第 379 期·中文精讀

蘭德爾·肯尼迪:N 字詞——種族、法律、政治與權力的歷史

Randall Kennedy: The N-Word – History of Race, Law, Politics, and Power

法學教授從種族歧視用語切入,討論美國種族歷史、法律演進與政治權力的交織。

官方音訊00:00 / --:--
中文精讀由 AI 基於原始訪談改寫,非官方翻譯,可能存在偏差或錯誤;表述以原音訊與官方文稿為準。說明

每年都有美國教師因為影印一本書裡的一章被停職,甚至被解僱。

書是哈佛法學院教授蘭德爾·肯尼迪(Randall Kennedy)2002 年出版的《Nigger: The Strange Career of a Troublesome Word》。教師多半在講馬克·吐溫的《哈克貝利·費恩歷險記》,那本小說裡這個詞出現了兩百多次。教師想讓學生弄明白這個詞的來歷,就從肯尼迪的書裡摘一段發給學生。學生回家告訴父母,父母衝到學校,說老師在用侮辱性的方式使用這個詞。管理者通常的選擇是放棄教師。

肯尼迪在 Lex Fridman 的播客裡說,這種事每年都發生。他每次聽說,就給學區督學寫信,給校長寫信,有時候給當地報紙寫一篇評論文章。二十年裡,沒有一個案例是他認為教師被處分得有哪怕一丁點道理的。

一個詞的六百年:從描述到武器

這個詞的英文原形是 nigger,詞尾帶一個硬 R。肯尼迪說,它的譜系很長,可以追到十六、十七世紀。源頭大致是拉丁語和西班牙語裡的 niger,意思就是黑。早期的拼寫變體很多,niger、nigger 的不同組合都出現過,有時候看起來純粹是描述性的,就像說一個人皮膚黑。

到了十九世紀初,它已經明確變成了侮辱詞。當時就有人抱怨,有人抗議。但它是怎麼完成這個轉換的,語言學家也說不清楚。

我們其實並不知道這個詞是怎麼變成侮辱詞的。(蘭德爾·肯尼迪)

這一點很重要。語言的墮落往往沒有一份清晰的判決書,沒有一個可以指著說"就是這一刻"的轉折點。它是在無數日常使用裡慢慢沉下去的,等到人們意識到它已經不能隨便說的時候,它早就已經在泥裡了。

幾千個聯邦判例裡的分佈

這本書的起點很偶然。肯尼迪坐在辦公室裡,琢磨下一個講座講什麼,這個詞忽然跳進腦子裡。他跳起來跑去查《牛津英語詞典》,想知道這個詞第一次在英語裡出現是什麼時候。然後他開啟電腦,檢索聯邦法院的判例資料庫,把所有出現過這個詞的案件調出來。

幾千個案子。

他花了一個月時間做分類整理,然後做了一件更關鍵的事:拿它跟其他侮辱詞比數量。

kike,針對猶太人的侮辱詞。出現過,但數量完全不在一個量級。wetback,針對墨西哥人的侮辱詞。同樣遠遠落後。他把能想到的侮辱詞全部過了一遍,沒有一個接近。

沒有任何一個詞能接近,連邊都沾不上。(蘭德爾·肯尼迪)

這個統計結果指向的東西比語言本身更深。肯尼迪的解釋是,這個詞在侮辱詞裡的獨特地位,反映的是膚色界線在美國的獨特地位,是強加在非裔美國人身上的那種獨一無二的汙名。

它甚至還衍生出了一整套二級侮辱。阿拉伯人被叫作"沙漠裡的黑鬼",愛爾蘭人被叫作"歐洲的黑鬼",女性被叫作"世界的黑鬼"。約翰·列儂有一首歌,歌名就是《女人是世界的黑鬼》,小野洋子跟這首歌有關。一個詞變成了一把尺子,所有被壓迫的群體都要拿它來量一量自己有多低。

父親說:這是世界上最聰明的黑鬼

肯尼迪自己是在這個詞里長大的。

他出生在南卡羅來納州,父母是逃離吉姆·克勞南方的黑人難民。他說在自己家裡,這個詞以所有可能的方式出現過。有作為侮辱用的,也有用來誇獎人的。

我清楚地記得我父親,我很敬重他,他會說:這是世界上最聰明的黑鬼;這是世界上最勇敢的黑鬼;這是我認識的最狠的黑鬼。(蘭德爾·肯尼迪)

這不是在貶低誰。這就是他父親說話的方式。一個被剝奪了幾乎一切尊嚴的群體,會把施加在自己身上的那個詞反過來當作內部的最高褒獎,這裡面有一種很難向外人解釋的東西。它不是認同壓迫,更像是在壓迫者的語言裡鑿出一個洞,把最鋒利的那個詞拿來磨自己的刀。

書名本可以叫"n-word",他選擇不

Lex 問他,反覆說這個詞是不是刻意的。肯尼迪的回答很直接:是。書名可以是"那個 N 開頭的詞",可以是"一本關於一個讓很多人痛苦的詞的書",有一百種更安全的命名方式。他選了最扎人的那個。

我想要一個有挑釁性的標題嗎?我想要一個抓人的標題嗎?答案是想要。我是個寫作者,我希望有人讀我寫的東西。這算不算聳動?如果你要這麼講,那就算吧,我不為此感到難為情。(蘭德爾·肯尼迪)

他不是不知道代價。二十年前第一次出書做巡迴宣傳,他被安排上一個清晨的電話連線節目。七點開播,他六點五十五打進去,主持人在開播前三分鐘告訴他:我們電臺有嚴格規定,從不使用這個詞。

他問:那意味著你們永遠不會完整念出我這本書的標題嗎?

主持人說:對。

他在那一瞬間必須做選擇。他上了節目,遵守了電臺的規矩,聊得也挺好。他說,委婉語有它存在的位置,英語是一門很有彈性的語言,替代說法多得是。他不會因為別人有原則地拒絕說這個詞而生氣,他甚至常常遷就對方的要求。

他要的只是一件事:請你也理解我為什麼說。

"我依然未被說服"

第一場書店活動,最後一位發言的是一位年長的黑人男性。他說他聽完了,也感謝肯尼迪講的這些,但他依然未被說服。

因為在我成長的那個年代,這個詞被用來把我趕到公交車的後排,這個詞被用來阻止我投票,這個詞被用來證明我永遠不該被選為陪審員。所以這個詞只有一個含義,一個極其糟糕的含義。我永遠不會使用它。(一位讀者,轉述自蘭德爾·肯尼迪)

這位老人還加了一句:你的書雖然用心良好,但很可能會被一些人當成可以使用這個詞的許可證。

肯尼迪記住了這段話。他說這話裡有很強的力量,而且說得大概是對的。今天在聽這期播客的人裡,也會有人覺得他是在發許可證。

我已經說過我不是。我希望人們理解這個詞。每次這個詞從你嘴裡出來,你都承擔著真實的責任。(蘭德爾·肯尼迪)

一個哈佛教授在鏡頭前把這個詞說了一百多遍,同時承認最有分量的反對意見來自一位在公交車上被這個詞趕走過的人。這兩件事同時成立,並不矛盾,只是很難看。

為什麼非得是原詞:格雷戈裡、普賴爾、鮑德溫

肯尼迪的辯護邏輯是這樣的:你如果真想了解美國曆史,想了解私刑,想了解黑人在這片土地上是怎麼被恐嚇的,你就必須知道這個詞。它是種族恐怖配樂裡的一個音符。

然後他列舉了一串人。

迪克·格雷戈裡(Dick Gregory),喜劇演員,民權活動家,馬丁·路德·金的朋友。他本來有一條很成功的演藝事業,為了投身種族正義運動把它放棄了,還去了南方腹地。他的第一本回憶錄,書名就叫《Nigger》。

理查德·普賴爾(Richard Pryor),他最好的一張專輯叫《That Nigger's Crazy》。

詹姆斯·鮑德溫(James Baldwin)。幾年前有一部備受讚譽的鮑德溫紀錄片,片名叫《我不是你的黑人》(I Am Not Your Negro)。肯尼迪說,鮑德溫原話不是這個。你去 YouTube 上現在就能查到,他說的是"我不是你的黑鬼"(I am not your nigger)。

鮑德溫不是在遮掩什麼。他要人們直面美國生活的真相。如果你是個教師,你想讓你的學生直面美國生活的真相,那你就得跟這個詞較勁。(蘭德爾·肯尼迪)

格雷戈裡和普賴爾不是在貶低黑人。他們把詞舉到美國社會面前,像舉一面鏡子:看這個詞,看看它被用成了什麼樣子,不許轉頭,不許打星號,不許說"那個 N 開頭的詞"。

而今天的學生在另一個方向上也在聽這個詞。Dr. Dre、Geto Boys、Snoop Dogg、NWA,Dave Chappelle、Katt Williams。說唱和單口喜劇裡,這個詞以各種變形高頻出現。學生把課堂上學到的"這是禁忌"和歷史頻道里的私刑照片放在一邊,耳機裡放的卻是另一套用法。這兩件事之間的落差,你不解釋,學生自己也會去猜,而且大機率猜錯。

教室裡的分界線在哪裡

肯尼迪畫的那條線非常清楚。

如果一個教師看著一個學生,叫他"黑鬼",讓他滾出去,那該處分,沒什麼好說的。但這不是那些案例裡發生的事。那些案例裡,是一個教師在課堂上,跟學生討論一個話題,這個詞作為討論物件本身出現在那裡。最近有法學院教師因為在課堂上朗讀一份法院判決書、判決書裡有這個詞而受到處分。

在我看來這是錯的,人們應該站出來說這是錯的。這在教學上是錯的,而且說實話,在很多這類事情裡,這就是愚蠢。我不介意這麼說。(蘭德爾·肯尼迪)

他也劃了年齡線。幼兒園不行,三年級大概也不行。十年級呢?他認為完全可以讀他的書。十一、十二年級、大學生、法學院學生更不用說。

discriminate 這個詞的兩條命

他反覆講的一個語言學例子是 discriminate。

你說"那個人 discriminate",語氣是責備的,隱含的意思是那個人在不正當的基礎上區別對待別人,這是壞事。但你說"那個人有 discriminating taste",意思完全反過來,是說這個人能分辨優秀、良好和平庸,這是好事,是品味。

同一個詞,兩種命運,靠語境分配。

他還講了侮辱詞本身會流動。Yankee 在十八世紀的美國是侮辱詞,今天它是紐約洋基隊,是一支球隊,是棒球帽上的一個字母。queer 在他有生之年曾經是一句"你這個死同性戀"的前奏,是要讓人拔腿就跑的東西,然後同性戀解放運動做了一次集體動作:我們不躲了,我們把這個詞抓過來貼在自己身上,重新賦予它意義。今天 queer 依然可以當侮辱詞用,但也完全可以不是。

所以"什麼是侮辱詞"這個問題本身就沒有乾淨答案。詞的殺傷力不是刻在字母裡的屬性,是使用者和聽眾之間當場結算的東西。

劇院裡的那一拳

書出版後的頭五年,他每週至少收到一封郵件,開頭都一樣:肯尼迪教授您好,我讀了您的書,想請教一個問題。他看到這個開頭就知道後面是什麼。

來信人通常是白人,說自己喜歡說唱,有黑人朋友,一起開車時放歌,唱到那個詞,黑人朋友照唱不誤,自己不知道該不該跟。有位來信人明確問:跟著唱是錯的嗎?

收到第十封左右,他寫了一封模板回信。內容兩層。

第一層,去跟你的朋友談。

第二層,即使朋友說"我不介意,我知道你不是那個意思",你也要考慮另一件事。

設想你在電影院裡,等開場,跟朋友聊天唱歌,說到這個詞,你一個白人男孩說了,下一秒你臉上捱了一拳,來自一個你根本沒看見的人,他就在你身後。這個人看到的只有一件事:一個白人在說這個詞。這不是某個法學教授腦子裡的過熱場景,這是非常可能發生的事。(蘭德爾·肯尼迪)

他的建議是:謹慎。除非你非常確定,而且被質問時你自認有能力為自己的行為辯護,否則離這個詞遠一點。

-er 和 -a 真的一樣嗎

Lex 在這裡提出了一個分歧。他認為帶硬 R 的版本和帶 -a 的版本不是一回事,前者穩居英文最狠詞彙榜首,後者在當代文化裡已經滑到很後面,說唱和喜劇削掉了它大部分殺傷力。

肯尼迪沒有正面否認,他談的是社會學事實:人們確實在做區分,這兩個詞在很多人心裡確實是兩種東西。

但他補了一句很冷的觀察。一個白人說了 -a 版本,被人指責,辯解說"我說的是 -a 不是 -er",那些生氣的人多半還是會繼續生氣。

這個補刀很關鍵。語言學家可以論證兩個詞音位不同、語用不同,但街上不按語言學辦事。辯解的有效性不取決於它是否正確,取決於聽的人願不願意接受。

negro、colored、black:一部縮微的政治史

黑人群體用來稱呼自己的詞換過很多輪:black、colored、Afro-American、African American、negro。肯尼迪說這是一份很長的名單,每一格都對應一段權力關係的變化。

negro 和 nigger 完全不是一個類別。它從來沒有被相當數量的人當作貶義詞,馬丁·路德·金那些偉大的演講裡用的是它,W.E.B. 杜波依斯的著作裡用的是它。

肯尼迪自己也用,而且能準確說出從哪一天開始的。1983 年夏天,他剛進入職業法律生涯,老闆要求他寫首字母大寫的 Negro。那位老闆是美國最高法院大法官瑟古德·馬歇爾(Thurgood Marshall),人稱"民權先生"。

現在你告訴我這個詞出界了、是貶義的、誰都不該用。瑟古德·馬歇爾要求我用這個詞,這會不會讓事情稍微複雜一點?(蘭德爾·肯尼迪)

他還用 colored。因為有這麼一個組織至今沒改名,叫全國有色人種協進會(NAACP),他認為這是個很棒的組織。他祖母就說 colored,說得完全自然。

他講這些的時候帶著明顯的不耐煩,針對的是那種只掌握三句當下流行說法、就急著給教授上詞彙課的學生。

他真正在爭的是什麼

把這場對話聽完,會發現肯尼迪要的從來不是"大家都可以隨便說"。他自己給出的限制比很多批評者更嚴:說出口就承擔真實責任,白人跟著說唱唱要冒挨拳頭的風險,教師面對學生要判斷年齡和場合,電臺有臺規他就遵守臺規。

他要的是另一件事:不要把一個詞變成不可討論的物件。

不準說、不準印、不準念,看起來是在保護受害者,實際效果往往是把歷史一起封存。這個詞從公共話語裡消失之後,隨之消失的是它承載的那段歷史:公交車後排、投票站門口的阻攔、陪審團名單上的空白。那位在書店裡說"我依然未被說服"的老人,恰恰是用自己的一生在證明這個詞有多重。他要人記住那份重量,而遺忘從不保護任何人。

訪談最後,Lex 把問題推向言論自由與平臺審查:社交網路該不該遮蔽這個詞。這場對話在這裡轉向了另一個戰場。按肯尼迪前面二十年的框架推下去,他大機率會反對把詞本身設為禁區,同時堅持使用者必須為自己的每一次使用負責。這兩條他一貫同時握住,從不鬆開任何一邊。

  • 如果你在寫東西或做內容,遇到這類敏感詞,先判斷你要它做什麼。是引用、是討論、是還原歷史語境,還是隻想靠它抓眼球。前三種可以有理由,第四種沒有。
  • 如果你在課堂上、在會上、在任何有聽眾的場合必須念出這類詞,提前說明你為什麼念、唸的是誰的話、這段材料要說明什麼。事後解釋永遠比事前宣告代價高。
  • 如果你是內容創作者或平臺運營,別把"遮蔽"當成"處理"。遮蔽能擋住字母,擋不住那段歷史,也擋不住學生自己去搜。
  • 如果你不確定某句話在某個場合會不會出事,用肯尼迪那個電影院測試:設想你身後有一個你完全看不見的人,他只能看到你嘴型的那一秒。如果這一秒可能引向你不想要的結果,就換一種說法。
  • 如果你真的想弄懂這段歷史,別從短影片和二手轉述開始。去讀馬克·吐溫,去聽理查德·普賴爾的專輯,去看詹姆斯·鮑德溫的原話,然後回來判斷這個詞該不該被說出口。判斷權在你,但前提是你先看清它。
文稿由本站用語音識別模型(基於官方釋出音訊)機器轉寫,可能有識別錯誤,人名與數字請以音訊為準。
Lex Fridman Podcast #379 – Randall Kennedy: The N-Word – History of Race, Law, Politics, and Power Machine transcription by Qwen3-ASR 0.6B (MLX, local, Apache-2.0). May contain recognition errors. The following is a conversation with Randall Kennedy, professor at Harvard Law School and author of many seminal books on race, law, history, culture and politics, including specifically on affirmative action, criminal justice, policing, and the topic explored extensively in this conversation—the single most powerful word and slur in the English language—the n-word with a hard R at the end. Randall has written a book with this word as the title, "N-word: The Strange Career of a Troublesome Word." Please be warned that Randall uses this word throughout this conversation deliberately and skillfully to discuss its power and its role in the history of the United States. I don't intend to shy away from controversial topics like these, and I'll work hard to handle them thoughtfully and thoroughly with respect and with empathy. Often with several guests who have very different perspectives on the topic, in the end, I believe in the power of long form conversations to heal divides by furthering understanding of human nature, of human history, and the full diversity of the human experience. And now a quick few second mention of each sponsor. Check them out in the description—it's the best way to support this podcast. We got A Sleep for naps, Linux for Linux cloud systems, and Inside Tracker for tracking your biological data. Choose wisely, my friends. Also, if you want to work with our amazing team, we're always hiring. Go to lexfreeman dot com slash hiring. And now onto the full ad reads. As always, no ads in the middle. I try to make this interesting, but if you must skip them, please still check out our sponsors. I enjoy their stuff. Maybe you will too. This episode is brought to you by A Sleep and its new Pod Three mattress—the very device, the technological smart portal into a dimension that I take every single day. For many hours once, and for a few minutes once or twice a day, also known as naps. Wherever the place that that portal takes me is a wonderful place. All I know very importantly is when I return. I return a new human being. Whatever happens to me, with the creatures that dwell in that alternate dimension, whatever they do to me, they they reset the CPU and the memory and whatever is required. They defrag the hard drive enough to where I wake up refreshed and ready to take on the rest of the day. Naps are just magic. Big believer, big lover of naps. If there is a hack to the simulation that we're all existing in, naps are it. Anyway, check out this magical portal into the alternate dimension and get special savings when you go to a sleep dot com slash lex. This episode is also brought to you by Linux, now called Akamai, and their incredible Linux virtual machines. I've said this many times, but Linux is my favorite operating system—all of the flavors. Some people talk about their favorite flavors of ice cream. I talk about my favorite flavors of Linux—both the ice cream and the Linux have evolved over the years. There was a time when I used to love coconut ice cream, and there was a time when I would use gentoo, but that time is long gone. I've grown up a little bit, still young at heart, but practical enough to be using Ubuntu. And my favorite flavor of Ubuntu is Monte. Anyway, all of that doesn't matter. The point is Linux is Linux, and you can use Linux in the cloud. In a way that's super easy for small personal projects and for huge systems, great customer support, lower cost in AWS. I love Linux, now called Akamai. I need to get used to saying I love Akamai—a rose by any other name will smell as sweet. Shakespeare has some wisdom on that one. Anyway, check out this beautiful sweet smelling rose that is Akamai at akamai dot com slash lex or linux dot com slash lex for a free credit. This show is also brought to you by Inside Tracker, a service I use to track data that comes from my own body, and that data when run through machine learning algorithms is able to give me advice on what to do with my life—well, some basic sort of lifestyle. And diet decisions. Unfortunately, can't tell me what I should do in terms of career or relationships or how to navigate all the different and the beautiful complexities of life. I think using data that comes from your own body to make decisions about your life, health decisions, medical decisions, career decisions—all that kind of stuff. Obviously, when you look at the power of large language models, it's clear that when paired with great data, large neural networks can help do incredible predictive work. This is the future, but it starts with getting data from your body and starts by taking action based on that data. And so, Inside Tracker is a pioneer that I support in this effort that I think will define a great quality of life in the 21st century. So you should check them out and get special savings for a limited time when you go to insidetracker dot com slash lex. This is a lex Friedman podcast to support it. Please check out our sponsors in the description. And now, dear friends, here is Randall Kennedy. You wrote a book whose title is the n-word spelled out with a hard R at the end. So let's start with the history of this word. What is the history of the n-word? The word you are referring to is nigger. The book that you are referring to is "Nigger: The Strange Career of a Troublesome Word." The word dates back to the 16th 17th century. It's got a long lineage. In other words, basically Latin, basically Spanish, basically nigger—you know, black—in various formulations. We don't know actually how the term nigger became a slur. So there were words that were close to nigger, nigger that were used in various ways. For instance, nigger, uh, you h has been was used, nigger, you r was used, and sometimes it was used in a way that seemed to be just purely descriptive. We do know that by the early 19th century, it had become a slur. It had become a derogatory word about which people complained, but exactly how that came about, not altogether clear. So it's been 20 years since you've written the book. What have you? What wisdom have you gained about this word since writing the book and maybe having to interact with people, having to read, having to see, having to feel the response to the book. This book has generated a lot of controversy. I thought it would—it's probably generated more controversy that I had anticipated. It has certainly generated more. More different sorts of experiences than I had anticipated. So for instance, I did not think that writing this book would prompt people to ask me to be an expert witness in cases. And over the past 20 years, I've been an expert witness in a number of different cases. I've been an expert witness in case in a murder case in various cases of of assault. I've been an expert witness in cases involving tort cases, intentional infliction of emotional distress. I've been an expert witness in a number of employment cases. I had not anticipated that, nor had I anticipated the extent to which people would get in trouble for using my book. Every year, there are teachers who are suspended or who are fired because they will excerpt a chapter of my book. Let's let's imagine a. And this is not I'm not imagining things as this happened. A teacher is teaching, for instance, the Mark Twain's Huckleberry Finn. The word nigger appears in that book over 200 times. The teacher, trying to be earnest, trying to be sensible, trying to be serious, will excerpt a part of my book. To acquaint students with the history of the word and maybe the history of controversy involving the use of the word in this particular novel. The student, you know, the teacher will give it out, hand it out to the teachers, hand it out to students, and there have been a number of teachers who've been suspended or worse because of that. Students will get upset, go home, tell their parents. Their parents will storm to the school and say that this is you know this is terrible. The teacher is quote using the word nigger in an offensive way, and oftentimes administrators will basically abandon the the teacher. And this whenever this comes to my attention, I write I'll write the you know superintendent of schools or I'll write the principal or sometimes I'll you know I'll write an opinion editorial piece for the local newspaper. But every year there are teachers who are disciplined for using my book. I had not I had not anticipated that. And what is the nature of the letter or the or the op-ed that you write on why they shouldn't be disciplined or if they they to the degree they should be or shouldn't be. There's there has not been one case. There's not been one case that has come to my attention in which it was even remotely sensible for the teacher to be disciplined. And what I say is that number one, frankly, I go through it's the what I write is almost a synopsis of my book. Number one, this is an important word in American history. It is a word that is explosive. That's why people get so upset. It's a word that's volatile. It's a word that has typically has typically been used in a terrible way. It's a word that is part of the soundtrack of racial terrorism in the United States. So people ought to know about this word. I mean, if you're interested in knowing the real history of the United States, if you're interested in knowing about lynching, if you're interested in knowing about the way in which black people have been terrorized in the United States, you need to know this word. You need to know that history, so you need to know why it is that people are upset about the word. But that's not but it doesn't in there. You have to know that, and if you know that, then that knowledge should equip you to be careful. It should equip you to know that you know to know the the the range of contexts in which this word appears. But again, it doesn't just in there because especially young people. You tell that to young people, they nod, they read, they understand that. But then, but then what? But then they turn on their radios and they turn on you know they listen to Spotify, they listen to their some of their favorite entertainers. They listen to Doctor Dre, they listen to the ghetto boys, they listen to you know Snoop. And they listen to NWA. What do they hear? They they they they listen to stand up comedians, they listen to Dave Chappelle, they listen to Cat Williams. Ah, they you know what do they hear? They hear the word nigger or nigga being used in a lot of different ways. And so they need to know about that as well. What are people doing? What do how does one explain the fact that Dick Gregory? Dick Gregory was a comedian activist, friend of Martin Luther King Jr. A true activist. I mean, he had a very he had a flourishing career as an entertainer that he abandons. In order to struggle for racial justice throughout the United States and including the Deep South, how does one explain the fact that he he wrote several memoirs? But his first memoir is called "Nigger." A memoir, how does one explain that? How does one explain the way in which? How does one explain Richard Pryor? I mean, Richard Pryor's best album is "That Nigger's Crazy." Well, was Richard Pryor trying to put down black people? How does one explain that? One can only explain that by getting deeper into the word by understanding that yes, this is a word that has been used in a derogatory way. This has been this is a word that has been used to put people down. This has been this is a word that has been used to terrorize people. You got to know that. But you also have to know that this is a word that has also been put to other uses. There are artists, there are entertainers. Who have used this word like Dick Gregory used it to put up a mirror to American society and say, "Look at this word and look at the terrible way in which it's been used." We don't want you to look away. No, don't look away. We're not no euphemism, no asterisk, no no n-word, no nigger. Now we want you to look at that, and we want to talk about that James Baldwin. James Baldwin there was a there was a documentary about James Baldwin a couple of years ago, highly lauded documentary. The title that was given in this documentary was, "I am not your Negro." That's not what James Baldwin said. Anybody can take go to YouTube right now, take a look. James Baldwin said, "I am not your nigger," and then he went on to talk about that. Well, you know James Baldwin wasn't again he he wasn't trying to cover up anything. He wanted people to face the facts of American life. And it seems to me that if you're a teacher and you want to have your students face the facts about American life, well, you've got to grapple with the word nigger. Now let me just quickly say, you know, teachers have a tough job. And if we're talking about students, of course, there's a wide range of students. Am I saying that one ought to give my book to kindergarteners? No, you know kindergarteners are probably not ready for such a book. Third graders probably no, not third grade. If we're talking, however, about people in the tenth grade, do I think the tenth graders can read my book? Yeah, sure, absolutely. 11th graders, 12th graders, people in college, there are people in college, there are people in college, there are people in law schools. Teachers in law schools have been disciplined for because the word nigger has come out of a teacher's mouth. Why in a couple of cases recently, teacher would be reading a a court opinion. The word appears in the court opinion. The teacher pronounces the word ah, you know students get up, leave in a huff, report the teacher. There's some instances in which teachers have been under those circumstances, have been disciplined. In my view, that's bad, and people ought to say it's bad. It's bad pedagogically, and frankly, in many of these instances, it's not only it's stupid, and I don't mind saying that. I think that some of these instances in which teachers have been disciplined absolutely stupid. People say, "Well, the teacher use the word, excuse me, use the word." It'd be one thing, it'd be one thing if a teacher looked at a student and called the student nigger. You know, get out of here, nigger. That'd be one. That'd be you know fine discipline. That's teacher. That's that's bad, but that's not what's going on. You don't have these none of these are cases in which you have an individual who is a stranger to another individual and this word just sort of comes out. No, what we have here is a class. Involving a person who is a teacher interacting with students, talking about subjects in which it would be perfectly understandable why this word would emerge as a subject of conversation. Now under those circumstances, it's somehow wrong for a teacher to you to to utter this word. In my view, the answer is no, and you know I said that 20 years ago. I say I say it even more emphatically now. Still, it is one of the most powerful words in the English language, and there's a kind of responsibility that we as humans should have with words with statements. That word. If not used skillfully, if not used competently, even when just read from a legal transcript, can do more more harm than good. Ah, I agree with what you say. Yes, words are powerful. Words do matter, and so I am certainly not suggesting that people be lax. I am not suggesting that people be irresponsible. It's precisely because words matter, however, that we need to be willing to face words and grapple with words and talk about words and talk about the history of words. Precisely because words matter. And among other things, it seems to me it's important to understand that words can mean different things in different contexts. It's not the case that a word. Means the same thing in every context. The word discriminating sometimes it's a very bad thing that person discriminates. And when you if you know again you know intonation of voice means something if I say that person discriminates, and I am obviously being disapproving. Implicitly, what I am saying is that person distinguishes between things on an unjustifiable basis, and that's a bad thing. On the other hand, that person has discriminating taste. Oh, that means something very different. That means that the person differentiates in a way that shows that they understand the difference between excellent, good, and not so good, and we think that that's a good thing. So words can have different, you know, words can mean different things in different contexts. It seems to me that that's something that actually we ought to recognize. We ought to recognize and talk about. Well, some words enter this territory of being a slur, and it seems like when they cross the line into being a slur. The there is the number of contexts in which it's okay to mention it exponentially decreases. Right. No, no, I am going to no, I am going to resist that a little bit because the whole idea of you know slurs, slurs change. Yankee was a slur. Yankee was a slur in you know 18th century United States. Slur today, you know New York Yankees. I am a Yankee fan. I am a Yankee. Um, queer, queer, you know you know and then this is in in in my lifetime there was a time you know that you queer. And people would really run away from it, and that was you know a bad thing. And then thank goodness. Gay liberation movement, gay liberation movement basically we're not going to run away from this. We're going to grab this quote slur and we're going to affix it to ourselves. And we are going to repurpose it. Now the word queer is again you know can it be a slur? Yeah, it can be a slur. Doesn't have to be. And it seems to me that it's important for people to know about how a word a symbol in some context can be a slur and some context doesn't have to be. So the whole idea of you know what's a slur, that's that's a complicated idea in and of itself. It's very complicated. It's if I may say almost fascinating how language evolves. But if we were to. Kind of have a minute by minute evaluation of the most powerful intensely slur like words in the world. I think the n-word with a hard R at the end, which is the title of your book, is number one on that list. Well, probably so, and of course that's one of the reasons why I wrote a little book about it. Yeah, but it hasn't even since you wrote a little book about it. It seems like it's maintained its number one status. You mentioned queer. It maybe queer was in the top 20. I don't know for a while and now it's sliding into the top thousand and the n-word is at the top. You are absolutely right. The origins of this book. I clearly remember I was I was at my office and I was thinking about lecture topics when I get invited to give lectures from time to time. And I was thinking, well, what what what might make for an interesting lecture? And all of a sudden, the word nigger popped into my mind. Now this is a word I've I've grown up with this word. I mean, there is there is there has never been a time in my life. When, um, at least in my conscious life, in which I've in which this word has been absent. I mean, in in my household for instance, in my household. My parents are black people. My parents were refugees from the Jim Crow South. I was born in the deep South, South Carolina. In my household, I heard the word nigger used in every possible way. I heard it used as a slur. I also heard it used with respect to people who were praised. You know my father. I clearly remember my father, whom I revere. That's the smartest nigger in the world. That's the bravest nigger in the world. That's the baddest nigger I know. Was he wasn't putting people down? This is how he talked. And I grew up hearing this word in various ways. And so I was thinking to myself, God, where did this word come from? And one of the first things I did, I clearly remember just jumping up at my seat, running up to the library Oxford English Dictionary. When did this word first appear in English? What was the history of the word? And then what really sort of grabbed my attention is um. I went. I I get my computer going and I ask the computer system. Um, give me every case, every federal court case in which this word appears, thousands of cases. And then I said, "Oh my goodness, this is really and you know this is really interesting." And then I started just cataloging all the different cases. There came a point I'd say probably about a month into this. I compared the usage. I compared the number of times nigger came up with other sorts of slurs. So for instance, kike. Kike long time you know you know derogatory word for Jews. How many times has this word come up? There was a time in which in which the word appeared, but nothing like the infamous n-word. Nothing and then I you know what about wet back. What about and then I just you know let me let me just take a look at all the other slurs. Nothing came close, not even remotely close to nigger, and I think it has something to do with. I think it has something to do with the uniqueness of the color line, particularly as it pertains to African Americans. I think that the the fact that nigger. Ah, sort of occupies such a unique status among slurs. I think that's a reflection of the unique stigma. That has been imposed on African Americans. It's hard to know the chicken or the egg. Why one word is able to so distinctly and clearly encapsulate this struggle between races that has throughout American history. I mean, it didn't have to probably be so, but it came to be that way. It became that not only that not only that but of course. The nigger spurred other slurs. So Arabs, San niggers, the Irish, the niggers of Europe. Women, the niggers of the world. John Lennon even has a song. That's right. Well, I think Yoko Ono I think had something to do with that song. So I mean, it is a slur that has spawned other slurs. And again, this is that's why you know as you indicated a moment ago, this is a quite. Unique term, but are you conscious? Are you deliberate in you saying this word? So let me just say from a personal experience. Maybe my upbringing where I came from in my daily life, I don't think I've ever heard that word with a hard R said as often. You clearly in my life said I've heard it today more than I have ever heard in my entire life. And I think there is a. A few people who listen to this they will be listening to this and be very uncomfortable. I would say not in a bad way. Probably in a good way. I am uncomfortable now and I am almost introspecting and trying to figure out why I am uncomfortable. And I think even the title of your book is making me think that. Just just looking into my own mind and trying to understand wow words have power and why does it have so much power but are you deliberate in that action and by the way not only are the people listening to this sweating this will be on YouTube in part. And YouTube the people on the other side will be sweating. What do we do with this? Yeah, well, am I deliberate? The answer is yes. And let me unpack that a little bit first. That's right. I mean, am I deliberate? Yeah, what I deliberately I deliberately wrote a book called Nigger: The Strange Career of a Troublesome Word. And you know, was that deliberate? Yeah, that was quite deliberate. But the title could have been n-word. The title could have been the title could have been n-word. Sure, the title could have been the title could have been. A book about a word that causes pain to many people. I could have named it that. There are many there are many titles I could have used. Did I want a title that would be provocative? Did I want a title that would grab people? The answer to that is yes. What do you know? I am a writer. I want people to read what I write. What was I being sensationalistic? Well, I mean if if if you want to put it like that, yes, I don't I don't I am not embarrassed to say that. I mean, I am sure that when people write books, they think really hard about their titles and they try to get a title that will you know grab people's attention. I know people respect people very deeply who never, as a matter of principle, never utter this word. And I've talked with people. I've had people say, you know, I read your book, let's talk about it, but let's be very clear, I am not going to use the word. I've had many conversations with people who've asked me not to use the word. I was on a I was on a the first time this came up. Was a book tour was 20 years ago when the first book first came out, and I was on one of these call in shows early in the morning. Time came to call in seven o'clock. I call in at five of seven. Right before I go on, the host of the show says, "Oh, by the way, we have a strict policy here at the station. We never use this word." And I said, "Well, gosh, I wish you had told me this earlier. Does this mean then that you are never going to pronounce fully the title of my book?" And she said, "That's right." And I had to make up choice right then and there. Am I going to go on or am I not? What did you do? I went on and I abided by the station's rules, and you know fine, we had a perfectly fine conversation. Um and you know I there is a place for euphemism. The American language is a very supple language. There are lots of words that one can use. I do not get angry with people who don't you know they say as a matter of principle they're not going to use the word fine. I am willing to I understand where they're coming from. And often I will defer to their wishes. All I say is, I want people to understand where I am coming from. I am not just using this word willy-nilly. There is a pedagogical reason. There is a reason for why I am saying what I am saying. There is a reason why. I use the word. Can you make the case why using the word is a good idea? And can you make can you steal man the case why it's a bad idea? Maybe you've heard from some critics. Yes, who said that you saying this word out loud is actually causing a lot of harm, not like harm because people's feelings are hurt, but increasing the amount of racism and hate in the world. Yeah, critics. Let's start with the critics. Um, one again going back to the when the book was first published, I remember going to the first bookstore I went to. And I talked about the book, had a very you know talk, asked questions, and the last comment. Wasn't a question, but the last comment was made by a an elderly black man. I called on him, and he said, "I've listened to what you've had to say, and I appreciate what you've had to say. But he he said, but I remain unconvinced. " And I remain unconvinced because when I was coming up, this word was used to put me in the back of the bus. And this word was used to prevent me from voting. And this was the word that was used to justify me never being called as a juror. So to me, this word has only one meaning. It's a terrible meaning. I am never going to use the word. It hurts me when I hear people use the word, especially those who don't know anything about the you know really about the history of it. And he went on to say, "I think that your book, though well intended, is probably going to be seen by some people as giving them permission to use the word. " And then he stopped, and I thought there was a lot of power behind that gentleman's comment. I think that what he said is probably correct. And so far, is there probably some people who read the you know read the book? There probably some people who are listening to our conversation right now. Who will um think that I am giving people permission to use the word? Um, you know I have said that I am I am not. I want people to understand the word. I think that there is a burden that comes from whenever whenever you utter a word like this. Um, but that's you know that's a critique and I think there is I think there is strength to that critique. I am not going to say that that's a ridiculous critique. I think that there is something to that. And by the way, I should say and that's why. I would say to anyone, um, that's right. If this word comes out of your mouth, you are taking on real responsibility. So for years, it doesn't happen so much now. But there were I'd say for about the first. Five years after this book was published, I would get an email at least once a week, and it would begin like this. You know, dear Professor Kennedy, I read your book and I am calling to ask you a question. And as soon as I saw that, I knew what the question was going to be. And what the person would say is the following: I like rap, and then I knew I knew what was coming. I like rap. I am white, and I have black friends. And we listen to rap. And we you know we're driving in the car and we're you know we're we're listening to the song. We starts you know we start humming along and sing singing along. And my black friends sing along, and when nigger or nigger comes up, they sing. And I don't know what to do. Is it wrong for me to sing along? This happened so often that I'd say about after about the tenth time I got in such an email, I wrote a form letter. Because I didn't want to just you know take up time writing you know you know sort of crafting letter after letter after letter, so I wrote a form letter and basically what I said was, listen number one. You know I am flattered that you are asking me, but number one you you should have a conversation with your friend. Number two, no matter what your friend says, let me put something else. For you to consider, let's suppose for the sake of discussion that your friend says, "Oh, doesn't bother me, I know where you are coming from, we're just enjoying the music, I don't think that this is a you know a racist utterance, you know coming out of your mouth. Let's suppose that your friend says that. That doesn't in matters because. Let's imagine the following: let's imagine that you are in a a theater and you are waiting for the you know a film to start and you are just you know talking with your friends or singing with your friends or just you know kicking back with your friends and they're talking about nigger this or nigger this and you say it you the white boy say it and the next thing you feel is a fist a big fist in your mouth that has been launched by a person that you did not see who was right behind you all this person saw was a white person saying nigger and the next thing pow that's not you know some sort of overheated scenario coming from some law professor's mind that is a very plausible scenario so you have to be worried about lots of things including mistake so my advice to you my is be prudent I would stay clear the word unless unless you are very certain and unless if you are called on it you feel you are in a position to defend yourself defend what you are doing but the prudent thing would be to stay clear there is so many questions I want to ask there one is about the violence and the legal aspect of that is very interesting you raised that in the book but you know I do want to bring up something I probably disagree with you on which is you say that there is not a significant difference between the different variations of the n-word the one the or maybe maybe you don't I just listened to a bunch of your interviews so there is the version with a er at the end version with a ga at the end and then gro at the end these are all different versions and I feel like in that list of powerful words you know I feel like there is a distinction I feel that the number one spot is the one with the hard r and I don't know maybe you can try to shed light but I feel like the one that ends in ga is really far down the list in terms of modern culture so this is we talked about the evolution of the words and the word queer for example it feels like because maybe because of rap because of comedians because it's become much more it lost so much of its power well you don't think so no I think there is a difference between nigger and nigger I mean people make a distinction between them and I think that to the extent that lots of people make a distinction between them I think you know just as a sociological fact they are different I think that people who get upset if somebody especially white people so you know if a white person says nigger and they're you know and and they and they're you know sort of criticized about it and they say well I didn't say nigger I said nigger I believe me I think most you know most people who are mad at them are going to stay mad at them um now you you raise the word you know so nigger and nigger I would put in a very different category than negro educate me here well yeah sure I am happy to negro is a also controversial it's also controversial but negro has never been viewed by a substantial number of people as a derogatory term at least in the with the same amount of animus the same amount of um it's it's it's a very different kind of word than nigger or nigger I mean after all I mean you know negro negro Martin Luther King Jr you know you know all of his great oratory negro you read the work of um the great W B DaBois negro you read the work of my boss so for instance I use the word negro I use African American black Afro American but I also use the word negro now there are some people who get really mad at me because of you know when I use the word negro and so for instance there are students who have gotten really quite exercised and they'll say you know I'll be giving a lecture and you know a hand will go up I'll call on somebody and they'll say listen are you using the word negro in it's purely because of the historical time period that you are using so you you know is that why you are using it or are you using it in your own voice and often I'll say well I am using it in my own voice and I'll say well I am offended we think that this is you know that's old timey it's derogatory when this first came up I I said let's pause for a moment and I'll take that under advisement and let me let me look into this and I ended up writing an essay about it an essay about the history of the terms that black people have used to describe themselves and it's a long list you know black colored Afro American African American negro etc so I go through all that and I said now let me just tell you I I know for certain when I started using the word negro often in in writing I can date it nineteen eighty three the summer of nineteen eighty three is when I started using the word negro in my professional life as a lawyer and I did it for a very specific reason I did it because my boss demanded that I negro capital n now who was my boss my boss in the summer of nineteen eighty three was Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court Thurgood Marshall known as Mister Civil Rights now it seems to me you are telling me that this word is so out of bounds that this word is derogatory nobody should ever use this word does the fact that Thurgood Marshall demanded that I use this word does that complicate things a little bit and so I think that people again you know ought to know more I mean I've I've encountered students who don't know very much but who want to lecture me on on word usage because they know you know three sentences about current fashion and hold it you know hold it by the way I I push it further I sometimes use the word colored and then you know some people really don't like that colored well you know there is there is an organization still very much alive in American life and law the National Association for the advancement of colored people the N double ACP they haven't changed their name and as far as I am concerned it's a wonderful organization there are people who have used the word colored that's what my grandmother used colored perfectly fine as far as I am concerned so again we there are lots of different words that one can use you can use different formulations I understand that people have different preferences fine I have my preferences at least know where I am coming from still words have power and they have power to hurt and there is there is a lot of reasons that I could see to justify the use of the word in its full form as you are saying when in this conversation as you are using it one of them is perhaps fighting for the freedom to be able to use those kinds of words so let me ask you about the freedom of speech and the censorship of the word should the use of the n-word be censored for example on social networks

本集資源與出處