing I can do for me business wise is to just abstain, you know? [01:04:04] And, you know, the robot. [01:04:06] I joke about her replacing me, but she does do half of my social media, you know, because it's I don't want people to get sick of me. I don't want to be redundant. There are times when I don't have the time or the energy to make a funny video. [01:04:20] But I know she's going to be compelling and interesting. And that's something that you can't see every day. [01:04:25] You know, of course, the the humor comes from your I mean, the cleverness, the with the humor comes from you when you film the robot, that's kind of the trick of it. [01:04:34] I mean, the robot is not quite there to make to do anything funny. [01:04:40] The absurdity is revealed through the filmmaker in that case or whoever is interacting not through the the actual robot, you know, being who she is. [01:04:50] Let me sort of love. OK, what is it? [01:04:57] What is it? Well, first, an engineering question. I know I know you're not an engineer, but how difficult do you think is it to build in the system that you can have a deep, fulfilling, monogamous relationship with sort of replace the human to human relationships that we value? I think anyone can fall in love with anything. You know, like how often have you look back and someone like I ran into someone the other day. That I was in love with and I was like, hey, it was like there was nothing there, there was nothing there, like, you know, like where you're able to go like, oh, that was weird. [01:05:37] Oh, right. [01:05:39] You know, I, I were abused from a distant past or something like. Yeah, when you're able to go like, I can't believe we had an incredible connection. And now it's just I do think that people will be in love with robots probably even more deeply with humans, because it's like when people mourn their animals, when they're animals dying, they're always it's sometimes harder than mourning a human because you can't go. [01:06:05] Well, he was kind of an asshole, but like, he didn't pick me up from school. You know, it's like you're able to get out of your grief a little bit. You're able to kind of be, oh, he was kind of judgmental or she was. With a robot, it's there's something so pure about an innocent, impish and childlike about it that I think it probably will be much more conducive to a narcissistic love for sure at that. [01:06:29] But it's not like, well, he cheated. She can't cheat. You can't leave you. She can't. [01:06:34] Well, if a bear claw leaves your life, it may be a new version or somebody else will enter there. [01:06:42] Are will you miss Bear Claw for guys that have these sex robots? They're building a nursing home for the bodies that are now rusting because they don't want to part with the bodies because they have such an intense emotional connection to it. [01:06:57] I mean, it's kind of like a car club a little bit, you know, like, you know. But I'm not saying this is right. [01:07:04] I'm not saying it's cool. It's weird. It's creepy. But we do anthropomorphize things with faces and we do develop emotional connections to things. I mean, there's certain have you ever tried to, like, throw I can't even throw away my teddy bear from when I was a kid. It's a piece of trash and it's upstairs. Like it's just like, why can I throw that away? [01:07:23] It's bizarre, you know? And there's something kind of beautiful about that. There's something it gives me hope in in humans because I see humans do such horrific things all the time. And maybe I'm too I see too much of it, frankly, but there's something kind of beautiful about the way we're able to have emotional connections to objects, which, you know, a lot of. [01:07:46] I mean, it's kind of specifically, I think, Western right, that we don't see objects as having souls. Like that's kind of specifically us. But I don't think it's so much that we're objectifying humans with these sex robots. We're kind of humanizing objects. Right. So there's something kind of fascinating in our ability to do that, because a lot of us don't humanize humans. So it's just a weird little place to play in. [01:08:09] And I think a lot of people I mean, a lot of people will be marrying these things as my guess. [01:08:14] So you've asked the question, let me ask reviews. What is love? You have a bit of a brilliant definition of love as being willing to die for someone who who you yourself want to kill. So that's that's kind of first of all, it's brilliant. That's a really good definition. I think you'll stick with me for a long time. Is this how little of a romantic I am? A plane went by when you said that and my brain is like, you're going to need to remember that I don't want you to get into post and then not be able to use that. [01:08:47] And I'm a romantic as a on the moon. Actually, I can not be conscious of the fact that I heard the plane and it made me feel like how amazing it is that we live in a world of planes. [01:09:00] And I just went, why have we fucking evolved past planes and why can't they make them quieter? [01:09:05] Yeah, well, yes, this is my definition of what? Yeah. [01:09:12] What's your sort of producing dopamine like consistent output of oxytocin with the same person? [01:09:22] Dopamine is a positive thing. What about the negative? What about the fear and insecurity? The longing? [01:09:31] Anger, all that kind of stuff, I think that's part of love, you know, I think you don't I think that love brings out the best in you, but it also if you don't get angry, upset, it's you know, I don't know. I think that that's that's part of it. I think we have this idea that love has to be like, really, you know, placid or something. I only saw stormy relationships growing up. [01:09:51] So I don't I don't have a judgment on how our relationship should look. [01:09:55] But I do think that this idea that love has to be eternal is is really destructive, is really destructive and self-defeating and a big source of stress for people. I mean, I'm still figuring out love. I think we all kind of are. But I do kind of stand by that definition. [01:10:18] And I think that I think for me, love is like just being able to be authentic with somebody. It's very simple. I know, but I think for me it's about not feeling pressure to have to perform or impress somebody, just feeling truly like accepted unconditionally by someone. [01:10:33] Although I do believe love should be conditional, that might be a hot take and think everything should be conditional. [01:10:41] I think if someone's behavior I don't think love should just be like I'm in love with you now. Behave however you want forever. This is unconditional. I think love is a daily action. It's not something you just like get tenure on and then get to behave however you want because we said I love you ten years ago. It's a daily it's a verb. Well, there's some things there. [01:11:02] You see, if you make it if you explicitly make it clear that it's conditional, it takes away some of the magic of it. So there's some stories we tell ourselves that we don't want to make explicit about love. I don't know. Maybe that's the wrong way to think of it. Maybe you want to be explicit in relationships. [01:11:19] So I also think love is a business decision like I do in a good way. [01:11:24] I like to think that love is not just when you're across from somebody, it's when I go to work. Can I focus? Do I am I worried about you, my stressed out about you? Am I right? You're not responding to me. You're not reliable. Like, I think that being in a relationship, the kind of love that I would want is the kind of relationship where when we're not together, it's not draining me, causing me stress, making me worry, you know, and sometimes passion that word. [01:11:50] You know, we get murky about it. [01:11:53] But I think it's also like I can be the best version of myself when the person's not around and I don't have to feel abandoned or scared or any of these kind of other things. So it's like love, you know, for me. I think I think it's a Flaubert quote. I'm going to butcher it, but I think it's like be, you know, boring in your personal life so you can be violent and take risks in your professional life. [01:12:12] Is that it? I got it wrong. Something like that. But I do think that it's being able to align values in a way to where you can also thrive outside of the relationship. [01:12:21] Some of the most successful people I know are still sort of happily married and have kids and so on. [01:12:26] It's okay to be boring. Boring is OK. Boring is serenity. And it's funny how the those elements actually make you much more productive. [01:12:35] I don't understand the I don't think relationships should drain you and take away energy that you could be using to create things that generate pride. [01:12:42] OK, did you say your relationship with Olivia, have you said your religion, your definition of love? My definition of love? [01:12:50] No, I did not say we're out of time now. [01:12:55] Do we have we have a podcast. Maybe you can invite me online. Oh, no, I already did. You're doing it. OK, we've already talked about this. [01:13:03] And because I also have co-dependency, I have to say yes. No, I think. [01:13:07] Yeah, no, no. You you owe me now actually the. I wondered whether when I asked if we could talk today after sort of doing more research and reading some of your book, a certain wonder, did she just feel pressured to say yes? [01:13:23] Yes, of course. Good. But I'm a fan of yours, too. [01:13:27] No, I actually because I am proud of it, but I'm in recovery for codependents, so I actually do. I don't do anything I don't want to. [01:13:34] Do you really you got to you know what. Good, good. [01:13:40] Trying to remember I moved it from one to two. I just. Yeah. Just just a little lower. [01:13:46] Haven't that but I, I don't do anything I don't want to do. Yeah. You're ahead of me on that. [01:13:52] OK, so I don't want to be. [01:13:57] Do you think about your mortality. Yes. It is a big part of how I was able to sort of like kick start my codependents recovery. [01:14:05] My dad passed a couple of years ago and when you have someone close to you in your life die, everything gets real clear in terms of how we're a speck of dust. Who's only here for a certain amount of time? [01:14:17] What do you think is the meaning of it all? Like what? The speck of dust. What what's maybe in your own life? What's the goal, the purpose of your existence? Is there one? [01:14:32] Well, you're exceptionally ambitious. [01:14:34] You've created some incredible things in different disciplines. [01:14:38] It's all just managing our terror because we know we're going to die. So we create and build all these things and rituals and religions and, you know, robots and whatever we need to do to just distract ourselves from imminent rodding. [01:14:51] We're ready. Yeah, we're all die. [01:14:54] You know, I you know, I got very into terror management theory when my dad died and it resonated. It helped me. [01:15:02] And everyone's got their own religion, our sense of purpose or thing that distracts them from the horrors of being human waste management. [01:15:12] Their terror management is basically the idea that since we're the only animal that knows they're going to die, we have to basically distract ourselves with awards and achievements and games and whatever just in order to distract ourselves from the terror we would feel if we really processed the fact that we could not only we are going to die, but also could die at any minute because we're only superficially at the top of the food chain. [01:15:39] And, you know, technically we're the top of the food chain if we have houses and guns and stuff machines. But if me and a lion are in the woods together, I'm most things could kill us. I mean, a bee can kill some people, like something this big can kill a lot of humans. So it's basically just to manage the terror that we all would feel if we were able to really be awake because we're mostly zombies right at the job. [01:16:04] School religion does go to sleep, train through the football. The relationship doesn't mean love. You know, we're kind of just like trudging along like zombies for the most part. [01:16:15] And then I think the fear of death as a motivation. Yes. [01:16:20] Well, I think I speak for a lot of people in saying that I can't wait to see what your terror creates in the in the next few years. [01:16:30] I'm a huge fan, wouldn't we? Thank you so much for talking to us. [01:16:35] Thanks for listening to this conversation with Whitney Cummings and thank you to our presenting sponsor, Cash. Download it and use code likes podcast. You'll get ten dollars and ten dollars will go to first STEM Education nonprofit that inspires hundreds of thousands of young minds to learn and to dream of engineering our future. You enjoy this podcast. Subscribe on YouTube. Give it five stars, an Apple podcast, support and patron or connect with me on Twitter. Thank you for listening and hope to see you next time.

本集資源與出處