第 275 期·中文精讀

裡克·魯賓:傳奇音樂製作人

Rick Rubin: Legendary Music Producer

傳奇製作人談創作中的直覺與剋制,以及如何幫助不同藝術家找到屬於自己的聲音。

官方音訊00:00 / --:--
中文精讀由 AI 基於原始訪談改寫,非官方翻譯,可能存在偏差或錯誤;表述以原音訊與官方文稿為準。說明

Red Hot Chili Peppers 在錄音棚裡剛錄完一段 solo,彈得非常炸。一位成員走過控制室,工程師沒忍住,說了一句,哇,這段 solo 真的很棒。

那位成員停下來,說,請你別說這個。然後走開了。

裡克·魯賓(Rick Rubin)在萊克斯·弗裡德曼(Lex Fridman)的播客裡講這件事,語氣很平靜。他說那個瞬間,錄音棚里正在維持的某種東西被打斷了。樂隊在裡面是為了彼此,為了把這件事做到最深。外面世界的任何一句評價,哪怕是好話,都會把人從裡面拽出來。

我們是為了自己才走那麼深的。一旦有人對另一個人做出認可,那種沉浸就被打破了。(裡克·魯賓)

這句話幾乎概括了他四十年工作的核心。他的角色是守住那個空間,讓裡面的人可以往深處走。守住之後,剩下的事才有機會發生。

音樂把時間和地點縫在一起

訪談從尼采開始。萊克斯引了那句著名的話:沒有音樂,生活將是個錯誤。

魯賓的解釋很樸素。音樂能自動把人帶到某個深度,不用費力。詩歌可以,某些抽象的形式也可以,但都需要你先走幾步。音樂不用。

然後他講了一件很具體的事。他家裡很多人還在費城,開車穿過新澤西的時候聽 Bruce Springsteen,聽《I'm On Fire》,會突然情緒上來。那首歌的吉他不是掃弦,是分解撥的,帶一點鄉村味,幾乎有點像 Johnny Cash。歌詞寫的是一個得不到的女人,她已婚,或者跟別人在一起。這類歌太多了。那段吉他的幽魂感,配上開車穿過新澤西這件事,就成了別的東西。

"我覺得每個人一生中都愛過一個新澤西女孩。"他說完自己補了一句,"我也沒有,但我就是有這種感覺。"

音樂和時間、地點的繫結,在魯賓這裡是物理層面的事,不只是修辭。

他自己也有反向的經驗。在紐約長大,Eagles 的歌對他沒什麼感覺,ZZ Top 也是。後來他開始在加州待著,開車穿過 Laurel Canyon,Eagles 突然就對了,他開始主動聽。

德州的藍調是另一個例子。Stevie Ray Vaughan 的《Texas Flood》,你聽的時候不需要知道德州長什麼樣。等你真的到了那兒,會有一種熟悉感,那個地方不再陌生。音樂提前給了你一副眼鏡。

車裡是一個神聖的空間

萊克斯研究自動駕駛,所以他問了一個有點殘忍的問題:當車不再是美國人生活的中心,會失去什麼?

魯賓的回答裡有一個詞,sacred place,神聖的地方。

一個人開車的時候,車是心理醫生的診室。你可以對別的司機生氣,然後坐在自己的憤怒裡,沒人打擾。長途路上放一首歌,記憶會一段一段翻上來,心碎的,美好的,全都在那個狹窄的空間裡發生。

開車還有另一個功能。

你必須保持足夠的注意力不至於撞車,但這件事佔用的心智非常少,剩下的部分可以去做別的。魯賓說,如果手上有一件輕微的事佔著,更有創造力的一面反而被放出來了。他有點羨慕那些在畫畫裡找到這種感覺的人。你在塗色,很慢,很安靜,只需要一小部分腦子,剩下的部分可以去聽。

萊克斯說的是跑步。

他的描述很實在。前幾英里全是身體在抗議,你太胖了,你走形了,你在變老。然後這層聲音散了,第二層聲音進來,那些催債一樣的念頭,你該做的事沒做,你在違背承諾。到第四英里左右,這些東西也沒了。你就跑,慢慢地跑,然後可以想了。設計、程式結構、人生裡的大決定,都在這個時候浮上來。

魯賓小時候用牙籤搭橋。那是一件極其誠實的工作,因為最後要壓重物測試,橋好不好,一壓就知道。為了讓膠水起作用,要把木頭削到最薄再粘起來。做拱橋要彎木頭,是另一套手藝。一座好橋能承受自身重量的幾千倍,然後到某個點,它會炸開。做得好的時候,它整體崩掉,碎片飛得到處都是,你找不到某個沒預料到的薄弱處開始裂開的痕跡。

幾百個小時的工作,在你眼前炸掉。除了走到那一步的過程,什麼都不剩。

那些被看見跳舞的人

尼采還有一句話,萊克斯很喜歡:那些被看見跳舞的人,被聽不見音樂的人當作瘋子。

他問魯賓,你覺得自己瘋過嗎?還是說瘋的是別人,你才是清醒的那個。

魯賓的回答很誠實,也很難。他說他覺得自己不一樣,但很難判斷是哪一邊瘋了。他確實遇到過能互相懂的人,某些氣質的藝術家,相處起來像能接住對方沒說完的半句話,看世界的方式一致,笑點也一致。

但這件事不是必需的。

他用教練做比喻。一個好教練可以把自己的東西帶給任何有天賦的人,幫他們找到路。有時候對的人碰上了對的人,就成了。有時候就是錯配。

萊克斯提到了電影《爆裂鼓手》(Whiplash)。那個老師用近乎虐待的方式逼學生成長。

魯賓說他看過,記不太清了,但他不認同那種路徑。他也承認,有些人就是這麼工作的,那也行。藝術裡沒有正確答案,所有人都在做實驗找路。他自己沒有一套固定的方法,每一個專案都是空著進去的,聽藝術家彈什麼、說什麼,從他們描述的目標裡找出最好的到達方式。

他提到了禪宗傳統裡的"兇老師"(mean roshi),你做錯了,會有身體上的動作,這是傳承裡的一部分,被認為就是這樣教的。他不來自那個傳承。他的方式是合作,從一開始就說好,任何一方不喜歡正在發生的東西,就說出來,一直做到所有人都真的滿意為止。做出來的東西藝術家喜歡他不喜歡,或者他喜歡藝術家不喜歡,都說明走得還不夠遠。

萊克斯追問了一句,那些毀滅型的和那些追求幸福的人,其實來自同一個傳承,我們都從魚來的。魯賓接住了這個玩笑,說所以深處那些東西你身上也有,只是還沒被啟用。

怎麼聽一個人

萊克斯問得很直接。你怎麼聽一個人?你剛見到一個人的時候,腦子裡在做什麼分析?

魯賓說,先清空。

不帶任何預設立場,真的去聽。他說如果他問一個問題,他不想在對方說話的時候有任何反應發生。他的目標不是形成一個觀點,是理解。如果對方說了一句讓他被觸動的話,他不會去挑戰,他會問,你是怎麼走到那兒的?

從好奇出發,人就會浮出來。有時候靠提問,有時候只是待在一起,慢慢就知道了。

知道了之後呢?怎麼把最好的東西帶出來?

他說,試錯。永遠是試錯。

但試錯有一個前提,在他們的錄音棚裡是一條協議:任何人提出的任何想法,都要真的做出來聽一遍。因為一件事被描述出來的時候,聽的人必須在腦子裡把它想象出來,而你的想象和我的想象完全不是一回事。語言說出來,兩個人在各自腦子裡播放了不同的版本,等真的做出來,差異本身就成了一次小小的共同發現。

他說很多人在一個房間裡合作的時候,一個人提議,另一個人說這聽起來不太行,然後就過去了。每一次都真的試一遍,才會看到,哦,這跟我想的完全不一樣。他自己也經常這樣,別人提一個想法,他覺得聽著很糟,試一下,十次裡有八次出來的東西和想象完全不同,而且很好。

然後他說了一句關鍵的話:不能有自尊心摻進來。如果你腦子裡覺得這是個壞主意,做出來發現很好,不能因為面子而彆扭。如果所有人都在為了讓東西變好而在這兒,就沒有別的了,也不該有邊界。

簡單是砍出來的結果

聊到 Jay Z 的《99 Problems》,有一段錄音棚的影片,魯賓建議用無伴奏開場,前面什麼都沒有,只有聲音。

這個選擇放在當時,很多人會覺得是壞主意。

魯賓說,追求簡單這件事從他做第一張唱片就開始了。他當時給自己寫的署名是 reduced by,而不是 produced by,就是因為這個。那會兒純粹是本能,做了這麼多年之後,他有了更清楚的解釋。

解釋分兩層。

聲音層面:元素越少,每一個元素越聽得清,能留給它們的空間越多,你能聽出它們的個性。

他打了一個特別好的比方。如果你錄十個人彈同一段吉他,最後聽起來就是"吉他"。如果你錄一個人彈,聽起來是"一個人在彈吉他"。這兩件事不一樣。

錄音棚裡有一種常見的直覺,加層,加厚,讓它聽起來更大。很多時候正好相反,加得越多,整體越小。這種東西光靠想是想不明白的,只能在實踐裡看。

愛因斯坦那句話,儘可能簡單,但不能更簡單。魯賓說難的是知道在哪兒停下來。

他講了一個方法,叫"無情的剪輯"(ruthless edit)。錄了二十五首歌,專輯打算收十首。不要挑最喜歡的十首,先挑出沒有它就活不下去的那五六首。直接跳過目標,走到真正的心臟位置,然後再問,往這個核心里加什麼會讓它更好而不是更糟。

順序反過來,整個心態就變了。你從做加法變成從做減法裡出來,而且經常會發現,沒什麼可加的。有時候事情到那個真正的核心,就是一個小而緊的東西,加任何東西都是稀釋。

Hurt:一首詩塞進一個七十歲老人的嘴裡

萊克斯說,如果只能選一首,他會選 Johnny Cash 的《Hurt》。

那首歌的分量,來自一個走到生命盡頭的人,用他正在變化的聲音,把一首年輕人在二十幾歲寫的詞唸了出來。開頭那句"今天我傷害了自己,看看還能不能感覺到疼",是流行音樂裡最好的開場句之一。這些話從 Trent Reznor 嘴裡出來和從 Johnny Cash 嘴裡出來,是兩種完全不同的東西。

魯賓講了這個決定是怎麼做出來的。

那個階段,他和 Cash 互相寄 CD,各自挑二三十首歌,寄給對方聽。他寄的那批裡就有《Hurt》,Cash 沒反應。按他們的慣例,沒反應就不回頭了。他又寄了一次,把這首歌放在第一首。後來通電話,Cash 還是沒提。魯賓說,你聽一下第一首,我真的覺得那首可以。

他看中的只有詞。

如果把旋律忘掉,把 Nine Inch Nails 的原版忘掉,把這首歌當成一首詩來讀,然後想象一個七十歲的老人讀它。那就成立了。這個判斷在當時幾乎是孤例,魯賓說全世界能看到這一層的人很少,包括 Cash 自己一開始也沒看到。

然後是製作。

基本軌在魯賓家的客廳錄的。兩把吉他,可能三把,Smokey Hormel、Matt Sweeney、Mike Campbell。Benmont Tench 在客廳裡彈鋼琴。Cash 跟著基本軌唱,之後再唱幾遍,把人聲拼出來。然後一點一點搭戲劇性。

歌的結尾音樂變得很響,但做得很微妙,你的耳朵被人聲佔著,不會特別注意後面在發生什麼,可它一直在往上走,最後甚至失真了,壓過來,成為情緒的一部分。那裡有一種接近憤怒和挫敗的東西。而 Cash 的聲音一直是乾淨的,簡單得不可思議。

一個年輕人的詞,配上一位老人的聲音、心臟和頭腦。萊克斯說這個組合本身就是整件事的力量所在。

年輕人寫得絕望,老人寫得有光

萊克斯順著這個往下問。年輕人的悲傷和老人的悲傷,質地不一樣。

魯賓說,年輕人寫悲傷的歌,更願意走到無望的地方去,因為他們前面還有大把時間。年長的藝術家傾向於看光明的一面,這也是一種年老的智慧,是一種更現實的位置。

他舉了 Tom Waits。二十三歲寫出《Martha》,寫的是一個上了年紀的男人給三十年前愛過的女人打電話,兩個人都已經各自成家,他們意識到愛還在,本來可以是另一種人生,另一個世界。《I Want You》更短,不到一分鐘,來來回回就是"我要你",然後哼了二十秒。簡單到那個程度需要勇氣。

年輕的時候寫這樣的東西,看起來反而更容易走到底,因為不著急。越到後面,越傾向於給一個出口。

The Beatles 也是這樣。中後期的詞已經很重了,可他們那會兒才二十出頭。從好玩到黑暗,整個旅程在幾年內就走完了。

歌詞曾經很長時間不重要

這一點很多人會意外。魯賓說,有很長一段時間,歌詞在他這裡幾乎不算什麼。

最早期他更關注節奏。歌詞不好他會知道,但那不是驅動力。《Fight for Your Right》那種歌,他覺得詞寫得好玩,但重要的部分在於那種接近玩鬧的調子,詞本身並不承擔嚴肅的重量。

後來旋律變得重要,這在最開始是沒有的。再後來,歌詞才慢慢變得重要。他說自己被什麼吸引,這件事一直在變。

他還說了一個很有意思的觀察:沒有鼓的時候,歌詞會顯得更重要。同一段話,配著節奏說出來和清唱出來,重量不一樣。

這也是為什麼阿卡貝拉版本常常讓人重新認識一個歌手。聽到 Marvin Gaye 清唱的時候,你才意識到那個聲音本身有多強。《What's Going On》整張專輯,很多地方你都可以把樂器全部撤掉,只留人聲,依然成立。同理還有《Hurt》,聽起來像人在房間裡,不像在唱歌,像剛剛被惹怒,怒氣還沒散。

魯賓說,錄音棚能做的唯一一件事,就是讓開,別把它弄壞。偉大的歌手之所以聽起來偉大,跟錄音棚裡發生了什麼關係不大。是那個人本來就帶著這個。

一個蘇聯少年聽到的那首歌

萊克斯講了自己的故事。他生在蘇聯,那時候有些樂隊是進不來的,但會滲進來,盜版磁帶在小圈子裡流傳,然後佔領一整代年輕人。金屬這邊是 Metallica 和 Iron Maiden,另一邊是 Beastie Boys。他記得聽到《Fight for Your Right》的那一刻,感覺是,原來美國就是你可以對權威說滾蛋。反叛,自由。

他大概是在發行幾年之後才聽到的,因為要繞過很多東西才能到手。但那首歌對他個人意義重大。而魯賓當時做這首歌的時候,根本沒想過這些。他只是在給朋友們做好玩的歌,沒有任何期待,沒人覺得會有人喜歡。

萊克斯說他當時甚至沒完全聽懂歌詞,那歌詞本來也很胡鬧。但就是那種感覺。如果這件事被允許,那麼什麼都被允許。

魯賓說,即使在他們自己看來,那也是諷刺的,是故意做到過頭的,目的就是讓彼此笑。他們沒想表達什麼觀點,就是想讓對方笑。

萊克斯問,那個做這張唱片的人,和今天的你差多遠?

魯賓說不太遠。他喜歡讓自己笑的東西,喜歡荒誕的東西,還是同一個人。他不覺得今天會做那樣的唱片,但他理解當時為什麼做。如果今天有一個合適的藝術家,做一件荒誕的事能給出那種感覺,那也說得通。

他講了一件最近的事。在哥斯大黎加碰到一個很久沒見的人,是紐約時期認識的,聊了兩個小時,對方說,你跟那時候一模一樣。

七八個醫生和一顆對的藥

訪談在這裡拐進了一段很私人的內容。

魯賓說他人生中有過一次抑鬱。觸發點很小,工作上一件不重要的事,有人說了句話。換任何一個人聽到,反應就是行,下週再處理。但他接收的方式不一樣,感覺腳下的地毯被抽走了。即使那個具體問題後來解決了,某種東西還是被擊穿了,讓他處在一種從未有過的脆弱裡,然後一路往下。

他怎麼出來的?

他試了很多。一開始是替代療法,一週見七八個醫生或治療師,針灸、談話治療、草藥,所有能想到的方式都試了,很長一段時間沒有效果。

他說自己不太吃西藥,不喝酒不嗑藥。後來找到一個精神藥理學家,同時是個靈媒。他解釋這件事的邏輯很好玩:因為她是靈媒,他才願意去看她。他可以接受一個靈媒,但接受不了一個精神藥理學家。靈媒這個身份讓她進入了他的世界觀。

她推薦了抗抑鬱藥。第一晚就出了大問題。然後是一段漫長而痛苦的尋找,每一種藥都讓他難受,五六個月之後才找到對的那一種。他吃了大概半年到一年,慢慢減掉,好了。幾年後又有一次類似的事,他又短期吃了一下,出來了,之後再沒需要過。

萊克斯問,你能不能回頭看清觸發點?

他說,可能是因為成長的方式,他以前沒有太多需要處理爭議的經驗,真正被挑戰的時候,手上沒有工具。

商業是那個踩下去的聲音

這段抑鬱是工作引起的,話題自然轉到了商業和藝術的關係。

萊克斯說,藝術和音樂讓人難過的一點是,它總是和商業纏在一起。做商業的人和做東西的人貼得太近,有時候會毀掉一個很脆弱的心和靈魂。他舉了蘋果的 Jony Ive,一個想法剛出來的時候極其脆弱,只敢給一小圈設計團隊看,因為怕被弄壞。

魯賓說,這是他的主要工作之一,把那些聲音擋在藝術家外面。

那些人在你這一邊,但他們不做東西。他們做的是他們那部分,他們的興奮點在你把東西交出來之後。可是如果藝術沒有以正確的方式發生,就沒有東西可賣。藝術不會按季度來。

萊克斯把這個模式推到了音樂之外。MIT 也是這樣,一邊是行政,一邊是教授和學生。學生有瘋狂的想法,會走到岔路上,會被某些東西點燃,然後行政會用各種方式設欄杆,他們覺得沒有傷害誰,其實傷害很大。他說自己在 MIT 有相當多的槓桿,即使這樣也會收到那種壓力:小心一點,我們真的希望你的職業生涯成功。這種壓力對一個做創作的人來說是致命的。

魯賓補了另一面。成功也有它的坑。身邊所有人都在說你的每個決定都很棒,久了就沒有東西可以撞了,失去了現實感。所以兩頭都重要:把噪音擋在外面,同時留一小圈你尊重的人,能對你說,我不確定這個有那麼好。你可以回答我不在乎你怎麼想,但聽到這句話本身是有用的。

前提是那句話來自愛,來自智慧。不是來自恐懼,不是來自"這個聽起來不如你上一張賣得好"。

每個人都是一根天線

聊到世界的複雜性,魯賓說他相信一切皆有可能。如果要在實用資訊裡挑一個可信的來源,他會選存續了幾千年的東西。不是因為古老就一定對,是因為它被測試過。

他對現代有一種警惕,是那種傲慢。每個時代都覺得自己解決了所有問題,父母都是傻子。可面對人體或者人心這麼複雜的東西,必須極其小心。

我們對任何事情的瞭解,都接近於零。如果我們接受這種"不知道",這輩子會過得更健康。(裡克·魯賓)

萊克斯問,你會不會覺得自己只是一個肉做的載體,在從別的地方接收想法?

他說百分之百。

他的解釋是這樣的:想法在準備好的時候會透過某個人出來,天線好的人能接到訊號。你一定有過這種經歷,你想到一個點子沒去做,過一陣子別人做了。不是他偷了你的想法,是那個想法的時間到了,你不做,別人會做。它被某個源頭廣播出來,誰接到算誰的。

他不太認為人有那麼特殊。街上走著的是一根一根不同型號的天線。這跟理查德·道金斯的迷因有點像,想法是生物,借用我們的大腦繁殖、篩選、競爭、演化。人類很想守住自己身體和心智的獨特性,真正在演化的可能是想法本身。

萊克斯把這個問題推到了個人層面。一個年輕人怎麼知道自己這根天線的規格?這輩子該做什麼?

魯賓說,他很幸運,這件事找上了他。他一開始根本不知道有製作人這個職業。

他給了一個練習:想象你可以活一千次,有無數條軌跡,挑出那條能讓你在這個世界上創造出最美的東西、活得最美的軌跡。想清楚它是什麼。

同時要意識到,你可以做任何事。社會會推著你順從。他自己也曾經有過一套順從的方式,以為就該照著走,到二十幾歲才反應過來,你不必聽老師的,不必聽父母的,不必聽社會的。他現在還穿著類似制服的衣服,跟成功沒有關係,那是一種從世界裡躲起來的辦法。他說自己是個內向的人,是個獨來獨往的人。

318 磅那一年

有一段時間他被卡在一個奇怪的商業處境裡,沒法舒展。他把創造力轉向了自己,減了很多重量,整個人變了。這也是一次創作。

他說那不是一個有意的創作行為,就是有一堆能量,然後一連串的事發生了。

最重的時候他 318 磅。他這輩子基本沒動過,一直躺在沙發上做音樂。然後他讀了一本書,寫一個叫 Stu Mittleman 的跑者,十一天跑了一千英里。他的反應是,我走到街角都喘,另一個人十一天能跑一千英里,那我顯然拿著錯的資訊,我做的某件事肯定不對。

他去聯絡了書裡提到的 Phil Maffetone。這個人很有意思,專注於心率訓練,四十年前就在講低碳、近似原始人飲食、生酮這些東西。對一個想健康、想運動、想真正有表現的人來說,他算是最早的一批。

Maffetone 給他的東西,本質上是允許他跑得更慢。他第一次意識到,只要慢下來,他能跑很遠。然後他真的愛上了跑步。對他來說,跑步的樂趣出現在長距離裡。

萊克斯提到《天生就會跑》(Born to Run),說跑步這件事,每個人都有自己的旅程,超馬那種東西會把一個人徹底改掉。他自己對超馬是有點怕的,因為他有意地去做那些"做完之後不再是同一個人"的選擇。

對話最好的狀態是忘掉攝像機

魯賓做過播客(Broken Record),做過和 Paul McCartney 的紀錄片(《McCartney 3,2,1》),也做過大量的對話。萊克斯問他從中學到了什麼。

他說,最好是感覺不到這件事在發生。

他走進這個房間,看到攝像機在架設,就知道對話的質量會受影響。最好的版本是看不到機器,看不到技術,就是兩個人坐在這張桌子邊說話。如果必要,事先戴好麥可以,但之後就只是說話,房間裡沒有別人。

他把這個和錄音棚裡的"紅燈熱"(red light fever)聯絡起來。樂手排練的時候彈得特別好,磁帶一轉起來就不行了。所有人都多多少少是這樣。

拍 McCartney 那部片子的時候,房間全黑,所有工作人員穿黑衣服,燈光打得讓機器消失在人的視野裡。

那部片子裡有十二到二十個工作人員在同一個房間,但對話開始三分鐘之後,Paul 和他就是屋子裡僅有的兩個人。偶爾會有一點聲音進來,會顯得突兀。所有人不許穿鞋,因為鞋跟地板的聲音會破壞那個空間。

魯賓說,錄音棚裡也一樣。通常只有他和一個工程師,工程師負責讓機器運轉。如果房間裡多了一個純粹在看的人,性質就變了。那個人在的時候,演奏不再是這個人正在內部感受著什麼、他們在把它捕捉下來,而變成了這個人在為某個人表演。

萊克斯提了一個反方向的觀察。他自己有時候很糾結這件事。今天房間裡有個 Evan,是他的製作人,也是魯賓的粉絲,聽到精彩的地方會點頭,會興奮。那種反應對說話的人是有推動的。有人跟你一起興奮,那是另一回事。

魯賓承認這一點。有些人就是在觀眾面前才活起來的。但他自己要的是儘可能遠離表演。他要的是那個東西發生。

一句讚美為什麼是破壞

Red Hot Chili Peppers 那個故事的另一面,是魯賓講它的時候的語氣。他沒有責怪那個工程師。他說,那種"哇,太棒了"的話,會提醒你外面還有一個世界。那個人本來在火堆邊跟大家一起跳,一句話把他拽到了火堆外面。

萊克斯接著往下想。那作為聽眾,有沒有辦法走進那個內部世界?有。那就意味著你說什麼很重要,你怎麼看很重要。空泛的讚美,哪怕用詞不空泛,語氣上仍然帶著外部世界的腔調。而你真正該做的,是加入那個圍著火跳舞的動作裡。

這段話放在任何協作場景裡都成立。團隊裡有人做出一個東西,最沒用的反饋就是"太厲害了"。它傳達了態度,沒有傳達任何可以繼續往前走的資訊,而且它把人從工作狀態裡叫了出來,要求他對你的態度作出回應。

No Hard Feelings:一首歌的現場

魯賓講了另一段錄音,The Avett Brothers 的《No Hard Feelings》。他是後來看影片才意識到當時發生了什麼。

歌詞是這樣的:等我的身體再也撐不住我,它終於放我走。等我的腳再也走不動,我會準備好。當我放下恐懼、希望和懷疑的時候,我的手會穩嗎。我手指上的戒指,我房子的鑰匙。沒有怨氣。

然後是那句,主知道這些東西對誰有過什麼好處,它們讓我害怕,讓我冷,明明有那麼多可以擁有,還有更多。

最後一段是,我一生所知的愛,我握著它穿過黑夜,直直走向光。沒有怨氣。在燃燒的天空下,我終於明白為什麼,為什麼這件事對你我重要,說出口,並且真的這麼想。

人生是孤獨的,孤獨的。對我已經夠好了。我沒有敵人。

魯賓說,那首歌錄的時候,整個屋子裡的狀態是對的。他沒有多解釋。這一段在訪談裡出現得很安靜,跟前面的 Chili Peppers 故事形成了對照:一個空間被打斷,一個空間完整地閉合起來,一群人一起走到了某個地方。

把自己當成一臺錄音機

萊克斯追問傾聽的技術細節。魯賓的說法是,聽的時候不去想接下來要說什麼,不去想自己的觀點,基本上把自己當成一臺錄音機,只接收進來的東西。

接收之後才處理資訊,而且儘量不讓自己的既有信念影響處理的結果。

他舉了一個很具體的原則。如果對方說了一句讓他不太舒服的話,他不會去反駁。他會問,你是怎麼找到這個的?你是怎麼走到那個位置的?從好奇出發。

目標不是形成判斷,是理解一個人。透過提問可以到達,透過只是待在一起也可以到達。

然後是下一步,怎麼把最好的東西從這個人身上帶出來。魯賓說,試錯,一直是試錯。

但他們有一條不成為規則的規則:任何人提出任何想法,都必須真的做一遍。因為語言在傳遞的時候會失真。你說出一個想法,對方必須在想象裡把它構建出來,而他的想象和你的想象完全是兩件事。等到真的做出來,看到的差異或者重合,會變成兩個人共同的、小小的發現。

他說很多房間裡不是這樣運作的。一個人提議,另一個人說聽著不太行,這事就過去了。而真正試一次的成本很低,收穫往往是,完全不是我想的那樣,而且很好。

他補了一句,這時候不能有自尊心。你腦子裡判定這是個壞主意,做出來發現很好,不能因為面子而不舒服。如果所有人都在為了讓東西變好而在這兒,就沒有別的了。

如果只能保留一張唱片給外星人

萊克斯把話題拉回了那個榜單。Rolling Stone 的五百張最偉大專輯,第一名是 Marvin Gaye 的《What's Going On》。他放了一段,然後問魯賓怎麼看這個選擇。

魯賓的第一反應是,藝術裡沒有能成立的度量。你可以給東西打數字,但這是在比較蘋果和桃子,這件事本身不公平。

然後他給了一個更有意思的框架:如果外星人來了,你只能保留一張唱片來代表人類這個物種,你選哪張?這是個非常私人的決定。你選你的,我選我的。

萊克斯說他會在 Beatles 和 Beach Boys 之間選 Beatles。

魯賓沒有正面接。他說《What's Going On》的力量在於,如果你只聽人聲,會發現那個聲音本身足夠撐住整首歌。整張專輯裡有很多地方,樂器全部撤掉,只留人聲也成立。那種靈魂的重量不依賴編曲。

然後他問,你聽過 Detroit mix 嗎?

萊克斯說沒有。魯賓讓他放。

放出來之後,混響更遠,聲音像從房間的四面湧過來,還有更多層次的人聲,是 Marvin Gaye 自己疊的,聽起來像一群人在唱,不是一個聲音。整個氛圍像一場聚會,一群人在同一個房間裡玩音樂。而正式發行的版本更像一次錄音。

魯賓說,這是阿卡貝拉的反面。它靠的是層層疊疊,靠的是那種"這兒不是錄音棚,這是一場派對"的感覺。

他還提了一個細節,這張專輯是 Marvin Gaye 自己製作的。這在當時的 Motown 並不尋常。

Pet Sounds 的第一首

聊到 Beach Boys,萊克斯說他一直沒能真正進入《God Only Knows》,但《Pet Sounds》的第一首《Wouldn't It Be Nice》他能進去。他問能不能放一下,魯賓說放。

那首歌的前奏一出來,是很明亮的和聲,很甜。歌詞說的是,如果我們能早點睡,一起醒來,那該多好。然後緊接著,但我們現在還不行。

魯賓說,這就是他們的路數。用歡快的殼子包著心碎。你先被打動,然後才發現裡面是空的、是缺的。

萊克斯說這跟 George Harrison 的《While My Guitar Gently Weeps》是同一類東西。他每次被問最喜歡的 Beatles 歌,答案會隨著日子不同而變化,但他經常回到這一首。

魯賓沒有接這個具體的判斷,他把話題放到了更大的地方。Beatles 的歌有幾大類,那首屬於其中一類,那種憂傷的情歌,或者叫民謠式的慢歌。《Yesterday》《Let It Be》也在這一片區域裡。它們的共同點是,不解釋,不煽情,只把那件事擺在那兒。

七萬人的現場

萊克斯問,跟 Paul McCartney 相處那麼長時間,作為一個創作者、一個音樂人,你有什麼變化?

魯賓說,你跟一個英雄待在一起,會發現對方就是個普通人,這會幫你看清很多事的比例。

然後他講了自己第一次看 McCartney 現場。體育場,七萬人。他開始彈,魯賓開始哭。他自己都覺得難以置信,在七萬人的場子裡,他還是覺得難以置信,這個人真的在這個地球上走過,我跟他處在同一個空間裡,他就是寫那首歌、彈那段旋律的人,現在他就在這兒,彈給我們聽。

他說那是一種壓倒性的感受。

萊克斯把這個問題問得更深了一層。這種時刻,是啟發,還是一種失落?你長期喜歡一個人,見到他,發現他就是個普通人,這裡有兩層:一層是很鼓舞,一個普通人類也能做出這麼美的東西;另一層是某種失落,你本來暗暗希望身邊走著的真的是神。

魯賓的回答偏向前者,但他說得很有意思。那更像一種安慰。知道還有更大的魚,自己只是條小魚,還有更大的魚會照看這片海。

接著他立刻推翻了這個說法的一半。

他說我們每個人都有能力成為大魚。他不認為存在什麼特殊的人。這個判斷放在他身上有點奇怪,因為他合作過的藝術家名單長到幾乎不真實。正因為他見過那麼多被當成神的人怎麼工作、怎麼犯錯、怎麼害怕,這個判斷才更有分量。

我不認為有特殊的人。我真心不這麼認為。(裡克·魯賓)

關於名聲、西裝和躲起來

萊克斯問他,名聲有沒有影響到你?你有沒有在某個時刻拔掉了插頭?

魯賓說他一直有點抽離,不覺得自己屬於任何一個系統。他知道出門的時候有人會上來說好聽的話,這很好,也就到這兒了。

萊克斯追問,那它會不會影響你獨處時的思考?

魯賓說,不能讓它影響。你之所以是你,你之所以能走到今天,是因為你對自己誠實。到了那個位置再開始改變、去迎合別人對你的期待,這件事說不通。

然後萊克斯問到了衣服。長期穿類似西裝的東西,是對某種身份的表達嗎?

魯賓說,很長一段時間是某種西裝。最近因為搬去德州,也變了。他解釋得很坦白:我是個獨來獨往的人,我是個內向的人。穿成那樣,一部分是從世界裡躲起來。他不想讓名聲、被認出來、錢這些事情成為動機。

萊克斯說了自己那一面。他不穿西裝,因為他的同行和圈子裡,西裝是某種成功符號,一種順從的符號。所以他穿別的,那對他來說反而是一種反叛。他還說,做這種"傻乎乎的播客"也是同一類事。

他承認這不容易。他一直覺得自己像一隻找腿的小鹿,很愛人類,也覺得自己挺傻的,所以別人說該這樣該那樣的時候,是會有壓力的。要不聽別人的建議,同時又保持脆弱和開放,這件事很難。你很容易變成"我總是對的",硬起來,站住。如果你想跟人連線,想把心掛在袖子上,你就要聽他們說,這就是雙刃劍。那種疼,如果不讓它毀掉你,是可以長出東西來的。

結尾:把方法拿走

整場對話裡,魯賓沒有給過一條規則。他反覆說的只有幾件事:清空、真的聽、每個想法都試一遍、把噪音擋在外面、在能停的地方停下來。

這些聽起來像心態,其實都是可以立刻執行的動作。

  • 下次開會或者協作,任何人的任何想法,都真的做一遍再評價。語言傳遞會失真,你腦子裡的版本和對方腦子裡的版本不是一回事。試的成本很低,誤判的成本很高。
  • 錄了二十五個版本、寫了三十稿,不要挑最喜歡的十個。先挑出沒有

    它就活不下去的那五六首,把它們擺回桌上,再問往這個核心里加什麼會讓它更好。順序反過來,你會砍掉很多原本捨不得的東西。

  • 把"太厲害了"從你的反饋裡刪掉。換成具體的一句:這裡我以為會往那邊走,你沒有,我被打斷了。具體的反饋把人留在工作狀態裡,空泛的讚美把人叫出來,還要求他對你的態度作出回應。
  • 聽人說話的時候,不要在心裡準備反駁。遇到讓你不舒服的觀點,先問一句你是怎麼走到那兒的。你的目標不是形成判斷,是理解這個人怎麼想。理解到位之後,判斷往往就不需要了。
  • 找一個佔用心智很少的重複動作,跑步、走路、洗碗、開車。讓它佔據你百分之二十的注意力,剩下的百分之八十會開始處理真正難的問題。前二十分鐘會很難受,先是身體抗議,然後是待辦事項在腦子裡催債,撐過去。
  • 如果你在一個環節上說了算,去當那個擋噪音的人。寫東西的人、做產品的人、帶團隊的人,身邊總有一群站在你這邊但不做東西的人,他們的時間表和你的不一樣。擋住他們不等於不聽勸,留下來的是那一小圈能從愛和判斷出發說"這個還不夠好"的人。
  • 每個新專案都空著進去。不帶著上一個專案的成功經驗,不帶著"我知道什麼是對的"。這條最難,因為經驗會偽裝成判斷力,而魯賓做了四十年,還在說自己對每個專案都一無所知。

他講自己的方式很特別。他不解釋天才,不解釋靈感,也不解釋為什麼某首歌成了。他反覆說的是同一件事:我們對任何事的瞭解都接近於零。

這句話聽起來像放棄,其實不是。它說的是,把判斷推遲到聽見之後。你自己腦子裡那個"這不行"的結論,八成是在還沒聽見之前就下了。真正的專業,很多時候表現為忍得住不下結論。

再往回看那個錄音棚裡的瞬間。工程師說了一句真心話,一句誰聽都覺得是好話的話,然後整個空間就散了。這件事的殘酷在於,它沒有壞人。工程師喜歡那段 solo,他想表達。樂隊成員只想待在裡面,他也只是想讓那個東西繼續。

兩邊都沒有錯,衝突還是發生了。所以魯賓的工作才不只是技術活。他要判斷什麼時候該說話,什麼時候該閉嘴,什麼時候該把一個想法真的做出來聽一遍,什麼時候該承認自己想錯了。這些判斷沒法寫成手冊,只能在一次次失敗裡校準。

他給萊克斯講牙籤橋的時候說,幾百個小時的工作在你眼前炸掉,除了走到那一步的過程,什麼都不剩。

做東西這件事大概就是這樣。橋會炸,唱片會做完然後被忘掉,一首歌可能寄了兩次對方還是沒反應。真正留下來的東西,是你在那個過程裡學會的怎麼聽、怎麼試、怎麼在正確的地方停下來。

這些東西不能傳授,只能自己走一遍。

文稿來自公開 Kaggle 資料集(rajneesh231/lex-fridman-podcast-transcript),為早期自動轉錄存檔,可能存在識別錯誤。
There are no right answers for anything involved in art. We're all trying experiments to find a way. And even for the things that I work on, I don't have a set way that I do anything. I come to every project blank. Maybe you're just a meat vehicle and you're channeling ideas from somewhere else. I believe we know close to nothing, close to nothing, about anything. If we embrace that not knowing, we'll have a healthier experience going through life. The following is a conversation with Rick Rubin, one of the greatest music producers of all time, known for bringing the best out of anyone he works with, no matter the genre of music or even the medium of art, or just the medium of creating something beautiful in this world. And the list of musicians he produced includes many, many, many of the greats over the past 40 years, including the Beastie Boys, Eminem, Metallica, LL Cool J, Kanye West, Slayer, Tom Petty, Johnny Cash, Dixie Chicks, Aerosmith, Adele, Danzig, Red Hot Chili Peppers, System of a Down, Jay Z, Black Sabbath. I can keep going for a very long time here. Most importantly, Rick is just an amazing human being. We became fast friends, which is surreal to say, and is just an incredible honor. I felt truly heard as a person when I spent the day with him eating some delicious Texas barbecue, talking about life, about music, about art, about beauty. This was a conversation and experience I will never forget. This is the Lex Friedman podcast. To support it, please check out our sponsors in the description. And now, dear friends, here's Rick Rubin. Are you nervous? I'm not shaky, but I would say I feel uneasy. And I feel like the sooner we start talking, the more relaxed we'll get. Yeah. Well, maybe we should sit in this moment and enjoy the nervousness of it. Let me start with Nietzsche. He said, without music, life would be a mistake. What do you think he means by that? Let's talk some philosophy. Let's try to analyze Friedrich Nietzsche from a century ago. It seems like music has the ability to bring us so much depth in our soul that's hard to access any other way. And without it, there would be a loss beyond the pleasure of it. Feels like it's a window into something else. Something that no other medium can express quite the same way. I would say not as automatically. Something about music can do it automatically. Maybe poetry or maybe certain abstract forms can get us there. But there's something about music that really can get us there quickly. But it's also the time, the place, the history. There's something about, like a lot of my family's still in Philly, there's something about driving through Jersey and listening to Bruce Springsteen. And then you just, I'll get emotional. Like listening to I'm On Fire. That like, one of my favorite Bruce Springsteen songs, there's a haunting kind of strumming to it. It's not a strumming, it's actually picked. It has a country feel to it, almost like a Johnny Cash feel actually. And it, I don't know, makes me feel, so for people who don't know, I'm On Fire. That song is, I guess, a love song to a woman that you can't have because she's married or she's with somebody else, which I guess is quite a lot of love songs. But there's something about the haunting nature of the guitar and then it has to be driving through Jersey. And I feel like everyone has fallen in love with a Jersey girl at one point in their life. I don't know if that's true for her, but I feel like that. I haven't either, but I just feel like that. There's something about Bruce Springsteen is like, yeah, I've been there. And that just takes you to a place of emotion that you just, that captures love, that captures longing, that captures the heartbreak of just the way time flows in life and the fact that it's finite and just all of that in a single simple song. What else can capture that? Yeah, I don't know. But it's true that there's a connection both between time and place and music. And I, certain music growing up on the East Coast didn't really resonate with me until I spent time on the West Coast. Eagles being an example. When I lived in New York, the Eagles didn't really speak to me. ZZ Top didn't really speak to me. And then when I started spending time in California and driving through Laurel Canyon, all of a sudden the music of the Eagles felt appropriate somehow. And I started listening to it more. Got it. So not until you went out West can you understand the sounds of the West. So it's really like New York has a sound. What other places have a sound in the United States? I think every place does. And that said, sometimes we can get an experience through music of a place. Like we can resonate with the music and not understand why. And then maybe when we go to the place where it was created, it's almost like we have a knowingness of that place. It's not a strange place anymore. Yeah, Stevie Ray Vaughan with blues and Texas blues. You can just listen to Texas Flood and just, again, this is like a woman you're missing, a broken heart and somehow that connects to the place. The Eagles, what song with the Eagles connects with you? Are we talking about like Take It Easy or are we talking more like Hotel California? I'm thinking Take It Easy, but both are great. Yeah, there's certain songs when I started learning guitar when I was young that's like, I would like to be the kind of person that not only knows how to play this song, but understands the song and like have that song be something I played 20 years ago. And I've lived with that song for a while. Like Hotel California is an example. Obviously there's the solo, but there's also the soulfulness of the lyrics, which I still don't understand. And it could be about anything. And as you get older, I feel like the meaning of the song could be anything. Yeah, I think that's true. I think that's the beauty of them. I think when the person wrote them, they may have had one interpretation, but it's not contingent on us getting that interpretation to like it or resonate with it or feel it. In some ways, the best art is open enough where the artist gets to have their experience when they make it and then the audience gets to have their experience when they listen and they don't have to be the same. And then it connects thousands or millions of people together. There's a togetherness of music when you share that music, when you're listening to stuff together, like in a car. First of all, the car is a sacred place. So I work in part on autonomous vehicles. And you start to think, well, what are the things you lose when the car stops being the central part of American life? The car ownership. It just feels like the car, when you're alone, it's like a therapist thing, session, because you get angry at other humans and then you get to like sit in your own anger and emotion. You get to listen to the song on a long road trip and remember, like run through your memories, the heartbreak. I don't know, the one that got away, but also like the beautiful moments, all of it. Yeah, and all of that in the car. Yeah, driving also serves another purpose. And it's one of the things that we can do that we have to pay attention enough not to crash, but typically can essentially run on autopilot enough where we could be thinking about something else or concentrating on something else. And the difference between concentrating on something or trying to solve a problem when you're solely trying to solve a problem versus when you have some little task that's keeping you occupied, I find if I have something slight to take care of, it frees a more creative side of my mind to better solve problems. You know, I'm kind of jealous of people that found that in painting, for example. They'll be drawing or painting and listening to, so that's the small task you do. You're coloring in the lines. It's like this gentle, peaceful, slow process that requires just a small fraction of your mind and then you can listen. Some people listen to podcasts that way. Some people listen to music that way. Yeah. How do you do it? How do you free your mind? Yeah, running is one of them. There's a process. So most freeing of the mind for me has to go through a process of a bit of pain for a bit. So doing something difficult, so it's like an airplane taking off or something. So that's like, for example, running. The first few miles would just be, just first of all, the physical aspect, which is like, ah, you're so fat. You're out of shape. You're, this is the getting old, this, that. Okay, that slowly dissipates. And then the demons come in who are like, you should be getting this and that and this done. You haven't gotten it done. You're like breaking promises, all those kinds of voices coming in. And after that, maybe mile four, it's like, fuck it. You just run, run with the wind at a very slow pace, but with the wind, and then you could think. So it's the footsteps, the physical activity. Then you could deeply think about stuff, ideas, sort of design, whether it's program design stuff or like high level life decisions, all those kinds of things. I would say running. I used to build bridges from toothpicks. I used to be a thing. It's an engineering. I guess some people like glue together airplanes and stuff like that. But the bridges, it's such deeply honest work because at the end of it, you're gonna have to test that bridge and you're gonna see how good your work was. The little details, but also the big picture. Do you use glue or no? Yeah, use glue. So it's not pure physics. It's materials engineering too. Because the way you want to do it is you actually split the wood as thin as possible and then glue it back together because the glue is really strong, except for the arches and things like that. So you're building arch bridges, which is a whole nother skill because you have to bend the wood. And it's so cool because the thing can hold thousands of times its weight. And then you get to watch it explode at a certain point from the pressure and when you do a really good job, it doesn't explode in a kind of some weak point that you didn't anticipate just kind of starts cracking. Everything cracks, everything explodes. It's just pieces fly everywhere. And it's literally hundreds of hours of work just explode in front of you. And that's a metaphor for life maybe. And it's all for nothing, except for the journey that you took to get there. And no one understands. Speaking of which, back to Nietzsche, these questions are ridiculous. So you're gonna have to try to figure out what the heck I'm trying to do here. So Nietzsche also said, a line I love, which is, and those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music. Do you, Rick Rubin, ever feel crazy? Or maybe you're the one who's sane and everybody else is crazy. You know that the dancing, the joy of the music, of just feeling the music and everybody else just doesn't understand. And this doesn't have to be literally about music. This is about art, about creation. I would say I feel different and it's hard to say it's like which side of the equation is crazy, you know? Did you ever find a group of people that you get, they get you? Yes. Is that what producing is essentially? Is you try to find the moments when you just get each other? No. I would say there are definitely certain artists with certain temperaments. When you're around them, it feels like you can finish each other's sentences. You know, just see the world the same way. Comedians as well. And that's not essential for the two of you together creating something special. No, no. So it could be attention too? It could be anything. It could be any, there's no rules. It'd be like, think of it like a coach. A coach could bring what they have to bring to any talented individual and help them find their way. And sometimes the right coach for the right athlete really works and other times there's a mismatch. Have you seen the movie Whiplash? I did. I saw it when it came out so I don't really remember it well, but I did see it. So there's a coach type of figure. Yes. Who is pushing a drummer to create, to grow as a musician, but also to create something special. I don't know if it's even special music skill wise, it's a special moment. I don't know what he's trying to create. From one perspective, it's just an abusive, a person who selfishly gets off on being abusive to those he's with. But from another perspective, the way I saw that movie, is it's just the two right humans finding each other at the right moment in life and risking destroying each other in the process, but maybe something beautiful will come of it. Do you think that's a toxic relationship? Or is there, does some of that movie resonate with you as that sometimes is required to create art? That kind of suffering. Yeah, it doesn't. Well, there's suffering involved, but not that kind of suffering. Not for me. There are some people who that's their process and that's whatever works. There's no right answers for anything involved in art. We're all trying experiments to find a way. And even for the things that I work on, I don't have a set way that I do anything. I come to every project blank and see, I really listen to what the artist plays and says and through what they explain they wanna do, help find the best way to get there. Was it implicit in the movie that the mean teacher liked being a mean teacher? You said the way you described it was that he got off on treating people this way. Do we know that to be the case? I don't remember that in the movie. No, but we sometimes project that onto people, people who are really rough on students. You start to think, well, maybe, maybe that is fundamentally who they are and if it's fundamentally who they are, that there must be some pleasure in it or it's an addiction of some sort. But it could be also a deliberate choice made by the teacher. It also could be a lineage. Like in the Zen tradition, there are sort of the mean Roshi's who if you do something wrong, take a physical action. And it's just in the lineage, it's considered that's how you teach. I didn't come from that lineage. So I'm much more of a, I feel like it's more of a collaboration between people working together to make the best thing. It's not a boss slave relationship at all. It's much more of a let's find our way. And we agree at the beginning of the process that if either of us or any of us don't like what's happening, we say it. And the goal is to keep working till we get to a point where we're all really happy with it. It's like if we make something that an artist likes and I don't like, or that I like and they don't like, we haven't gone far enough. In terms of lineage, the ones that seek destruction and the ones that seek happiness all come from the same lineage. We all came from fish. So somewhere in you, deep down there, there's the other stuff too. It's just that you haven't been yet, by the way, because you said every new project, including maybe starting today, is an opportunity to channel, to plug into something that was always there and you haven't gotten a chance to plug into. You mentioned listening. How do you listen to a person? How do you hear a person? When you first come in, like we just met, what's the analysis happening? But I mean, with me is one thing. I'm an artist of sorts. I program and I'm just, I'm human, I guess. I guess we're all creating art. How do you see, like, how do I bring out? So for people who don't know, I mean, obviously everyone knows that you've produced some of the greatest records ever, but the way I see that is you just brought out the best in a lot of interesting artists. And so in order to bring out the best in them, you have to understand them. You have to hear the music of their soul, hopefully not being too romantic here, but just like, is there something you can say of how difficult that is, if there's a process, if there's tricks, if it's luck? I think it starts with this, again, coming in blank, like not having any preconceived ideas, being open and really listening, health and uh sometimes i would go to nashville and record with him at his house sometimes he would come to california but he was coming to california less regularly and because there was there were so many songs we wanted to try he would start sometimes recording just a straight acoustic version like you'd have someone play guitar he would sing and they would send those to me and we would discuss like is this one to build on um and that was when we said i don't want to record this one until we're together i feel like we should do this one together so on the next trip to california we recorded it at my at my old house and i mean all the songs we recorded felt special so i can't say this one felt special but lyrically it just it's more the the lyrics have such a profound sense of regret what have i become yeah and to hear when you're 20 years old talking about regret yeah it's heartbreaking but it's heartbreaking in a different way because you have your whole life to figure it out when you're looking back over your life at the end of your life with regret it's brutal yeah it's brutal so that was the initial spark of doing it and then we when we recorded it i believe it was um two guitar players if i remember correctly maybe even three um smoky hormel matt sweeney and mike campbell i believe and ben montench was playing the piano in my living room as we were doing it and we cut the basic track and with johnny singing and then johnny probably sang over that basic track a few more times and then we comped his vocal and then built up the drama and you didn't get to the part but at the end of the song it gets very loud the music gets very loud it's subtle because it's not anything that takes your ear and the vocal is so powerful that you don't really think about what's going on but it's building the whole time it's building and it even gets distorted at the end it gets really uh like over overpowering and that's part of the emotion of it you know it's uh i hear almost anger and frustration and it just rings out the clean vocal i mean it's so simple so incredible and it's interesting to have a young man's lyrics in in an old johnny cash voice and heart and mind i had um are you a fan of tom waits of course uh tom waits when he was younger had his this is a song called martha but there's a bunch of songs he's written when he was young it's like how does a young man have that like melancholy wisdom the song martha is about uh an older man calling a woman he used to love that she's now married and he's married and they're having that conversation they haven't spoken for 30 years and they realize that there's still love there and it could have been a different life a different world where they could have been together and here's like a 23 year old tom waits writing so beautifully about something that's very uh i've had a lot of people like tell me how real that uh as an older person looking back at that love that you had and realizing it wasn't it was really it's still there inklings of that love are still there i think there's a um when a young person writes a sad song they almost seem more willing to go to a more hopeless place because they have they have a so much time ahead and older artists tend to want to look at the bright side of things which which also i think comes from the wisdom of aging it's it's a more realistic position so it's not uncommon for younger people to write i think even in the beatles you'll see like they're very heavy lyrics um middle to late era beatles which is still you know they're in their 20s you know early 20s i guess wow that's hard to think about so much accomplished unbelievable and they they went through the full journey from fun to darkness in the span of a few years uh you mentioned lyrics um so you've obviously produced albums with incredible lyrics i think you've mentioned the interesting characteristics of hip hop of rap is that you're writing poetry to rhythm versus writing poetry to melody so that's like one way to think about it and i'm a fan i mean tom waits let it go i'm a fan of poetry period is there something um about highlighting the poetry of it the power of words as you did with with heart if uh like if i have to play it again it's one uh a tom waits song that's like less than a minute long that i always go back to it's one i really love and has just a few lines it's called i want you and all it is is him saying i want you i want you this is a 22 year old Tom Waits all i want is you give you stars above the sun on the brightest day giving you all my love if only you would see that i want you you you you all i want is you you you and then he hums for 20 more seconds beautiful so so simple man that young man like low and but for people who don't know tom waits you should definitely listen to him and his voice sounds very different now and it's interesting to see the evolution of a human voice the the artist over time because that's a young like boy like voice hopeful less clever less witty more simple that simplicity is there and he's not i mean that takes guts to be so simple i would say lyrically and uh musically is there um sort of laying that out on the table is there ways to that you like to highlight the voice the lyrics or there's no one rule so do you what is the thing that makes music special is it the rhythm the melody the uh or is ultimately the lyrics are always there or the idea you just asked me five different questions i don't care i'll just get that it's not about you you don't want the answers i'll listen uh i look forward to your comments the internet okay uh you have the greatest producer of all time in front of you and you can't shut the hell up that's right friends uh is but you do value lyrics is there a way to celebrate lyrics i value lyrics if the lyrics are important i'm not a lyric person i'm very much uh whatever the thing that makes the thing good is the thing that i'm drawn to for me um for a long time lyrics meant very little i would say from me really yes yes from the earliest days for your right to party beastie boys yeah it was it was fun i thought they were good lyrics but it wasn't what was important i mean it was in a in a almost a novelty way not in a serious way early in my career i was much more focused on the rhythm first the rhythm and i would if the lyrics weren't good enough i would be aware of it but it wasn't the driving force for me and eventually over time then melody became an important piece which it wasn't in the beginning and then uh lyrics became more important over time but it's always been a always changing what what draws me in and one of the things i found as it relates to lyrics that that can give a lyric a different power has to do with rhythm where if there's no drum um the lyrics tend to mean more so earlier what you were saying about if it was just acapella you felt you felt marvin gay in a different way hearing the acapella can you comment on i mean in terms of one of the greatest albums ever why does it sound so raw her voice she's just a great singer but this is that you're not doing anything else you're doing the uh there's there's there's strumming and then there's just a single beat and then it builds starting in my heart this gets simpler but it feels like it's a giant orchestra we almost had it all the scars of your love they leave me breathless i can't help feeling there's backing vocals the anger i love it i just there's something about uh such a powerful voice and the instruments not getting in the way i mean the same with the with hurt and johnny cash it is there um why does it sound so like raw it's the same as hurt there's a it feels like you're in the room with them it feels like they're not even singing they're like uh they're literally freshly mad and angry i think those are the things that make great singers sound like great singers it's not it's not anything that that's happening in the studio i mean we're i would say the only thing that us in the studio can do is kind of get out of the way and not not ruin it you know it's like that's that's what comes through of these these people i should also before i forget there is a lot of song choices on that cd i would love to see the full options on the cd that you sent to johnny cash that i love so solitary man is one of my favorite choices made there uh is it is that a neil damon song it's funny you talk about them as songs because i tend to i tend to listen more to albums than songs so if you really you're that's what you're doing your head you're pulling up the album essentially no i'm like i'm going to that song but i don't know i've never listened to that song but i know that when that when that song comes up in the sequence of the album um it has a really powerful effect in me let's see what it does if you just started if you could read my so interesting wow i could tell just like an old time movie about a ghost from a wishing well in a castle dark or a fortress strong with chains around my feet you know that ghost is me and i will never be set free as long as there's a ghost that you can see that's beautiful such a beautiful choice beautiful melody such a beautiful melody and haunting words sung so simply i i have to um i mean so uh i was born in the soviet union when when you when you're growing up uh there's a few bands that kind of i mean they're probably forbidden still but they seep in and you get like uh bootlegged and and they somehow take over the culture of the young of the young folk such as myself so uh on the metal side it was metallica and iron maiden and uh on the i don't know what you call them but beastie boys i remember hearing uh fight for your right and it was just like for some reason that stuck as it did for a lot of people in russia it's like wow america is when you get to say fuck you to the man the rebellion the freedom um i probably heard it uh a few years after it was released because it kind of it dissipates to the culture you get the bootlegged i mean it's hard to get your hands on but i just remember me i i wanted to kind of bring that up because it was such a personally important song to me and yet probably you didn't even think of that you probably thought of it as its role in the culture here in the united states like in terms of musically but i was you know 20 21 years old and we just well you were that kid too right we're just making fun songs for our friends there was no there was no uh expectation that's just a fun song yeah no one thought we never imagined anybody would like any of it one of the greatest albums ever yeah i have to it's i love this so much i just remember this is america i didn't even know i didn't even understand the lyrics to be honest and the lyrics are ridiculous so hearing that and hearing metallica master puppets i was like i knew i'm gonna have to end up in america one day i mean maybe now that i'm more mature or maybe a little bit more mature i realized like that was kind of the longing for freedom it felt like at least at the time if this is allowed that anything is allowed yeah and i think that uh the rebellion of it the uh is i guess it's also fun i just i just loved it is there if you look back to that because you're you're uh uh i mean you were that person not just the producer it feels like yes and no like it was even to us then it was still like satirical you know it wasn't oh absolutely but isn't like music in part like you're dancing in the line is part satirical part serious in in the sense like you're losing yourself in the satire like when you have anytime you go over the top isn't that part of the or is this is it explicitly satirical you make it fun i mean girls there's a lot of ridiculous songs in that album i don't know i just think it's it was definitely to make each other laugh like we were trying to make each other laugh we weren't trying to make a point we're trying to make each other laugh but that person how's that person different than the person today in you the the person that produced that i wouldn't say so different it's like it really is that that um i like things that make me laugh you know i like ridiculous things it's the same person still i think so that is a strange just how many incredible i mean i wouldn't i don't think i would make that today but i understand why we made it when we did it's uh in the vocabulary of of um ridiculous that would make sense to do you know for the right artist today could make something ridiculous and gives you that feeling i mean there's just a sense when you make so many many different albums then you look back at that creation and it can feel like a different person created that but you're making it seem like if you travel back in time or maybe do a memory replay you'll be able to hang out with the with a teenage and the 20s recruitment i think yeah i i don't i don't think i was so different honestly that's hilarious it's funny i ran into someone um recently in costa rica who i hadn't seen in a long time and who i knew from the new york days when those days and um and we spent a couple of hours talking and she said you're exactly the same person that you were then so i have a short you know a recent confirmation that that's the case that's beautiful was it tim ferris asked you about like who's the most successful person you know that's the definition of success i would say it's exactly the same person you haven't lost yourself and or rather you found yourself early on i would say there there are aspects of me that have changed for sure um but i but i can't say that it's that it's necessarily better it's different um at that i would say at that time i was more confident than i am now and i'm very confident now but then i had an unrealistic um confidence and i think now it's a little more um based in reality at that point in time i had never been depressed and then once you go through a depression you well some people i know in my case and when i went through depression afterwards i was a different person than i was before and i and i feel more um grounded now than i did then and i probably relate to the artists who so many of the artists i work with suffer so many artists suffer because that's part of what makes an artist great is their level of sensitivity that this the same thing that makes uh an artist uncomfortable other people don't feel at all people don't feel at all the time you were depressed what was the darkest moments of your life what took you there how did you get out it was triggered by a person making a comment about something to do with work that didn't matter you know it was like uh to anyone else they would hear that and it would just be like okay we'll deal with it next week whatever but for some reason i took it in a way that um i felt like the rug had been pulled out from under me even beyond the rational part of it of understanding you know even after the problem that came up was solved it somehow undermined something in me and made me feel very vulnerable in a way that i hadn't felt before and it spiraled how did you get out i did a lot of different kinds of therapy i did um starting with alternative therapies i was seeing i would say between seven and eight doctors and or therapists a week um acupuncture uh talk therapy um herbs or any any possible modality tried everything for a long time and um and and nothing seemed to have an impact and then finally um i'm wary of taking any western medicine i'm not a drug taker and or drinker partier in any way and um i found a a psychopharmacologist who was a psychic but because she was a psychic i was okay to see her because she's like i'll i'll do i'll listen to a psychic yeah but i'm not going to listen to a psychopharmacologist but the fact that she had the the psychic uh that made her fit into my world view and um and she recommended antidepressant which went terribly wrong in the first night that i took it and then i that set me on a journey of looking for the right antidepressant which was a long and painful process heck of a journey every one that i took made me sick everyone and then finally i don't know five months later six months later i found the magic one that worked for me and it um it shifted me out of the depression i took it for my camera was six months or a year and then weaned off and was okay and then i had another event some years later i think i took it again for a short period of time and got out of it and i've not needed it since were you able to kind of introspect the triggers that led to the events is there something or is it random events of life i think it's more that um because of the way that i grew up i never had to deal with much controversy ah and um when i when i was challenged i didn't have any ability to deal with it it's like um you know jonathan hight talks about it's like that so you've actually also mentioned like business sometimes gives you stress so these this was business related stuff yeah it was a business related thing it just made me feel bad it's one of the sadder things about art and music is that it's often interleaved with business folk i suppose that's the way of the world if you have a capitalist system but it makes that business folks rubbing up against artists um can sometimes destroy a fragile mind and soul like uh to me like one of the best representations of an artist honestly johnny i have the designer from apple and he's just so fragile with his ideas and you talked about like when he has ideas he really wouldn't show it to steve jobs or anybody except for a small design team because he was so nervous that it would it would break let's give it a chance let it give it a chance to grow and it seems like the outside world uh business people pr people people kind of um have not lost themselves in the passion of creating but instead of kind of representing or like making deals all that kind of stuff they they can kind of trample on those little ideas and it's it's sad to see yeah it's really it's really heartbreaking to see because you know how much trampling there's going on it's one of the main jobs my jobs as a record producer is to um keep the keep the voices away from the artist from all the people who are really on their side but don't know you know like the uh whether it be people um anyone on the business side who doesn't make things they're excited to do their part you know they're excited if when you deliver the thing the the art that you make to me then we can start the project yeah um but there's nothing to sell if the art doesn't happen in the right way and it has to be protected and it can't happen on the same kind of a timetable that um that business can it's just a different thing it doesn't art doesn't come in a quarterly way and that doesn't apply just to music or it applies to art it applies to all creative pursuits like this is generally the case like at mit it's just there's the administration and then there is the professors and students and the professors students are the creative folk yeah they create stuff they dream they have wild ideas that go on tangents and so on they they uh they have hopes and they they go with those and they get like on these weird passionate pursuits and then the administration can often just trample on that um and they they set up bars on all kinds of in all kinds of ways that you think you're not actually hurting um but you really are and you know i won't mention why but because this happens to everybody and i have a large amount of leverage at mit now but even i get a little bit of pressure in such stupid ways to like don't like be careful be careful like we really want your career to succeed be careful and that little pressure to an artist you know do you want to go acapella do you want to go do you want to do a country record like be careful like you're already a superstar be careful yeah and then in that way you kind of push people like flock of fish into one fish tank where they're all the same and it's it's sad to see and it's obviously in the modern world there's nice mechanism to protect to let artists flourish a little bit more because they get to put themselves to the world and get a little bit more confidence maybe different funding mechanisms all that kind of stuff but tremendous problem that the the voices that don't understand interfering with the process is huge the other side of it is in success there can be a lack of there can be a lack of reality where all of the people around the successful person just tell them everything they do is great and then they they don't have anything to bump up against anymore have a realistic uh sense of what's what how things work or how how it how the how things measure you know um so both sides are really important both both avoiding the voices getting in the way and having a trusted group of you know a sangha a group of people who can say you know i don't know if that's as good and you can still you know say i don't care what you think that's fine but it helps to hear it you know it helps to have if someone who you respect tells you something isn't good enough it's helpful when you know it comes from a place of love when it comes from a place of wisdom 100 percent and not from a place of fear not from a place of oh this doesn't sound like it's going to do as well as your last thing that's yeah that's not the point the point is on this uh quest for greatness are you living up to your ability by the way is there something interesting to say about your world view because you mentioned psychic and instead of the ways we can be healthy the ways we can grow and how much maybe medicine or science or has um has the answers is there is there some interesting way to describe that world view i would just say i'm open mind i believe anything's possible and if i was going to trust in any practical information it would be something thousands of years old there's wisdom in that history yeah well it's it's more tested it's not always right but it's at least it's been somewhat tested so science is also tested the thing i'm a little bit skeptical of sometimes is just the hubris that often comes with the modern with the latest the newest the this this feeling like you figured it all out everything that's been done in the past has no wisdom and uh we basically solved every problem uh you know there's nothing else to be solved this i mean that's the defining characteristic of any age is like we've solved all the problems there are we have the final answers and our parents are all stupid that kind of energy yeah and that you have to be extremely extremely careful with that when it talks about when you think about something as complex as the human body or the human mind you have to be very very very we know close to nothing yeah exactly close to nothing that's about anything about anything about anything that place of humility is a good place to start to figure to figure it all out and in the end we'll still know almost nothing yeah i don't think we need to know it's like we need to see what works and we need to see what works for us it's interesting to know i i know on the art side knowing how it works isn't what makes it work you know isn't the magic of it isn't how it works the magic is the magic and the magic happens in a way that's intuitive and accidental at times or uh incidental where you're trying many things all of a sudden something works and um and you don't know why and it's okay not to know why it doesn't matter it doesn't really matter why as long as it does the thing that you want it to do whatever that is yeah that's so weird when you know the components you don't you still yeah the magic what's the magic where's the magic like we know the components for stuff i care about artificial intelligence we know the components of a powerful computing machinery where does consciousness come from what is that uh where does the uh brilliant moments of insight come from what's that when uh even in simple games of chess or in simple where do those breakthrough ideas of taking the big risk that doesn't make any sense and then all of a sudden it becomes something beautiful yeah we don't need to understand why it just happens it just happens and often the things that end up breaking through don't break through in the way we thought or turn out to be a third iteration of something that we thought was an entirely different thing or we don't know you know it's and i i think it's if we embrace that not knowing we'll have a healthier experience going through life you made a lot it's not just music everything rearranging the chairs the furniture as well you've done like i said the documentary i guess you would say with paul mccartney and um you've done a podcast yourself uh broken record podcast and just you've done conversation too so what have you learned from that process about the art of conversation and also maybe what advice would you give to this uh to me about how what to do with conversation like what is interesting to you about conversation one of the things that i i like is to not feel like it's there is any stakes or that it's actually almost that it's not happening like the fact that when i came in you were setting up cameras made it less good from for me i knew that that would impact the conversation in a negative way the best version of it would be if we didn't see the cameras and if we were and we didn't see any technology and we didn't see any technology and we were just sitting at this table having a conversation maybe even if we were miked beforehand would be okay if it was necessary but then we were just sitting here having a conversation no people in the room nothing and feeling like we're just having a conversation i feel like it would get closer to um closer to the relaxed feeling same thing we do in the studios like you know you've heard of red light fever you know when uh artists get nervous when like they play a song great and then the tape starts rolling and they can't play it and it's we're all we're all to some degree like that when you were with paul mccartney i mean you're did were you cognizant of cameras we had the room black everybody who was working there was dressed in black everything was invisible that we were lit in a way where even though there were probably 20 people between 12 and 20 people working in the room within three minutes of starting the conversation paul and i were alone in the room so it that was the the feeling on occasion you'd hear a noise and it would be weird people we also had nobody was allowed to wear shoes because it had to we were trying to create this intimate space and and i know from in the recording studio when we're recording if even one person is there that's just watching and not working you know like does like there's usually i'm usually there and an engineer is there technically making it happen if anyone else is in the room it's different because then it goes from this moment where the person's doing a performance to the sense or where the person is is feeling something internally and we're capturing it to the the other version is they're performing for someone it's so interesting so like to push back in the alternatives here so one about the third person not to make people self conscious but i find that i'm so torn on that because sometimes when that person uh like um so evan is in the room here he's been in the room before he's a huge fan of yours by the way uh so he'll he'll nod yeah he'll get excited he's like and you can see that nodding and for some reason for me he's like yeah yeah you get it like yeah you get excited together i mean that's that third person can be like a really special so having an audience uh when it's a friend or somebody that has that love in them it depends on the performer right yeah some people really thrive in front of an audience and you're saying you like that simple intimacy well i like the reality of it not being i want it to be as far from a performance as possible got it and if if someone i'll tell you a story a story that just happened and it was viewed as kind of a it seemed uncool in the moment to the person that it happened to it wasn't at all um we were recording the new chili peppers album which is coming out i think any day now like uh i don't know what today's date is but within the next it maybe by the time this airs it will be out and um the band was playing in the studio and it was ripping because they play they're incredible and um one of the members walked through the control room after a particularly great performance and um the engineer said wow that solo is really great and the person who heard this said please don't say that and walked away it's like it it was not it it just changed yeah this feeling of we're in this place where we're doing this thing and there's there is no outside world yeah you know we're doing this for us we're going as deep as we can for us and as soon as there's an acknowledgement to someone else in a way it breaks the concentration of being inside of it that's so well told and but it's something about saying wow that's always great is is uh shows the it reminds you that there's an outside world but i feel like there's a way to enter the inside world as an audience so you just have to do that so it matters what you say it matters how you look it matters uh so there's like these generic compliments not generic but they they sound in the way an outside world would interact as opposed to in that creative thing where you're dancing around the fire together or something it was actually i can tell you there's another interesting one that happened to me and i didn't know this until i saw the film of it which was a strange one um we were recording with the avid brothers and um the song was called no hard feelings and it was this recording of no hard feelings when my body won't hold me anymore it finally lets me free well i'll be ready when my feet won't walk another such a great voice so beautiful kissed goodbye will my hands be steady when i lay down my fears my hopes and my doubts the rings on my fingers and the keys to my house with no hard feelings when the sun hangs low in the west and the light in my chest won't be kept hell today any longer when the jealousy fades away so bright so hopeful so lighthearted and it's just hallelujah and love involved love in the words love in the songs they sing in the church and no hard feelings Lord knows they have it done much good for anyone kept me afraid and cold with so much to have and more when my body won't hold me anymore it finally lets me free is he sound as good as good, yeah? yes, every bit of snow from the heavens will i join with the ocean blue or run into the savior true and shake hands laughing and walk through the night straight to the light holding the love i've known in my life and no hard feelings Lord knows they have it done much good for anyone kept me afraid and cold with so much to have and more under the burning sky i'm finally learning why it matters for me and you to say it and mean it too life is loneliness it's loneliness good as it's been to me i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies listening and not thinking about what you're gonna say next or what your opinion is or any, you know, not basically being a recorder and just hearing what comes in. And then once you hear what comes in, processing that information and trying our best to do that without any of the beliefs that we might have to impact what that is. If I ask you a question, I don't wanna hear what, I don't wanna listen to you and have any reaction happening when you're speaking. I wanna be as neutral as possible. For me, my goal is not to form an opinion, it's to understand. So if anything, I would draw you out further and just ask questions to really understand. And if you say, or if you say something that somehow triggers me in a way that that's, you know, I wonder how he came to that. I wouldn't challenge you, I would ask, like, how did you find that? You know, how did you get to that place? From a place of curiosity, you would try to figure out. Yeah, I wanna understand who the person is. And through questioning, we can usually get there. Or through just spending time together, you find out who the person is. What about finding out and figuring out how to then take the next steps of bringing out the best in them? Like, is it just trial and error? Like, let's try this. It's definitely trial and error. It's always trial and error. Are you afraid of making a mistake? Like, let's add this instrument, let's remove this instrument. Let's add this line, let's remove this line. Let's try. And let's be open. So one of the, we don't really have rules, but one of the agreements in the studio is any idea that anyone has will always demonstrate it, will always try it. Because I can describe to you an idea and you can think, that's a terrible idea, let's not do that. And then I can play you the idea and then you can say, oh, that's really good. And it's completely different because we, when we hear, when we're told something, we have to imagine what that is and the way you see something and imagine it and the way I see something and imagine it are completely different. So you say a thing and now there's two humans that play that thing in their mind differently, in their imagination, and then there's a cool creative step and when you actually do it, to see how it differs in the imagination, and then the difference or the commonality will be like an exciting little discovery together. Well, so many groups of people making things together in a room, one person will suggest something and someone else in the room say, ah, that doesn't sound like a good idea, let's not do that, and then they move on. The testing of every idea is really important and that's how you get to see, oh, that's not at all what I thought it was gonna be. Happens to me all the time, I know, because someone will suggest, why don't we do it like this? And I'll think, that sounds bad, and then I'll think, okay, let's try it, and then we hear it, and then eight times out of 10, it's nothing like I imagined and great. And then you try not to have an ego about the fact that you thought it was not a good idea in your head. There can't be any ego in this. It doesn't, if everyone's there with the purpose of making the best thing we can, there's nothing else. There are no, there can't be any boundaries to that. So there's a moment I saw with, I know you don't love talking about previous things you've done, but it's cool to dive in there every once in a while. I'm fine to talk about anything. To sample it, anything? We'll see. I have this pain I gotta talk now. I'll think of something ridiculous that would make you change your mind. You mentioned, I saw a video of you with Jay Z at Workaround 99 Problems where you suggested acapella, opening the song with acapella, just no instruments, just voice. That to me, I mean, that's one of the characteristics of the things, of the ways you've brought out the best in artists is doing less. Sort of the tending towards simplicity in some kind of way. So that choice of acapella is really interesting because I could see a lot of people think that that's a bad idea, but it turned out to be a really powerful idea. Can you maybe talk about the simplicity, how to find simplicity, why you find simplicity is beautiful. It does appear to be beautiful. What is that? Yeah, I don't know where it comes from. It has been with me from the beginning of my work, the very first album I ever produced, the credit I took was reduced by me instead of produced by me for that reason. I like the idea of getting to the essential and I have a better idea now that I've done it for a while, but at the time it was purely an instinctual thing. And part of it is a sonic, there's a sonic benefit, which is the less elements you have, you can hear each of the ones that are there and they can sound better. And the less there are, the more space they could have around them and the more you can hear their personality. If you were to record 10 people playing the same guitar part and you listened to it, it would sound like guitar. And if you record one person playing a guitar part, it sounds like a person playing the guitar. It's different than just guitar. And often in the studio, the idea of building upon things and adding layers to thicken, to make it sound bigger, sometimes the more things you add, the smaller it gets. So a lot of it is counterintuitive until you just in practice see what works. Try it, to try removing stuff until it's just right. It's the Einstein thing, make it as simple as possible, but not simpler. That's such a, like finding a stopping place, just keep chopping away and chopping away. Yeah, there's something we also like to do called the ruthless edit, which is, let's say you're at a point where it can work for anything, but I'll give you the example with an album. We've recorded 25 songs. We think the album is gonna have 10. Instead of picking our favorite 10, we limit it to what are the five or six that we can't live without. So going past even the goal to get to the real heart of it and then see, okay, we have these five or six that we can't live without. Now, what would we add to that that makes it better and not worse? It's just, it puts you in a different frame when you start with building instead of removing. And you might find that there's nothing you need to add. Sometimes, sometimes something happens when you get to the real essence. Then when you start adding things back, it becomes clear that it was just supposed to be this tight little thing. Can I ask you like a therapy session question? So you mentioned somewhere that one way to kind of think about music to get into music is to look at the top like 100 albums of all time and just go down the list and like, just take it all in like one piece of artwork. So I was doing that for a while. It's a cool experiment, because unfortunately I have to admit I've gotten lazy and stopped taking in albums as albums. And I looked at one interesting top 100 list, top 500 actually, which is put together by Rolling Stone. And they put, this is the therapy session part, and this has to do with simplicity too. They put Marvin Gaye's What's Going On at number one. Spoiler alert. So I'd like to maybe get your opinion on that choice. The reason that Marvin Gaye is really interesting, it'd actually be cool to play What's Going On in a second, but when you just listen to his like acapella, just listen to his voice, it is really good. Like people, it makes me wonder if it's possible to pull off like most of his songs with no instruments. Like in many parts, there's so much soul in just Mercy, Mercy, Me, What's Going On. There's so many songs that you could just be like, I wonder if you could just like, just go raw, or maybe in parts, or maybe do what you do with Jay Z, just open up with nothing. Anyway, there's something so powerful to a great soulful voice. Do you mind if I play it real quick? No, please. What's going on? This is probably one of my favorite songs. I mean, it's up there. Hey, what's happening? What's up, brother? What's up? Hey, how you doing? Hey man. Wow. Hey man. Mother, mother, i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies i have no enemies you That voice. There's too many of you to cry. Brother, brother, brother. There's far too many of you to die. there's some just very subtle backing vocals this one hurts father father we don't need to escalate i wonder who the father he's talking about is oh that's interesting i mean i have so for people who don't know his his own father ended up uh killing marvin gay yeah i mean that one is really pain i mean for a lot of people your relationship with your father your mother i mean there's different dynamics but there's it's almost like part of life is resolving some kind of complex puzzle you have or the people you love the people close to you or the people who are not there all those kinds of things that's so much pain in that we don't need to escalate father father i never thought if it's i always thought it's his father directly yeah i don't get that it could be but i don't i feel like it's a more um masculine spirituality like a father figure or just broadly some kind of spirituality could be like god father god mother god you know like could be i don't know but there's there's so much it's like both hope and melancholy you seeing war is not the answer it's like you you don't tell your father war is not your your blood father war is not the answer it's strange conversation it's a bigger conversation they're not personal don't you think it feels like war if one is personal what's the difference between is the war is personal too it's only leaders think about war in a geopolitical sense yeah when people that fight wars you lose your brothers you lose i mean you death is just right there so it might feel just like that but yeah there is a dance between like the personal and like talking to the entirety of the society it's like john lennon imagine like also a song where is that is that a hopeful is that cynical is it like melancholy like heartbroken like you you hope you wish things would be a certain way and they're not yeah i don't know i don't know john lennon is giving up on the world in imagine yeah i don't know you know it's a it's an interesting question there's another uh john lennon lyric um in let me think of what it is take me a second and different songs keep coming into my head the one that i'm looking and you keep pressing next um across the universe um nothing's going to change my world and when i hear that i hear it as hopeless but i don't think i don't believe that that's well it may be how he meant it but i don't think that's how it's normally taken and it's also the taker is important i'm generally optimistic and hopeful so i i always like look for the hope and the actually the harshest love uh heartbreak songs are always somehow hopeful to me that's a love song uh to me like a song about losing love is is a song about the great capacity for love in the human heart that's what i hear so to me losing love is exciting because it's like that means you really cared that means you felt something you feel something you can sit in that pain and that pain is a reminder what it means to be human when you're that um what is it uh we're just listening uh the only man who could have reached me was the son of a preacher man so see um it's like that early love or something or partially sexual or whatever that's not as interesting to me it's fun it's great but it's not as interesting to me as it is to me it's fun it's great but it's that heartbreak that's the reminder that it can go deep although that's a damn good song have you ever heard the uh detroit mix of the marvin gay album no call it up how by far better mind blowing i just heard it recently blew my mind oh wow reverb distant interesting there's there's far too many of you it feels like it's all around the room more to bring some loving here today more voices more voices he's layering his own vocals just like there's multiple people singing don't punish me with brutality talk to me so you can see oh what's going on that's beautiful yeah seems to have more energy if you if you listen to the whole album even even though you just said you don't listen albums anymore the detroit mix of the whole album changes the album a lot i mean that that felt uh so that's the opposite of a cappella i would say yes because it's saying it's it's um there's layers there's um and that maybe i don't know if you remember but if memory serves me uh correct here he produces this own album here marvin gay was the producer on this i believe i believe so and this one sounds more like it's a get together and the whole album sounds more like a get together where it's a group of people in a room playing music together whereas the album version sounds more like an out like a recording this sounds less like a recording and a little more like a party now you had a series of conversations with paul mccartney which is amazing that people should should watch but is is there this is continuing our therapy session is there a case to be made that uh what's going on is number one album above the beatles uh white album or abbey road above pet sounds can you still manage case there's there's always a case i mean there's always a case every there's no uh in reality in art there is no um there's no metric that makes sense so um you could put numbers on things but it's like is this apple better than this peach like it's not really a fair comparison but if you just had to keep one to represent the human species that's the way i think to the aliens so i think it's a very personal decision i don't i think you can make you can make your choice to represent the human species and i'll make mine you know well i would pick the beatles over the beach boys so that's my if i became dictator of the world i was talking to the aliens but i do think that aliens but i don't know the full historical context to the impact of the music i don't know if that's something to consider like this kind of thought experiment of imagine what it was like back then to create to go into the studio to do such interesting work in the studio as opposed to like listening to just as a pop song almost from because i've never been able to understand uh beach boys god only knows the song god only knows god only knows but all of it the album the pet sounds just in my room was uh in my room that's all um is that what's your favorite on the album that sounds album that sounds um the opening track do you mind if i play it please it's it's it's too fun that's part of their trip though the you uh you open the heart with the fun it's possible original mono and stereo mix versions i don't know what's the opening song wouldn't it be nice yeah that's the song we could say good night and stay together wouldn't that be nice wouldn't it be nice wake up together but we're not there's heartbreak in this one too still to me like george harris like um uh is that the way that album while my guitar gently weeps i mean that um with the beatles it's so hard to depending on the day i'll i'll say a very different song that's my favorite song but i often return to while my guitar gently weeps is my favorite song spectacular spectacular anything george harrison honestly something something in the way she moves the bet i what would you classify that there's like several beatle songs categories of beatles categories of beatles songs so that's like the melancholy love songs or ballads or something like that um yesterday let it be what's do you have favorites so from your like how have you changed as a man as a human being as a musician and music producer ever having done that lengthy interaction with with mccartney hmm anytime you're around someone who's such a hero and you spend time with them and they're a human being it helps put perspective on everything you know that they're just human that well obviously i mean every everyone's just human and um but i remember the first time i got to see paul mccartney play live it was in a stadium of 70 000 people and he started playing and i started crying and i couldn't believe i was in even with 70 000 people i couldn't believe i that this man walks the earth and that i'm in the same place as him and he's the person who wrote that and played that and now he's here playing it for us it's mind blowing that's the voice that's the it's overwhelming is it inspiring or is it um like because sometimes when you have and i've gotten a chance to me i mean i love people in general like every every person is fascinating to me but yeah when you've been a fan for a long time and you meet a person uh sort of uh i'll just remove present company is you um it's like oh they're just human so there's both it's both inspiring that just a simple human can achieve such beautiful things but it's also like almost wishing there were gods moving in around us it's it's somehow peaceful this is it's more uh comforting to know that there's you know uh there's bigger fish i'm just a small fish and then there's bigger fish and it will take care of the ocean for us i think we're all capable of being big fish i don't think that there are special people i don't think it it's like that i i would make a case so the variety of artists that you worked with and brought the best out of it does seem the year out of this world so do you think you would know like if you're the same kind of species maybe you're just a meat vehicle and you're channeling ideas from somewhere else i feel like i'm channeling ideas from somewhere else 100 but i think have you asked questions about where from i believe we i believe we all are though you know i believe we are um we're vehicles for information that when it's ready to come through it comes through and the people who have good antennas pick up the signal but um if i'm sure you've had an experience in your life where you've had an idea for something and you've not acted on it and eventually someone else does it and it's not because they're doing and it's not because they're doing it because you had the idea and they stole your idea it's because the time has come for that idea and if you don't do it someone else is going to it's being broadcast by whatever the source whatever the source is uh yeah i tend to i tend to see humans as not quite special in that way yeah it's it's different kinds of antennas walking around listening to ideas and ideas that are i like the the notion of uh richard dawkins of memes or it's kind of the ideas of the organisms and they're just using our brains to multiply to to select to compete to to evolve and humans we really want to hold on to the specialness of our body of our mind but it's it's really the ideas so for a group when was born two centuries ago you wouldn't be a music producer you'd be or i mean maybe but you have an antenna and if no signal is coming in uh or you'd be hearing a potentially a different signal is there um i think we all have our own antenna for whatever it is that we you know maybe not everyone has tuned into their antenna to see what it is that their strength and bringing through is i'm lucky in that it found me because i didn't know that it was a i didn't even know this was a job i sometimes wonder i mean a lot of young people a lot of people wonder like what's the purpose and the the specs of my antenna what am i put on this earth to do like if um you know i i can live a thousand lives there's so many trajectories and imagine the greatest possible trajectory that reveals the the most beautiful thing i can possibly create in this world live the most beautiful way uh what is that i feel like that's a good exercise to think about um because it's also liberating to think that you can do anything i mean that um more and more i suppose that's kind of life it's like society is pushing conformity on you you know i thought i i had my own flavor of conformity i thought i'm supposed to be following and then early on i would say like in the late 20s you realize wait a minute you don't have to tell you don't have to do what teachers tell you to do what parents tell you to do what society tells you do you can like um i would never wear a suit if i listened to like my colleagues and community who think a suit is like the symbol of uh what is it a symbol of conformity actually which is hilarious but uh it's actually a kind of rebellion and everything else like of that nature doing doing these silly podcasts like um i have a question i have to ask sure because you brought up the suit yeah uh do you wear the suit is this your daily uniform outside of podcasting so uh for the longest time it was some kind of suit and then recently i mean coinciding with going to texas there's a i'm such a loner i'm an introvert and there's a bit of a hiding from the world when i wear other stuff i really want to um to not make fame recognition money all those things a motivation at all and the world kind of wants you to make those motivations not not the world but i would say maybe the western world and maybe america maybe a capitalist system does but that's a choice to buy into that or not right it takes a brave person a person of character to not buy in and i'm i'm like a like a baby deer trying to find his legs you don't have to buy in because i love people and i think i'm kind of an idiot and so when other people say do this and do that it uh there's a there is a pressure there it's actually very difficult to not listen necessarily to the advice of others and yet keep yourself fragile and open to the world it's easy to be like i'm always right you know just kind of sticking a ground but if you want to be like vulnerable if you want to connect with people and just wear your heart on your sleeve then you're going to listen to them i mean that's the double edged sword of it and uh but then again that pain like if you don't let it destroy you can grow grow from that has fame affected you at all did you unplug from the system at some point same i've always been sort of removed i don't feel like i'm part of any system do you feel famous um i'm aware that when i go out people will you know say nice things to me which is great but that's about it that's about as far as but it doesn't affect your art about your creativity or your thoughts like when you're sitting alone and thinking about the world it can't it's a destructive force the the thing the reason that you're who you are and the reason that you're finding the success you're finding is because you've been true to yourself to get to that stage so to start changing that to conform to either conform to someone else's idea what you should be doing it just seems like uh it doesn't make sense do you have a sense of who you are because i don't necessarily have a i don't know i i know that i really like making good things and i know that i'm um crazy about it in that um it's like an obsession and i want things to be as good as they could be whatever it is and if i'm if i finish a music project and i have a window of time where i'm not working on music i might be moving the furniture around in the house you know i'm always looking for a prod a creative outlet to find a way to make something better or there was a period of time where i was in a weird corporate situation that was uh that didn't allow me to flourish and i turned i focused the creativity and on myself and i lost a bunch of weight and changed my life and so that was the kind of art like the you've gone through a whole process of losing weight getting in shape getting healthy that was a kind of creative act it certainly was it wasn't an intentional creative act but i had a lot of energy and i just a series of events happened i read a book at the time that was my heaviest i weighed about 318 pounds yeah and i'd never been i'd been sedentary my whole life basically laying on a couch working on music so i've never been physically active in my life and i read a book about a guy named stew middleman a runner who ran a thousand miles in 11 days and i thought wow i you know get out of breath walking to the corner and another human being can run a thousand miles in 11 days i feel like i have bad information you know i'm doing clearly i'm doing something wrong and um and i reached out to a person that stew mentioned in the book phil maffatone who's a legend i i really appreciate him as well he's math 180 method too he's such an interesting i think he focuses on heart rate uh training and he was the first person to talk about um essentially a low carbs paleo yeah keto diet 40 40 years ago for a person who's going to be healthy who can exercise and actually perform at an early level he's the first person when i um you know talked about heart rate training him and other endurance athletes he influenced he gave me permission to like run slower yeah it's the first time i realized oh i can run long distances if i just run slower and then take that seriously and i actually fell in love with running very much so because for me everyone's different but for me the love of running happens in the longer distances yeah did you read born to run great book amazing book there is something special about running and everybody has their own their own journey with it and even ultra marathon running those kinds of things it's a it is like many journeys one that can pull you in like you won't be the same person after and i i try to be deliberate about making deliberate about making choices after which you'll not be the same person and so i'm nervous about like the ultra marathon running world i have to talk to you about johnny cash i mean when people ask me what my favorite musical thing is of all time i'm you know it's a very difficult question to answer of course but i'm pretty quick if i'm not allowed to pick anything by tom ways i'm pretty quick to say hurt by johnny cash the performance the whatever you call it whatever the heck that is because that's not just a song covered by an artist that's a human being at the end of their life that the rawness of that the i mean just the there's also a music video which for a lot of people adds a lot to it uh for me just the music alone is i mean the guitar every choice on that see the the few things i've heard about it it seemed like almost accidental i mean like little subtle choices here and there can you maybe comment on that um to to the degree i i think you had a huge role in sort of bringing johnny cash back from from a different part of his life it's like bringing something out that wasn't there before and it was it was it was incredible it was a celebration of a really special musician and a totally new kind of celebration now hurt is just one of the songs that's that's a that's an amazing celebration of johnny cash but hurt is like at the at the at the peak of that so what was that like putting that song together okay maybe maybe uh it might be nice to listen to it because i freaking love that song and as a guitarist i just the simplicity of it uh it seems like every choice contributes to the greatness of the song simple it's crisp but it's dark too i hurt myself today it's one of the greatest opening lines of any song to see if i still feel yeah i'm talking about the lyrics i don't even mean the performance the words but those words out of Trent Reznor are not the same they have a different meaning coming out of johnny cash's mouth try to kill it all away but i remember everything what have i become what have i become my sweetest friend written probably for a young man i think he was 20 when he wrote it the way the guitarist played the choice of instrument the layers there the uh the freedom to give him to use the voice that's um fading it's not fading it's changing maybe he's losing some aspects of his voice and it's it's almost like shaking a little bit and it's a little bit out of tune in parts uh how much of that was deliberate how much was like how do you give johnny castor freedom to to do that how do you find that together is there any insights you can give i think it's a it's a case almost of like the right pairing the right role with the right actor you could say the the song lyrics that the reason we chose the song was because the lyrics purely about the lyrics and at that point in time both johnny and i would send each other songs of possible ideas to record and um that was one that i sent him and he didn't respond to initially i sent i would send him see at that time we would burn cds and i would send him like cd of 20 songs or 25 songs and then and he would send them to me he burned a cd for johnny cash and you sent him uh of different songs of like songs to consider recording yeah um and we would send these back and forth and then that i had hurt on one of the ones that i sent him and he didn't respond and usually if he didn't respond we didn't go back to it you know and that one i remember i sent it again and i put it first on the next on the next cd and um and when when we spoke about when he listened to cd again he didn't respond i said check out that first song and i really feel like that one could be good what did you see in that song it's the lyrics it's the lyrics because i feel like nobody there's very few people in the world that would see these lyrics in johnny cash's mouth and think this is a good idea including for president yeah i know that trant was trant had trepidations in the evening um but if you listen to the words if you forget the music and if you get what if you forget what nine ish nail sounds like and you just read it like a poem and then you imagine a 70 year old man reading these lyrics it'll be it'll be profound it's profound so that was the based on lyrics that started the journey and then at this point in time johnny was not in great

本集資源與出處